Neoplasms, ProstatePhase 4NCT00363311
Assessment Of Dutasteride (AVODART) In Extending The Time To Progression Of Low-Risk, Localized Prostate Cancer In Men
A Phase 4 study testing Dutasteride in people with Neoplasms, Prostate, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 82 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of dutasteride on the inhibition of low-risk, localized prostate cancer progression in men who would otherwise receive no active therapy (expectant management). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 80 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Neoplasms, Prostate
- What is being tested?
- Dutasteride
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 302 participants
- Where
- 82 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2006to Jul 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 80 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be male ≥48 and ≤82 years of age
- Have biopsy proven, low-risk, localized prostate cancer and active in expectant management not more than 14 months. [For the purposes of assessing subject eligibility a diagnostic biopsy must have included at least 10 cores, (< 4 cores positive and <50% of any one core positive) and must have been obtained within 8 months of screening]. If a saturation biopsy was performed (20 or more cores obtained) 2-3 cores are to be positive for prostate cancer and with <50% of any one core positive. Initial diagnosis of T1a/T1b obtained during a Transrectal ultrasound (TURP) is not allowed.
- Gleason score ≤6 [Gleason pattern 4 or above must not be present on any biopsy (initial or entry)]
- Clinical stage T1c-T2a
- Serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ≤11ng/mL. If the screening PSA value from the central laboratory is greater than 11ng/ml, one PSA retest is allowed through the central laboratory
- A life expectancy greater than five years.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Able to swallow and retain oral medication
- Able and willing to participate in the full 3 years of the study
- Able to read and write (health outcomes questionnaires are self-administered), understand instructions related to study procedures and give written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Subject has ever been treated for prostate cancer with any of the following:
- Radiotherapy (external beam or brachytherapy)
- Chemotherapy
- Hormonal therapy (e.g., megestrol, medroxyprogesterone, cyproterone, diethylstilbestrol (DES)
- Oral glucocorticoids
- Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues (e.g., leuprolide, goserelin)
Show all 24Show fewer
- Glucocorticoids, except inhaled or topical, are not permitted within 3 months prior to visit one
- Current and/or previous use of the following medications:
- Finasteride (Proscar, Propecia), or Dutasteride (GI198745, AVODART) exposure within 6 months prior to study entry are excluded.
- Any other investigational 5α-reductase inhibitors within the past 12 months.
- Anabolic steroids (subject must discontinued for 6 months prior to study entry to be eligible)
- Drugs with antiandrogenic properties within the past 6 months (e.g,. spironolactone, flutamide, bicalutamide, *cimetidine, *ketoconazole, metronidazole, progestational agents) NOTE: Use of dietary and herbal supplements (e.g., selenium, Vitamin E, saw palmetto) during the study is discouraged but not prohibited. All dietary and herbal supplement usage will be recorded in the case report form (CRF).
- The use of cimetidine is permitted prior to study entry. The use of topical ketoconazole is permitted prior to and during the study.
- Prostate volume >80 cc
- Subject has had prior prostatic surgery including Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate (TUNA), TURP, Transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP), laser treatment, thermotherapy, balloon dilatation, prosthesis, and ultrasound ablation within 3 months of enrolment
- Severe Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) symptoms as manifested by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) symptom score (calculated using the first 7 questions only) of ≥25 or >20 if already on alpha blocker therapy.
- Participation in any investigational or marketed drug trial within the 30 days prior to the first dose of study drug or anytime during the study period.
- Any unstable serious co-existing medical condition(s) including but not limited to myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, unstable angina, cardiac arrhythmias, clinically evident congestive heart failure, or cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to Screening visit; uncontrolled diabetes or peptic ulcer disease which is uncontrolled by medical management.
- Abnormal liver function test (greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal for alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], or alkaline phosphatase [ALP]); or bilirubin >1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
- Serum creatinine >1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
- History of another malignancy within five years that could affect the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
- History or current evidence of drug or alcohol abuse within the last 12 months.
- History of any illness (including psychiatric) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose additional risk to the subject.
- Known hypersensitivity to any 5α-reductase inhibitor or to any drug chemically related to dutasteride.
Trial locations and contacts
82 sites in 2 countries.
