Migrainous HeadachePhase 2NCT00355394
Treatment of Acute Migraine Headache in Children
A Phase 2 study testing Metoclopramide in people with Migrainous Headache, run by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Migraine is common in children and is one of the most common etiologies of headache leading to emergency room presentation in children. Despite this, few studies have investigated the treatment of acute migraine headache in the emergency room. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Migrainous Headache
- What is being tested?
- Metoclopramide
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2006to Mar 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Males or Females age 8-18 years
- Girls 11 years or older must have a negative urine/serum pregnancy test.
- Diagnosis of pediatric migrainous headache. The criteria for pediatric migraine headache based on the most recent ICHD criteria are listed below. The requirement of 5 attacks (A) will not be required for this study, this making the diagnosis migrainous headache. As described elsewhere in the protocol, this change is required to make the study applicable to ED patients who require treatment before five attacks have occurred.
Who cannot join
- Evidence that headache is due to a secondary underlying disorder based on history or physical examination.
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- Any investigational drug use within 30 days.
- Known to have a contraindication to metoclopramide or valproic acid such as pregnancy, liver disease, hematologic disease, or metabolic disease.
- Have used metoclopramide (or other antidopaminergic medications) or valproic acid within two days of presentation.
- Severe developmental disorders or mental retardation if insufficient information can be obtained to make a clear diagnosis of migraine or judge headache severity.
- If patients re-present to the ED, they can not be re-enrolled.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
Migraine is common in children and is one of the most common etiologies of headache leading to emergency room presentation in children. Despite this, few studies have investigated the treatment of acute migraine headache in the emergency room. We will perform a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of metoclopramide versus placebo in the treatment of acute migraine headache. The primary outcome will be the number of subjects headache free at two hours.
Read the detailed description
Migraine is common in children and is one of the most common etiologies of headache leading to emergency room presentation of children [1-3]. Despite the high prevalence, there have been few pediatric studies of the acute treatment of migraine headache. Anti-dopaminergic medications such as metoclopramide are often considered first line medications in the emergency room treatment of acute migraine [personal communication with Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Emergency Department physicians], but only two pediatric studies guide this clinical management. One was a retrospective, uncontrolled, descriptive study [4] and one was a prospective, double-blind study that compared an anti-dopaminergic medication to a different medication but did not include a control group [5]. More rigorous studies are needed to determine whether commonly utilized anti-dopaminergic medications are efficacious.
We will perform a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study of the acute treatment of pediatric migrainous headache with metoclopramide.
Primary Objective The primary objective of the study is to determine whether metoclopramide added to standard care [intravenous (iv) hydration, darkened room] is superior to placebo and standard care in resolving acute migraine headache intensity within two hours in children aged 8 to 18 years presenting to the emergency department (ED).
Secondary Objectives:
- Determine whether metoclopramide added to standard care (iv hydration, darkened room) is superior to placebo and standard care in resolving acute migraine headache intensity within one hour in children aged 8 to 18 years presenting to the emergency department.
- Determine whether metoclopramide added to standard care (iv hydration, darkened room) is superior to placebo and standard care in resolving acute migraine headache intensity at 24 hours in children aged 8 to 18 years presenting to the emergency department.
Study Design:
The study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of metoclopramide versus placebo. Subjects may receive up to two doses of study medication one hour apart.
Children who present to the emergency department with migraine headache based on International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) criteria will be eligible for enrollment. A standard assessment form will be sued to ensure children meet ICHD criteria. Children will then be randomized to receive either metoclopramide or placebo (intravenous fluid injection). Both patients and the study investigator performing assessments will be blind as to group assignment, while the Emergency Department physician will be aware of group assignment (acting as the pharmacist) so that if problems arise they can be evaluated and treated as clinically indicated. Assessment of headache and associated features will occur at one hour. If the child is not headache free, they will receive a second dose of either metoclopramide or placebo. If they received metoclopramide initially the second dose will be metoclopramide, and if they received placebo initially the second dose will be placebo. Assessment of headache and associated features will occur again at two hours. This marks the primary endpoint, as our primary objective is to determine whether metoclopramide is superior to placebo in making patients headache free at two hours.
