OsteoporosisPhase 3NCT00330460
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare the Efficacy of Treatment With Denosumab Versus Alendronate Sodium in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density.
A Phase 3 study testing Alendronate and Denosumab in people with Osteoporosis and Osteopenia, run by Amgen.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, the mean percent change in total hip BMD in subjects receiving denosumab is not less than that observed in subjects receiving alendronate sodium by more than a pre-specified non-inferiority margin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoporosis, Osteopenia
- What is being tested?
- Alendronate and Denosumab
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,189 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2006to Jan 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion Criteria: - Patient is an ambulatory postmenopausal woman - Patient has BMD value that corresponds to a T-score of less than or equal to -2.0 (g/cm2) at the lumbar spine OR total hip within range specific to the study protocol. Exclusion Criteria: o Any disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or to comply with study procedures
- Evidence of any of the following per subject report, chart review or central laboratory result:
- Hyper- or hypothyroidism; however, subjects on stable thyroid hormone replacement therapy may be allowed per the following criteria:
- If TSH level is normal, subject is eligible for the study.
- If TSH level is below normal range, subject is not eligible for the study.
- If TSH level is elevated (> 5.5 mIU/mL to 10.0 mIU/mL), serum T4 should be measured. If serum T4 is within normal range, subject is eligible. If serum T4 is outside of normal range, subject is not eligible for the study.
- If TSH level is above 10.0 mIU/mL, subject is not eligible.
- Current hyper- or hypoparathyroidism
- Elevated transaminases
- Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST; serum glutamate-oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT]) ³ 2.0 x upper limits of normal (ULN)
- Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT; serum glutamate-pyruvate transaminase [SGPT]) ³ 2.0 x ULN
- Significantly impaired renal function as determined by serum creatinine ³ 2.0 mg/dL
- Current hypo- or hypercalcemia based on the central laboratory reference ranges
- Active gastric or duodenal ulcer; history of significant gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion, or dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease that is uncontrolled by medication
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Paget's disease, Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia, or cirrhosis of the liver
- Known to have tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis B surface antigen
- Malignancy (except fully resected cutaneous basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma, cervical or breast ductal carcinoma in situ) within the last 5 years
- Any metabolic bone disease, eg, osteomalacia or osteogenesis imperfecta, which may interfere with the interpretation of the findings
- Malabsorption syndrome or any gastrointestinal disorders that are associated with malabsorption
- Received any solid organ or bone marrow transplant
- Vitamin D deficiency (25(OH) vitamin D level < 12 ng/mL). Vitamin D repletion will be permitted and subjects may be re-screened; see Section 7.
- Any laboratory abnormality which, in the opinion of the investigator, will prevent the subject from completing the study or interfere with the interpretation of the study results
- Contraindicated or poorly tolerant of ALN therapy; contraindications for ALN therapy include:
- Abnormalities of the esophagus, which delay esophageal emptying such as stricture or achalasia.
- Inability to stand or sit upright for at least 30 minutes.
- Hypersensitivity to ALN or other constituents of ALN tablets o Known sensitivity to mammalian cell derived drug products
- Known intolerance to calcium supplements
- Administration of intravenous bisphosphonate, or fluoride (except for dental treatment) or strontium ranelate
- Oral bisphosphonate treatment:
- ³ 3 months cumulatively in the past 2 years, OR
- ³ 1 month in the past year, OR
- Any use during the 3-month period prior to randomization
- PTH or PTH derivatives (eg, teriparatide) within the last year
- Administration of any of the following treatments within 3 months of randomization:
- Any SERM (eg, raloxifene)
- Tibolone
- Anabolic steroids or testosterone
- Glucocorticosteroids (³ 5 mg prednisone equivalent per day for more than 10 days)
- Systemic (oral, transdermal, topical) hormone replacement therapy (local vaginal estrogen preparation will be allowed)
- Calcitonin
- Calcitriol or vitamin D derivatives
- Other bone active drugs including anti-convulsives (except benzodiazepines) and heparin
- Chronic systemic ketoconazole, androgens, ACTH, cinacalcet, aluminum, lithium, protease inhibitors, methotrexate, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists
- Height, weight or girth which may preclude accurate DXA measurements
- Less than 2 lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4) evaluable for DXA measurements
- Both hips not evaluable by DXA (eg, history of bilateral hip replacement or pins in both hips)
- Currently enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 1 month since ending other investigational device or drug trial(s), or subject is receiving other investigational agent(s)
- Any physical or psychiatric disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, will prevent the subject from completing the study or interfere with the interpretation of the study results
- Evidence of alcohol or substance-abuse within the last 12 months which the investigator believes would interfere with understanding or completing the study
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare the Efficacy of Treatment With Denosumab Versus Alendronate Sodium in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Denisty
The purpose of this study is to determine whether in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, the mean percent change in total hip BMD in subjects receiving denosumab is not less than that observed in subjects receiving alendronate sodium by more than a pre-specified non-inferiority margin.