82 sites in 2 countries
United States58 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Albany, New York, 12208
GSK Investigational Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109
GSK Investigational Site
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
GSK Investigational Site
Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, 19004
GSK Investigational Site
Beverly Hills, California, 90210
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
GSK Investigational Site
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 83814
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
GSK Investigational Site
Elmont, New York, 11003
GSK Investigational Site
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825
GSK Investigational Site
Garden City, New York, 11530
GSK Investigational Site
Greenbelt, Maryland, 20770
GSK Investigational Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403
GSK Investigational Site
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202
GSK Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
GSK Investigational Site
Laguna Hills, California, 92653
GSK Investigational Site
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604
GSK Investigational Site
Largo, Florida, 33773
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148
GSK Investigational Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211
GSK Investigational Site
Marlton, New Jersey, 08053
GSK Investigational Site
Melrose Park, Illinois, 60160
GSK Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
GSK Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota
GSK Investigational Site
Mission Hills, California, 91345
GSK Investigational Site
Modesto, California, 95350
GSK Investigational Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
GSK Investigational Site
New Britain, Connecticut, 06052
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10016
GSK Investigational Site
Newburgh, Indiana, 47630
GSK Investigational Site
Orchard Park, New York, 14127
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32803
GSK Investigational Site
Overland Park, Kansas, 66211
GSK Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
GSK Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23235
GSK Investigational Site
Roswell, Georgia, 30076
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303
GSK Investigational Site
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
GSK Investigational Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
GSK Investigational Site
San Bernardino, California, 92404
GSK Investigational Site
Seattle, Washington, 98101
GSK Investigational Site
Seattle, Washington, 98166
GSK Investigational Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71106
GSK Investigational Site
Spokane, Washington, 99202
GSK Investigational Site
Springfield, Oregon, 97477
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63136
GSK Investigational Site
Syracuse, New York, 13210
GSK Investigational Site
Temple, Texas, 76508
GSK Investigational Site
Torrance, California, 90506
GSK Investigational Site
Trumbull, Connecticut, 06611
GSK Investigational Site
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23455
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20307
GSK Investigational Site
Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472
GSK Investigational Site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
GSK Investigational Site
Williamsburg, Virginia, 23185
GSK Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Canada24 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 7G1
GSK Investigational Site
Brampton, Ontario, L6T 3J1
GSK Investigational Site
Brantford, Ontario, N3R 4N3
GSK Investigational Site
Burlington, Ontario, L7N 3V2
GSK Investigational Site
Burlington, Ontario, L7S 1V2
GSK Investigational Site
Chicoutimi, Quebec, G7H 4A3
GSK Investigational Site
Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5B8
GSK Investigational Site
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H3
GSK Investigational Site
Guelph, Ontario, N1H 5J1
GSK Investigational Site
Kitchener, Ontario, N2N 2B9
GSK Investigational Site
Laval, Quebec, H7G 2E6
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4
GSK Investigational Site
North Bay, Ontario, P1B 4Z2
GSK Investigational Site
Oakville, Ontario, L6H 3P1
GSK Investigational Site
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, H9R 4S3
GSK Investigational Site
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6
GSK Investigational Site
Scarborough Village, Ontario, M1P 2T7
GSK Investigational Site
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1N1
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4C 5T2
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M6A 3B5
GSK Investigational Site
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G9A 3V7
GSK Investigational Site
Victoria, British Columbia, V8T 5G1
GSK Investigational Site
Victoria, British Columbia, V8V 3N1
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Dutasteride in Extending the Time to Progression of Low-Risk, Localized Prostate Cancer in Men Who Are Candidates for or Undergoing Expectant Management
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of dutasteride on the inhibition of low-risk, localized prostate cancer progression in men who would otherwise receive no active therapy (expectant management).
