Sickle Cell DiseaseNCT00386048
Pain Management Protocol for Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease
An observational study of Sickle Cell Disease, run by University of South Carolina at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a devastating chronic health condition that primarily affects African-Americans. Painful episodes are the most frequent form of morbidity in SCD and the most frequent reason for hospitalization. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sickle Cell Disease
- What is being tested?
- Brief Cognitive-Behavioral Pain Management Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2006to Aug 2012
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: The study population are youths with sickle cell disease who are experiencing intermittent pain episodes that interfere with quality of life.
Who may be able to join
- Inclusion criteria mandate that the families selected demonstrate adherence with standard SCD treatment as indicated by reliable attendance to clinic visits, and chart notes demonstrating adherence to prescribed medical care (e.g., follow-through with required specialist visits and appointments for diagnostic procedures). Participants must have had at least 1 major pain episode or 3 minor pain episodes in the previous 6 months that resulted in functional impairment, such as reduced school attendance.
Who cannot join
- Individuals with developmental disabilities such as mental retardation, autism, and Down syndrome, severe cognitive limitations following stroke, or diagnoses of severe psychopathology will be excluded from participation as these disorders have the potential to confound the findings.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Children's Cancer and Blood Disorder
Columbia, South Carolina, 29203
About this study
Official title: Home-based Pain Management Protocol for Children With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a devastating chronic health condition that primarily affects African-Americans. Painful episodes are the most frequent form of morbidity in SCD and the most frequent reason for hospitalization. Cognitive-behavioral interventions for pain management have shown efficacy for improving coping abilities, reducing the amount of medication needed to manage pain, and improving daily functioning during painful episodes. However, difficulties with disseminating and implementing cognitive-behavioral treatments have resulted in almost no use of these techniques in pediatric settings. In South Carolina these difficulties are compounded by social and geographical factors that pose particular challenges. A major issue with implementing quality pain management protocols is the difficulty with providing adequate practice and monitoring of the use of the techniques, particularly given the rural population in South Carolina and transportation difficulties for economically disadvantaged families. Due to a history of under-treating pain in SCD it is also critical that psychological and medical treatments are presented in an integrated manner so that these approaches are viewed as complimentary, not mutually exclusive, approaches to pain management. Finally, we believe the same implementation issues for improving the use of behavioral coping skills are also important for improving adherence to medication protocols for appropriate home-based pain management.
The purpose of this proposal is to develop, implement, and evaluate a pain management protocol that uses portable electronic devices and other technologies to increase the practice of psychosocial pain management techniques, improve adherence to the overall biopsychosocial pain management protocol, and improve the clinician's ability to track progress with fewer office visits. In addition to addressing important dissemination issues, by embedding methods to assess for adherence into the technology it will be possible to continuously evaluate and modify protocol efficacy, resulting in a product that is effective, empirically sound, and flexible. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention or waitlist control condition. Those on the waitlist condition will receive the same study procedures after a 2 month wait periods. We anticipate that the intervention will result in better pain management and less impairment in the participants.
Read the detailed description
"Home-Based Pain Management Protocol for Children with Sickle Cell Disease"
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a devastating chronic health condition that primarily affects African-Americans. Painful episodes are the most frequent form of morbidity in SCD and the most frequent reason for hospitalization. Cognitive-behavioral interventions for pain management have shown efficacy for improving coping abilities, reducing the amount of medication needed to manage pain, and improving daily functioning during painful episodes. However, difficulties with disseminating and implementing cognitive-behavioral treatments have resulted in almost no use of these techniques in pediatric settings. In South Carolina these difficulties are compounded by social and geographical factors that pose particular challenges. A major issue with implementing quality pain management protocols is the difficulty with providing adequate practice and monitoring of the use of the techniques, particularly given the rural population in South Carolina and transportation difficulties for economically disadvantaged families. Due to a history of under-treating pain in SCD it is also critical that psychological and medical treatments are presented in an integrated manner so that these approaches are viewed as complimentary, not mutually exclusive, approaches to pain management. Finally, we believe the same implementation issues for improving the use of behavioral coping skills are also important for improving adherence to medication protocols for appropriate home-based pain management.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this research is to implement and evaluate a pain management protocol that uses portable electronic devices (PDA) and other technologies to increase the practice of psychosocial pain management techniques, improve adherence to the overall biopsychosocial pain management protocol, and improve the clinician's ability to track progress with fewer office visits. In addition to addressing important dissemination issues, by embedding methods to assess for adherence into the technology it will be possible to continuously evaluate and modify protocol efficacy, resulting in a product that is effective, empirically sound, and flexible.
