Childhood Acute Basophilic LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00369317
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Young Patients With Down Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndromes
A Phase 3 study testing asparaginase, daunorubicin hydrochloride and cytarabine in people with Childhood Acute Basophilic Leukemia and Childhood Acute Eosinophilic Leukemia, run by Children's Oncology Group at 97 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
This phase III trial is studying how well combination chemotherapy works in treating young patients with Down syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 4 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Childhood Acute Basophilic Leukemia, Childhood Acute Eosinophilic Leukemia, Childhood Acute Erythroleukemia (M6)
- What is being tested?
- asparaginase, daunorubicin hydrochloride and cytarabine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 205 participants
- Where
- 97 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2007to 31 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 4 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis DS or DS mosaicism by karyotype or chromosomal analysis
- Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with < 30% blasts or acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
- Newly diagnosed disease
- Patients with a history of transient myeloproliferative disorder (TMD) are eligible provided the patient is diagnosed with AML or MDS at > 90 days of age AND meets either of the following criteria:
- At least 30% blasts in the bone marrow regardless of time since resolution of TMD
- More than 8 weeks since resolution of TMD with ≥ 5% blasts in the bone marrow
Show all 28Show fewer
- Immunophenotype required for study entry
- No promyelocytic leukemia
- Shortening fraction ≥ 27% by echocardiogram OR ejection fraction ≥ 50% by radionuclide angiogram
- Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- AST or ALT < 2.5 times ULN
- Creatinine adjusted according to age as follows:
- No greater than 0.4 mg/dL (≤ 5 months)
- No greater than 0.5 mg/dL (6 months -11 months)
- No greater than 0.6 mg/dL (1 year-23 months)
- No greater than 0.8 mg/dL (2 years-5 years)
- No greater than 1.0 mg/dL (6 years-9 years)
- No greater than 1.2 mg/dL (10 years-12 years)
- No greater than 1.4 mg/dL (13 years and over [female])
- No greater than 1.5 mg/dL (13 years to 15 years [male])
- No greater than 1.7 mg/dL (16 years and over [male])
- Creatinine clearance or radioisotope glomerular filtration rate at least 70 mL/min
- No evidence of dyspnea at rest
- No exercise intolerance
- Pulse oximetry > 94%
- No prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or any antileukemic therapy
- Intrathecal cytarabine therapy given at diagnosis allowed
- Prior therapy for TMD allowed
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
97 sites in 4 countries.
97 sites in 4 countries
United States88 sites
Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron
Akron, Ohio, 44308
C S Mott Children's Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta - Egleston
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Sinai Hospital of Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21215
Johns Hopkins University-Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Eastern Maine Medical Center
Bangor, Maine, 04401
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20889-5600
Saint Luke's Mountain States Tumor Institute
Boise, Idaho, 83712
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
University of Vermont
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
Lurie Children's Hospital-Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60614
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Palmetto Health Richland
Columbia, South Carolina, 29203
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Wayne State University-Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Saint John Hospital and Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48236
Southern California Permanente Medical Group
Downey, California, 90242
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Sanford Medical Center-Fargo
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Hurley Medical Center
Flint, Michigan, 48502
Broward Health Medical Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316
Cook Children's Medical Center
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Penn State Hershey Children's Hospital
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Memorial Healthcare System - Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
University of Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University Medical Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Riley Hospital for Children
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Saint Vincent Hospital and Health Services
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Nemours Children's Clinic - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207-8426
The Childrens Mercy Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108
Nevada Cancer Research Foundation CCOP
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Miller Children's Hospital
Long Beach, California, 90806
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Kosair Children's Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Covenant Children's Hospital
Lubbock, Texas, 79410
Children's Hospital Central California
Madera, California, 93636-8762
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105
Midwest Children's Cancer Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota - Minneapolis
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55404
University of Minnesota Medical Center-Fairview
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Saint Peter's University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901
UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903
Tulane University Health Sciences Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
Newark, New Jersey, 07112
Childrens Hospital-King's Daughters
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Children's Hospital and Research Center at Oakland
Oakland, California, 94609-1809
Kaiser Permanente-Oakland
Oakland, California, 94611
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Children's Hospital and Medical Center of Omaha
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198
Childrens Hospital of Orange County
Orange, California, 92868-3874
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital.