- Conditions
- Neoplasms, Prostate
- Being tested
- Dutasteride, Matching placebo
- Keywords
- Dutasteride Prostate Cancer Expectant management REDEEM
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DutasterideDrug
Dutasteride 0.5mg
Matching placeboDrug
Matching placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dutasteride | Active comparator | Dutasteride 0.5mg Receives: Drug: Dutasteride |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Matching placebo Receives: Drug: Matching placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Prostate Cancer (PCa) Progression [Restricted Crude Rate Analysis: Number of Participants With PCa Divided by Number of Participants in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population Who Had >=1 Post-baseline Biopsy or Had a Progression
PC progression (prog.) was defined as the earliest occurrence of primary therapy, also referred to as therapeutic prog., for PC (prostatectomy/radiation/hormonal therapy); or pathological prog., defined as 1 of the following: >=4 cores involved; >=50% of any 1 core involved; or a Gleason pattern of >=4 as a result of any on-study/for-cause biopsy. Primary Gleason grade is assigned to the most common tumor pattern; a second grade to the next most common tumor pattern. The two grades are added together to get a score. Gleason grade= 1-5; Gleason score=2-10; 5 and 10 indicate worst prognosis.
Measured: Year 1.5 and Overall (Years 0-3)
Secondary outcomes (29)
Number of Participants With Therapeutic Progression
Primary therapy, also referred to as therapeutic progression, for prostate cancer can be one of the following: prostatectomy, radiation, or hormonal therapy.
Measured: Year 1.5 and Overall (Years 0-3)
Number of Participants With Pathologic Progression
Pathological progression is defined as one of the following: >=4 cores involved; >=50% of any 1 core involved; or a Gleason pattern of >=4 as a result of any on-study/for-cause biopsy. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathologists recommendations for Gleason scoring (GS) were used to grade tumors. A primary grade is assigned to the most common tumor pattern, and a second grade to the next most common tumor pattern. The two grades are added together to get a GS. The Gleason grade=1-5, with 5 having the worst prognosis. The Gleason score=2-10, with 10 having the worst prognosis.
Measured: Year 1.5 and Overall (Years 0-3)
Participants With at Least One Post-baseline Biopsy With the Indicated Prostate Cancer (PCa) Diagnosis
All participants were required by protocol to undergo a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. If a for-cause biopsy occurred within 6 months prior to the protocol-mandated biopsy, the biopsy was counted as the protocol-mandated biopsy. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist.
Measured: Baseline to Month 18
Participants With at Least One Post-baseline Biopsy With the Indicated Prostate Cancer (PCa) Diagnosis for Their Final Biopsy
All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. If a for-cause biopsy occurred within 6 months prior to the protocol-mandated biopsy, the biopsy was counted as the protocol-mandated biopsy. The final biopsy is defined as the latest post-baseline biopsy for which the results are available from the central pathology laboratory.
Measured: Years 0-3
Number of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy
All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. . The final biopsy is defined as the latest post-baseline biopsy for which the results are available from the central pathology laboratory.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)
Change From Baseline in the Number of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy at Years 1.5, 3, and 0-3
All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. Change from baseline was calculated as the number of cancer-positive cores at post-baseline biopsy minus the number of cancer-positive cores at baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)
Mean Percentage of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy
All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsies (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. The sum of cancer positive cores and the sum of evaluated cores were used to compute the percentage (100* number of positive cores/number of evaluated cores).
Measured: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy at Years 1.5, 3, and 0-3
All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. (100 * number of positive cores/number of evaluated cores).
Measured: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)
Cumulative Length of Cancer Tumor Core
All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. Tumor length is calculated as the number of cores (12) * total tumor length/number of evaluated cores.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)
Change From Baseline in the Cumulative Length of Cancer Tumor Core at Years 1.5, 3, and 0-3
All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Gleason Score (GS) on Repeat Biopsy at Year 1.5
The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathologists recommendations for Gleason scoring were used to grade tumors. A primary grade is assigned to the most common tumor pattern (how the cancer cells look under a microscope), and a second grade to the next most common pattern. The two grades are added together to get a GS. Gleason grade range= 1-5; 5=worst prognosis. GS range=2-10; 10=worst prognosis. Improvement is defined as a decrease in GS from a baseline score of 6 (GS<=6; includes no cancer); worsening is defined as an increase in GS from a baseline score of 6 (GS >6).
