Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol SpecificNCT00343629
Sulindac Capsules Compared With Sulindac Tablets in Healthy Volunteers
A study testing sulindac and pharmacological study in people with Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Giving healthy volunteers sulindac capsules or sulindac tablets may help doctors learn which form of the drug may be more effective in preventing cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying sulindac capsules to see how well they work compared with sulindac tablets in healthy volunteers. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific
- What is being tested?
- sulindac and pharmacological study
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2006to Oct 2007
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Healthy volunteer
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- Hemoglobin ≥ 12.0 g/dL (women)
- Hemoglobin ≥ 13.5 g/dL (men)
- WBC > 3,000/mm³
- Platelet count > 100,000/mm³
- Absolute neutrophil count > 1,500/mm³
- Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times ULN
- ALT ≤ 1.5 times ULN
- Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN OR creatinine clearance ≥ 30 mL/min
- No history of allergic reactions or hypersensitivity to sulindac or other NSAIDs, including aspirin-sensitive asthma or urticaria
- No condition that interferes with ingestion or absorption of oral medications
- No cancer within the past 3 years except nonmelanomatous skin cancer, localized prostate cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or superficial bladder cancer that was previously treated > 6 months ago
- No uncontrolled concurrent illness including, but not limited to, the following:
- Ongoing or active infection
- Symptomatic congestive heart failure
- Unstable angina pectoris
- Cardiac arrhythmia
- Myocardial infarction in the past 6 months
- Chronic renal disease
- Chronic liver disease
- Hypertension that is difficult to control
- Psychiatric illness or social situations that would limit study compliance
- No other significant clinical disorder or laboratory finding that would preclude study participation
- No consumption of alcoholic or caffeinated beverages for ≥ 24 hours prior to study drug administration and until all blood samples have been drawn
- Willing to provide required biologic specimens
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- More than 6 months since prior investigational agents
- More than 6 months since prior regular use of (defined as a frequency of 7 consecutive days for > 3 weeks or > 21 days total) or other concurrent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors including, but not limited to, the following:
- Ibuprofen
- Ketoprofen
- Naproxen
- More than 6 weeks since prior oral corticosteroids
- More than 30 days since prior and no concurrent use of any of the following:
- Methotrexate
- Corticosteroids
- Warfarin
- Ticlopidine
- Clopidogrel
- Low molecular weight heparins
- Abciximab
- Dipyridamole
- Eptifibatide
- Tirofiban
- Lithium
- Cyclosporine
- Hydralazine
- Angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACE) inhibitors
- ACE-receptor antagonists allowed
- Angiotensin-receptor blockers
- Ginkgo
- Ketorolac
- Levofloxacin
- Loop diuretics
- Meadowsweet
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
- Danaparoid
- No concurrent regular aspirin use unless prescribed by a physician for prevention
- A maximum of one aspirin (81 mg/day) allowed
- No concurrent herbal products (e.g., saw palmetto or Hypericum perforatum [St. John's wort])
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
About this study
Official title: Bioequivalency Study of Sulindac in Capsule vs. Tablet Formulations
RATIONALE: Giving healthy volunteers sulindac capsules or sulindac tablets may help doctors learn which form of the drug may be more effective in preventing cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying sulindac capsules to see how well they work compared with sulindac tablets in healthy volunteers.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the systemic exposure of sulindac tablets vs sulindac capsules in healthy volunteers.
Secondary
- Compare the terminal half-life and time of peak drug concentration of sulindac tablets vs sulindac capsules.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Participants receive one sulindac capsule followed 7-10 days later by one sulindac tablet.
- Arm II: Participants receive one sulindac tablet followed 7-10 days later by one sulindac capsule.
Blood is collected periodically during treatment for pharmacokinetic studies.
After completion of study therapy, participants are followed at 7-10 days.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 28 participants will be accrued for this study.
- Being tested
- sulindac, pharmacological study
- Keywords
- unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
sulindacDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jun 2006 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2006
- Study completionOct 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol SpecificStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mayo ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Investigators
- Paul J. Limburg, MD, MPH, Study chair, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00343629
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000473167
- Other IDs
- MAYO-03-1-BIO, MAYO-CPN0576, MAYO-05-004233
- Status last verified
- Dec 2006
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2006
- Last updated
- 28 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Bioequivalency Study of Sulindac in Capsule vs. Tablet Formulations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00343629
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000473167
- Keywords
- unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Apr 2006
- Study completion
- Oct 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jun 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Giving healthy volunteers sulindac capsules or sulindac tablets may help doctors learn which form of the drug may be more effective in preventing cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying sulindac capsules to see how well they work compared with sulindac tablets in healthy volunteers.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the systemic exposure of sulindac tablets vs sulindac capsules in healthy volunteers.
Secondary
- Compare the terminal half-life and time of peak drug concentration of sulindac tablets vs sulindac capsules.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Participants receive one sulindac capsule followed 7-10 days later by one sulindac tablet.
- Arm II: Participants receive one sulindac tablet followed 7-10 days later by one sulindac capsule.
Blood is collected periodically during treatment for pharmacokinetic studies.
After completion of study therapy, participants are followed at 7-10 days.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 28 participants will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| sulindac | Drug | – |
| pharmacological study | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Apr 2015.
Related trials for Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
RNR Inhibitor COH29 in Treating Patients With Solid Tumors That Are Refractory to Standard Therapy or For Which No Standard Therapy Exists
Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific
Active, not recruiting
Assessment Tool for Older Patients With Cancer
Cognitive/Functional Effects, Psychosocial Effects of Cancer and Its Treatment
Active, not recruiting
Copper Cu 64 Anti-CEA Monoclonal Antibody M5A PET in Diagnosing Patients With CEA Positive Cancer
Breast Cancer, Colon Cancer
Recruiting
Copenhagen Prospective Personalized Oncology (CoPPO)
Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific
Active, not recruiting
3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F] Fluorothymidine PET Imaging in Patients With Cancer
Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors, Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul J. Limburg, MD, MPH study chair
Mayo Clinic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing sulindac and pharmacological study in people with Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2015.