Diabetic Neuropathy, PainfulPhase 4NCT00385671
An Open-Label Comparison of Duloxetine to Other Alternatives for the Management of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
A Phase 4 study testing duloxetine hydrochloride, pregabalin and gabapentin in people with Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 9 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
To test the non-inferiority of duloxetine monotherapy as a treatment for the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain as compared to pregabalin treatment among patients who have not had an adequate response to gabapentin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful
- What is being tested?
- duloxetine hydrochloride, pregabalin and gabapentin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 407 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2006to Nov 2009
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- You must have been diagnosed with Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
- Patient has an average daily pain score greater than or equal to 4 on an 11-point Likert scale, and patient or provider feel that a change from the current gabapentin therapy for pain management is warranted
- Patient is currently treated with gabapentin greater than or equal to 900 milligram/day, has been prescribed the current dose for at least 4 weeks, and has been at least 80% compliant with dosing, according to patient report
- Patient must agree not to change dose of gabapentin between Visits 1 and 2
- You must have stable glycemic control
Who cannot join
- Are judged prior to randomization to be at suicidal risk as defined by a score of 2 or greater on question 9 of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
- Current diagnosis or history of hemangiosarcoma
- Patients with New York Heart Association Class III or IV symptoms of congestive heart failure
- Patients with uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma
- Presence of a current seizure disorder
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 2 countries.
9 sites in 2 countries
United States5 sites
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
Cromwell, Connecticut, 06416
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
Midvale, Utah, 84047
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
Staten Island, New York, 10312
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
Torrance, California, 90503
Germany4 sites
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
Bochum, D-44805
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
Dresden, 01307
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
Hamburg, 20354
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
Siegen, 57072
About this study
Official title: An Open-Label, Randomized Comparison of Duloxetine, Pregabalin, and the Combination of Duloxetine and Gabapentin Among Patients With Inadequate Response to Gabapentin for the Management of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
To test the non-inferiority of duloxetine monotherapy as a treatment for the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain as compared to pregabalin treatment among patients who have not had an adequate response to gabapentin.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful
- Being tested
- duloxetine hydrochloride, pregabalin, gabapentin
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Neuropathies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
duloxetine hydrochlorideDrug
Also called LY248686, Cymbalta
Duloxetine (DLX) once daily (QD), orally (PO)
pregabalinDrug
Pregabalin (PGB) orally (PO)
gabapentinDrug
Stable Gabapentin (GAB) (participants will remain on the same dose of gabapentin at which they entered the study)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pregabalin | Active comparator | Pregabalin (PGB) 50 milligram (mg) three times a day (TID) (US \& Germany) or 75 mg twice daily (BID) (Canada), orally (PO) for 2 weeks, then PGB 100 mg TID (US \& Germany) or 150 mg BID (Canada), PO for 10 weeks. Receives: Drug: pregabalin |
| Duloxetine | Experimental | Duloxetine (DLX) 30 milligram (mg) once daily (QD), orally (PO) for 1 week, then DLX 60 mg QD, PO for 11 weeks. Receives: Drug: duloxetine hydrochloride |
| Gabapentin + Duloxetine | Experimental | Stable Gabapentin (GAB) + Duloxetine (DLX) 30 milligram (mg) once daily (QD), orally (PO) for 1 week, then stable GAB + DLX 60 mg QD, PO for 11 weeks. Receives: Drug: duloxetine hydrochloride; Drug: gabapentin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Weekly Mean of Daily 24 Hour Average Pain Score, Pregabalin Compared With Duloxetine
This is an ordinal scale with scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Data presented represent the weekly mean of the scores of the average pain severity over the last 24 hours. Scores are based on daily assessments recorded by patients in their diaries. Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (50)
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Weekly Mean of Daily 24 Hour Average Pain Score, Duloxetine Compared With Duloxetine+Gabapentin
This is an ordinal scale with scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Data presented represent the weekly mean of the scores of the average pain severity over the last 24 hours. Scores are based on daily assessments recorded by patients in their diaries. Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Weekly Mean of Nighttime Pain Severity
This is an ordinal scale with scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Data presented represent the weekly mean of the scores of the daily nighttime pain severity over the last 24 hours. Scores are based on daily assessments recorded by patients in their diaries. Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Weekly Mean of the Daily Worst Pain Severity Score
This is an ordinal scale with scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Data presented represent the weekly mean of the scores of the daily worst pain severity over the last 24 hours. Scores are based on daily assessments recorded by patients in their diaries. Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale (CGI Severity)
Measures severity of illness at the time of assessment compared with start of treatment. Scores range from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Patient's Global Impression of Improvement Scale (PGI - Improvement) at 12 Weeks
A scale that measures the patient's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. The score ranges from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).