Measured: Year 1.5
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Gleason Score on Repeat Biopsy at Years 0-3
The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathologists recommendations for Gleason scoring were used to grade tumors. A primary grade is assigned to the most common tumor pattern (how the cancer cells look under a microscope), and a second grade to the next most common pattern. The two grades are added together to get a GS. Gleason grade range= 1-5; 5=worst prognosis. GS range=2-10; 10=worst prognosis. Improvement is defined as a decrease in GS from a baseline score of 6 (GS<=6; includes no cancer); worsening is defined as an increase in GS from a baseline score of 6 (GS >6).
Measured: Years 0-3 (Final Biopsy)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Total Gleason Score
All on-study or for-cause biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathologists recommendations for Gleason scoring were used to grade the tumor. A primary grade is assigned to the most common tumor pattern (how the cancer cells look under a microscope), and a secondary grade to the next most common tumor pattern. The two grades are added together to get a GS. The Gleason grade ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 having the worst prognosis. The Gleason score ranges from 2 to 10, with 10 having the worst prognosis.
Measured: Years 0-3 (Final Biopsy)
Number of Biopsies With the Indicated Clinical Tumor Stage at Baseline
All on-study or for-cause biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathologists recommendations for clinical tumor staging were used. T1c = tumor identified by needle biopsy (e.g., because of elevated prostate-specific antigen [PSA]); T2 = tumor confined within the prostate; T2a = tumor involves one-half of one lobe, but not both lobes of the prostate.
Measured: Baseline
Number of Post-baseline Biopsies With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Clinical Stage
All on-study or for-cause biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. The National Comprehensive Network (NCCN), 2005 clinical practices guidelines in Oncology-prostate cancer were used for clinical tumor staging. T0: no evidence of primary tumor; T1: clinically inapparent tumor, neither palpable nor visible by imaging; T2: tumor confined within the prostate; T3: tumor extends through the prostate capsule; T4: tumor is fixed or invades adjacent structures other than seminal vesicles. A clinical stage of T0 in post-baseline biopsies has been interpreted as "No Worsening."
Measured: Months 0-18
Prostate Volume (PV) LOCF
Prostate volume was determined at baseline, at Year 1.5, and at Year 3. The anteroposterior, cephalocaudal, and transverse diameters of the prostate were obtained by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to calculate the prostate volume using the following formula:
π/ 6 (anteroposterior width * cephalocaudal width * transverse width). Prostate volume calculated by pre-programmed equipment is unacceptable for the on-study prostate volume measurements.
Measured: Baseline and Years 1.5 and 3
Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Years 1.5 and 3
Prostate volume was determined at baseline, Year 1.5, and Year 3. The anteroposterior, cephalocaudal, and transverse diameters of the prostate were obtained by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to calculate the prostate volume using the following formula:
π/ 6 (anteroposterior width * cephalocaudal width * transverse width). Prostate volume calculated by pre-programmed equipment was unacceptable for the on-study prostate volume measurements.
Measured: Baseline and Years 1.5 and 3
Percent Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Years 1.5 and 3
Prostate volume was determined at baseline, Year 1.5, and Year 3. The anteroposterior, cephalocaudal, and transverse diameters of the prostate were obtained by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to calculate the prostate volume using the following formula:
π/ 6 (anteroposterior width * cephalocaudal width * transverse width). Prostate volume calculated by pre-programmed equipment is unacceptable for the on-study prostate volume measurements.
Measured: Baseline and Years 1.5 and 3
Total Memorial Anxiety Scale Scores for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC)
The MAX-PC is a self-reported measure evaluating three aspects of PC-related anxiety: general anxiety related to PC/treatment, fear of recurrence, and anxiety related to PSA testing. The MAX-PC consists of 18 questions, each score ranging from 0 (least anxiety) to 3 (maximum anxiety). Total score is the sum of each question score, thus ranging from 0 to 54. A higher MAX-PC score indicates greater anxiety. At Months 18 and 36, participants were given an additional copy of the questionnaire and were asked to complete at home once they were notified of their PSA result and to send back to clinic.
Measured: Baseline and Month 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36
Change From Baseline in Total Memorial Anxiety Scale Scores for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) LOCF
The MAX-PC is a self-reported measure evaluating three aspects of PC-related anxiety: general anxiety related to PC/treatment, fear of recurrence, and anxiety related to PSA testing. The MAX-PC consists of 18 questions, each score ranging from 0 (least anxiety) to 3 (maximum anxiety). Total score is the sum of each question score, thus ranging from 0 to 54. A higher MAX-PC score indicates greater anxiety. At Months 18 and 36, participants were given an additional copy of the questionnaire and were asked to complete at home once they were notified of their PSA result and to send back to clinic.