STUDY PROCEDURES:
Recruitment and Assignment to Study Conditions. Families will be approached as part of their routine psychosocial screenings currently conducted at the Children's Cancer and Blood Disorder Center. Parental informed consent and child assent will be obtained from families who meet inclusion criteria and agree to participate. Next, participants will be randomly assigned to waitlist control or intervention groups through the use of a random assignment procedure. The researcher will explain details of the participation incentive system to the families at this time, including the number of coupons assigned for each phase of study completion and how to redeem coupons for toys and gift cards. All participants (waitlist control group and intervention group) will complete the initial measures: Background Information Questionnaire ; Structured Pain History Interview - Parent and Child Forms; Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ); Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PEDS-QL); Pediatric Pain Questionnaire (PPQ); Child Health Locus of Control during the initial meeting and the second set of measures (CSQ, PEDS-QL and PPQ) 4 weeks after the initial meeting.
Cognitive-Behavioral Training. Following completion of the intake measures, families in the intervention condition will be provided education on pain medication use and explanation of active versus passive methods of coping with pain and the cognitive-behavior techniques will be introduced (Progressive Muscle Relaxation, Deep Breathing, Guided imagery and Distraction). These techniques will be tailored to the child's preferences and recorded onto the PDA.
Next, the researcher will review with the family the pain flow chart, how to complete the Daily Pain and Activity Diary (DPAD), and use the PDA and Pain Management software. Participants and their parents will be provided with detailed instructions regarding care of PDA, who to contact if device is broken or lost, policy on continued participation if device is lost, and a padded addressed stamped envelope to return the PDA should it require attention. Three days after the initial visit families will be contacted to answer questions and ensure implementation of skills.
Families will also receive a weekly telephone contact at a pre-arranged time to address any difficulties with protocol implementation. Pain diaries and frequency of skills practice will be electronically downloaded approximately every three days using wireless synchronization built into the PDA devices. One month following the initial session, all participants (waitlist and intervention groups) will complete the PPQ, PEDS-QL and CSQ outcome measures. Two months after the initial session, intervention participants will complete outcome measures, including PPQ, PEDS-QL, CSQ and Protocol Evaluation Form (PEF). Six months after the initial session, intervention participants will complete the follow-up measures, including child report on the CSQ, and parent and child report on the PPQ and PEDS-QL. At this time the participant's school will be contacted to obtain school attendance records so as to document absences due to illness over the previous year and participants medical records will be reviewed to examine patient's disease severity over the course of their study participation time and their lives (Medical Record Review Form). Participants in the waitlist control group will start participation in the intervention at the two month point, and follow the procedures outlined above for the intervention condition.
Concurrent Validity Study Procedures. Assessment of pain experience will be obtained for study participants undergoing routine venipuncture as part of their clinic visit co-occurring with study entry and study completion. Observational, physiological response, parent-report, and self-report of pain experience will be obtained to provide convergent validity for measures of pain report. A brief measure of medical coping style, the Child Approach-Avoidance Rating Scale (CAARS; Appendix J) will be included to assess for shifts in coping strategies employed by the participant during painful procedures. Participants and parents will report on child pain experience before, during, and after the routine venipuncture that is part of their clinic visit on the day of initial contact. Participant response to routine venipuncture will also be captured via video recording to allow for an in-depth analysis of observable pain behaviors. Pre-procedural heart rate will be taken at three intervals: when the patient is first seen for the clinic visit, immediately prior to the venipuncture, and immediately following the venipuncture. Additionally, small extra vial of blood will be obtained (5mL) to measure the participant's level of endothelin-1, a biological marker of pain. This extra vial of blood will not require an additional needle stick. Finally, the medical records of all participants will be reviewed to obtain information about disease course.
