AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailureREDUCEhfNCT00354159

Reducing Decompensation Events Utilizing Intracardiac Pressures in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (HF) (REDUCEhf)

A study testing Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD) in people with Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 52 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this clinical research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the investigational implantable hemodynamic monitor (IHM), and of the IHM in combination with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure
What is being tested?
Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
442 participants
Where
52 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2006to Jan 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects with heart failure that only sometimes interferes with daily activities (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class II (1)) or subjects with heart failure which severely limits daily activities (NYHA Class III (2)) at baseline
  • Subject has appropriate medical therapy for heart failure (such as diuretic, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and beta blocker) for at least three months prior to the baseline evaluation.
  • Subject has been on stable medications maximized to the subject's tolerance of ACE or ARB and beta blockers as determined by the study investigator for at least 30 days prior to baseline evaluation. (Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or a 50% decrease in dose.) If a subject is intolerant of ACE, ARB or beta blockers documented evidence must be available.
  • Subject has had at least one heart failure-related hospitalization or at least one heart failure-related emergency department or urgent care visit necessitating heart failure-related intravenous therapy (e.g. diuretic administration) within 12 months prior to the baseline evaluation
  • To be considered for Chronicle ICD: Subject has, or is at risk of having, a heart beat that is too fast and his/her doctor has determined he/she needs an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).
  • Class II Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina.
  • Class III Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects with severe heart failure who should always be resting (NYHA Class IV(3)) or Stage D(4) refractory heart failure.
  • Subjects with severe renal dysfunction.
  • Subjects with severe non-cardiac condition limiting 12-month survival.
  • Subjects in concurrent studies that may confound the results.
  • (3)Class IV Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure or the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
  • (4)Stage D refractory heart failure: Patients who have marked symptoms at rest despite maximal medical therapy (e.g., those who are recurrently hospitalized or cannot be safely discharged from the hospital without specialized interventions)

Trial locations and contacts

52 sites in 1 country.

52 sites in 1 country

United States52 sites
  • Lehigh Valley Heart Specialists

    Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103

  • St Joseph Mercy Hospital

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106

  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Crawford Long/Emory University Hospitals

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30308

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Brigham & Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Lahey Clinic Medical Center

    Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805

  • Fletcher Allen Health Care

    Burlington, Vermont, 05401

  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • Carolinas Medical Center

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203

  • Presbyterian Hospital Mid Carolinas Cardiology

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204

  • University of Virginia Health System

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908

  • The Christ Hospital

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Ohio State University

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • Mercy Hospital Metropolitan Cardiology Consultants

    Coon Rapids, Minnesota, 55433

  • Baylor Research Institute

    Dallas, Texas, 75226

  • UT Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

  • Genesis Hospital Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation

    Davenport, Iowa, 52803

  • Henry Ford Hospital

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • Inova Fairfax Hospital

    Falls Church, Virginia, 22042

  • University of FL Shands

    Gainesville, Florida, 32610

  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32224

  • Mid America Heart Institute/St. Lukes

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64111

  • Scripps Green Hospital

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Lancaster Heart & Stroke Foundation

    Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17603

  • Bryan LGH Heart Institute

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68506

  • Loma Linda University Medical Center

    Loma Linda, California, 92354

  • Midwest Heart Foundation

    Lombard, Illinois, 60148

  • Long Beach Memorial

    Long Beach, California, 90806

  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • Doctors Medical Center Modesto

    Modesto, California, 95350

  • Morristown Memorial Hospital

    Morristown, New Jersey, 07962

  • Baptist Hospital

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • St Thomas

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37205

  • Yale University, School of Medicine

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06510

  • Mt Sinai Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Christiana Care Hospital

    Newark, Delaware, 19718

  • Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23507

  • University of Oklahoma

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Oklahoma Heart Hospital

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120

  • Drexel University College of Medicine

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102

  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Allegheny General Hospital

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212

  • Spartanburg Regional

    Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • North Mississippi Medical Center

    Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801

  • Iowa Heart Center

    West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266

  • Forsyth Medical Center

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103

  • University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655

  • Lankenau Hospital

    Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Reducing Decompensation Events Utilizing Intracardiac Pressures in Patients With Chronic HF (REDUCEhf)

The purpose of this clinical research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the investigational implantable hemodynamic monitor (IHM), and of the IHM in combination with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The investigational IHM has the ability to record and report the force with which the heart pumps blood (heart pressures). When combined with the ICD, the device has the additional ability to send a strong electrical impulse, or shock, to the heart when it detects dangerously fast heartbeats to return it to a normal rhythm. The IHM and IHM/ICD are implanted surgically just under the skin in the upper chest area. This study will also determine how doctors use the information related to heart pressures in the management of heart failure.

