AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple MyelomaPhase 3NCT00344422

Vincristine, DOXIL (Doxorubicin HCl Liposome Injection) and Dexamethasone vs. Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 3 study testing Vincristine, DOXIL (doxorubicin HCl liposomal injection), and Dexamethasone (VDD) vs. Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VAD) in people with Multiple Myeloma and Myeloma, run by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C..

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine how well newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients respond to an experimental regimen of Vincristine, DOXIL (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection) and Dexamethasone (VDD) versus the standard treatment of Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VAD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Myeloma, Myeloma, M-Protein
What is being tested?
Vincristine, DOXIL (doxorubicin HCl liposomal injection), and Dexamethasone (VDD) vs. Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VAD)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
198 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2000to Jun 2004
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Untreated multiple myeloma requiring treatment
  • Total cumulative dose of prior doxorubicin can not exceed 240 mg/m2
  • Must have measurable disease
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) >= 50 % determined by Multiple Gated Acquisition Scan (MUGA)
  • Karnofsky performance status of >= 60%
  • Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function
  • Disease-free from prior malignancies >= 5 years with the exception of basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • Female participants (if of child bearing potential and sexually active) and male participants (if sexually active with a partner of child-bearing potential) must use medically acceptable methods of birth control.

Who cannot join

  • Life expectancy of >= 3 months
  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • History of cardiac disease, with New York Heart Association Class II or greater, with congestive heart failure
  • or unstable angina, uncontrolled hypertension or cardiac arrythmias or myocardial infarction within the last 6 months
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or systemic infection
  • Nonsecretory myeloma, Monoclonal Gammopathy of Unknown Significance (MGUS) or smoldering myeloma
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Confusion, disorientation, or history of psychiatric illness which may impair patient's ability to give informed consent
  • Prior chemotherapy to treat Multiple Myeloma
  • Prior radiotherapy to an area greater than 1/3 of the skeleton
  • Prior local radiotherapy within 1 week of treatment
  • Any investigational agent within 30 days of the first dose of treatment
  • Prior single agent dexamethasone (or another corticosteroid) to treat Multiple Myeloma.

About this study

Official title: A Multi-Center Randomized Study of Vincristine, Doxil and Dexamethasone vs. Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to determine how well newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients respond to an experimental regimen of Vincristine, DOXIL (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection) and Dexamethasone (VDD) versus the standard treatment of Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VAD).

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, open label study comparing the efficacy, clinical benefit, toxicity and safety of the combination of Vincristine, DOXIL® (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection), and Dexamethasone (VDD) to the standard regimen of Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VAD) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Approximately 200 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma will be randomized to receive either VDD or VAD. This study will determine and compare the objective response rate (the percentage of patients who attain an Objective Status of Complete Remission, Remission or Partial Remission) for patients receiving VDD vs. VAD. This study will also evaluate and compare the clinical benefit of VDD vs. VAD for the following measures: Hospitalization; Documented sepsis; Antibiotic use; Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or neutropenic fever.

VDD: Vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV on Day 1; Doxil® 40 mg/m2 IV on Day 1; Dexamethasone 40 mg/day oral Days 1-4; VAD: Vincristine 0.4 mg/day continuous infusion Days 1-4; Doxorubicin 9.0 mg/m2/day continuous infusion Days 1-4; Dexamethasone 40 mg/day orally on Days 1-4; Every 28 days for 4 cycles

Being tested
Vincristine, DOXIL (doxorubicin HCl liposomal injection), and Dexamethasone (VDD) vs. Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VAD)
Keywords
Anthracyclines, Liposomes, Liposomal, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, Dexamethasone, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, DOXIL, drug resistant myeloma
Medical subject headings
Multiple Myeloma, Neoplasms, Plasma Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vincristine, DOXIL (doxorubicin HCl liposomal injection), and Dexamethasone (VDD) vs. Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VAD)Drug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To determine and compare the objective response rate (the percentage of patients who attain an Objective Status of Complete Remission, Remission or Partial Remission) for patients receiving VDD vs VAD.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. To evaluate and compare the clinical benefit of VDD vs VAD for the following measures: Hospitalization, Documented sepsis,Antibiotic use, Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or neutropenic fever

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jun 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2000
  3. Study completionJun 2004

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
198 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00344422
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR002434
Status last verified
Apr 2010
First submitted
23 Jun 2006
Last updated
10 Jun 2011
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Rifkin RM, Gregory SA, Mohrbacher A, Hussein MA. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone provide significant reduction in toxicity compared with doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a Phase III multicenter randomized trial. Cancer. 2006 Feb 15;106(4):848-58. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21662.

    PubMed 16404741

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Vincristine, DOXIL (doxorubicin HCl liposomal injection), and Dexamethasone (VDD) vs. Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VAD) in people with Multiple Myeloma and Myeloma, run by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C..

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To determine and compare the objective response rate (the percentage of patients who attain an Objective Status of Complete Remission, Remission or Partial Remission) for patients receiving VDD vs VAD.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00344422, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in