SUBJECT POPULATION:
Participants will include up to 50 children and adolescents with SCD ranging between the ages of 8 to 18 years of age and their primary caregivers. Participants will be recruited from the Children's Cancer and Blood Disorder Center at Palmetto Health and four DHEC Children's Rehabilitative Services sites (Orangeburg, Columbia, Florence and Sumter). Reviews of behavioral interventions for rheumatoid arthritis or chronic low back pain have indicated typical treatment effect sizes for pain experience and coping of d = 0.46 or greater (Astin et al., 2002; van Tulder et al., 2001). Using this value as a basis for computing study power (with an alpha level of .05) the study has an expected power of .80 with a sample size of 50 participants.
Inclusion/Exclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria mandate that the families selected demonstrate adherence with standard SCD treatment as indicated by reliable attendance to clinic visits, and chart notes demonstrating adherence to prescribed medical care (e.g., follow-through with required specialist visits and appointments for diagnostic procedures). Participants must have had at least 1 major pain episode or 3 minor pain episodes in the previous 6 months that resulted in functional impairment, such as reduced school attendance. Finally, individuals with developmental disabilities such as mental retardation, autism, and Down syndrome, severe cognitive limitations following stroke, or diagnoses of severe psychopathology will be excluded from participation as these disorders have the potential to confound the findings.
CONFIDENTIALITY: To minimize threats to confidentiality, only investigators will have access to participant data. For data management purposes and confidentiality, subjects will be given a unique identifier to use when recording data and electronically transmissions of data. This arrangement minimizes risk to loss of patient confidentiality. All study staff, including research assistants who may enter data, will be required to complete and pass the University of South Carolina Human Subjects on-line tutorial prior to commencing their work on this research project. All data will be stored in a locked file cabinet in the investigators office at Palmetto Health.
EXPECTED RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS: We anticipate that the intervention will result in better pain management and less impairment in the participants. These data will be used to seek funding for a larger-scale study and in the development of interventions to decrease the impact of pain on the lives of individuals with SCD.
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Being tested
- Brief Cognitive-Behavioral Pain Management Training
- Keywords
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease, Pain Management
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brief Cognitive-Behavioral Pain Management TrainingBehavioural
Participants complete a manualized, single session of training which includes: (A) education about the causes of sickle cell pain, (B) education about how the nervous system processes pain signals, and (C) explanations of how one can use cognitive and behavioral treatment (CBT) strategies to decrease the extent of pain experienced (all based on how the nervous system processes pain). Four specific CBT skills are taught and practiced by the participant (Progressive muscle relaxation, Controlled Deep Breathing, Imagery, and Distraction). The protocol explicitly emphasizes the use of CBT as a complimentary pain management tool to use in addition to the standard of care methods.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care Observation Group | This group is randomized to continue their current medical management strategies for pain as recommended/prescribed by health care providers. Primary and secondary outcomes are collected at the same time intervals as the biopsychosocial intervention group. | |
| Biopsychosocial Intervention Group | This group continues all standard of care procedures for managing pain and adds to this additional cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) strategies for managing pain. The intervention explicitly frames the CBT strategies as added, complimentary pain management methods to add to the standard of care treatment. Receives: Behavioral: Brief Cognitive-Behavioral Pain Management Training |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2006
- Primary completionAug 2012
- Study completionAug 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sickle Cell DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of South CarolinaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of South Carolina
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Catherine B McClellan, Ph.D., Principal investigator, University of South Carolina
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00386048
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SCD pain management protocol
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 10 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 28 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
McClellan CB, Schatz JC, Puffer E, Sanchez CE, Stancil MT, Roberts CW. Use of handheld wireless technology for a home-based sickle cell pain management protocol. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jun;34(5):564-73. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn121. Epub 2008 Nov 23.
PubMed 19029141Schatz J, Schlenz AM, McClellan CB, Puffer ES, Hardy S, Pfeiffer M, Roberts CW. Changes in coping, pain, and activity after cognitive-behavioral training: a randomized clinical trial for pediatric sickle cell disease using smartphones. Clin J Pain. 2015 Jun;31(6):536-47. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000183.
