AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney StonesNCT00351351

Trial Comparing Dual Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy to a Single Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy

A study testing Cyberwand and single probe ultrasonic in people with Kidney Stones, run by Indiana Kidney Stone Institute at 7 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), in conjunction with intracorporeal lithotripsy, allows for the rapid removal of any kidney stone regardless of size. Currently, the choice of intracorporeal lithotripters includes ultrasonic, pneumatic, and combined ultrasonic/pneumatic energy sources. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Stones
What is being tested?
Cyberwand and single probe ultrasonic
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
7 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Jul 2006to May 2008
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient of Methodist Urology in Indianapolis, IN
  • Undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy for calculi greater than 2 cm
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Stone easily visible/measurable on kidney, ureters and bladder (KUB) or computed tomography (CT) scan preoperatively

Who cannot join

  • Radiolucent stones
  • Size of largest stone less than 2 cm
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Multiple percutaneous access anticipated
  • Active urinary tract infection
  • Recent (within last 3 months) extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 2 countries.

7 sites in 2 countries

United States5 sites
  • John's Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • Northwestern University Dept. of Urology

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Duke University

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Methodist Hospital

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • University of Wisconsin

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

Other trials in United States

Canada2 sites
  • University of Western Ontario - St. Joseph's Hospital

    London, Ontario

  • Vancouver Hospital

    Vancouver, British Columbia

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Randomized Control Trial Comparing Dual Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy to a Single Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), in conjunction with intracorporeal lithotripsy, allows for the rapid removal of any kidney stone regardless of size. Currently, the choice of intracorporeal lithotripters includes ultrasonic, pneumatic, and combined ultrasonic/pneumatic energy sources. Recently, a novel dual probe design as been introduced by Cybersonics of Erie, Pennsylvania. This dual probe intracorporeal lithotrite is called the Cyberwand, and is composed of a fixed inner probe vibrating at an ultrasonic frequency with an outer probe vibrating at about 1,000 Hz. As this new design has the potential to revolutionize intracorporeal lithotripsy, we intend to compare this novel technology to currently available lithotripsy technology in a randomized clinical trial.

Read the detailed description

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is used to remove large and complex stones from the upper urinary tract. Intracorporeal lithotripsy is an integral part of PNL. Commercially available intracorporeal lithotripsy modalities include ultrasonic, pneumatic, and combined ultrasonic and pneumatic models. Each modality has its inherent advantages and disadvantages. Ultrasonic lithotrites are capable of fragmenting stones while concomitantly suctioning out fragments. Unfortunately some stones are hard enough to resist fragmentation from ultrasonic lithotripsy. Pneumatic lithotrites are able to fragment all stones regardless of hardness, but this modality is unable to suction out stone pieces at the same time fragmentation is occurring. The newest lithotrite which combines both ultrasonic and pneumatic components is capable of fragmenting any stone, but also has some inherent limitations. The handpiece of the lithotripsy device is somewhat cumbersome, the suction component can clog, and the device has overheated at the maximal settings (Kuo et al). Current intracorporeal lithotrites, while functional, can certainly be improved.

Recently, a novel dual probe design has been introduced by Cybersonics of Erie, PA. This dual probe intracorporeal lithotrite is called the Cyberwand and is composed of a fixed inner probe vibrating at an ultrasonic frequency with an outer probe vibrating at about 1,000 Hz. As this new design has the potential to revolutionalize intracorporeal lithotripsy, we intend to compare this novel technology to currently available lithotripsy technology in a randomized clinical trial.

Conditions
Kidney Stones
Being tested
Cyberwand, single probe ultrasonic
Keywords
Kidney Stones, Renal Calculi
Medical subject headings
Kidney Calculi

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CyberwandDevice

    FDA approved - dual probe intracorporeal lithotrite

  • single probe ultrasonicDevice

    FDA-approved - single probe ultrasonic

Study groups in NCT00351351
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AExperimentalCyberwand
Receives: Device: Cyberwand
BActive comparatorCurrently available lithotripsy technology
Receives: Device: single probe ultrasonic

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Kidney Stone Clearance Rate

    stone clearance rate calculated in mm^2/min per protocol specification

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jul 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2006
  3. Primary completionMay 2008
  4. Study completionMay 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00351351
Sponsor's protocol ID
06-035
Status last verified
Feb 2013
First submitted
11 Jul 2006
Last updated
30 Mar 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Siqueira TM Jr, Evan AP, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr, Lingeman JE. In vitro assessment of lithoclast ultra intracorporeal lithotripter. J Endourol. 2004 Mar;18(2):153-6. doi: 10.1089/089277904322959789.

    PubMed 15072622

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in