Measured: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36
Total MAX-PC Anxiety Subscale Score Related to PSA Testing
The MAX-PC anxiety subscale consists of 3 questions related to PSA testing; "I have been so anxious about my PSA test that I have thought about delaying it.", "I have been so worried about my PSA test result that I have thought about asking my doctor to repeat the test.", "I have been so concerned about my PSA test result that I have thought about having the test repeated at another laboratory to make sure the test results were accurate." A higher MAX-PC score indicates greater anxiety.Scores range from 0 to 3 for each question. The total score is the sum of the 3 question scores; 0 to 9.
Measured: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36
Change From Baseline in MAX-PC Anxiety Subscale Score Related to PSA Testing (LOCF)
The MAX-PC anxiety subscale consists of 3 questions related to PSA testing; "I have been so anxious about my PSA test that I have thought about delaying it.", "I have been so worried about my PSA test result that I have thought about asking my doctor to repeat the test.", "I have been so concerned about my PSA test result that I have thought about having the test repeated at another laboratory to make sure the test results were accurate." A higher MAX-PC score indicates greater anxiety.Scores range from 0 to 3 for each question. The total score is the sum of the 3 question scores; 0 to 9.
Measured: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36
Total MAX-PC Fear of Recurrence Subscale Score
The MAX-PC fear of recurrence subscale consists of 4 questions related to fear of recurrence; "Because cancer is unpredictable, I feel I cannot plan for the future.", "My fear of having my cancer getting worse gets in the way of my enjoying life.", "I am afraid of my cancer getting worse.", "I am more nervous since I was diagnosed with prostate cancer." A higher MAX-PC score indicates greater anxiety. Scores range from 0 to 3 for each question. The total score is the sum of the 4 question scores: 0 to 12.
Measured: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36
Change From Baseline in MAX-PC Fear of Recurrence Subscale Score (LOCF)
The MAX-PC fear of recurrence subscale consists of 4 questions related to fear of recurrence; "Because cancer is unpredictable, I feel I cannot plan for the future.", "My fear of having my cancer getting worse gets in the way of my enjoying life.", "I am afraid of my cancer getting worse.", "I am more nervous since I was diagnosed with prostate cancer." A higher MAX-PC score indicates greater anxiety. Scores range from 0 to 3 for each question. The total score is the sum of the 4 question scores: 0 to 12.
Measured: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36
Total Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale, Prostate Module (FACT-P) Score
The FACT-P consists of a total of 39 questions. This scale is divided into five subscales: the Physical Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); the Social/Family Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); the Emotional Well-Being Subscale (6 questions); the Functional Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); and the Prostate Cancer Subscale (12 questions). The score for each of the 39 questions ranges from 0 to 4. The total FACT-P score thus ranges from 0 to156; a higher score indicates better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Months 18 and 36
Change From Baseline in Total FACT-P Score (LOCF)
The FACT-P consists of a total of 39 questions. This scale is divided into five subscales: the Physical Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); the Social/Family Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); the Emotional Well-Being Subscale (6 questions); the Functional Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); and the Prostate Cancer Subscale (12 questions). The questionnaire was administered at baseline and at Months 18 and 36. The score for each of the 39 questions ranges from 0 to 4. The total FACT-P score thus ranges from 0 to156; a higher score indicates better QOL.
Measured: Baseline and Months 18 and 36
Percent Change From Baseline in Total FACT-P Score (LOCF)
The FACT-P consists of a total of 39 questions. This scale is divided into five subscales: the Physical Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); the Social/Family Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); the Emotional Well-Being Subscale (6 questions); the Functional Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); and the Prostate Cancer Subscale (12 questions). The questionnaire was administered at baseline and at Months 18 and 36. The score for each of the 39 questions ranges from 0 to 4. The total FACT-P score thus ranges from 0 to156; a higher score indicates better QOL.
