Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Phase 4NCT00386100
A Type 2 Diabetes Study of the Longer-Term Glycemic Effect of AVANDAMET vs. Metformin
A Phase 4 study testing Avandamet 6 mg/1500 mg (ttd), Avandamet 4 mg/1000 mg (ttd) and Avandamet 2 mg/500 mg (ttd) in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 116 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the longer-term glycemic effect of two medicines approved for initial treatment of type 2 diabetes. The study consists of a 2 week screening period (2 study visits), followed by an 80 week double-blind treatment period (11 study visits). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Avandamet 6 mg/1500 mg (ttd), Avandamet 4 mg/1000 mg (ttd) and Avandamet 2 mg/500 mg (ttd)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 688 participants
- Where
- 116 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2006to Sep 2009
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The subject provides written informed consent.
- The subject is male or female and 18 to 75 years of age at the time of pre-screening.
- The subject has an established clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes according to recommended guidelines (e.g., American Diabetes Association, International Diabetes Federation, World Health Organization, Canadian Diabetes Association, or American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists).
- The subject is currently treated with diet and exercise, and has not taken more than 2 weeks of an anti-diabetic monotherapy or insulin in the past 6 months.
- The subject has a BMI >25 kg/m2 at pre-screening.
- The subject has a Quest HbA1c 7.5% to 10.5% at pre-screening.
Show all 9Show fewer
- The subject has a fasting capillary blood glucose 126 mg/dL (7mmol/L), as measured by the site staff at week 0.
- If the subject is a pre-menopausal female of child-bearing potential, she agrees to practice acceptable contraceptive measures (e.g. oral birth control pills, Norplant, Depo-Provera, an intrauterine device (IUD), a diaphragm with spermicide or a condom with spermicide, or abstinence) at least 1 month before screening, during the study, and for 30 days after the last dose of study medication is taken
- The subject is able and willing to perform self-monitoring of blood glucose as specified in this protocol.
Who cannot join
- The subject has taken an oral anti-diabetic monotherapy or insulin for more than 14 days in the past 6 months.
- The subject has presence of clinically significant renal or hepatic disease (serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL (132.6 mol/L) for males and 1.4 mg/dL (123.8 mol/L) for females): ALT, AST, total bilirubin, or alkaline phosphatase >2.5 times the upper limit of the normal (ULN) reference range.
- The subject has anemia defined by hemoglobin concentration <11g/dL (110g/L) for males or <10g/dL (100g/L) for females.
- Presence of unstable or severe angina, coronary insufficiency or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV or any congestive heart failure requiring pharmacologic treatment.
- The subject has systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg
- The subject has a chronic disease requiring intermittent or chronic treatment with oral, intravenous, or intra-articular corticosteroids (i.e., only use of topical, inhaled or nasal corticosteroids is permitted).
Show all 20Show fewer
- The subject has acute or chronic metabolic acidosis or a history of diabetic ketoacidosis.
- The subject has a clinically significant abnormality which in the judgment of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study (e.g., physical examination, laboratory tests, or electrocardiogram, etc).
- The subject has used an investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever was longer) prior to pre-screening.
- The subject is a female who is lactating, pregnant, or planned to become pregnant.
- The subject has a prior history of severe edema or a medically serious fluid related event (e.g., heart failure).
- The subject has a history of macular edema.
- The subject has significant hypersensitivity (e.g., difficulty swallowing, difficulty breathing, and tachycardia or skin reaction) to TZDs, biguanides, or compounds with similar chemical structures.
- The subject has a diagnosis of cancer (other than squamous, basal cell, or cervical cancer in-situ) in the past 3 years and is receiving treatment for cancer.
- The subject has a history or suspicion of drug abuse or alcohol abuse within the last 6 months.
- The subject is known to have severe lactose intolerance.
- The subject is not willing to comply with visits and procedures described in the protocol.
- The subject has a disease that may affect bone turnover including, but not limited to: Paget's disease, hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism, osteomalacia, metastatic bone disease
- The subject has a weight of greater than 300 lbs (136.4 kg).
- The subject has received treatment with bisphosphonates (≥1 month cumulative treatment within the last 12 months) or fluoride (dose greater than 10mg/day within the previous 5 years).
Trial locations and contacts
116 sites in 9 countries.