Measured: 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Severity: 24-hour Average Pain
A self-reported scale that measures the severity of pain based on the average pain over the past 24-hours. The severity scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as severe as you can imagine). Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Severity: Worst Pain
A self-reported scale that measures the severity of pain based on the worst pain experienced over the past 24-hours. The severity scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as severe as you can imagine). Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Severity: Least Pain
A self-reported scale that measures the severity of pain based on the least pain experienced over the past 24-hours. The severity scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as severe as you can imagine). Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Severity: Pain Right Now
A self-reported scale that measures the severity of pain based on the pain right now. The severity scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as severe as you can imagine). Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference: With General Activity
A self-reported scale that measures the interference of pain in the past 24 hours on general activity. The Interference scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference With Mood
A self-reported scale that measures the interference of pain in the past 24 hours on mood. The Interference scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference With Walking Ability
A self-reported scale that measures the interference of pain in the past 24 hours on walking ability. The Interference scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference With Normal Work
A self-reported scale that measures the interference of pain in the past 24 hours on normal work. The Interference scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference With Relations With Other People
A self-reported scale that measures the interference of pain in the past 24 hours on relations with other people. The Interference scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference With Sleep
A self-reported scale that measures the interference of pain in the past 24 hours on sleep. The Interference scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference With Enjoyment of Life
A self-reported scale that measures the interference of pain in the past 24 hours on enjoyment of life. The Interference scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Mean Interference Score
The Interference scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). There are 7 questions assessing the interference of pain in the past 24 hours for general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Number of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction in the Weekly Mean 24 Hour Average Pain Score at 12 Weeks
This is a nominal outcome reflecting whether or not a clinically-important efficacy outcome was achieved at endpoint. It is based on a comparison between baseline and endpoint scores on an ordinal scale with scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Used were the weekly mean of the scores of the average pain severity over the last 24 hours. The weekly averages were based on daily assessments recorded by patients in their diaries.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Number of Patients With a Reduction of ≥ 50% in Weekly Mean of 24 Hour Average Pain Score
This is a nominal outcome reflecting whether or not a clinically-important efficacy outcome was achieved at endpoint. It is based on a comparison between baseline and endpoint scores on an ordinal scale with scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Used were the weekly mean of the scores of the average pain severity over the last 24 hours. The weekly averages were based on daily assessments recorded by patients in their diaries.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Number of Participants With a ≥ 2-points Reduction on the Weekly Average of the Daily 24-hour Average Pain Scale at 12 Weeks
This is a nominal outcome reflecting whether or not a clinically-important efficacy outcome was achieved at endpoint. It is based on a comparison between baseline and endpoint scores on an ordinal scale with scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Used were the weekly mean of the scores of the average pain severity over the last 24 hours. The weekly averages were based on daily assessments recorded by patients in their diaries.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Subscales of Ease of Going to Sleep (GTS), Awakening (AFS), and Behavior Following Wakefulness (BFW), Quality of Sleep (QOS)
The LSEQ assesses the effects of psychoactive compounds on sleep and early morning behavior. Participants mark a series of 100 mm line analogue scales, indicating the direction and magnitude of any changes in behavioral state they experience following administration of the drug. Scores are represented in millimeters, higher scores indicate better sleep and better early morning behavior. Subscale score ranges: GTS=0-300, QOS=0-200, AFS=0-200, BFW=0-300. Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) - Total Score and Scores for Items 1 to 3
The SDS is completed by the patient and is used to assess the effect of the patient's symptoms on their work/social/family life. Total scores range from 0 to 30, higher values indicate greater disruption in the patient's life. Item 1 assesses the effect of the patient's symptoms on their work/school schedule, Item 2 on their social life/leisure activities, and Item 3 on their family life/home responsibilities. Subscales scores range: 0-10, higher values indicate greater disruption in the patient's life. Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Summary of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ) Total Score and Subscale Scores
14-item subject-rated scale assessing medication related changes in sexual activity + functioning. Structured interview/questionnaire. It measures five dimensions of sexual behavior: pleasure; desire/frequency; desire/interest; arousal; and orgasm. The total score is obtained across all 5 dimensions, ranging from 14 to 70. Subscale score ranges: desire/frequency=2-10; desire/interest=3-15; pleasure=1-5; arousal=3-15; orgasm=3-15. Higher scores = better sexual functioning. Least-squares means: adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Categorical Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ) Total Score and Subscale Scores