PubMed 25503599
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Home-based Pain Management Protocol for Children With Sickle Cell Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00386048
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCD pain management protocol
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Keywords
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease, Pain Management
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of South CarolinaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Study start
- Nov 2006
- Primary completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a devastating chronic health condition that primarily affects African-Americans. Painful episodes are the most frequent form of morbidity in SCD and the most frequent reason for hospitalization. Cognitive-behavioral interventions for pain management have shown efficacy for improving coping abilities, reducing the amount of medication needed to manage pain, and improving daily functioning during painful episodes. However, difficulties with disseminating and implementing cognitive-behavioral treatments have resulted in almost no use of these techniques in pediatric settings. In South Carolina these difficulties are compounded by social and geographical factors that pose particular challenges. A major issue with implementing quality pain management protocols is the difficulty with providing adequate practice and monitoring of the use of the techniques, particularly given the rural population in South Carolina and transportation difficulties for economically disadvantaged families. Due to a history of under-treating pain in SCD it is also critical that psychological and medical treatments are presented in an integrated manner so that these approaches are viewed as complimentary, not mutually exclusive, approaches to pain management. Finally, we believe the same implementation issues for improving the use of behavioral coping skills are also important for improving adherence to medication protocols for appropriate home-based pain management.
The purpose of this proposal is to develop, implement, and evaluate a pain management protocol that uses portable electronic devices and other technologies to increase the practice of psychosocial pain management techniques, improve adherence to the overall biopsychosocial pain management protocol, and improve the clinician's ability to track progress with fewer office visits. In addition to addressing important dissemination issues, by embedding methods to assess for adherence into the technology it will be possible to continuously evaluate and modify protocol efficacy, resulting in a product that is effective, empirically sound, and flexible. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention or waitlist control condition. Those on the waitlist condition will receive the same study procedures after a 2 month wait periods. We anticipate that the intervention will result in better pain management and less impairment in the participants.
Detailed description
"Home-Based Pain Management Protocol for Children with Sickle Cell Disease"
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a devastating chronic health condition that primarily affects African-Americans. Painful episodes are the most frequent form of morbidity in SCD and the most frequent reason for hospitalization. Cognitive-behavioral interventions for pain management have shown efficacy for improving coping abilities, reducing the amount of medication needed to manage pain, and improving daily functioning during painful episodes. However, difficulties with disseminating and implementing cognitive-behavioral treatments have resulted in almost no use of these techniques in pediatric settings. In South Carolina these difficulties are compounded by social and geographical factors that pose particular challenges. A major issue with implementing quality pain management protocols is the difficulty with providing adequate practice and monitoring of the use of the techniques, particularly given the rural population in South Carolina and transportation difficulties for economically disadvantaged families. Due to a history of under-treating pain in SCD it is also critical that psychological and medical treatments are presented in an integrated manner so that these approaches are viewed as complimentary, not mutually exclusive, approaches to pain management. Finally, we believe the same implementation issues for improving the use of behavioral coping skills are also important for improving adherence to medication protocols for appropriate home-based pain management.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this research is to implement and evaluate a pain management protocol that uses portable electronic devices (PDA) and other technologies to increase the practice of psychosocial pain management techniques, improve adherence to the overall biopsychosocial pain management protocol, and improve the clinician's ability to track progress with fewer office visits. In addition to addressing important dissemination issues, by embedding methods to assess for adherence into the technology it will be possible to continuously evaluate and modify protocol efficacy, resulting in a product that is effective, empirically sound, and flexible.
STUDY PROCEDURES:
Recruitment and Assignment to Study Conditions. Families will be approached as part of their routine psychosocial screenings currently conducted at the Children's Cancer and Blood Disorder Center. Parental informed consent and child assent will be obtained from families who meet inclusion criteria and agree to participate. Next, participants will be randomly assigned to waitlist control or intervention groups through the use of a random assignment procedure. The researcher will explain details of the participation incentive system to the families at this time, including the number of coupons assigned for each phase of study completion and how to redeem coupons for toys and gift cards. All participants (waitlist control group and intervention group) will complete the initial measures: Background Information Questionnaire ; Structured Pain History Interview - Parent and Child Forms; Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ); Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PEDS-QL); Pediatric Pain Questionnaire (PPQ); Child Health Locus of Control during the initial meeting and the second set of measures (CSQ, PEDS-QL and PPQ) 4 weeks after the initial meeting.