116 sites in 9 countries
United States71 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
GSK Investigational Site
Alhambra, California, 91801
GSK Investigational Site
Artesia, California, 90701
GSK Investigational Site
Avon, Indiana, 46123
GSK Investigational Site
Beaver, Pennsylvania, 15009
GSK Investigational Site
Billings, Montana, 59102
GSK Investigational Site
Burke, Virginia, 22015
GSK Investigational Site
Canal Fulton, Ohio, 44614
GSK Investigational Site
Canton, Ohio, 44718
GSK Investigational Site
Chaska, Minnesota, 55318
GSK Investigational Site
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376
GSK Investigational Site
Clairton, Pennsylvania, 15205
GSK Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
GSK Investigational Site
Clinton, South Carolina, 29325
GSK Investigational Site
Coatsville, Pennsylvania, 19320
GSK Investigational Site
Columbia, South Carolina, 29201
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
GSK Investigational Site
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78404
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75235
GSK Investigational Site
East Syracuse, New York, 13057
GSK Investigational Site
Elkridge, Maryland, 21075
GSK Investigational Site
Erie, Pennsylvania, 16508
GSK Investigational Site
Evansville, Indiana, 47710
GSK Investigational Site
Evansville, Indiana, 47712
GSK Investigational Site
Excelsior Springs, Missouri, 64024
GSK Investigational Site
Flushing, New York, 11355
GSK Investigational Site
Georgetown, Texas, 78626
GSK Investigational Site
Gig Harbor, Washington, 98335
GSK Investigational Site
Gilbert, Arizona, 85296
GSK Investigational Site
Glendale, Arizona, 85308
GSK Investigational Site
Graham, Washington, 98338
GSK Investigational Site
Greenbrae, California, 94904
GSK Investigational Site
Hamilton, New Jersey, 08690
GSK Investigational Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33013
GSK Investigational Site
Huntersville, North Carolina, 28078
GSK Investigational Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46254
GSK Investigational Site
Kahului, Hawaii, 96732
GSK Investigational Site
Kettering, Ohio, 45429
GSK Investigational Site
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660
GSK Investigational Site
Kingston, New York, 12401
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89016
GSK Investigational Site
Manassas, Virginia, 20110
GSK Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407-3799
GSK Investigational Site
Mogadore, Ohio, 44260
GSK Investigational Site
Ocala, Florida, 34471
GSK Investigational Site
Olympia, Washington, 98506
GSK Investigational Site
Oregon City, Oregon, 97045
GSK Investigational Site
Pahrump, Nevada, 89048
GSK Investigational Site
Pelzer, South Carolina, 29669
GSK Investigational Site
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85020
GSK Investigational Site
Roseville, California, 95661
GSK Investigational Site
Sacramento, California, 95825
GSK Investigational Site
Salem, Virginia, 24153
GSK Investigational Site
Sewickley, Pennsylvania, 15143
GSK Investigational Site
Slidell, Louisiana, 70461
GSK Investigational Site
South Burlington, Vermont, 05403
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63128
GSK Investigational Site
Sunset, Louisiana, 70584
GSK Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
GSK Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
GSK Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85745
GSK Investigational Site
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35406
GSK Investigational Site
Vancouver, Washington, 98664
GSK Investigational Site
Wandsworth, Ohio, 44281
GSK Investigational Site
Waterloo, Iowa, 50702
GSK Investigational Site
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53228
GSK Investigational Site
Wenatchee, Washington, 98801
GSK Investigational Site
West Chester, Pennsylvania, 19382
GSK Investigational Site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
Canada9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bathurst, New Brunswick, E2A 4X7
GSK Investigational Site
Bay Roberts, Newfoundland and Labrador, A0A 1G0
GSK Investigational Site
Brampton, Ontario, L6T 3T1
GSK Investigational Site
Coquitlam, British Columbia, V3K 3P4
GSK Investigational Site
Gatineau, Quebec, J8Y 6S8
GSK Investigational Site
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 4J6
GSK Investigational Site
Smiths Falls, Ontario, K7A 4W8
GSK Investigational Site
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1E 2C2
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M9W 4L6
Argentina8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1425
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1117ABH
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aries, Buenos Aires, C1425AWC
GSK Investigational Site
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, C1416DRJ
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, B1704ETD
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1155ADP
GSK Investigational Site