Park Ridge, Illinois, 60068
Saint Jude Midwest Affiliate
Peoria, Illinois, 61602
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Saint Christopher's Hospital for Children
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19134
Phoenix Childrens Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
Legacy Emanuel Hospital and Health Center
Portland, Oregon, 97227
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642
Primary Children's Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84113
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900
Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego
San Diego, California, 92123
University of California San Francisco Medical Center-Parnassus
San Francisco, California, 94143
Seattle Children's Hospital
Seattle, Washington, 98105
Southern Illinois University
Springfield, Illinois, 62702
All Children's Hospital
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701
State University of New York Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Mary Bridge Children's Hospital and Health Center
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Ny Cancer%
Valhalla, New York, 10595
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20057
Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children
Wilmington, Delaware, 19803
Canada7 sites
Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9
Children's Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1
Janeway Child Health Centre
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3V6
Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8
British Columbia Children's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
Australia1 site
Princess Margaret Hospital for Children
Perth, Western Australia, 6008
About this study
Official title: The Treatment of Down Syndrome Children With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Under the Age of 4 Years
This phase III trial is studying how well combination chemotherapy works in treating young patients with Down syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Determine the event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival rates in pediatric patients with Down syndrome (DS) and acute myeloid leukemia AML or myelodysplastic syndromes MDS treated with induction therapy comprising cytarabine, daunorubicin hydrochloride, thioguanine, and asparaginase followed by intensification therapy comprising cytarabine and etoposide.
II. Determine if the EFS rate in these patients can be increased with an intensified course of cytarabine therapy during induction therapy, compared to the EFS rate of patients in protocol COG-A2971.
III. Determine if the number of intrathecal chemotherapy treatments can be reduced in these patients.
IV. Determine if the total cumulative anthracycline dose can be reduced in these patients.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- Determine the type and degree of treatment-related toxicity in these patients.
II. Determine the prevalence of leukemia phenotype and globin transcription factor 1 (GATA1) mutations of DS patients < 4 years of age at diagnosis.
III. Determine the relationship of GATA1 mutations with leukemia phenotype and EFS rates of DS patients < 4 years of age at diagnosis.
IV. Determine the relationship of minimal residual disease monitored by flow cytometry and remission status during and after completion of therapy based on bone marrow morphology.
- Examine parameters of in vitro drug sensitivity and in vivo Ara-C pharmacokinetics.
VI. Examine gene expression profiles by microarrays and the relationship to leukemia phenotype and outcome.
VII. Examine the relationship of functional polymorphisms in phase I and phase II detoxification genes and DNA repair pathways that may modify susceptibility to leukemia and outcome of therapy in DS children.
VIII. Assess the effect of karyotypic abnormalities on survival. IX. Establish a DS leukemia cell bank for future biological studies.
OUTLINE: This is a nonrandomized, multicenter study.
INDUCTION THERAPY: Patients undergo 4 courses of induction therapy. Each course is 28 days.
COURSE I: Patients receive intrathecal (IT) cytarabine on day 1* and cytarabine IV continuously over 96 hours, daunorubicin hydrochloride IV continuously over 96 hours, and oral thioguanine twice daily on days 1-4.
NOTE: *Patients with Central Nervous System (CNS) disease receive cytarabine IT twice weekly for up to 6 doses; patients with persistent CNS leukemia after 6 doses of IT cytarabine are removed from the study.
COURSE II: Patients receive high-dose cytarabine IV over 3 hours twice daily on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 and asparaginase intramuscularly (IM) on days 2 and 9.
COURSE III: Patients receive treatment as in course 1.
COURSE IV: Patients receive cytarabine IV, daunorubicin hydrochloride IV, and oral thioguanine as in course 1.
Induction therapy continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with partial response, relapsed, or refractory disease after completion of course 4 are taken off study. Patients achieving complete response proceed to intensification therapy.
INTENSIFICATION THERAPY: Patients receive cytarabine IV continuously over 168 hours on days 1-7 and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for 5 years and then annually thereafter.
