AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple MyelomaPhase 3NCT00376883

Pamidronate Prophylaxis in Multiple Myeloma 30 mg/Month Versus 90 mg/Month

A Phase 3 study testing pamidronate in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Nordic Myeloma Study Group at 14 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Multiple myeloma is a malignant hematological disease dominated by monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. Major symptoms are related to the bones due to an increased bone resorption and a decreased bone formation leading to bone pain and increased risk of fractures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Myeloma
What is being tested?
pamidronate
How many people
500 participants
Where
14 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
Jan 2000to Oct 2006
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • New diagnosed multiple myeloma with treatment demanding disease

Who cannot join

  • Life-expectancy less than 3 months, another active malignant disease, treatment with bisphosphonates for more than 3 months within the last 6 months, patients with creatinine above 400 µmol/l 4 weeks after starting chemotherapy, patients who cannot cooperate for monthly infusions, patients who do not give their informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

14 sites in 3 countries.

14 sites in 3 countries

Sweden6 sites
  • Sahlgrenska Universitetsjukhuset Östra

    Gothenburg, SE-416 85

  • Hematologkliniken, Universitetssjukhuset

    Linköping, SE-581 85

  • Medicinklin, Universitetssjukhuset MAS,

    Malmö, SE-205 02

  • Medicinkliniken, Universitetssjukhuset

    Örebro, SE-70185

  • Medicinklin, sekt för hematologi, Norrlands Universitetssjukhus

    Umeå, SE-901 85

  • Medicinklinikken Akademiska sjukhuset

    Uppsala, SE-751 85

Other trials in Sweden

Denmark4 sites
  • Department of Haematology B, Aalborg Hospital, University of Aarhus

    Aalborg, 9000

  • Hæmatologisk afd., Århus Universitetshospital

    Aarhus, DK-8000

  • Department of Haematology, Herlev University Hospital

    Herlev, 2730

  • Department of Hematology L, Rigshospitalet

    København Ø, DK-2100

Other trials in Denmark

Norway4 sites
  • Hematologisk seksjon, med avd, Haukeland Universitetssykehus

    Bergen, N-5021

  • Hematologisk avdeling Ullevål Sykehus

    Oslo, N - 0407

  • Med avd B, Hematologisk seksjon, Universitetssykehuset Nord Norge

    Tromsø, N-9038

  • Hematologisk seksjon, St.Olav Hospital

    Trondheim, N-7006

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: The Effect of i.v. Bisphosphonate on Health-Related Quality of Life and Skeletal Morbidity for Newly Diagnosed Treatment Demanding Multiple Myeloma. A Prospective Randomised Double Blinded Dose-Effective Study With Cost-Utility Analysis.

Multiple myeloma is a malignant hematological disease dominated by monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. Major symptoms are related to the bones due to an increased bone resorption and a decreased bone formation leading to bone pain and increased risk of fractures. The normal osteoclasts are responsible for bone degradation through stimulation from the malignant plasma cells. Bisphosphonates have been shown to inhibit the osteoclast activity but may have serious side-effects due to renal toxicity and the optimal dose have not been established.

In a randomized double blinded design it is aim to compare the standard of monthly injections of 90 mg pamidronate with 30 mg.

The primary end-point is physical function estimated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire at 12 months after starting the treatment in newly diagnosed treatment demanding multiple myeloma. Secondary end-points are skeletal related events, cost-utility analysis, response, response duration and survival and quality of life with respect to fatigue and pain.

Read the detailed description

Patients with newly diagnosed treatment demanding multiple myeloma are after informed consent and approved inclusion criteria randomised by telephone call to Copenhagen Trial Unit (CTU) and information on the target dose is send to the distributor, Amgros, and the local pharmacy for preparation of the pamidronate solution. Infusion is given for 2½ hours.

Before starting treatment the patient has to fulfil the first EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire that is send to the quality of life secretariat in Oslo, Norway. Subsequent questionnaires are mailed directly to the patients every third month.

The infusions are continued for 3 years and may be extended further upon the patient's request.

Every third month the number of skeletal event, the response and complications are recorded.

Skeletal X-rays are performed 9 and 24 months after starting the treatment.

Being tested
pamidronate
Keywords
multiple myeloma, pamidronate prophylaxis, dose comparison, quality of life, skeletal event, response, survival
Medical subject headings
Multiple Myeloma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • pamidronateDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Physical function at 12 months estimated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Skeletal related event (time to first SRE)

  2. Cost-utility analysis

  3. Subgroup analysis (conventional chemotherapy vs. high dose chemotherapy with stem cell support)

  4. Response, recons duration, survival

  5. Quality of Life estimated by fatigue and pain according to EORTC QLQ-C30

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2000
  3. Study completionOct 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
500 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00376883
Sponsor's protocol ID
NMSG 08/00
Other IDs
NCU D3-98
Status last verified
Jan 2007
First submitted
14 Sep 2006
Last updated
4 Jan 2007
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Gimsing P, Carlson K, Turesson I, Fayers P, Waage A, Vangsted A, Mylin A, Gluud C, Juliusson G, Gregersen H, Hjorth-Hansen H, Nesthus I, Dahl IM, Westin J, Nielsen JL, Knudsen LM, Ahlberg L, Hjorth M, Abildgaard N, Andersen NF, Linder O, Wisloff F. Effect of pamidronate 30 mg versus 90 mg on physical function in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Nordic Myeloma Study Group): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Oct;11(10):973-82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70198-4.

    PubMed 20863761

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing pamidronate in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Nordic Myeloma Study Group at 14 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 14 sites in Sweden, Denmark, Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Physical function at 12 months estimated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00376883, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in