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, 5000
GSK Investigational Site
Mendoza, Mendoza Province, 5500
Brazil6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brasília, 71625-009
GSK Investigational Site
Campinas, São Paulo, 13073-350
GSK Investigational Site
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60120-021
GSK Investigational Site
Goiânia, Goiás, 74110-010
GSK Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-170
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01323-001
South Korea6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Gwangju, 501-757
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 110-749
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 139-872
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 152-703
GSK Investigational Site
Suwon, Kyonggi-do, 443-721
GSK Investigational Site
Uijeongbu-si, Kyonggi-do, 480-130
Philippines5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Cebu City, 6000
GSK Investigational Site
Manila, 1000
GSK Investigational Site
Manila, 1008
GSK Investigational Site
Marikina City, 1810
GSK Investigational Site
Quezon City, 1108
Taiwan5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Changhua, 500
GSK Investigational Site
Kaohsiung City, 833
GSK Investigational Site
Taichung, 404
GSK Investigational Site
Taipei, 114
GSK Investigational Site
Taoyuan Hsien, 333
Mexico4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Durango, Durango, 34070
GSK Investigational Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
GSK Investigational Site
Pachuca, Hidalgo, 42039
GSK Investigational Site
Tijuana, Baja California Norte, 22320
Pakistan2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Karachi, 74800
GSK Investigational Site
Lahore, 54000
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Parallel Group, Double-blind, Multi-center Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of AVANDAMET and Metformin After 80 Weeks of Treatment.
This study will evaluate the longer-term glycemic effect of two medicines approved for initial treatment of type 2 diabetes. The study consists of a 2 week screening period (2 study visits), followed by an 80 week double-blind treatment period (11 study visits). Also, a sub-study was included to look at changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine.
Read the detailed description
This was a phase IV, randomized, double-blind, global, multi-centre study. The study consisted of a 2 week screening period followed by an 80 week double-blind treatment period. Subjects who met all eligibility requirements were randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by country, gender (male and female) and pre-screening HbA1c (≤9% or>9) either to MET or AVM. When the substudy was added, a new randomization was created for the participating centers. Those subjects in the bone sub-study were stratified by country, gender (male, premenopausal female, and postmenopausal female), pre-screening HbA1c (i.e., ≤9%; >9%), and either to MET or AVM.
At randomization, Visit 3 (Week 0), subjects were initiated at Dose Level 1. Treatment with AVM was initiated at a dose of 4 mg/500 mg and titrated up to a maximum total daily dose of AVM 8 mg/2000 mg. Treatment with MET therapy was initiated at a dose of 500 mg and titrated up to a maximum daily dose of 2000mg.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- Avandamet 6 mg/1500 mg (ttd), Avandamet 4 mg/1000 mg (ttd), Avandamet 2 mg/500 mg (ttd), Avandamet 8 mg/ 2000 mg (ttd), Metformin 500 mg (ttd)
- Keywords
- Fasting Plasma Glucose, Dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA), Drug-naive, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Bone Mineral Density, Hyperglycemia, HbA1c
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hyperglycemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Avandamet 6 mg/1500 mg (ttd)Drug
One 2 mg/ 500 mg capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal Two 2 mg/ 500 mg capsules will be taken in the PM with the evening meal
Avandamet 4 mg/1000 mg (ttd)Drug
One 2 mg/500 mg capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal. One 2 mg/500 mg capsule will be taken in the PM with the evening meal.
Avandamet 2 mg/500 mg (ttd)Drug
one placebo capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal one 2 mg/ 500 mg capsule will be taken in the PM with the evening meal.
Avandamet 8 mg/ 2000 mg (ttd)Drug
Two 2 mg/ 500 mg capsules will be taken in the AM with the morning meal. Two 2 mg/ 500 mg capsules will be taken in the PM with the evening meal.
Metformin 500 mg (ttd)Drug
One placebo capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal. One 500 mg capsule will be taken in the PM with the evening meal.
Metformin 1000 mg (ttd)Drug
One 500 mg capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal. One 500 mg capsule will be taken in the PM with the evening meal.
Metformin 1500 mg (ttd)Drug
One 500 mg capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal. Two 500 mg capsules will be taken in the PM with the evening meal.