Headache recurrence will be assessed at 24 hours.
Subject Population:
Children will be recruited from the Emergency Department. Consent and assent will be obtained as described in the protocol.
Number of Subjects:
All subjects will be recruited from the Emergency Department of a single institution. Sample size calculation suggests we will need 44 subjects for analysis.
Study Duration The total duration of the study is one day for each subject. The maximum time spent in the Emergency Department will be six hours. We expect subject enrollment to take approximately six months.
Study Phases:
- Screening Phase: Upon presentation to the Emergency Department, patients diagnosed with migrainous headache based on International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria will be considered for enrollment. If they meet inclusion and exclusion criteria they will be consented/assented and enrolled in the study.
- Basic Information Collection Basic demographic information, medical history, psychological/psychiatric history past headache history, and information regarding the current headache will be gathered.
- Double-Blind Study Subjects will be randomized to receive metoclopramide or placebo in a double blind study. Baseline headache and associated symptom data will be gathered. Assessments will be performed at one hour and two hours. The two hour assessment is the primary endpoint. If the headache has not resolved, the cross-over will occur. Children who received metoclopramide initially will receive a placebo injection and, if needed, a second injection one hour later. Children who received placebo initially will receive metoclopramide and, if needed, a second injection one hour later. Headache assessments will be performed one and two hours after the cross-over.
- Follow-up Phase Patients will rate their headache intensity and associated symptoms at one day in order to assess for recurrence.
Efficacy Evaluations:
Efficacy will be judged hourly after each medication (or placebo administration). Efficacy in reducing headache intensity will be judged on a 0-10 point numerical rating scale. The primary measure of efficacy will be headache freedom (rating of zero). Secondary measures will be improvement in headache intensity that is clinically relevant (6 point improvement) or improvement that is measurable (3 point improvement), improvement in associated symptoms (based on a 4 point categorical scale), or improvement in disability (based on a 4 point categorical scale).
Safety Evaluations:
All subjects entered in the study will be included in safety analysis. The frequency and descriptions of all adverse events will be summarized. Any serious adverse events will be described in detail.
Statistical And Analytic Plan:
Based on prior studies, we estimate a metoclopramide efficacy of 80% and placebo rate of 35%. Sample size and power calculations using an alpha value of 0.05 and power of 0.8 demonstrate that we will need to enroll 44 patients in the study. Subjects who drop out due to need for faster rescue medication will be maintained in the analysis which will be performed in an intent-to-treat manner.
- Conditions
- Migrainous Headache
- Being tested
- Metoclopramide, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Migraine Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MetoclopramideDrug
Also called Reglan
Intravenous bolus administration.
PlaceboOther
Standard care including intravenous fluid, but no metoclopramide.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Standard care including intravenous fluid, but no metoclopramide. Receives: Other: Placebo |
| Metoclopramide | Active comparator | Standard care including intravenous fluid PLUS metoclopramide. Receives: Drug: Metoclopramide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Number of Subjects With a Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) of Zero at Two Hours.
The NRS is a 0 to 10 point scale with 0 representing no headache and 10 representing severe headache.
Measured: 2 hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
The Number of Subjects With a NRS Score of Zero at One Hour.
The NRS is a 0 to 10 point scale with 0 representing no headache and 10 representing severe headache.
Measured: 1 hour
The Number of Subjects With a NRS Score of Zero at 24 Hours.
The NRS is a 0 to 10 point scale with 0 representing no headache and 10 representing severe headache.
Measured: 24 hours
Change in Headache Intensity as Measured by the NRS Score From Baseline to the One Hour Assessment.
The NRS is a 0 to 10 point scale with 0 representing no headache and 10 representing severe headache.
Measured: 1 hours
Change in Headache Intensity as Measured by the NRS Score From Baseline to the Two Hour Assessment.
The NRS is a 0 to 10 point scale with 0 representing no headache and 10 representing severe headache.
Measured: 2 hours
Change in Headache Intensity as Measured by the NRS Score From Baseline to the 24 Hour Assessment.