14-item subject-rated scale assessing changes in sexual activity and functioning; structured interview/questionnaire, designed to measure medication related changes in sexual functioning. 5 dimensions of sexual behavior: pleasure; desire/frequency; desire/interest; arousal; orgasm. Total score: obtained across all 5 dimensions, ranges from 14 to 70. Subscale scores: desire/frequency=2-10; desire/interest=3-15; pleasure=1-5; arousal=3-15; orgasm=3-15. Higher scores = better sexual functioning. Categories: better=positive change in score; same=no change in score; worse=negative change in score.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Portland Neurotoxicity Scale - Total Score and Subscale Scores
The Portland Neurotoxicity Scale is a 15-item, patient-completed questionnaire designed to assess the degree of impact of anti-epileptic drug therapy on a number of cognitive and somatomotor parameters. The total score ranges from 15-135 with higher scores indicating more toxicity. The cognitive toxicity score ranges from 10-90 and the somatomotor toxicity score ranges from 5-45, for both higher scores indicate more toxicity. Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Categorial Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Portland Neurotoxicity Scale - Total Score and Subscale Scores
The Portland Neurotoxicity Scale is a 15-item, patient-completed questionnaire designed to assess the degree of impact of anti-epileptic drug therapy on a number of cognitive and somatomotor parameters. Categories: better=negative change in score; same=no change in score; worse=positive change in score.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Path Analysis of Improvement in Pain Through Improvement in Depressive Symptoms
Contribution to reduction in pain directly by treatment and indirectly by treatment through the reduction of depressive symptoms using path analysis. The direct treatment effect estimates the mean drug difference in pain reduction directly through treatment; the indirect treatment effect estimates the contribution that treatment plays to the mean drug difference in pain reduction indirectly through the reduction in mood symptoms; the total effect estimates the drug difference in reducing pain in sum through the specified path of direct and indirect treatment effects.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) Total Score
A 21-item, patient-completed questionnaire to assess characteristics of depression. Each of the 21 items corresponding to a symptom of depression is summed to give a single score. There is a four-point scale for each item ranging from 0 to 3. Total score of 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe. Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Categorical Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Number of Patients Using Health Care as Measured by the Resource Utilization Scale
The Resource Utilization Scale measures direct and indirect costs (collected only for US sites). Direct costs include inpatient and outpatient costs, while indirect costs include lost days of work and caregiver time spent with patients. Inpatient costs include costs associated with hospitalizations and time spent in emergency rooms and psychiatric rooms. Outpatient costs include costs associated with visits to various health care providers, home health care by health care providers, and partial care.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Summary of Number of Participants Who Discontinued
Number of participants who discontinued. The reasons for discontinuation are presented in the participant flow.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Time to First ≥ 30% Reduction in Weekly Mean 24 Hour Average Pain Score
This is the number of days required to first achieve a nominal outcome reflecting whether or not a clinically-important efficacy outcome was achieved. It is based on a comparison between baseline and post-baseline scores on an ordinal scale with scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Used were the weekly mean of the scores of the average pain severity over the last 24 hours. The weekly averages were based on daily assessments recorded by patients in their diaries.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Time to First ≥ 50 % Reduction in Weekly Mean 24 Hour Average Pain Score
This is the number of days to first achieve ≥50% reduction, baseline to endpoint, in the weekly means of the 24-hour average pain severity via daily patient assessments using an ordinal scale (scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The median time to first ≥50% reduction with some measure of dispersion could not be calculated for each treatment group. The number of patients who reached a ≥50% reduction in weekly mean 24 hour average pain score are presented in outcome measure 20.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Time to First Sustained Response in Weekly Mean 24 Hour Average Pain Score
This is the number of days to first achieve an outcome using the weekly means of the 24-hour average pain severity via daily patient assessments using an ordinal scale (scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Sustained response: ≥30% reduction, baseline to endpoint, with 30% reduction from baseline ≥2 weeks prior to endpoint, remaining at ≥20% reduction between. The median time to sustained response with some measure of dispersion could not be calculated for each treatment group.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Time to First ≥ 2 Points Reduction in Weekly Mean 24 Hour Average Pain Score
This is the number of days required to first achieve a nominal outcome reflecting whether or not a clinically-important efficacy outcome was achieved. It is based on a comparison between baseline and post-baseline scores on an ordinal scale with scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Used were the weekly mean of the scores of the average pain severity over the last 24 hours. The weekly averages were based on daily assessments recorded by patients in their diaries.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Weekly Mean Change in 24 Hour Average Pain Severity +/- Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
This is an ordinal scale with scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Data presented represent the weekly mean of the scores of the average pain severity over the last 24 hours. Scores are based on daily assessments recorded by patients in their diaries.