- Conditions
- Childhood Acute Basophilic Leukemia, Childhood Acute Eosinophilic Leukemia, Childhood Acute Erythroleukemia (M6), Childhood Acute Megakaryocytic Leukemia (M7), Childhood Acute Minimally Differentiated Myeloid Leukemia (M0), Childhood Acute Monoblastic Leukemia (M5a)
- Being tested
- asparaginase, daunorubicin hydrochloride, cytarabine, thioguanine, etoposide
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Eosinophilic, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
asparaginaseDrug
Also called ASNase, Colaspase, Crasnitin, Elspar
Given IM
daunorubicin hydrochlorideDrug
Also called Cerubidin, Cerubidine, daunomycin hydrochloride, daunorubicin
Given IV
cytarabineDrug
Also called ARA-C, arabinofuranosylcytosine, arabinosylcytosine, Cytosar-U
Given IV or IT
thioguanineDrug
Also called 6-TG
Given orally
etoposideDrug
Also called EPEG, VP-16, VP-16-213
Given IV
laboratory biomarker analysisOther
Correlative studies
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (combination chemotherapy) | Experimental | INDUCTION THERAPY COURSE I: Patients receive cytarabine IT on day 1 and cytarabine IV continuously over 96 hours, daunorubicin hydrochloride IV continuously, and oral thioguanine BID on days 1-4. COURSE II: Patients receive high-dose cytarabine IV over 3 hours BID on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 and asparaginase (IM) on days 2 and 9.
COURSE III: Patients receive treatment as in course I. COURSE IV: Patients receive cytarabine IV, daunorubicin hydrochloride IV, and oral thioguanine as in course I
INTENSIFICATION THERAPY: Patients receive cytarabine IV continuously over 168 hours on days 1-7 and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Drug: asparaginase; Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: cytarabine; Drug: thioguanine; Drug: etoposide; Other: laboratory biomarker analysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Event-free Survival (EFS) at 3 Years
Measured: Time from study entry to induction failure, relapse, or death assessed at 3 years.
Overall Survival (OS) at 3 Years
Measured: Time from study entry to death, assessed at 3 years.
Secondary outcomes (9)
Induction Remission Rate
Proportion of participants with a remission after four courses of Induction therapy.
Measured: End of induction therapy (day 112)
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Grade 3 or 4 Toxicity Assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0
Proportion of participants with at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event during therapy.
Measured: From the beginning of induction therapy to the end of intensification therapy
Prevalence of Leukemia Phenotype of DS Patients < 4 Years of Age at Diagnosis by Flow Cytometry
Proportion of participants having megakaryoblastic subtype (AMkL) phenotype among patients with phenotype data available.
Measured: At the start of therapy
Prevalence of of GATA1 Mutations of DS Patients < 4 Years of Age at Diagnosis
Proportion of participants having GATA1 mutation among patients with phenotype data available.
Measured: At baseline and at the end of therapy (intensification) or disease relapse
Proportions of Patients in Morphologic Remission With Positive MRD by Flow Cytometry
Proportion of participants in complete remission by morphology and with positive MRD by flow cytometry among patients having evaluable remission and MRD assessment.
Measured: After Induction I therapy (day 28 from start of therapy)
Cytarabine Drug Sensitivity by R-Strip (MicroMath) Curve Fitting Program
Mean and standard deviation of peak plasma concentration. Specimen draws were performed only with dose 1, day 1 of induction II of AraC. First sample drawn pre-infusion, then drawn 30 mins prior to the end of the infusion, and then drawn for 6 time periods post infusion up to 8 hours post infusion (and before the 2nd dose of AraC). Results are based from these multiple time points on Day 1 of Induction II only.
Measured: Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of induction II
Cytarabine Drug Sensitivity by R-Strip (MicroMath) Curve Fitting Program
Mean and standard deviation of area under the concentration time curve. Specimen draws were performed only with dose 1, day 1 of induction II of AraC. First sample drawn pre-infusion, then drawn 30 mins prior to the end of the infusion, and then drawn for 6 time periods post infusion up to 8 hours post infusion (and before the 2nd dose of AraC). Results are based from these multiple time points on Day 1 of Induction II only.
Measured: Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of induction II
Cytarabine Drug Sensitivity by R-Strip (MicroMath) Curve Fitting Program
Mean and standard deviation of half-life of elimination. Specimen draws were performed only with dose 1, day 1 of induction II of AraC. First sample drawn pre-infusion, then drawn 30 mins prior to the end of the infusion, and then drawn for 6 time periods post infusion up to 8 hours post infusion (and before the 2nd dose of AraC). Results are based from these multiple time points on Day 1 of Induction II only.
Measured: Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of induction II
Gene Expression Profiles by Microarrays
A hierarchical clustering algorithm is used to assemble the genes into a dendrogram or tree structure with branches containing genes with similar patterns of expression. This ordered representation can be graphically displayed with colors that reflect the qualitative and quantitative relationships of the expressed genes.
