AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaPhase 4NCT00381355

RCT of a Written Action Plan vs. Usual Care in Children With Acute Asthma

A Phase 4 study testing Written Action Plan for Acute Asthma in people with Asthma, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of the proposed large, high-intensity, randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of providing a written action plan to asthmatic children discharged from the emergency department (ED) or hospital on the short-term adherence to written recommendations (including medication… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Asthma
What is being tested?
Written Action Plan for Acute Asthma
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
218 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Oct 2006to Apr 2007
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children will be eligible, whether they are discharged from the ED or following a hospital admission, if:
  • aged 1 to 17 years;
  • presenting with acute asthma as per the 2003 Canadian Consensus Statement - The ED physician will be responsible for confirming the diagnosis of asthma;
  • requiring at least one nebulisation of salbutamol;
  • the ED physician plans on prescribing the patient inhaled steroids and/or inhaled b2-agonists delivered by metered dose inhaler or continuing a previously prescribed inhaled steroid;
  • the patient intends to stay in the Province of Quebec in the next 45 days;
  • the patient (and their parents) have a good understanding of written and spoken French or English.

Who cannot join

  • Children will be excluded if they:
  • currently take asthma medications (ß2-agonist and/or inhaled steroids) using a turbuhaler or diskus, because these delivery devices cannot be fitted with Doser CT, a computerized electronic dose counter for metered dose inhalers;
  • have another chronic lung disease (other than asthma) such as cystic fibrosis or bronchopulmonary dysplasia;
  • have known hypersensitivity to inhaled salbutamol or fluticasone.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Ste-Justine Hospital

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Does the Use of a New Written Action Plan Increase Short-term Adherence to Prescribed Medication and Asthma Control in Children Treated for an Asthma Attack in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The objective of the proposed large, high-intensity, randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of providing a written action plan to asthmatic children discharged from the emergency department (ED) or hospital on the short-term adherence to written recommendations (including medication, attendance to asthma education and medical follow-up). main outcome is adherence to prescribed inhaled preventive medication measured by an electronic counter. Secondary outcomes include attendance to asthma education and to medical follow-up, serving by pharmacy of prescription of oral steroids, as well as asthma control measured by questionnaire (Asthma Quiz for Kidz),2 use of rescue ß2-agonists, relapse to emergency room.

Read the detailed description

The objective of the proposed large, high-intensity, randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of providing a written action plan to asthmatic children discharged from the emergency department (ED) or hospital on the short-term adherence to written recommendations (including medication, attendance to asthma education and medical follow-up). Contrary to the traditional definition of a written action plan,1 i.e., a set of written instructions to follow in case of an exacerbation, we propose to test a new written action plan based on the innovative concept that emphasises the key elements associated with good asthma care: (1) use of preventive medication, (2) need for asthma education, (3) need for regular medical review, (4) environmental control and (5) instructions for use of rescue medication. The main outcome is adherence to prescribed inhaled preventive medication measured by an electronic counter. Secondary outcomes include attendance to asthma education and to medical follow-up, serving by pharmacy of prescription of oral steroids, as well as asthma control measured by questionnaire (Asthma Quiz for Kidz),2 use of rescue ß2-agonists, relapse to emergency room. Because of the recommended medical follow-up where primary care physicians may recommend a change in the preventive treatment initiated in hospital, only short-term outcomes occurring within 28 days of the index visit will be considered as associated with the use of the written action plan. We have purposely designed this trial to test the additional benefit of the intervention over the usual care, recognizing the heterogeneity in the amount of asthma information provided within the time constraints of the emergency room by our 90 physicians. To provide clinically meaningful and generalisable information, the eligibility criteria for study entry have been limited to the bare necessity to confirm the diagnosis of asthma. The randomisation will be stratified on age to reflect the target interlocutor of the written action plan, namely the parents for the 60% children aged < 6 years, the child and parent pair for the 40% children aged 7 to 12 years old, and the adolescents for the 10% patients aged 13-17 years old. We anticipate important variations in the characteristics of enrolled patients reflecting the real heterogeneity of the emergency department attendees, namely in the severity of baseline exacerbation (55% mild, 35% moderate, 10% severe), ownership of a written action plan (15%), prior asthma education (30%), use of daily preventive medicine (25%), etc, all of which may influence the adherence rate to the written action plan. To compensate this heterogeneity in patients' characteristics and provided instructions, the power of the trial to identify a clinically important difference in the main outcome has been set at 90% rather than the traditional 80%. The strength of the proposed study is clearly the assessment the real-life effectiveness of providing a new concept written action plan to a high-risk population to improve the main obstacles to good asthma control, namely adherence to preventive medication and attendance to asthma education and regular review.

Conditions
Asthma
Being tested
Written Action Plan for Acute Asthma
Keywords
asthma, children, written action plan, education, guided self-management, efficacy, compliance, b2-agonists, inhaled corticosteroids, oral steroids, relapse, randomised controlled trial, emergency department
Medical subject headings
Asthma, Patient Compliance, Recurrence, Emergencies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Written Action Plan for Acute AsthmaProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adherence rate to daily inhaled steroids, reported as the ratio of the sum of number of recorded over prescribed activation per day during the 28 days following the index visit.

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Proportion of children filling their prescription of oral steroids

  2. Use of rescue B2-agonists measured by dose counter

  3. Quality of life in children aged 7 years and older, measured by the Juniper Questionnaire

  4. Quality of life of their parent, measured by the Juniper Questionnaire

  5. Asthma control, measured by the Asthma Quiz for Kidz

  6. Attendance to asthma education

  7. Attendance to regular medical review

  8. Return visit rate to the ED

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Sep 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2006
  3. Primary completionApr 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Enrolment
218 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00381355
Sponsor's protocol ID
051703
Status last verified
Mar 2014
First submitted
25 Sep 2006
Last updated
27 Mar 2014
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Ducharme FM, Zemek RL, Chalut D, McGillivray D, Noya FJ, Resendes S, Khomenko L, Rouleau R, Zhang X. Written action plan in pediatric emergency room improves asthma prescribing, adherence, and control. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan 15;183(2):195-203. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201001-0115OC. Epub 2010 Aug 27.

    PubMed 20802165

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Written Action Plan for Acute Asthma in people with Asthma, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adherence rate to daily inhaled steroids, reported as the ratio of the sum of number of recorded over prescribed activation per day during the 28 days following the index visit.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00381355, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in