Conditions
Heart Failure
Being tested
Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD)
Keywords
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Intracardiac pressures
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD)Device

    Also called Chronicle® IHM, Chronicle® ICD

    Surgical implantation of hemodynamic device (IHM), or IHM/ICD, and intracardiac leads.

Study groups in NCT00354159
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment ArmExperimentalPhysicians have access to device-based hemodynamic monitor information to guide patient management
Receives: Device: Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD)
Control ArmPlacebo comparatorPhysicians do not have access to device-based hemodynamic monitor information to guide patient management
Receives: Device: Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent of Subjects With an Attempted Implant of the Chronicle ICD System Free From System-related Chronicle ICD Complications at 6-months Post-implant.

    A Chronicle ICD system-related complication was defined as any system-related adverse event that occurred during the clinical investigation which is (1) treated with invasive means (including intravenous drug therapy), (2) results in death or serious injury of subject, (3) results in the explant of any Chronicle ICD component,and/or (4) causes permanent loss of significant function of the implanted system.

    Measured: Within 6 months post-implant

  2. Percent of Subjects With an Attempted Chronicle IHM Implant Free From Chronicle IHM System-related Complications at 6-months Post-implant

    A Chronicle IHM system-related complication was defined as any system-related adverse event that occurred during the clinical investigation which is (1) treated with invasive means (including intravenous drug therapy), (2) results in death or serious injury of subject, (3) results in the explant of any Chronicle IHM component,and/or (4) causes permanent loss of significant function of the implanted system.

    Measured: 6 months post implant

  3. Relative Risk Reduction of All Heart Failure Related Events in the Treatment Group Compared to the Control Group

    The rate of HF-related events (hospitalizations >24h, hospitalizations <24h with IV therapy, ED visits with IV therapy, and urgent clinic visits with IV therapy) during the 12-month randomized follow-up period was compared between the Chronicle and Control groups.

    Measured: 12 months post-implant

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Cumulative Days in the Hospital for Heart Failure

    The endpoint for this objective was defined as the cumulative days in hospital for heart failure (HF) expressed as a percentage of hospital free follow-up days during the 12-month randomized period. The relatedness of the events was based on the primary reason for which the subject was originally admitted to the hospital or seen in the emergency department or at an urgent visit, not on the development of new events that occur during hospitalization.

    Measured: 12 months post-implant

  2. Relative Risk Reduction of Cardiovascular Related Events in the Treatment Group Compared to the Control Group

    The rate of CV-related events (hospitalizations >24h, hospitalizations <24h with IV therapy, ED visits with IV therapy, and urgent clinic visits with IV therapy) during the 12-month randomized follow-up period was compared between the Chronicle and Control groups.

    Measured: 12 months post-implant

  3. Freedom From All Cause Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization

    Death from any cause or heart failure related hospitalization greater than 24 hours during the 12-month randomized period

    Measured: 12 months post-implant

  4. Relative Risk of All-cause Events

    All-cause events were defined as hospitalizations, hospitalizations <24 hours necessitating intravenous therapy, emergency department visits necessitating intravenous therapy or urgent visits necessitating intravenous therapy.

    Measured: 12 months post-implant

  5. Percentage of Randomized Subjects at Each Level of the Composite Response Endpoint Between the Treatment Arm and the Control Arm.

    The definitions of worsened, improved, and unchanged are as follows:

    Worsened: Subject dies, is hospitalized for worsening heart failure, permanently discontinues blinded randomized assignment and has worsening heart failure at time of study discontinuation, demonstrates worsening NYHA Class at LOCF, or moderate-marked worsening of global assessment score at LOCF.

    Improved: Subject has not worsened, and demonstrates improvement in NYHA class and/or moderate-marked improvement in subject global assessment score.

    Unchanged: Subject is neither worsened nor improved.

    Measured: 12 months post implant

  6. Characterize Health Resource Utilization

    Percentage of randomized days spent in the intensive care unit for heart failure. Reason for hospitalization was determined by the adverse event adjudication committee.

    Measured: 12 months post implant

  7. Characterize Randomized Days Alive Out of Hospital

    Randomized days alive outside of the hospital was computed for each subject as the total number of randomized days minus the number of randomized days spent in the hospital for any cause.

    Measured: 12 months post implant

  8. Characterize Subject Survival

    Death from any cause during the 12-month randomization period

    Measured: 12 months post implant

  9. Characterize Medication Usage

    The rate of change of cardiovascular medications in changes per subject month were computed and compared between treatment groups.

