AzTrials
AzTrials

AmputationPhase 2NCT00383682

Efficacy of Opioids and Mexiletine for the Treatment of Postamputation Pain

A Phase 2 study testing morphine and mexiletine in people with Amputation and Chronic Pain, run by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Persistent pain occurs in 50-85 percent of patients who experience the amputation of an extremity. This study will compare the effectiveness of morphine and mexiletine to placebo in the treatment of postamputation pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Amputation, Chronic Pain
What is being tested?
morphine and mexiletine
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 1997to Apr 2003
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults (18 years or older) of both sexes and all races with persistent phantom and or stump pain for 6 months or longer following an amputation will be eligible for enrollment in the study.

Who cannot join

  • 1) age less than 18 or over 85 years, 2) history of allergic reaction to the study drugs, i.e., morphine and mexiletine, 3) cardiac conduction defects such as second degree or complete heart block, or a myocardial infarction in the last 3 months, 4) severe pulmonary disease, 5) current history of alcohol or substance abuse, 6) seizures, dementia or encephalopathy, 7) pregnancy and nursing mothers, 8) chronic hepatic disease or hepatic failure, 9) hematological disease associated with leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia, and 10) other terminal illness with a life expectancy of less than 6 months. 11) Finally, to avoid a bias in patient selection, patients who failed to achieve clinically significant pain relief to a previous optimal trial with morphine and/or mexiletine will be excluded. An optimal trial will be defined as minimum of 3 week trial with either agent using a drug titration paradigm where the dose of the drugs were increased at intervals of one week or less.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Cross-Over Trial of Opioids Versus Mexiletine in the Treatment of Postamputation Pain

Persistent pain occurs in 50-85 percent of patients who experience the amputation of an extremity. This study will compare the effectiveness of morphine and mexiletine to placebo in the treatment of postamputation pain.

It is hypothesized that the effects of opioids and mexiletine on behavior and mental functioning in patients with postamputation pain are unlikely to be significant barriers to the clinical use of the drugs.

Read the detailed description

The long-term objective of this research is to develop better clinical strategies for alleviating pain resulting from amputation of extremities. Amputation is the most radical form of nerve injury. The two major types of postamputation painful sequela are phantom pain and stump pain. Phantom pain has been defined as painful sensation perceived in the missing body part, or portion thereof (Merskey and Bogduk,1994). Phantom pain is the most distressing, and often difficult to treat, chronic neuropathic pain syndrome that results from direct injury to the peripheral or central nervous system. Recent epidemiological studies indicate that 50-85% of patients experience persistent pain following amputations. This controlled clinical trial will examine the role of opioid analgesics and local anesthetics in the treatment of phantom and associated stump pain resulting from amputations. Specifically, our objectives are to answer the following questions:

  1. Does therapy with opioids and mexiletine result in better management of postamputation pain than treatment with placebo? Using a randomized, blinded, crossover clinical trial, the effectiveness of therapy with the opioid, morphine, and the oral local anesthetic, mexiletine, will be compared with placebo in the management of phantom and associated stump pain following amputations. The effectiveness of the treatment regimens will be judged by improvements in: a) The intensity of ongoing, stimulus-independent pain using established pain intensity and pain relief scales, b) Stimulus-evoked pain using quantitative sensory tests, and c) Impairment of function using established measures.
  2. What are the relative effects of opioids and mexiletine on affective and cognitive function in patients with amputated extremities? Using established tests of neuropsychological function, mood, and psychosocial and physical impairment, affective and cognitive changes associated with the opioid and mexiletine therapies will be quantified and compared with changes associated with placebo treatment. These studies will help determine if the effects of opioids and mexiletine on affect and cognition are likely to limit the usefulness of the medications in the treatment of pain following amputations.
Being tested
morphine and mexiletine
Keywords
postamputation pain, phantom pain, stump pain, neuroma pain, opioid, mexiletine
Medical subject headings
Chronic Pain, Phantom Limb

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • morphine and mexiletineDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain intensity (0-10 numerical rating scale)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Pain relief (0-100%)

  2. Functional activity (Multidimensional Pain Inventory activity and interference subscales

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Oct 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 1997
  3. Study completionApr 2003

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
60 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00383682
Sponsor's protocol ID
P01HD033990
Other IDs
Project 2, P01HD33990
Status last verified
Sep 2006
First submitted
29 Sep 2006
Last updated
3 Oct 2006
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Wu CL, Agarwal S, Tella PK, Klick B, Clark MR, Haythornthwaite JA, Max MB, Raja SN. Morphine versus mexiletine for treatment of postamputation pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Anesthesiology. 2008 Aug;109(2):289-96. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817f4523.

    PubMed 18648238

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing morphine and mexiletine in people with Amputation and Chronic Pain, run by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain intensity (0-10 numerical rating scale). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00383682, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2006.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in