The NRS is a 0 to 10 point scale with 0 representing no headache and 10 representing severe headache.
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2006 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2006
- Primary completionMar 2010
- Study completionMar 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Migrainous HeadacheStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nicholas S Abend, MD, Principal investigator, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00355394
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2006-4-4755
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 19 Jul 2006
- Last updated
- 30 Nov 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Nov 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Acute Migraine Headache in Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00355394
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2006-4-4755
- Conditions
- Migrainous Headache
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2006
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Aug 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Migraine is common in children and is one of the most common etiologies of headache leading to emergency room presentation in children. Despite this, few studies have investigated the treatment of acute migraine headache in the emergency room. We will perform a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of metoclopramide versus placebo in the treatment of acute migraine headache. The primary outcome will be the number of subjects headache free at two hours.
Detailed description
Migraine is common in children and is one of the most common etiologies of headache leading to emergency room presentation of children [1-3]. Despite the high prevalence, there have been few pediatric studies of the acute treatment of migraine headache. Anti-dopaminergic medications such as metoclopramide are often considered first line medications in the emergency room treatment of acute migraine [personal communication with Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Emergency Department physicians], but only two pediatric studies guide this clinical management. One was a retrospective, uncontrolled, descriptive study [4] and one was a prospective, double-blind study that compared an anti-dopaminergic medication to a different medication but did not include a control group [5]. More rigorous studies are needed to determine whether commonly utilized anti-dopaminergic medications are efficacious.
We will perform a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study of the acute treatment of pediatric migrainous headache with metoclopramide.
Primary Objective The primary objective of the study is to determine whether metoclopramide added to standard care [intravenous (iv) hydration, darkened room] is superior to placebo and standard care in resolving acute migraine headache intensity within two hours in children aged 8 to 18 years presenting to the emergency department (ED).
Secondary Objectives:
- Determine whether metoclopramide added to standard care (iv hydration, darkened room) is superior to placebo and standard care in resolving acute migraine headache intensity within one hour in children aged 8 to 18 years presenting to the emergency department.
- Determine whether metoclopramide added to standard care (iv hydration, darkened room) is superior to placebo and standard care in resolving acute migraine headache intensity at 24 hours in children aged 8 to 18 years presenting to the emergency department.
Study Design:
The study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of metoclopramide versus placebo. Subjects may receive up to two doses of study medication one hour apart.
Children who present to the emergency department with migraine headache based on International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) criteria will be eligible for enrollment. A standard assessment form will be sued to ensure children meet ICHD criteria. Children will then be randomized to receive either metoclopramide or placebo (intravenous fluid injection). Both patients and the study investigator performing assessments will be blind as to group assignment, while the Emergency Department physician will be aware of group assignment (acting as the pharmacist) so that if problems arise they can be evaluated and treated as clinically indicated. Assessment of headache and associated features will occur at one hour. If the child is not headache free, they will receive a second dose of either metoclopramide or placebo. If they received metoclopramide initially the second dose will be metoclopramide, and if they received placebo initially the second dose will be placebo. Assessment of headache and associated features will occur again at two hours. This marks the primary endpoint, as our primary objective is to determine whether metoclopramide is superior to placebo in making patients headache free at two hours.
Headache recurrence will be assessed at 24 hours.
Subject Population:
Children will be recruited from the Emergency Department. Consent and assent will be obtained as described in the protocol.
Number of Subjects:
All subjects will be recruited from the Emergency Department of a single institution. Sample size calculation suggests we will need 44 subjects for analysis.
Study Duration The total duration of the study is one day for each subject. The maximum time spent in the Emergency Department will be six hours. We expect subject enrollment to take approximately six months.
Study Phases:
- Screening Phase: Upon presentation to the Emergency Department, patients diagnosed with migrainous headache based on International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria will be considered for enrollment. If they meet inclusion and exclusion criteria they will be consented/assented and enrolled in the study.
- Basic Information Collection Basic demographic information, medical history, psychological/psychiatric history past headache history, and information regarding the current headache will be gathered.