Metformin 2000 mg (ttd)Drug
Two 500 mg capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal. Two 500 mg capsule will be taken in the PM with the evening meal.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Metformin | Placebo comparator | MET began at a total daily dose of 500 mg and could be increased up to a maximum dose of MET 2000 mg. The dose level was to be increased unless a tolerability issue existed at the current dose level. Receives: Drug: Metformin 500 mg (ttd); Drug: Metformin 1000 mg (ttd); Drug: Metformin 1500 mg (ttd); Drug: Metformin 2000 mg (ttd) |
| Avandamet (Rosiglitazone maleate/metformin hydrochloride) | Active comparator | AVM began at a total daily dose of 4 mg/500 mg and could be increased up to a maximum dose of AVM 8 mg/2000 mg Receives: Drug: Avandamet 6 mg/1500 mg (ttd); Drug: Avandamet 4 mg/1000 mg (ttd); Drug: Avandamet 2 mg/500 mg (ttd); Drug: Avandamet 8 mg/ 2000 mg (ttd) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 80
Blood was taken for serum HbA1c measurements. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 80 value minus the baseline value. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was not used for this analysis.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Secondary outcomes (28)
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 80
Blood was taken for serum Hb1AC measurements. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 80 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Week 32 for withdrawn participants or missing values.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c <=6.5% and <7% at Week 80
Blood was taken for serum Hb1AC measurements. Hb1AC responders were described as participants having achieved Hb1AC <=6% and <7% at Week 80 with LOCF from Week 32.
Measured: Week 80
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline at Week 80
Blood was taken for serum FPG measurements. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 80 value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 80
Blood was taken for serum FPG measurements. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 80 value minus the baseline value with LOCF from Week 32 for withdrawn participants or missing values.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Number of Participants Achieving FPG <=6 mmol/L (110 mg/dL) and <=7 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) at Week 80
Blood was taken for serum FPG measurements. FPG responders were described as participants having achieved FPG <=6 mmol/L (110 mg/dL) and <7 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) Hb1AC at Week 80 with LOCF from Week 32.
Measured: Week 80
Number of Participants Achieving Treatment Failure
Treatment failure was defined as an HbA1c level >= 7% after Week 32 or withdrawal due to insufficient therapeutic effect (ITE) at any time.
Measured: Randomization to treatment failure (up to Week 80)
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 80
Blood was taken for measurement of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. Percent change from baseline at Week 80 was based on log transformed data. Geometric mean, GM; standard error, SE. n is the number of evaluable participants, which is the number of participants with a value at baseline and at the specified visit for the parameter of interest.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Week 80 (United States [US] and Mexico Subset of Participants )
Blood was taken for measurement of adiponectin. Percent change from baseline at Week 80 was based on log transformed data. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the US and Mexico only.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Percent Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 80 (US and Mexico Subset of Participants)
Blood was taken for measurement of CRP. Percent change from baseline at Week 80 was based on log transformed data. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the US and Mexico only.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Percent Change in Free Fatty Acids (FFA) From Baseline at Week 80 (US and Mexico Subset of Participants).