Measured: Baseline and Months 18 and 36
Change From Baseline in FACT-P Physical Well-Being Subscale Score (LOCF)
The FACT-P Physical Well-Being subscale is divided into 7 questions, and the participants rated the outcome over the past 7 days; "I have a lack of energy.", "I have nausea.", "Because of my physical condition, I have trouble meeting the needs of my family.", "I have pain.", "I am bothered by side effects of treatment.", "I feel ill.", "I am forced to spend time in bed." The score for each question ranges from 0 to 4; a lower score indicates better physical well-being. The total FACT-P score thus ranges from 0 to156; a higher score indicates a better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Months 18 and 36
Change From Baseline in FACT-P Social Well-Being Subscale Score (LOCF)
The FACT-P Social Well-Being subscale is divided into 7 questions, and the participants rated the outcome over the past 7 days; "I feel close to my friends.", "I get emotional support from my family.", "I get support from my friends.", "My family has accepted my illness.", "I am satisfied with family communication about my illness.", "I feel close to my partner (or the person who is my main support).", "I am satisfied with my sex life." The score for each question ranges from 0 to 4; a higher score indicates better social well-being. The total FACT-P score thus ranges from 0 to 156.
Measured: Baseline and Months 18 and 36
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Aug 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2006
- Primary completionMar 2010
- Study completionJul 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neoplasms, ProstateStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00363311
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AVO105948
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2006
- Last updated
- 18 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Publications
Fleshner NE, Lucia MS, Egerdie B, Aaron L, Eure G, Nandy I, Black L, Rittmaster RS. Dutasteride in localised prostate cancer management: the REDEEM randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Mar 24;379(9821):1103-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61619-X. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
PubMed 22277570Moreira DM, Fleshner NE, Freedland SJ. Baseline Perineural Invasion is Associated with Shorter Time to Progression in Men with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Active Surveillance: Results from the REDEEM Study. J Urol. 2015 Nov;194(5):1258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.113. Epub 2015 May 16.
PubMed 25988518
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Dutasteride in Extending the Time to Progression of Low-Risk, Localized Prostate Cancer in Men Who Are Candidates for or Undergoing Expectant Management
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00363311
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AVO105948
- Conditions
- Neoplasms, Prostate
- Keywords
- Dutasteride Prostate Cancer Expectant management REDEEM
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2006
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Aug 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Jun 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of dutasteride on the inhibition of low-risk, localized prostate cancer progression in men who would otherwise receive no active therapy (expectant management).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dutasteride | Active comparator | Drug: DutasterideDutasteride 0.5mg |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Matching placeboMatching placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 80 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Must be male ≥48 and ≤82 years of age
- Have biopsy proven, low-risk, localized prostate cancer and active in expectant management not more than 14 months. [For the purposes of assessing subject eligibility a diagnostic biopsy must have included at least 10 cores, (< 4 cores positive and <50% of any one core positive) and must have been obtained within 8 months of screening]. If a saturation biopsy was performed (20 or more cores obtained) 2-3 cores are to be positive for prostate cancer and with <50% of any one core positive. Initial diagnosis of T1a/T1b obtained during a Transrectal ultrasound (TURP) is not allowed.
- Gleason score ≤6 [Gleason pattern 4 or above must not be present on any biopsy (initial or entry)]
- Clinical stage T1c-T2a
- Serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ≤11ng/mL. If the screening PSA value from the central laboratory is greater than 11ng/ml, one PSA retest is allowed through the central laboratory
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Subject has ever been treated for prostate cancer with any of the following:
- Radiotherapy (external beam or brachytherapy)
- Chemotherapy
- Hormonal therapy (e.g., megestrol, medroxyprogesterone, cyproterone, diethylstilbestrol (DES)
- Oral glucocorticoids
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DutasterideDutasteride 0.5mg | Drug | Dutasteride |
| Matching placeboMatching placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Prostate Cancer (PCa) Progression [Restricted Crude Rate Analysis: Number of Participants With PCa Divided by Number of Participants in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population Who Had >=1 Post-baseline Biopsy or Had a Progression
Time frame: Year 1.5 and Overall (Years 0-3)
PC progression (prog.) was defined as the earliest occurrence of primary therapy, also referred to as therapeutic prog., for PC (prostatectomy/radiation/hormonal therapy); or pathological prog., defined as 1 of the following: >=4 cores involved; >=50% of any 1 core involved; or a Gleason pattern of >=4 as a result of any on-study/for-cause biopsy. Primary Gleason grade is assigned to the most common tumor pattern; a second grade to the next most common tumor pattern. The two grades are added together to get a score. Gleason grade= 1-5; Gleason score=2-10; 5 and 10 indicate worst prognosis.