It was planned to analyze participants stratified by the presence or absence of a co-morbidity with GAD. However, due to the low number of participants with GAD in the study this analysis was not possible.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Weekly Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in 24 Hour Average Pain Severity - Only Participants Who Adhered to Key Protocol Requirements (Per-Protocol Population)
Ordinal scale: 0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain. Data=weekly mean of scores of average pain severity over last 24 hours (h). Scores: daily assessments recorded by patients in diaries. Only patients adhering to key protocol criteria included: baseline Weekly Mean 24h Average Pain Score ≥4; 80-120% compliant with study Drug, each visit; baseline Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Physical Assessment Total Score ≥3; gabapentin taper ≤14 days, no HbA1c ≥12% post randomization; no contraindicated medications used. Least-squares means=adjustment due to baseline severity + investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Weekly Mean Change in 24 Hour Average Pain Severity by Week by Gabapentin Exposure Subgroup (de Novo Versus Prior Use)
This is an ordinal scale with scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Data presented represent the weekly mean of the scores of the average pain severity over the last 24 hours. Scores are based on daily assessments recorded by patients in their diaries. De novo: use of gabapentin for <56 contiguous days prior to randomization. Prior use: use of gabapentin for >=56 contiguous days prior to randomization. Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks, 6 weeks, 7 weeks, 8 weeks, 9 weeks, 10 weeks, 11 weeks, 12 weeks
Discontinuations for Abnormal Laboratory Analytes, Vital Signs, Overall and for Each Measure
Presented are numbers of participants who discontinued due to a change from baseline in laboratory analytes or vital signs.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Blood Pressure
Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Heart Rate
Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Body Weight
Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Elevated Blood Pressure
Elevated systolic blood pressure: >=130 millimeter mercury (mm Hg) + an increase of >=10 mm Hg if baseline <130 mm Hg.
Elevated diastolic blood pressure: >=85 mm Hg + an increase of >=10 mm Hg if baseline <85 mm Hg.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Elevated Heart Rate
Elevated heart rate: >=100 beats per minute (bpm) + an increase of >=10 bpm if baseline <100 bpm.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes in Body Weight
Treatment-emergent high body weight: weight at last visit >=107% of baseline weight.
Treatment-emergent low body weight: weight at last visit <=93% of baseline weight.
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Hepatic Enzyme Serum Levels
Aspartate aminotransferase = AST Alanine aminotransferase = ALT Gamma glutamyl transferase = GGT Alkaline phosphatase = AlkPhos
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Total Bilirubin
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Fasting Plasma Glucose
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Hemoglobin A1C
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Elevated Laboratory Analytes
Treatment-emergent: within range at baseline, out of range after baseline. Ranges in Units/Liter (U/L). Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): female (f): >34, male (m): >36. Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): f:<69 years (yr) >34, ≥69yr >32; m: <69yr >43, ≥69yr >35. Total Bilirubin (TBili): >21. Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT): f: <59yr >49, ≥59yr >50; m: <59yr >61, ≥59yr >50. Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG): <59yr >6.4, ≥59yr >6.7. Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) >6%. Alkaline Phosphatase (AlkPhos): f: 18-50yr >106, 50-70yr >123, 70-80yr >164, ≥80yr >221; m: 18-50yr >129, 50-70yr >131, 70-80yr >156, ≥80yr >187
Measured: baseline through 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2006
- Primary completionAug 2009
- Study completionNov 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic Neuropathy, PainfulStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Eli Lilly and CompanyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 407 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Investigators
- Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), Study director, Eli Lilly and Company
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00385671
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10822
- Other IDs
- F1J-US-HMEZ
- Status last verified
- Jul 2011
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 26 Jul 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Tanenberg RJ, Irving GA, Risser RC, Ahl J, Robinson MJ, Skljarevski V, Malcolm SK. Duloxetine, pregabalin, and duloxetine plus gabapentin for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain management in patients with inadequate pain response to gabapentin: an open-label, randomized, noninferiority comparison. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Jul;86(7):615-26. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0681.