Cognitive-Behavioral Training. Following completion of the intake measures, families in the intervention condition will be provided education on pain medication use and explanation of active versus passive methods of coping with pain and the cognitive-behavior techniques will be introduced (Progressive Muscle Relaxation, Deep Breathing, Guided imagery and Distraction). These techniques will be tailored to the child's preferences and recorded onto the PDA.
Next, the researcher will review with the family the pain flow chart, how to complete the Daily Pain and Activity Diary (DPAD), and use the PDA and Pain Management software. Participants and their parents will be provided with detailed instructions regarding care of PDA, who to contact if device is broken or lost, policy on continued participation if device is lost, and a padded addressed stamped envelope to return the PDA should it require attention. Three days after the initial visit families will be contacted to answer questions and ensure implementation of skills.
Families will also receive a weekly telephone contact at a pre-arranged time to address any difficulties with protocol implementation. Pain diaries and frequency of skills practice will be electronically downloaded approximately every three days using wireless synchronization built into the PDA devices. One month following the initial session, all participants (waitlist and intervention groups) will complete the PPQ, PEDS-QL and CSQ outcome measures. Two months after the initial session, intervention participants will complete outcome measures, including PPQ, PEDS-QL, CSQ and Protocol Evaluation Form (PEF). Six months after the initial session, intervention participants will complete the follow-up measures, including child report on the CSQ, and parent and child report on the PPQ and PEDS-QL. At this time the participant's school will be contacted to obtain school attendance records so as to document absences due to illness over the previous year and participants medical records will be reviewed to examine patient's disease severity over the course of their study participation time and their lives (Medical Record Review Form). Participants in the waitlist control group will start participation in the intervention at the two month point, and follow the procedures outlined above for the intervention condition.
Concurrent Validity Study Procedures. Assessment of pain experience will be obtained for study participants undergoing routine venipuncture as part of their clinic visit co-occurring with study entry and study completion. Observational, physiological response, parent-report, and self-report of pain experience will be obtained to provide convergent validity for measures of pain report. A brief measure of medical coping style, the Child Approach-Avoidance Rating Scale (CAARS; Appendix J) will be included to assess for shifts in coping strategies employed by the participant during painful procedures. Participants and parents will report on child pain experience before, during, and after the routine venipuncture that is part of their clinic visit on the day of initial contact. Participant response to routine venipuncture will also be captured via video recording to allow for an in-depth analysis of observable pain behaviors. Pre-procedural heart rate will be taken at three intervals: when the patient is first seen for the clinic visit, immediately prior to the venipuncture, and immediately following the venipuncture. Additionally, small extra vial of blood will be obtained (5mL) to measure the participant's level of endothelin-1, a biological marker of pain. This extra vial of blood will not require an additional needle stick. Finally, the medical records of all participants will be reviewed to obtain information about disease course.
SUBJECT POPULATION:
Participants will include up to 50 children and adolescents with SCD ranging between the ages of 8 to 18 years of age and their primary caregivers. Participants will be recruited from the Children's Cancer and Blood Disorder Center at Palmetto Health and four DHEC Children's Rehabilitative Services sites (Orangeburg, Columbia, Florence and Sumter). Reviews of behavioral interventions for rheumatoid arthritis or chronic low back pain have indicated typical treatment effect sizes for pain experience and coping of d = 0.46 or greater (Astin et al., 2002; van Tulder et al., 2001). Using this value as a basis for computing study power (with an alpha level of .05) the study has an expected power of .80 with a sample size of 50 participants.