Blood was taken for measurement of FFA. Percent change from baseline at Week 80 was based on log transformed data. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the US and Mexico only.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Change in Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 80 (US and Mexico Subset of Participants)
Blood was taken for fasting insulin measurements. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 80 value minus the baseline value, with LOCF from Week 32 for withdrawn participants or missing values. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the US and Mexico only.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Change in C-peptide From Baseline at Week 80 (US and Mexico Subset of Participants)
Blood was taken for C-peptide measurements. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 80 value minus the baseline value with LOCF from Week 32 for withdrawn participants or missing values. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the US and Mexico only.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Percent Change From Baseline in in HOMA-S and HOMA-B to Week 80 (US and Mexico Subset of Participants)
Blood was taken for measurement of homeostasis model assessment for insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S) and beta-cell function (HOMA-B). Percent change from baseline at Week 80 was based on log transformed data. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the US and Mexico only. GM, geometric mean; SE, standard error.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Slope of Delta-cell Function as Estimated by the Ratio deltaI/deltaG
The ratio Delta I/Delta G is calculated based on the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), where Delta I = (30 minute immunoreactive insulin minus 0 minute immunoreactive insulin) and Delta G = (30 minute plasma glucose minus 0 minute plasma glucose). The 0 minute values are fasting insulin and glucose; the 30 minute values are taken 30 minutes after the oral glucose challenge. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the US and Mexico only.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Number of Participants at Final Dose Level
Measured: Baseline to Week 80 or withdrawal
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mass Density (BMD) at Weeks 20, 56, and 80 (Bone Sub-study Subset of Participants)
BMD was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD at a given timepoint was defined at the participant level by the following formula: percent change = (BMD at given week minus BMD at baseline)/BMD at baseline x 100%. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the bone study only.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Weeks 20, 56, and 80 (Bone Sub-study Subset of Participants)
BMD was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD at a given timepoint was defined at the participant level by the following formula: percent change = (BMD at given week minus BMD at baseline)/BMD at baseline x 100. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the bone study only.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Trochanter BMD at Weeks 20, 56, and 80 (Bone Sub-study Subset of Participants)
BMD was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD at a given timepoint was defined at the participant level by the following formula: percent change = (BMD at given week minus BMD at baseline)/BMD at baseline x 100. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the bone study only.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Weeks 20, 56, and 80 (Bone Sub-study Subset of Participants)
BMD was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD at a given timepoint was defined at the participant level by the following formula: percent change = (BMD at given week minus BMD at baseline)/BMD at baseline x 100. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the bone study only.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Distal Radius BMD at Weeks 20, 56, and 80 (Bone Sub-study Subset of Participants)
BMD was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD at a given timepoint was defined at the participant level by the following formula: percent change = (BMD at given week minus BMD at baseline)/BMD at baseline x 100. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the bone study only.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMD at Weeks 20, 56, and 80 (Bone Sub-study Subset of Participants)
BMD was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD at a given timepoint was defined at the participant level by the following formula: percent change = (BMD at given week minus BMD at baseline)/BMD at baseline x 100. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the bone study only.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Calcium at Weeks 12, 32, 56, and 80
Blood was taken for measurement of serum calcium. Percent change from baseline was based on log transformed data. Geometric mean, GM; standard error, SE. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the bone study only. n is the number of evaluable participants, which is the number of participants with a value at baseline and at the specified visit for the parameter of interest.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 32, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Intact Parathyroid Hormone at Week 80
Blood was taken for measurement of intact parathyroid hormone. Percent change from baseline was based on log transformed data. Standard error, SE; Wk, Week; %, percent. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the bone study only. n is the number of evaluable participants, which is the number of participants with a value at baseline and at the specified visit for the parameter of interest.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Percent Change From Baseline in 25-hydroxy Vitamin D at Week 80
Blood was taken for measurement of 25-hydroxy vitamin D. Percent change from baseline was based on log transformed data. Standard error, SE; Wk, Week; %, percent. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the bone study only. n is the number of evaluable participants, which is the number of participants with a value at baseline and at the specified visit for the parameter of interest.
Measured: Baseline and Week 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Estradiol at Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Blood was taken for measurement of estradiol. Percent change from baseline was based on log transformed data. Standard error, SE; Wk, Week; %, percent. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of female participants in the bone study only. n is the number of evaluable participants, which is the number of female participants with a value at baseline and at the specified visit for the parameter of interest.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in C-terminal Telopeptide (CTX) at Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Blood was taken for measurement of CTX. Percent change from baseline was based on log transformed data. Standard error, SE; Wk, Week; %, percent. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the bone study only. n is the number of evaluable participants, which is the number of participants with a value at baseline and at the specified visit for the parameter of interest.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type-1 N-propeptide (P1NP) at Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Blood was taken for measurement of P1NP. Percent change from baseline was based on log transformed data. Standard error, SE; Wk, Week; %, percent. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the bone study only. n is the number of evaluable participants, which is the number of participants with a value at baseline and at the specified visit for the parameter of interest.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Blood was taken for measurement of BSAP. Percent change from baseline was based on log transformed data. Standard error, SE; Wk, Week; %, percent. This outcome measure was analyzed for a subset of participants in the bone study only. n is the number of evaluable participants, which is the number of participants with a value at baseline and at the specified visit for the parameter of interest.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2006
- Primary completionSep 2009
- Study completionSep 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 688 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00386100
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AVT105913
- Status last verified
- Oct 2016
- First submitted
- 9 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 23 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Publications
Borges JL, Bilezikian JP, Jones-Leone AR, Acusta AP, Ambery PD, Nino AJ, Grosse M, Fitzpatrick LA, Cobitz AR. A randomized, parallel group, double-blind, multicentre study comparing the efficacy and safety of Avandamet (rosiglitazone/metformin) and metformin on long-term glycaemic control and bone mineral density after 80 weeks of treatment in drug-naive type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011 Nov;13(11):1036-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01461.x.