PubMed 21719618Irving G, Tanenberg RJ, Raskin J, Risser RC, Malcolm S. Comparative safety and tolerability of duloxetine vs. pregabalin vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Sep;68(9):1130-40. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12452. Epub 2014 May 18.
PubMed 24837444
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jul 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-Label, Randomized Comparison of Duloxetine, Pregabalin, and the Combination of Duloxetine and Gabapentin Among Patients With Inadequate Response to Gabapentin for the Management of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00385671
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 10822
- Conditions
- Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 407 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eli Lilly and CompanyIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Study start
- Sep 2006
- Primary completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Oct 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To test the non-inferiority of duloxetine monotherapy as a treatment for the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain as compared to pregabalin treatment among patients who have not had an adequate response to gabapentin.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pregabalin | Active comparator | Drug: pregabalinPregabalin (PGB) 50 milligram (mg) three times a day (TID) (US \& Germany) or 75 mg twice daily (BID) (Canada), orally (PO) for 2 weeks, then PGB 100 mg TID (US \& Germany) or 150 mg BID (Canada), PO for 10 weeks. |
| Duloxetine | Experimental | Drug: duloxetine hydrochlorideDuloxetine (DLX) 30 milligram (mg) once daily (QD), orally (PO) for 1 week, then DLX 60 mg QD, PO for 11 weeks. |
| Gabapentin + Duloxetine | Experimental | Drug: duloxetine hydrochloride, Drug: gabapentinStable Gabapentin (GAB) + Duloxetine (DLX) 30 milligram (mg) once daily (QD), orally (PO) for 1 week, then stable GAB + DLX 60 mg QD, PO for 11 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- You must have been diagnosed with Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
- Patient has an average daily pain score greater than or equal to 4 on an 11-point Likert scale, and patient or provider feel that a change from the current gabapentin therapy for pain management is warranted
- Patient is currently treated with gabapentin greater than or equal to 900 milligram/day, has been prescribed the current dose for at least 4 weeks, and has been at least 80% compliant with dosing, according to patient report
- Patient must agree not to change dose of gabapentin between Visits 1 and 2
- You must have stable glycemic control
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Are judged prior to randomization to be at suicidal risk as defined by a score of 2 or greater on question 9 of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
- Current diagnosis or history of hemangiosarcoma
- Patients with New York Heart Association Class III or IV symptoms of congestive heart failure
- Patients with uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma
- Presence of a current seizure disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| duloxetine hydrochlorideAlso: LY248686, CymbaltaDuloxetine (DLX) once daily (QD), orally (PO) | Drug | Duloxetine, Gabapentin + Duloxetine |
| pregabalinPregabalin (PGB) orally (PO) | Drug | Pregabalin |
| gabapentinStable Gabapentin (GAB) (participants will remain on the same dose of gabapentin at which they entered the study) | Drug | Gabapentin + Duloxetine |
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Weekly Mean of Daily 24 Hour Average Pain Score, Pregabalin Compared With Duloxetine
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
This is an ordinal scale with scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Data presented represent the weekly mean of the scores of the average pain severity over the last 24 hours. Scores are based on daily assessments recorded by patients in their diaries. Least-squares means represent adjustment due to baseline severity and investigative site.
