Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPhase 4NCT00367055
Rosiglitazone-Metformin Combination Versus Metformin-Sulfonylurea Combination On Beta-Cell Function In Type 2 Diabetes
A Phase 4 study testing rosiglitazone-metformin, Metformin and metformin+ gliclazide in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by GlaxoSmithKline.
Trial summary
It has been shown in previous study that progressive glycemic deterioration was associated with progressive loss of b-cell function, measured by the decrease in plasma insulin levels, irrespective of the therapy used (diet, sulfonylureas or metformin).There is growing evidence that thiazolidinediones could have a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- rosiglitazone-metformin, Metformin and metformin+ gliclazide
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 2004to Oct 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males and females 40 to 75 years of age (inclusive at the time of screening)
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus as defined by the WHO criteria, diagnosed for at least 1 year
- Subjects receiving 1.5 to 3g of metformin alone at a constant dose for at least 8 weeks prior to visit 1
- Patients with 6.5% < HbA1c > 8% at visit 1 and visit 2
- 25 < BMI < 35
Who cannot join
- Patient with type 1 diabetes
- Treatment with other hypoglycaemic agents than metformin in the last 3 months
- FPG >200 mg/dL at visit 2
- Hypersensitivity to the studied treatments (rosiglitazone, metformin chlorhydrate, gliclazide)
- Congestive heart failure (NYHA class I to IV), unstable or severe angina, recent myocardial infarction
- Respiratory insufficiency
Show all 17Show fewer
- Subjects who have required the use of insulin for glycaemic control in the past 6 months prior to visit 1 (except during pregnancy or acute episodes such as hospitalization, trauma or infection) or subjects with a history of metabolic acidosis including diabetic ketoacidosis
- Anemia defined by haemoglobin concentration <11.0 g/dL for males and <10.0 g/dL for females
- Renal disease or renal dysfunction, e.g. as suggested by serum creatinine levels ≥135.0 µmol/L in males and ≥110.0 µmol/L in females and/or creatinine clearance <40 mL/min
- Presence of clinically significant hepatic disease, with ALT, AST, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase >2.5 times the upper limit of the normal reference range
- Subjects with chronic diseases requiring periodic ot intermittent treatment with oral or IV corticosteroids
- Subjects receiving danazol, miconazole or phenylbutazone
- Active alcohol, drug or medication abuse within the last 6 months or any condition that would indicate the likelihood of poor subject compliance
- Women who are lactating, pregnant or planning to become pregnant
- Any clinically significant abnormality identified at screening which, in the investigator's judgement, makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study
- Use of any other investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to visit 1
- Subjects who receive or anticipate receiving radiocontrast dye during the study
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Action of the Rosiglitazone-metformin Fixed-dose Combination and of a Metformin-sulfonylurea Free Combination on the B-cell Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Not Controlled With Metformin Alone.
It has been shown in previous study that progressive glycemic deterioration was associated with progressive loss of b-cell function, measured by the decrease in plasma insulin levels, irrespective of the therapy used (diet, sulfonylureas or metformin).There is growing evidence that thiazolidinediones could have a positive action on the b-cell function. But it has not yet been demonstrated that they could protect from a deterioration in insulin secretion in the long term. So, it appears interesting to study the long term evolution of the b-cell function and the possible protection with rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes showing evidence of loss of b-cell function with metformin alone.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- rosiglitazone-metformin, Metformin, metformin+ gliclazide
- Keywords
- Beta cell function, Type 2 diabetes, Combination treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rosiglitazone-metforminDrug
MetforminDrug
metformin+ gliclazideDrug
Also called rosiglitazone-metformin, Metformin
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Median Change From Baseline in the Insulin Secretory Capacity After a 36-month Treatment
Change from baseline in the insulin secretory capacity was measured by the assesment of blood insulin concentrations (conc.) using the hyperglycaemic clamp (HC) technique, per intravenous glucose perfusion by a catheter. Change from baseline for insulin conc peaks (highest conc level) was calculated as the Month 36 value minus the baseline value. Insulin secretion was assessed by calculating AUC during the first 10 minutes of HC (incremental and total AUC0-10 min) and the AUC after the first 10 minutes of the HC (10-180min).
Measured: Baseline and Month 36
Secondary outcomes (9)
Median Change From Baseline in the Ratio M/I After a 36-month Treatment
Measured: Baseline and Month 36
Median Change From Baseline in the Insulin Secretion Capacity After an 18-month Treatment
Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 18 value minus the baseline value. Insulin secretion capacity is measured in blood (blood level of insulin) and is a response of the pancreatic beta-cells to hyperglycemia induced by a glucose IV bolus, then infusion. Hyperglycemic clamp (HC) is a reference technique to evaluate the initial and the secondary phases of insulin secretion.