Inclusion/Exclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria mandate that the families selected demonstrate adherence with standard SCD treatment as indicated by reliable attendance to clinic visits, and chart notes demonstrating adherence to prescribed medical care (e.g., follow-through with required specialist visits and appointments for diagnostic procedures). Participants must have had at least 1 major pain episode or 3 minor pain episodes in the previous 6 months that resulted in functional impairment, such as reduced school attendance. Finally, individuals with developmental disabilities such as mental retardation, autism, and Down syndrome, severe cognitive limitations following stroke, or diagnoses of severe psychopathology will be excluded from participation as these disorders have the potential to confound the findings.
CONFIDENTIALITY: To minimize threats to confidentiality, only investigators will have access to participant data. For data management purposes and confidentiality, subjects will be given a unique identifier to use when recording data and electronically transmissions of data. This arrangement minimizes risk to loss of patient confidentiality. All study staff, including research assistants who may enter data, will be required to complete and pass the University of South Carolina Human Subjects on-line tutorial prior to commencing their work on this research project. All data will be stored in a locked file cabinet in the investigators office at Palmetto Health.
EXPECTED RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS: We anticipate that the intervention will result in better pain management and less impairment in the participants. These data will be used to seek funding for a larger-scale study and in the development of interventions to decrease the impact of pain on the lives of individuals with SCD.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care Observation Group | – | –This group is randomized to continue their current medical management strategies for pain as recommended/prescribed by health care providers. Primary and secondary outcomes are collected at the same time intervals as the biopsychosocial intervention group. |
| Biopsychosocial Intervention Group | – | Behavioral: Brief Cognitive-Behavioral Pain Management TrainingThis group continues all standard of care procedures for managing pain and adds to this additional cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) strategies for managing pain. The intervention explicitly frames the CBT strategies as added, complimentary pain management methods to add to the standard of care treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- The study population are youths with sickle cell disease who are experiencing intermittent pain episodes that interfere with quality of life.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Inclusion criteria mandate that the families selected demonstrate adherence with standard SCD treatment as indicated by reliable attendance to clinic visits, and chart notes demonstrating adherence to prescribed medical care (e.g., follow-through with required specialist visits and appointments for diagnostic procedures). Participants must have had at least 1 major pain episode or 3 minor pain episodes in the previous 6 months that resulted in functional impairment, such as reduced school attendance.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Individuals with developmental disabilities such as mental retardation, autism, and Down syndrome, severe cognitive limitations following stroke, or diagnoses of severe psychopathology will be excluded from participation as these disorders have the potential to confound the findings.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Cognitive-Behavioral Pain Management TrainingParticipants complete a manualized, single session of training which includes: (A) education about the causes of sickle cell pain, (B) education about how the nervous system processes pain signals, and (C) explanations of how one can use cognitive and behavioral treatment (CBT) strategies to decrease the extent of pain experienced (all based on how the nervous system processes pain). Four specific CBT skills are taught and practiced by the participant (Progressive muscle relaxation, Controlled Deep Breathing, Imagery, and Distraction). The protocol explicitly emphasizes the use of CBT as a complimentary pain management tool to use in addition to the standard of care methods. | Behavioural | Biopsychosocial Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 19029141McClellan CB, Schatz JC, Puffer E, Sanchez CE, Stancil MT, Roberts CW. Use of handheld wireless technology for a home-based sickle cell pain management protocol. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jun;34(5):564-73. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn121. Epub 2008 Nov 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25503599Schatz J, Schlenz AM, McClellan CB, Puffer ES, Hardy S, Pfeiffer M, Roberts CW. Changes in coping, pain, and activity after cognitive-behavioral training: a randomized clinical trial for pediatric sickle cell disease using smartphones. Clin J Pain. 2015 Jun;31(6):536-47. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000183.
Related trials for Sickle Cell Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Long-term Mitapivat Dosing in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease: An Extension of a Phase I Pilot Study of Mitapivat
Sickle Cell Disease, Hemolytic Anemia
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Escalating Doses of Fostamatinib in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disorders, Sickle Cell Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical and Biomarker Effects of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Females With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Buprenorphine for the Management of Pain in Children With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Catherine B McClellan, Ph.D. principal investigator
University of South Carolina
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Sickle Cell Disease, run by University of South Carolina at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00386048, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2021.