50 secondary outcomes
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Weekly Mean of Daily 24 Hour Average Pain Score, Duloxetine Compared With Duloxetine+Gabapentin
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Weekly Mean of Nighttime Pain Severity
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Weekly Mean of the Daily Worst Pain Severity Score
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale (CGI Severity)
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Patient's Global Impression of Improvement Scale (PGI - Improvement) at 12 Weeks
Time frame: 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Severity: 24-hour Average Pain
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Severity: Worst Pain
Time frame: baseline, 12 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Severity: Least Pain
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Severity: Pain Right Now
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference: With General Activity
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference With Mood
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference With Walking Ability
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference With Normal Work
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference With Relations With Other People
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference With Sleep
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Interference With Enjoyment of Life
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Mean Interference Score
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Number of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction in the Weekly Mean 24 Hour Average Pain Score at 12 Weeks
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Number of Patients With a Reduction of ≥ 50% in Weekly Mean of 24 Hour Average Pain Score
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Number of Participants With a ≥ 2-points Reduction on the Weekly Average of the Daily 24-hour Average Pain Scale at 12 Weeks
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) Subscales of Ease of Going to Sleep (GTS), Awakening (AFS), and Behavior Following Wakefulness (BFW), Quality of Sleep (QOS)
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) - Total Score and Scores for Items 1 to 3
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Summary of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation
Time frame: baseline through 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ) Total Score and Subscale Scores
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Categorical Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ) Total Score and Subscale Scores
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Portland Neurotoxicity Scale - Total Score and Subscale Scores
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Categorial Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Portland Neurotoxicity Scale - Total Score and Subscale Scores
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Path Analysis of Improvement in Pain Through Improvement in Depressive Symptoms
Time frame: baseline through 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) Total Score
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Categorical Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Number of Patients Using Health Care as Measured by the Resource Utilization Scale
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Summary of Number of Participants Who Discontinued
Time frame: baseline through 12 weeks
Time to First ≥ 30% Reduction in Weekly Mean 24 Hour Average Pain Score
Time frame: baseline through 12 weeks
Time to First ≥ 50 % Reduction in Weekly Mean 24 Hour Average Pain Score
Time frame: baseline through 12 weeks
Time to First Sustained Response in Weekly Mean 24 Hour Average Pain Score
Time frame: baseline through 12 weeks
Time to First ≥ 2 Points Reduction in Weekly Mean 24 Hour Average Pain Score
Time frame: baseline through 12 weeks
Weekly Mean Change in 24 Hour Average Pain Severity +/- Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Weekly Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in 24 Hour Average Pain Severity - Only Participants Who Adhered to Key Protocol Requirements (Per-Protocol Population)
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Weekly Mean Change in 24 Hour Average Pain Severity by Week by Gabapentin Exposure Subgroup (de Novo Versus Prior Use)
Time frame: baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks, 6 weeks, 7 weeks, 8 weeks, 9 weeks, 10 weeks, 11 weeks, 12 weeks
Discontinuations for Abnormal Laboratory Analytes, Vital Signs, Overall and for Each Measure
Time frame: baseline through 12 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Blood Pressure
Time frame: baseline through 12 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jul 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 21719618Tanenberg RJ, Irving GA, Risser RC, Ahl J, Robinson MJ, Skljarevski V, Malcolm SK. Duloxetine, pregabalin, and duloxetine plus gabapentin for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain management in patients with inadequate pain response to gabapentin: an open-label, randomized, noninferiority comparison. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Jul;86(7):615-26. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0681.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24837444Irving G, Tanenberg RJ, Raskin J, Risser RC, Malcolm S. Comparative safety and tolerability of duloxetine vs. pregabalin vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Sep;68(9):1130-40. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12452. Epub 2014 May 18.
- Lilly Clinical Trial RegistryLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful
RecruitingObservational study
Safety and Effect of Peripheral Nerve Decompression Combined With Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Diabetes Complication
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Modality Choice Before and After Failure for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN), Diabetic Nephropathies
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Perineural Botulinum Toxin Injection Versus Oral Duloxetine in Relief of Foot Pain in Painful Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
RecruitingPhase 2
SPENDD: Quantitative Sensory Testing and Analgesic Response for Painful Peripheral Neuropathy.
Painful Peripheral Neuropathy, Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (DPN)
Recruiting
Neurofeedback for the Management of Neuropathic Pain in People With Diabetes
Neuropathy, Painful Diabetic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST) study director
Eli Lilly and Company
9 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing duloxetine hydrochloride, pregabalin and gabapentin in people with Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 9 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in United States, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Oct 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Weekly Mean of Daily 24 Hour Average Pain Score, Pregabalin Compared With Duloxetine (time frame: baseline, 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00385671, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2011; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.