AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoporosisPhase 3NCT00330460

A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare the Efficacy of Treatment With Denosumab Versus Alendronate Sodium in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density.

A Phase 3 study testing Alendronate and Denosumab in people with Osteoporosis and Osteopenia, run by Amgen.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, the mean percent change in total hip BMD in subjects receiving denosumab is not less than that observed in subjects receiving alendronate sodium by more than a pre-specified non-inferiority margin. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Osteoporosis, Osteopenia
What is being tested?
Alendronate and Denosumab
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,189 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
May 2006to Jan 2008
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Inclusion Criteria: - Patient is an ambulatory postmenopausal woman - Patient has BMD value that corresponds to a T-score of less than or equal to -2.0 (g/cm2) at the lumbar spine OR total hip within range specific to the study protocol. Exclusion Criteria: o Any disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or to comply with study procedures

  • Evidence of any of the following per subject report, chart review or central laboratory result:
  1. Hyper- or hypothyroidism; however, subjects on stable thyroid hormone replacement therapy may be allowed per the following criteria:
  • If TSH level is normal, subject is eligible for the study.
  • If TSH level is below normal range, subject is not eligible for the study.
  • If TSH level is elevated (> 5.5 mIU/mL to 10.0 mIU/mL), serum T4 should be measured. If serum T4 is within normal range, subject is eligible. If serum T4 is outside of normal range, subject is not eligible for the study.
  • If TSH level is above 10.0 mIU/mL, subject is not eligible.
  1. Current hyper- or hypoparathyroidism
  2. Elevated transaminases
  • Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST; serum glutamate-oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT]) ³ 2.0 x upper limits of normal (ULN)
  • Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT; serum glutamate-pyruvate transaminase [SGPT]) ³ 2.0 x ULN
  1. Significantly impaired renal function as determined by serum creatinine ³ 2.0 mg/dL
  2. Current hypo- or hypercalcemia based on the central laboratory reference ranges
  3. Active gastric or duodenal ulcer; history of significant gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion, or dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease that is uncontrolled by medication
  4. Rheumatoid Arthritis, Paget's disease, Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia, or cirrhosis of the liver
  5. Known to have tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis B surface antigen
  6. Malignancy (except fully resected cutaneous basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma, cervical or breast ductal carcinoma in situ) within the last 5 years
  7. Any metabolic bone disease, eg, osteomalacia or osteogenesis imperfecta, which may interfere with the interpretation of the findings
  8. Malabsorption syndrome or any gastrointestinal disorders that are associated with malabsorption
  • Received any solid organ or bone marrow transplant
  • Vitamin D deficiency (25(OH) vitamin D level < 12 ng/mL). Vitamin D repletion will be permitted and subjects may be re-screened; see Section 7.
  • Any laboratory abnormality which, in the opinion of the investigator, will prevent the subject from completing the study or interfere with the interpretation of the study results
  • Contraindicated or poorly tolerant of ALN therapy; contraindications for ALN therapy include:
  1. Abnormalities of the esophagus, which delay esophageal emptying such as stricture or achalasia.
  2. Inability to stand or sit upright for at least 30 minutes.
  3. Hypersensitivity to ALN or other constituents of ALN tablets o Known sensitivity to mammalian cell derived drug products
  • Known intolerance to calcium supplements
  • Administration of intravenous bisphosphonate, or fluoride (except for dental treatment) or strontium ranelate
  • Oral bisphosphonate treatment:
  • ³ 3 months cumulatively in the past 2 years, OR
  • ³ 1 month in the past year, OR
  • Any use during the 3-month period prior to randomization
  • PTH or PTH derivatives (eg, teriparatide) within the last year
  • Administration of any of the following treatments within 3 months of randomization:
  1. Any SERM (eg, raloxifene)
  2. Tibolone
  3. Anabolic steroids or testosterone
  4. Glucocorticosteroids (³ 5 mg prednisone equivalent per day for more than 10 days)
  5. Systemic (oral, transdermal, topical) hormone replacement therapy (local vaginal estrogen preparation will be allowed)
  6. Calcitonin
  7. Calcitriol or vitamin D derivatives
  8. Other bone active drugs including anti-convulsives (except benzodiazepines) and heparin
  9. Chronic systemic ketoconazole, androgens, ACTH, cinacalcet, aluminum, lithium, protease inhibitors, methotrexate, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists
  10. Height, weight or girth which may preclude accurate DXA measurements
  • Less than 2 lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4) evaluable for DXA measurements
  • Both hips not evaluable by DXA (eg, history of bilateral hip replacement or pins in both hips)
  • Currently enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 1 month since ending other investigational device or drug trial(s), or subject is receiving other investigational agent(s)
  • Any physical or psychiatric disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, will prevent the subject from completing the study or interfere with the interpretation of the study results
  • Evidence of alcohol or substance-abuse within the last 12 months which the investigator believes would interfere with understanding or completing the study

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare the Efficacy of Treatment With Denosumab Versus Alendronate Sodium in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Denisty

The purpose of this study is to determine whether in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, the mean percent change in total hip BMD in subjects receiving denosumab is not less than that observed in subjects receiving alendronate sodium by more than a pre-specified non-inferiority margin.

Being tested
Alendronate, Denosumab
Keywords
Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, AMG 162, Fracture - hip, Postmenopausal
Medical subject headings
Osteoporosis, Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Hip Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AlendronateDrug

    ALN; 70 mg; oral; once weekly

  • DenosumabDrug

    60 mg; SC; every 6 months

Study groups in NCT00330460
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AlendronateActive comparatorSubjects in this arm will receive active ALN and placebo denosumab
Receives: Drug: Alendronate
DenosumabExperimentalSubjects in this arm will receive active denosumab and placbo ALN
Receives: Drug: Denosumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12

    Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12

    Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Trochanter Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12

    Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12

    Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Distal 1/3 Radius Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12

    Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2006
  3. Primary completionNov 2007
  4. Study completionJan 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,189 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00330460
Sponsor's protocol ID
20050141
Status last verified
Jan 2011
First submitted
6 Apr 2006
Last updated
24 Jan 2011

Publications

  • Brown JP, Prince RL, Deal C, Recker RR, Kiel DP, de Gregorio LH, Hadji P, Hofbauer LC, Alvaro-Gracia JM, Wang H, Austin M, Wagman RB, Newmark R, Libanati C, San Martin J, Bone HG. Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Jan;24(1):153-61. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.0809010.

    PubMed 18767928
  • Gold DT, Horne R, Coon CD, Price MA, Borenstein J, Varon SF, Satram-Hoang S, Macarios D. Development, reliability, and validity of a new Preference and Satisfaction Questionnaire. Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

    PubMed 22152181

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Alendronate and Denosumab in people with Osteoporosis and Osteopenia, run by Amgen.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Jul 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00330460, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2011.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT00330460 | AzTrials