PubMed 21682834
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Parallel Group, Double-blind, Multi-center Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of AVANDAMET and Metformin After 80 Weeks of Treatment.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00386100
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AVT105913
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- Fasting Plasma Glucose, Dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA), Drug-naive, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Bone Mineral Density, Hyperglycemia, HbA1c
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 688 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2006
- Primary completion
- Sep 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Apr 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the longer-term glycemic effect of two medicines approved for initial treatment of type 2 diabetes. The study consists of a 2 week screening period (2 study visits), followed by an 80 week double-blind treatment period (11 study visits). Also, a sub-study was included to look at changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine.
Detailed description
This was a phase IV, randomized, double-blind, global, multi-centre study. The study consisted of a 2 week screening period followed by an 80 week double-blind treatment period. Subjects who met all eligibility requirements were randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by country, gender (male and female) and pre-screening HbA1c (≤9% or>9) either to MET or AVM. When the substudy was added, a new randomization was created for the participating centers. Those subjects in the bone sub-study were stratified by country, gender (male, premenopausal female, and postmenopausal female), pre-screening HbA1c (i.e., ≤9%; >9%), and either to MET or AVM.
At randomization, Visit 3 (Week 0), subjects were initiated at Dose Level 1. Treatment with AVM was initiated at a dose of 4 mg/500 mg and titrated up to a maximum total daily dose of AVM 8 mg/2000 mg. Treatment with MET therapy was initiated at a dose of 500 mg and titrated up to a maximum daily dose of 2000mg.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Metformin | Placebo comparator | Drug: Metformin 500 mg (ttd), Drug: Metformin 1000 mg (ttd), Drug: Metformin 1500 mg (ttd), Drug: Metformin 2000 mg (ttd)MET began at a total daily dose of 500 mg and could be increased up to a maximum dose of MET 2000 mg. The dose level was to be increased unless a tolerability issue existed at the current dose level. |
| Avandamet (Rosiglitazone maleate/metformin hydrochloride) | Active comparator | Drug: Avandamet 6 mg/1500 mg (ttd), Drug: Avandamet 4 mg/1000 mg (ttd), Drug: Avandamet 2 mg/500 mg (ttd), Drug: Avandamet 8 mg/ 2000 mg (ttd)AVM began at a total daily dose of 4 mg/500 mg and could be increased up to a maximum dose of AVM 8 mg/2000 mg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- The subject provides written informed consent.
- The subject is male or female and 18 to 75 years of age at the time of pre-screening.
- The subject has an established clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes according to recommended guidelines (e.g., American Diabetes Association, International Diabetes Federation, World Health Organization, Canadian Diabetes Association, or American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists).
- The subject is currently treated with diet and exercise, and has not taken more than 2 weeks of an anti-diabetic monotherapy or insulin in the past 6 months.
- The subject has a BMI >25 kg/m2 at pre-screening.
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- The subject has taken an oral anti-diabetic monotherapy or insulin for more than 14 days in the past 6 months.
- The subject has presence of clinically significant renal or hepatic disease (serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL (132.6 mol/L) for males and 1.4 mg/dL (123.8 mol/L) for females): ALT, AST, total bilirubin, or alkaline phosphatase >2.5 times the upper limit of the normal (ULN) reference range.
- The subject has anemia defined by hemoglobin concentration <11g/dL (110g/L) for males or <10g/dL (100g/L) for females.
- Presence of unstable or severe angina, coronary insufficiency or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV or any congestive heart failure requiring pharmacologic treatment.