29 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Therapeutic Progression
Time frame: Year 1.5 and Overall (Years 0-3)
Number of Participants With Pathologic Progression
Time frame: Year 1.5 and Overall (Years 0-3)
Participants With at Least One Post-baseline Biopsy With the Indicated Prostate Cancer (PCa) Diagnosis
Time frame: Baseline to Month 18
Participants With at Least One Post-baseline Biopsy With the Indicated Prostate Cancer (PCa) Diagnosis for Their Final Biopsy
Time frame: Years 0-3
Number of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)
Change From Baseline in the Number of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy at Years 1.5, 3, and 0-3
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)
Mean Percentage of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy at Years 1.5, 3, and 0-3
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)
Cumulative Length of Cancer Tumor Core
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)
Change From Baseline in the Cumulative Length of Cancer Tumor Core at Years 1.5, 3, and 0-3
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Gleason Score (GS) on Repeat Biopsy at Year 1.5
Time frame: Year 1.5
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Gleason Score on Repeat Biopsy at Years 0-3
Time frame: Years 0-3 (Final Biopsy)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Total Gleason Score
Time frame: Years 0-3 (Final Biopsy)
Number of Biopsies With the Indicated Clinical Tumor Stage at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Post-baseline Biopsies With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Clinical Stage
Time frame: Months 0-18
Prostate Volume (PV) LOCF
Time frame: Baseline and Years 1.5 and 3
Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Years 1.5 and 3
Time frame: Baseline and Years 1.5 and 3
Percent Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Years 1.5 and 3
Time frame: Baseline and Years 1.5 and 3
Total Memorial Anxiety Scale Scores for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC)
Time frame: Baseline and Month 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36
Change From Baseline in Total Memorial Anxiety Scale Scores for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) LOCF
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36
Total MAX-PC Anxiety Subscale Score Related to PSA Testing
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36
Change From Baseline in MAX-PC Anxiety Subscale Score Related to PSA Testing (LOCF)
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36
Total MAX-PC Fear of Recurrence Subscale Score
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36
Change From Baseline in MAX-PC Fear of Recurrence Subscale Score (LOCF)
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36
Total Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale, Prostate Module (FACT-P) Score
Time frame: Baseline and Months 18 and 36
Change From Baseline in Total FACT-P Score (LOCF)
Time frame: Baseline and Months 18 and 36
Percent Change From Baseline in Total FACT-P Score (LOCF)
Time frame: Baseline and Months 18 and 36
Change From Baseline in FACT-P Physical Well-Being Subscale Score (LOCF)
Time frame: Baseline and Months 18 and 36
Change From Baseline in FACT-P Social Well-Being Subscale Score (LOCF)
Time frame: Baseline and Months 18 and 36
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jan 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22277570Fleshner NE, Lucia MS, Egerdie B, Aaron L, Eure G, Nandy I, Black L, Rittmaster RS. Dutasteride in localised prostate cancer management: the REDEEM randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Mar 24;379(9821):1103-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61619-X. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25988518Moreira DM, Fleshner NE, Freedland SJ. Baseline Perineural Invasion is Associated with Shorter Time to Progression in Men with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Active Surveillance: Results from the REDEEM Study. J Urol. 2015 Nov;194(5):1258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.113. Epub 2015 May 16.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Neoplasms, Prostate
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
82 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Dutasteride in people with Neoplasms, Prostate, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 82 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 82 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jun 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Prostate Cancer (PCa) Progression [Restricted Crude Rate Analysis: Number of Participants With PCa Divided by Number of Participants in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population Who Had >=1 Post-baseline Biopsy or Had a Progression (time frame: Year 1.5 and Overall (Years 0-3)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00363311, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.