- Double-Blind Study Subjects will be randomized to receive metoclopramide or placebo in a double blind study. Baseline headache and associated symptom data will be gathered. Assessments will be performed at one hour and two hours. The two hour assessment is the primary endpoint. If the headache has not resolved, the cross-over will occur. Children who received metoclopramide initially will receive a placebo injection and, if needed, a second injection one hour later. Children who received placebo initially will receive metoclopramide and, if needed, a second injection one hour later. Headache assessments will be performed one and two hours after the cross-over.
- Follow-up Phase Patients will rate their headache intensity and associated symptoms at one day in order to assess for recurrence.
Efficacy Evaluations:
Efficacy will be judged hourly after each medication (or placebo administration). Efficacy in reducing headache intensity will be judged on a 0-10 point numerical rating scale. The primary measure of efficacy will be headache freedom (rating of zero). Secondary measures will be improvement in headache intensity that is clinically relevant (6 point improvement) or improvement that is measurable (3 point improvement), improvement in associated symptoms (based on a 4 point categorical scale), or improvement in disability (based on a 4 point categorical scale).
Safety Evaluations:
All subjects entered in the study will be included in safety analysis. The frequency and descriptions of all adverse events will be summarized. Any serious adverse events will be described in detail.
Statistical And Analytic Plan:
Based on prior studies, we estimate a metoclopramide efficacy of 80% and placebo rate of 35%. Sample size and power calculations using an alpha value of 0.05 and power of 0.8 demonstrate that we will need to enroll 44 patients in the study. Subjects who drop out due to need for faster rescue medication will be maintained in the analysis which will be performed in an intent-to-treat manner.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboStandard care including intravenous fluid, but no metoclopramide. |
| Metoclopramide | Active comparator | Drug: MetoclopramideStandard care including intravenous fluid PLUS metoclopramide. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Males or Females age 8-18 years
- Girls 11 years or older must have a negative urine/serum pregnancy test.
- Diagnosis of pediatric migrainous headache. The criteria for pediatric migraine headache based on the most recent ICHD criteria are listed below. The requirement of 5 attacks (A) will not be required for this study, this making the diagnosis migrainous headache. As described elsewhere in the protocol, this change is required to make the study applicable to ED patients who require treatment before five attacks have occurred.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Evidence that headache is due to a secondary underlying disorder based on history or physical examination.
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- Any investigational drug use within 30 days.
- Known to have a contraindication to metoclopramide or valproic acid such as pregnancy, liver disease, hematologic disease, or metabolic disease.
- Have used metoclopramide (or other antidopaminergic medications) or valproic acid within two days of presentation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MetoclopramideAlso: ReglanIntravenous bolus administration. | Drug | Metoclopramide |
| PlaceboStandard care including intravenous fluid, but no metoclopramide. | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
The Number of Subjects With a Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) of Zero at Two Hours.
Time frame: 2 hours
The NRS is a 0 to 10 point scale with 0 representing no headache and 10 representing severe headache.
5 secondary outcomes
The Number of Subjects With a NRS Score of Zero at One Hour.
Time frame: 1 hour
The Number of Subjects With a NRS Score of Zero at 24 Hours.
Time frame: 24 hours
Change in Headache Intensity as Measured by the NRS Score From Baseline to the One Hour Assessment.
Time frame: 1 hours
Change in Headache Intensity as Measured by the NRS Score From Baseline to the Two Hour Assessment.
Time frame: 2 hours
Change in Headache Intensity as Measured by the NRS Score From Baseline to the 24 Hour Assessment.
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Nov 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Migrainous Headache
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Glymphatic System in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of tDCS to Visual and Motor Cortex in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
App-Based Migraine Treatment: The Health enSuite Study
Migraine, Migraine With Aura
Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Study of Rimegepant for Short-term Preventive Treatment of Night-shift-related Migraine in Healthcare Professionals
Migraine Disorders
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nicholas S Abend, MD principal investigator
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Metoclopramide in people with Migrainous Headache, run by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Aug 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Number of Subjects With a Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) of Zero at Two Hours. (time frame: 2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Nov 2015.