- The subject has systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Avandamet 6 mg/1500 mg (ttd)One 2 mg/ 500 mg capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal Two 2 mg/ 500 mg capsules will be taken in the PM with the evening meal | Drug | Avandamet (Rosiglitazone maleate/metformin hydrochloride) |
| Avandamet 4 mg/1000 mg (ttd)One 2 mg/500 mg capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal. One 2 mg/500 mg capsule will be taken in the PM with the evening meal. | Drug | Avandamet (Rosiglitazone maleate/metformin hydrochloride) |
| Avandamet 2 mg/500 mg (ttd)one placebo capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal one 2 mg/ 500 mg capsule will be taken in the PM with the evening meal. | Drug | Avandamet (Rosiglitazone maleate/metformin hydrochloride) |
| Avandamet 8 mg/ 2000 mg (ttd)Two 2 mg/ 500 mg capsules will be taken in the AM with the morning meal. Two 2 mg/ 500 mg capsules will be taken in the PM with the evening meal. | Drug | Avandamet (Rosiglitazone maleate/metformin hydrochloride) |
| Metformin 500 mg (ttd)One placebo capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal. One 500 mg capsule will be taken in the PM with the evening meal. | Drug | Metformin |
| Metformin 1000 mg (ttd)One 500 mg capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal. One 500 mg capsule will be taken in the PM with the evening meal. | Drug | Metformin |
| Metformin 1500 mg (ttd)One 500 mg capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal. Two 500 mg capsules will be taken in the PM with the evening meal. | Drug | Metformin |
| Metformin 2000 mg (ttd)Two 500 mg capsule will be taken in the AM with the morning meal. Two 500 mg capsule will be taken in the PM with the evening meal. | Drug | Metformin |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 80
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Blood was taken for serum HbA1c measurements. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 80 value minus the baseline value. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was not used for this analysis.
28 secondary outcomes
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 80
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c <=6.5% and <7% at Week 80
Time frame: Week 80
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline at Week 80
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 80
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Number of Participants Achieving FPG <=6 mmol/L (110 mg/dL) and <=7 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) at Week 80
Time frame: Week 80
Number of Participants Achieving Treatment Failure
Time frame: Randomization to treatment failure (up to Week 80)
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 80
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Adiponectin at Week 80 (United States [US] and Mexico Subset of Participants )
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Percent Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 80 (US and Mexico Subset of Participants)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Percent Change in Free Fatty Acids (FFA) From Baseline at Week 80 (US and Mexico Subset of Participants).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Change in Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 80 (US and Mexico Subset of Participants)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Change in C-peptide From Baseline at Week 80 (US and Mexico Subset of Participants)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Percent Change From Baseline in in HOMA-S and HOMA-B to Week 80 (US and Mexico Subset of Participants)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Slope of Delta-cell Function as Estimated by the Ratio deltaI/deltaG
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Number of Participants at Final Dose Level
Time frame: Baseline to Week 80 or withdrawal
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mass Density (BMD) at Weeks 20, 56, and 80 (Bone Sub-study Subset of Participants)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Weeks 20, 56, and 80 (Bone Sub-study Subset of Participants)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Trochanter BMD at Weeks 20, 56, and 80 (Bone Sub-study Subset of Participants)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Weeks 20, 56, and 80 (Bone Sub-study Subset of Participants)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Distal Radius BMD at Weeks 20, 56, and 80 (Bone Sub-study Subset of Participants)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMD at Weeks 20, 56, and 80 (Bone Sub-study Subset of Participants)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Calcium at Weeks 12, 32, 56, and 80
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 32, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Intact Parathyroid Hormone at Week 80
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Percent Change From Baseline in 25-hydroxy Vitamin D at Week 80
Time frame: Baseline and Week 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Estradiol at Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in C-terminal Telopeptide (CTX) at Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type-1 N-propeptide (P1NP) at Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 20, 56, and 80
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Nov 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21682834Borges JL, Bilezikian JP, Jones-Leone AR, Acusta AP, Ambery PD, Nino AJ, Grosse M, Fitzpatrick LA, Cobitz AR. A randomized, parallel group, double-blind, multicentre study comparing the efficacy and safety of Avandamet (rosiglitazone/metformin) and metformin on long-term glycaemic control and bone mineral density after 80 weeks of treatment in drug-naive type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011 Nov;13(11):1036-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01461.x.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
116 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Avandamet 6 mg/1500 mg (ttd), Avandamet 4 mg/1000 mg (ttd) and Avandamet 2 mg/500 mg (ttd) in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 116 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 116 sites in United States, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, South Korea and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Apr 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 80 (time frame: Baseline and Week 80). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00386100, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Nov 2016.