Measured: At baseline and at the time of relapse (if available)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Aug 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2007
- Primary completion1 Dec 2013
- Study completion31 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Childhood Acute Basophilic LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Children's Oncology GroupThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 205 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jeffrey Taub, MD, Principal investigator, Children's Oncology Group
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00369317
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AAML0431
- Other IDs
- NCI-2009-00318, CDR0000492776, COG-AAML0431, AAML0431, U10CA098543
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 24 Aug 2006
- Last updated
- 28 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Taub JW, Berman JN, Hitzler JK, Sorrell AD, Lacayo NJ, Mast K, Head D, Raimondi S, Hirsch B, Ge Y, Gerbing RB, Wang YC, Alonzo TA, Campana D, Coustan-Smith E, Mathew P, Gamis AS. Improved outcomes for myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome: a report from the Children's Oncology Group AAML0431 trial. Blood. 2017 Jun 22;129(25):3304-3313. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-01-764324. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
PubMed 28389462
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Treatment of Down Syndrome Children With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Under the Age of 4 Years
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00369317
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AAML0431
- Conditions
- Childhood Acute Basophilic Leukemia, Childhood Acute Eosinophilic Leukemia, Childhood Acute Erythroleukemia (M6), Childhood Acute Megakaryocytic Leukemia (M7), Childhood Acute Minimally Differentiated Myeloid Leukemia (M0), Childhood Acute Monoblastic Leukemia (M5a)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 205 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Mar 2007
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Aug 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Jan 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This phase III trial is studying how well combination chemotherapy works in treating young patients with Down syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Determine the event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival rates in pediatric patients with Down syndrome (DS) and acute myeloid leukemia AML or myelodysplastic syndromes MDS treated with induction therapy comprising cytarabine, daunorubicin hydrochloride, thioguanine, and asparaginase followed by intensification therapy comprising cytarabine and etoposide.
II. Determine if the EFS rate in these patients can be increased with an intensified course of cytarabine therapy during induction therapy, compared to the EFS rate of patients in protocol COG-A2971.
III. Determine if the number of intrathecal chemotherapy treatments can be reduced in these patients.
IV. Determine if the total cumulative anthracycline dose can be reduced in these patients.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- Determine the type and degree of treatment-related toxicity in these patients.
II. Determine the prevalence of leukemia phenotype and globin transcription factor 1 (GATA1) mutations of DS patients < 4 years of age at diagnosis.
III. Determine the relationship of GATA1 mutations with leukemia phenotype and EFS rates of DS patients < 4 years of age at diagnosis.
IV. Determine the relationship of minimal residual disease monitored by flow cytometry and remission status during and after completion of therapy based on bone marrow morphology.
- Examine parameters of in vitro drug sensitivity and in vivo Ara-C pharmacokinetics.
VI. Examine gene expression profiles by microarrays and the relationship to leukemia phenotype and outcome.
VII. Examine the relationship of functional polymorphisms in phase I and phase II detoxification genes and DNA repair pathways that may modify susceptibility to leukemia and outcome of therapy in DS children.
VIII. Assess the effect of karyotypic abnormalities on survival. IX. Establish a DS leukemia cell bank for future biological studies.
OUTLINE: This is a nonrandomized, multicenter study.
INDUCTION THERAPY: Patients undergo 4 courses of induction therapy. Each course is 28 days.
COURSE I: Patients receive intrathecal (IT) cytarabine on day 1* and cytarabine IV continuously over 96 hours, daunorubicin hydrochloride IV continuously over 96 hours, and oral thioguanine twice daily on days 1-4.
NOTE: *Patients with Central Nervous System (CNS) disease receive cytarabine IT twice weekly for up to 6 doses; patients with persistent CNS leukemia after 6 doses of IT cytarabine are removed from the study.
COURSE II: Patients receive high-dose cytarabine IV over 3 hours twice daily on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 and asparaginase intramuscularly (IM) on days 2 and 9.
COURSE III: Patients receive treatment as in course 1.
COURSE IV: Patients receive cytarabine IV, daunorubicin hydrochloride IV, and oral thioguanine as in course 1.
Induction therapy continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with partial response, relapsed, or refractory disease after completion of course 4 are taken off study. Patients achieving complete response proceed to intensification therapy.