Measured: Baseline and Month 18
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Month 36
Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 36 value minus the baseline value. HbA1c levels were measured by blood draw.
Measured: Baseline and Month 36
Mean Change From Baseline in FBG at Month 36
Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 36 value minus the baseline value. FBG levels were measured by blood draw.
Measured: Baseline and Month 36
Median Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance Index (HOMA-IR) After a 36-month Treatment
Measured: Baseline and Month 36
Median Change From Baseline in Beta Cell Function Index (HOMA-beta) After a 36-month Treatment
Measured: Baseline and Month 36
Mean Change From Baseline in CPP Total and Incremental AUC T0-T30 After a 36-month Treatment
Measured: Baseline and Month 36
Mean Change From Baseline in CPP Concentration Peak and Incremental Concentration Peak T0-T30 After a 36-month Treatment
Measured: Baseline and Month 36
Mean Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Index at Months 18 and 36
Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 18 and 36 values minus the baseline value. Insulin sensitivity is measured as the quantity of glucose metabolized per unit of plasma insulin concentration.
Measured: Baseline and Months 18 and 36
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Aug 2006 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2004
- Primary completionOct 2008
- Study completionOct 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, MD, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00367055
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 101765
- Other IDs
- AVAF4001
- Status last verified
- Jul 2010
- First submitted
- 21 Aug 2006
- Last updated
- 27 Jul 2010
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jul 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Action of the Rosiglitazone-metformin Fixed-dose Combination and of a Metformin-sulfonylurea Free Combination on the B-cell Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Not Controlled With Metformin Alone.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00367055
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 101765
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Beta cell function, Type 2 diabetes, Combination treatment
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2004
- Primary completion
- Oct 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Aug 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Nov 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It has been shown in previous study that progressive glycemic deterioration was associated with progressive loss of b-cell function, measured by the decrease in plasma insulin levels, irrespective of the therapy used (diet, sulfonylureas or metformin).There is growing evidence that thiazolidinediones could have a positive action on the b-cell function. But it has not yet been demonstrated that they could protect from a deterioration in insulin secretion in the long term. So, it appears interesting to study the long term evolution of the b-cell function and the possible protection with rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes showing evidence of loss of b-cell function with metformin alone.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Males and females 40 to 75 years of age (inclusive at the time of screening)
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus as defined by the WHO criteria, diagnosed for at least 1 year
- Subjects receiving 1.5 to 3g of metformin alone at a constant dose for at least 8 weeks prior to visit 1
- Patients with 6.5% < HbA1c > 8% at visit 1 and visit 2
- 25 < BMI < 35
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Patient with type 1 diabetes
- Treatment with other hypoglycaemic agents than metformin in the last 3 months
- FPG >200 mg/dL at visit 2
- Hypersensitivity to the studied treatments (rosiglitazone, metformin chlorhydrate, gliclazide)
- Congestive heart failure (NYHA class I to IV), unstable or severe angina, recent myocardial infarction
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rosiglitazone-metformin | Drug | – |
| Metformin | Drug | – |
| metformin+ gliclazideAlso: rosiglitazone-metformin, Metformin | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Median Change From Baseline in the Insulin Secretory Capacity After a 36-month Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Month 36
Change from baseline in the insulin secretory capacity was measured by the assesment of blood insulin concentrations (conc.) using the hyperglycaemic clamp (HC) technique, per intravenous glucose perfusion by a catheter. Change from baseline for insulin conc peaks (highest conc level) was calculated as the Month 36 value minus the baseline value. Insulin secretion was assessed by calculating AUC during the first 10 minutes of HC (incremental and total AUC0-10 min) and the AUC after the first 10 minutes of the HC (10-180min).
9 secondary outcomes
Median Change From Baseline in the Ratio M/I After a 36-month Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Month 36
Median Change From Baseline in the Insulin Secretion Capacity After an 18-month Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Month 18
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Month 36
Time frame: Baseline and Month 36
Mean Change From Baseline in FBG at Month 36
Time frame: Baseline and Month 36
Median Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance Index (HOMA-IR) After a 36-month Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Month 36
Median Change From Baseline in Beta Cell Function Index (HOMA-beta) After a 36-month Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Month 36
Mean Change From Baseline in CPP Total and Incremental AUC T0-T30 After a 36-month Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Month 36
Mean Change From Baseline in CPP Concentration Peak and Incremental Concentration Peak T0-T30 After a 36-month Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Month 36
Mean Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Index at Months 18 and 36
Time frame: Baseline and Months 18 and 36
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jul 2010.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials, MD study director
GlaxoSmithKline
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing rosiglitazone-metformin, Metformin and metformin+ gliclazide in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by GlaxoSmithKline.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Nov 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Median Change From Baseline in the Insulin Secretory Capacity After a 36-month Treatment (time frame: Baseline and Month 36). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2010.