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis, Osteopenia
- Being tested
- Alendronate, Denosumab
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, AMG 162, Fracture - hip, Postmenopausal
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis, Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Hip Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AlendronateDrug
ALN; 70 mg; oral; once weekly
DenosumabDrug
60 mg; SC; every 6 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Alendronate | Active comparator | Subjects in this arm will receive active ALN and placebo denosumab Receives: Drug: Alendronate |
| Denosumab | Experimental | Subjects in this arm will receive active denosumab and placbo ALN Receives: Drug: Denosumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Measured: 12 months
Trochanter Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Measured: 12 months
Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Measured: 12 months
Distal 1/3 Radius Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2006
- Primary completionNov 2007
- Study completionJan 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,189 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00330460
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20050141
- Status last verified
- Jan 2011
- First submitted
- 6 Apr 2006
- Last updated
- 24 Jan 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Brown JP, Prince RL, Deal C, Recker RR, Kiel DP, de Gregorio LH, Hadji P, Hofbauer LC, Alvaro-Gracia JM, Wang H, Austin M, Wagman RB, Newmark R, Libanati C, San Martin J, Bone HG. Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Jan;24(1):153-61. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.0809010.
PubMed 18767928Gold DT, Horne R, Coon CD, Price MA, Borenstein J, Varon SF, Satram-Hoang S, Macarios D. Development, reliability, and validity of a new Preference and Satisfaction Questionnaire. Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
PubMed 22152181
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jan 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare the Efficacy of Treatment With Denosumab Versus Alendronate Sodium in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Denisty
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00330460
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20050141
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis, Osteopenia
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, AMG 162, Fracture - hip, Postmenopausal
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,189 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2006
- Primary completion
- Nov 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Jul 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, the mean percent change in total hip BMD in subjects receiving denosumab is not less than that observed in subjects receiving alendronate sodium by more than a pre-specified non-inferiority margin.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Alendronate | Active comparator | Drug: AlendronateSubjects in this arm will receive active ALN and placebo denosumab |
| Denosumab | Experimental | Drug: DenosumabSubjects in this arm will receive active denosumab and placbo ALN |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AlendronateALN; 70 mg; oral; once weekly | Drug | Alendronate |
| Denosumab60 mg; SC; every 6 months | Drug | Denosumab |
Primary outcome
Total Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
Time frame: 12 months
Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
4 secondary outcomes
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
Time frame: 12 months
Trochanter Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
Time frame: 12 months
Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
Time frame: 12 months
Distal 1/3 Radius Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jan 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 18767928Brown JP, Prince RL, Deal C, Recker RR, Kiel DP, de Gregorio LH, Hadji P, Hofbauer LC, Alvaro-Gracia JM, Wang H, Austin M, Wagman RB, Newmark R, Libanati C, San Martin J, Bone HG. Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Jan;24(1):153-61. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.0809010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22152181Gold DT, Horne R, Coon CD, Price MA, Borenstein J, Varon SF, Satram-Hoang S, Macarios D. Development, reliability, and validity of a new Preference and Satisfaction Questionnaire. Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Osteoporosis
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Quanduzhong Capsules for Primary Osteoporosis
Primary Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
A Natural History Study of Bone and Mineral Disorders
Tumor Induced Osteomalcia, Osteomalacia
RecruitingObservational study
A Study Evaluating the Performance of Using AI Software and Chest X-rays to Screen for Osteoporosis as Compared to Standard DXA Scans in Patients 50 Years and Older
Osteoporosis, Osteopenia
RecruitingObservational study
Bone Health in Adults With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Survey on Osteoporosis, Fractures and Treatment.
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)
RecruitingObservational study
REMS vs DXA for Osteoporosis Diagnosis and Fracture Risk Prediction
Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Bone Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Alendronate and Denosumab in people with Osteoporosis and Osteopenia, run by Amgen.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Jul 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00330460, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2011.