INTENSIFICATION THERAPY: Patients receive cytarabine IV continuously over 168 hours on days 1-7 and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for 5 years and then annually thereafter.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (combination chemotherapy) | Experimental | Drug: asparaginase, Drug: daunorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: cytarabine, Drug: thioguanine, Drug: etoposide, Other: laboratory biomarker analysisINDUCTION THERAPY COURSE I: Patients receive cytarabine IT on day 1 and cytarabine IV continuously over 96 hours, daunorubicin hydrochloride IV continuously, and oral thioguanine BID on days 1-4. COURSE II: Patients receive high-dose cytarabine IV over 3 hours BID on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 and asparaginase (IM) on days 2 and 9. COURSE III: Patients receive treatment as in course I. COURSE IV: Patients receive cytarabine IV, daunorubicin hydrochloride IV, and oral thioguanine as in course I INTENSIFICATION THERAPY: Patients receive cytarabine IV continuously over 168 hours on days 1-7 and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 4 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Diagnosis DS or DS mosaicism by karyotype or chromosomal analysis
- Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with < 30% blasts or acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
- Patients with a history of transient myeloproliferative disorder (TMD) are eligible provided the patient is diagnosed with AML or MDS at > 90 days of age AND meets either of the following criteria:
- Immunophenotype required for study entry
- No promyelocytic leukemia
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| asparaginaseAlso: ASNase, Colaspase, Crasnitin, ElsparGiven IM | Drug | Treatment (combination chemotherapy) |
| daunorubicin hydrochlorideAlso: Cerubidin, Cerubidine, daunomycin hydrochloride, daunorubicinGiven IV | Drug | Treatment (combination chemotherapy) |
| cytarabineAlso: ARA-C, arabinofuranosylcytosine, arabinosylcytosine, Cytosar-UGiven IV or IT | Drug | Treatment (combination chemotherapy) |
| thioguanineAlso: 6-TGGiven orally | Drug | Treatment (combination chemotherapy) |
| etoposideAlso: EPEG, VP-16, VP-16-213Given IV | Drug | Treatment (combination chemotherapy) |
| laboratory biomarker analysisCorrelative studies | Other | Treatment (combination chemotherapy) |
Primary outcome
Event-free Survival (EFS) at 3 Years
Time frame: Time from study entry to induction failure, relapse, or death assessed at 3 years.
Overall Survival (OS) at 3 Years
Time frame: Time from study entry to death, assessed at 3 years.
9 secondary outcomes
Induction Remission Rate
Time frame: End of induction therapy (day 112)
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Grade 3 or 4 Toxicity Assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0
Time frame: From the beginning of induction therapy to the end of intensification therapy
Prevalence of Leukemia Phenotype of DS Patients < 4 Years of Age at Diagnosis by Flow Cytometry
Time frame: At the start of therapy
Prevalence of of GATA1 Mutations of DS Patients < 4 Years of Age at Diagnosis
Time frame: At baseline and at the end of therapy (intensification) or disease relapse
Proportions of Patients in Morphologic Remission With Positive MRD by Flow Cytometry
Time frame: After Induction I therapy (day 28 from start of therapy)
Cytarabine Drug Sensitivity by R-Strip (MicroMath) Curve Fitting Program
Time frame: Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of induction II
Cytarabine Drug Sensitivity by R-Strip (MicroMath) Curve Fitting Program
Time frame: Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of induction II
Cytarabine Drug Sensitivity by R-Strip (MicroMath) Curve Fitting Program
Time frame: Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of induction II
Gene Expression Profiles by Microarrays
Time frame: At baseline and at the time of relapse (if available)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jan 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28389462Taub JW, Berman JN, Hitzler JK, Sorrell AD, Lacayo NJ, Mast K, Head D, Raimondi S, Hirsch B, Ge Y, Gerbing RB, Wang YC, Alonzo TA, Campana D, Coustan-Smith E, Mathew P, Gamis AS. Improved outcomes for myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome: a report from the Children's Oncology Group AAML0431 trial. Blood. 2017 Jun 22;129(25):3304-3313. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-01-764324. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
- Data Available: Select individual patient-level data from this trial can be requested from the NCTN/NCORP Data ArchiveLink provided by the sponsor.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeffrey Taub, MD principal investigator
Children's Oncology Group
97 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing asparaginase, daunorubicin hydrochloride and cytarabine in people with Childhood Acute Basophilic Leukemia and Childhood Acute Eosinophilic Leukemia, run by Children's Oncology Group at 97 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 28 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 97 sites in United States, Canada, Australia, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jan 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Event-free Survival (EFS) at 3 Years (time frame: Time from study entry to induction failure, relapse, or death assessed at 3 years.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00369317, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2022.