    Measured: 12 months post implant

  10. Characterize Intracardiac Pressure

    The average daily median estimated pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure (ePAD) was computed for each subject with at least 90 days of ePAD data available and compared between the Treatment and Control arms.

    Measured: 12 months post implant

  11. Characterize Intracardiac Pressure Changes in Response to Subject Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure Events

    The average daily median estimated pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure (ePAD) was computed for each subject with at least 90 days of ePAD data available and compared between the Control Arm subjects with and without a heart failure related event during the 12-month randomized period.

    Measured: 12 months post implant

  12. Characterize NYHA Functional Class

    The outcome is the change in NYHA functional class between the baseline visit and the 12-month follow-up visit. At baseline subjects were required to be NYHA functional class II or III. The outcome will show the percentage of subjects that were functional class II and III at baseline and functional class I, II, III, or IV at the 12-month visit. The percent improvement from baseline is calculated as the percentage of subjects with a lower NYHA functional class at the 12-month visit compared to their NHYA functional class at baseline.

    Measured: baseline to 12 months post implant

  13. Characterize Distance Walked in Six Minutes

    The outcome is the change in distance walked in 6-minutes in meters between the baseline visit and the 12-month follow-up visit. The change in distance walked was calculated within each subject as the distance walked in 6-minutes at the 12-month visit minus the distance walked in 6-minutes at the baseline visit. Positive values indicate an increase in the distance walked in 6-minutes from baseline.

    Measured: baseline to 12 months post implant

  14. Characterize Renal Function at the Baseline and 12-month Visit

    Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline to the 12-month follow-up visit. eGFR was estimated using the MDRD forumula from the National Kidney Foundation (American Journal of Kidney Diseases 39: S1-299). Change in eGFR was computed as the 12-month eGFR value minus the baseline eGFR value. Positive values indicate an increase in eGFR from baseline and negative values indicate a decrease in eGFR from baseline.

    Measured: baseline to 12 months post implant

  15. Characterize Intracardiac Pressure Monitoring Following Defibrillation Testing (Chronicle ICD Subjects Only)

    Intracardiac pressure monitoring was deemed successful following defibrillation testing if physiological pressure waveforms were present following defibrillation testing.

    Measured: implant

  16. Characterize Defibrillation Threshold Testing Efficacy (Chronicle ICD Subjects Only)

    The outcome measure is the percentage of subjects implanted with the Chronicle ICD who completed defibrillation testing and had a 10 Joule safety margin

    Measured: Implant

  17. Characterize Quality of Life at Baseline and 12-month Visit

    The outcome is the change in the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure® (MNLWHF) questionnaire response from baseline to the 12-month follow-up visit. The MNLWHF questionnaire is a 21 question questionnaire scored from zero (no impact of heart failure) to 5 (severe impact of heart failure). The composite MNLWHF score ranges from 0 (no impact of heart failure) to 105 (severe impact of heart failure). Change in MNLWHF score was computed as the 12-month minus the baseline score.

    Measured: baseline to 12 months post implant

  18. Characterize Arrhythmic Events

    The rate of spontaneous VT (ventricular tachycardia)/VF (ventricular fibrillation) episodes during the 12-month follow-up period in episodes per subject month was compared between the Treatment Arm and the Control Arm

    Measured: 12 months post implant

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2006
  3. Primary completionJan 2011
  4. Study completionJan 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
442 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00354159
Sponsor's protocol ID
103
Acronym
REDUCEhf
Status last verified
Aug 2012
First submitted
19 Jul 2006
Last updated
9 Aug 2012
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Reiter MJ, Stromberg KD, Whitman TA, Adamson PB, Benditt DG, Gold MR. Influence of intracardiac pressure on spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias in patients with systolic heart failure: insights from the REDUCEhf trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;6(2):272-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000223. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

    PubMed 23515265
  • Adamson PB, Conti JB, Smith AL, Abraham WT, Aaron MF, Aranda JM Jr, Baker J, Bourge RC, Warner-Stevenson L, Sparks B. Reducing events in patients with chronic heart failure (REDUCEhf ) study design: continuous hemodynamic monitoring with an implantable defibrillator. Clin Cardiol. 2007 Nov;30(11):567-75. doi: 10.1002/clc.20250.

    PubMed 18000962

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD) in people with Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 52 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 52 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Aug 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent of Subjects With an Attempted Implant of the Chronicle ICD System Free From System-related Chronicle ICD Complications at 6-months Post-implant. (time frame: Within 6 months post-implant). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00354159, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in