AzTrials
AzTrials

NeuroblastomaPhase 4NCT00336531

Efficacy of Prophylactic Itraconazole in High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

A Phase 4 study testing itraconazole in people with Neuroblastoma and Brain Tumor, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the prophylactic use of itraconazole is a better option than empirical use of itraconazole in the management (prevention and treatment) of fungal infection associated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 15 years
Conditions the study is for
Neuroblastoma, Brain Tumor, Retinoblastoma
What is being tested?
itraconazole
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Apr 2006to Oct 2008
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 15 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with high risk solid tumors who are going to receive high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Who cannot join

  • Significant organ toxicity (National Cancer Institute [NCI] grade > 2) prior to high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Prophylactic Itraconazole in High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Pediatric Solid Tumors

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the prophylactic use of itraconazole is a better option than empirical use of itraconazole in the management (prevention and treatment) of fungal infection associated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with high-risk solid tumor.

Read the detailed description

With the advance of chemoradiotherapy, survival of patients, especially children, with malignant disease has improved. However, prognosis is still poor with conventional chemotherapy if patients have an advanced or high-risk tumor at diagnosis. Outcome in advanced or high-risk pediatric solid tumor such as advanced neuroblastoma, high-risk brain tumor, or recurrent pediatric solid tumor is still not satisfactory with conventional chemotherapy. In this context, investigators have explored the possible efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with high-risk or relapsed pediatric solid tumor. Efficacy of HDCT and ASCT has been well demonstrated in high-risk neuroblastoma, high-risk brain tumor, and recurrent pediatric solid tumors. Therefore, now, HSCT and ASCT is the most important treatment modality in the treatment of a variety of pediatric solid tumors poorly responding to conventional chemotherapy.

However, although HDCT and ASCT has improved the survival of patients with high-risk tumor, a variety of clinical issues associated with HDCT and ASCT are present causing significant morbidity and even mortality. The most frequent cause of morbidity associated with HDCT and ASCT is infection. Once high-dose myeloablative chemotherapeutic agents are administered, most hematopoietic cells in bone marrow die and prolonged marrow aplasia is unavoidable even after autologous hematopoietic stem cells infusion because it takes time for infused stem cells to reconstitute sufficient hematopoietic function. In addition, high-dose chemotherapy results in severe gastrointestinal mucosal damage which facilitates bacterial and/or fungal infection via damaged mucosal barrier. Therefore, infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality associated with HDCT and ASCT. Common pathogens associated with infection during HDCT and ASCT are bacteria and fungi.

To reduce the chance of infection and therefore, to reduce the morbidity and mortality from severe infection, various prophylactic antibiotics including antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral agents have been used according to standard guideline in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, in autologous transplantation for solid tumor in which hematologic recovery is rapid and immune suppression is less severe than allogeneic transplantation, there is no standard guideline for the use of prophylactic antibiotics whereas infection is the most important cause of morbidity. Standard guideline for the use of prophylactic antifungal agent is also not available. While some institutes use anti-fungal agent prophylactically, others use antifungal agent empirically only when neutropenic fever persist despite of empirical use of antibacterial agents.

HDCT in pediatric solid tumor is generally more intensive, and therefore, usually cause more severe mucositis than that in adult tumor. Severe mucositis facilitates fungal infection via damaged mucosal barrier (mainly by Candida species). Therefore, use of prophylactic anti-fungal agent may reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with HDCT and ASCT in pediatric solid tumor. However, there is no randomized clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic use of anti-fungal agent to date.

Itraconazole is one of newly developed antifungal agents and many physicians started to use itraconazole as first-line antifungal agent in the management of neutropenic fever in immunocompromised patients. However, the efficacy of prophylactic itraconazole has not been established in children with solid tumor, especially who receive HDCT and ASCT.

In this context, we are going to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic use of itraconazole in children with high-risk solid tumors during HDCT and ASCT. "Prophylactic" group will be treated with itraconazole once ANC fall below 500/uL regardless of infection and "Empirical" group will be treated with itraconazole only when high fever persists despite of treatment with first-line anti-bacterial agents.

Being tested
itraconazole
Keywords
prophylactic itraconazole, Relapsed pediatric solid tumors, Embryonal brain tumor
Medical subject headings
Neuroblastoma, Brain Neoplasms, Retinoblastoma, Wilms Tumor, Mycoses

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • itraconazoleDrug

    2.5 mg/kg twice daily for the first two days --> once daily

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Presence/absence of documented fungal infection

    Measured: until post transplant day 30

  2. Presence/absence of clinical fungal infection

    Measured: until post transplant day 30

  3. Total duration of high fever

    Measured: until post transplant day 30

  4. Total duration of antibiotic treatment

    Measured: until post transplant day 30

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jun 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2006
  3. Primary completionJun 2008
  4. Study completionOct 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00336531
Sponsor's protocol ID
2006-02-069
Status last verified
Nov 2008
First submitted
11 Jun 2006
Last updated
19 Nov 2008
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Kim YJ, Sung KW, Hwang HS, Jung SH, Kim JY, Cho EJ, Lim SJ, Choi YB, Cheuh HW, Lee SH, Yoo KH, Koo HH. Efficacy of itraconazole prophylaxis for autologous stem cell transplantation in children with high-risk solid tumors: a prospective double-blind randomized study. Yonsei Med J. 2011 Mar;52(2):293-300. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.2.293.

    PubMed 21319349

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing itraconazole in people with Neuroblastoma and Brain Tumor, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Presence/absence of documented fungal infection (time frame: until post transplant day 30). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00336531, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in