AzTrials
AzTrials

AmblyopiaPhase 3ATS8NCT00315302

Trial Comparing Atropine to Atropine Plus a Plano Lens for the Sound Eye for Amblyopia in Children 3 to <7 Years Old

A Phase 3 study testing Atropine and Plano Lens in people with Amblyopia, run by Jaeb Center for Health Research at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is: To compare the effectiveness and safety of weekend atropine augmented with a plano lens for the sound eye versus weekend atropine alone for moderate amblyopia (20/40 to 20/100) in children 3 to less than 7 years old. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 6 years
Conditions the study is for
Amblyopia
What is being tested?
Atropine and Plano Lens
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
240 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2005to Jan 2008
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 6 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must be 3 to less than 7 years old with amblyopia associated with strabismus, anisometropia, or both.
  • Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye must be between 20/40 and 20/400 inclusive, visual acuity in the sound eye 20/40 or better and inter-eye acuity difference > 3 logMAR lines.
  • Spectacles, if needed, must be worn for at least 16 weeks or until visual acuity documented to be stable.

Who cannot join

  • Atropine treatment within 6 months of enrollment and other amblyopia treatment of any type (other than normal spectacle lenses) used within one month of enrollment
  • No myopia in amblyopic eye

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75235

  • Southern California College of Optometry

    Fullerton, California, 92831

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Trial Comparing Atropine to Atropine Plus a Plano Lens for the Sound Eye As Prescribed Treatments for Amblyopia in Children 3 to <7 Years Old

The purpose of the study is:

  • To compare the effectiveness and safety of weekend atropine augmented with a plano lens for the sound eye versus weekend atropine alone for moderate amblyopia (20/40 to 20/100) in children 3 to less than 7 years old.
  • To provide data on the response of severe amblyopia (20/125 to 20/400) to atropine treatment with and without a plano lens.
Read the detailed description

Atropine is an effective treatment of moderate amblyopia. Reduction of the plus sphere for the sound eye is an accepted method of enhancing and possibly accelerating the treatment effect. Demonstrating additional value of the plano lens in terms of speed of improvement will shorten the treatment period, possibly improving child and parental compliance, leading to improved overall outcomes for patients with amblyopia. If the plano lens leads to greater improvement, then there will be less permanent visual impairment in patients with a history of amblyopia. It also is important to determine if the use of a plano lens in conjunction with atropine has a deleterious effect on the sound eye, and if yes, how often this occurs.

Little is known about the pharmacologic treatment of severe amblyopia. This study will provide important prospectively determined outcome data at little additional expense.

In a study conducted by the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, A Randomized Trial Comparing Daily Atropine Versus Weekend Atropine for Moderate Amblyopia, the use of weekend atropine for moderate amblyopia was as effective as daily treatment. Intermittent atropine use (such as using it only on the weekends) has the theoretical potential benefit of the sound eye having some time each week during which cycloplegia is only partial. It is possible that allowing some loss of the cycloplegic effect over the course of each week may be safer for the sound eye.

The study has been designed as a simple trial that, other than the type of amblyopia therapy being determined through the randomization process, approximates standard clinical practice. The two treatment regimes for the 18 week primary treatment period are: 1) Atropine 1% once each weekend day in the sound eye and 2) Atropine 1% once each weekend day in the sound eye plus a plano lens for the sound eye.

Conditions
Amblyopia
Being tested
Atropine, Plano Lens
Keywords
Amblyopia, Atropine, Plano lens
Medical subject headings
Amblyopia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AtropineDrug

    Atropine 1% once each weekend day

  • Plano LensDevice

    Plano lens for the sound eye

Study groups in NCT00315302
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AtropineActive comparatorAtropine 1% once each weekend day in the sound eye
Receives: Drug: Atropine
Atropine plus planoActive comparatorAtropine 1% once each weekend day in the sound eye plus a plano lens for the sound eye
Receives: Drug: Atropine; Device: Plano Lens

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Acuity Mean Score in the Amblyopic Eye

    Visual acuity is measured in each eye using the Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) visual acuity testing protocol at 18 weeks resulting in an Snellen equivalent acuity score that can range from 20/16 to 20/800. This visual acuity score is converted to logMAR (log of min angle of resolution) for statistical analysis.

    20/16=-0.1 logMAR; best 20/20=0.0 logMAR; 20/25=0.1; 20/32=0.2; 20/40=0.3; 20/50=0.4; 20/63=0.5; 20/80=0.6; 20/100=0.7; 20/125=0.8; 20/160=0.9; 20/200=1.0; 20/250=1.1; 20/320=1.2; 20/400=1.3; 20/500=1.4; 20/640=1.5; 20/800=1.6; worst

    Measured: 18 weeks

  2. Visual Acuity Distribution in the Amblyopic Eye

    Visual acuity is measured in each eye using the Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) visual acuity testing protocol at 18 weeks resulting in a Snellen acuity score that can range from 20/16 to 20/800. This visual acuity score is converted to logMAR (log of min angle of resolution) for statistical analysis.

    20/16=-0.1 logMAR; best 20/20=0.0 logMAR; 20/25=0.1; 20/32=0.2; 20/40=0.3; 20/50=0.4; 20/63=0.5; 20/80=0.6; 20/100=0.7; 20/125=0.8; 20/160=0.9; 20/200=1.0; 20/250=1.1; 20/320=1.2; 20/400=1.3; 20/500=1.4; 20/640=1.5; 20/800=1.6; worst

    Measured: 18 weeks

  3. Mean Change in Visual Acuity in the Amblyopic Eye

    Acuity is measured in each eye using the Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) visual acuity testing protocol at baseline and at 18wks resulting in a Snellen acuity score that can range from 20/16 to 20/800. The score is converted to logMAR (log of min angle of resolution) for statistical analysis, and a difference between the scores is calculated.

    A positive difference indicates acuity was better at 18wks than at baseline; a negative difference indicates acuity was worse at 18wks than at baseline.

    Measured: baseline to 18 weeks

  4. Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity in the Amblyopic Eye

    Acuity is measured in each eye using the Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) visual acuity testing protocol at baseline and at 18wks resulting in a Snellen acuity score that can range from 20/16 to 20/800. The score is converted to logMAR (log of min angle of resolution) for statistical analysis, and a difference between the scores is calculated.

    A positive difference indicates acuity was better at 18wks than at baseline; a negative difference indicates acuity was worse at 18wks than at baseline.

    Measured: baseline to 18 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Randot Preschool Stereoacuity at 18 Weeks- Participants With All Causes of Amblyopia

    The Randot Preschool Stereotest measures stereopsis from 800 to 40 seconds of arc on patients as young as 2 years of age. This Stereotest is designed as a matching game in which the patient matches pictures in a test booklet wearing special glasses. A subject can fail the pretest (not see any pictures) or can score >800 (the worst), 800, 400, 200, 100, 60, or 40 (the best) seconds of arc. If two shapes are identified correctly the patient progresses to the next lower stereoacuity level. A failed test occurs when the patient cannot identify any shapes.

    Measured: 18 weeks

  2. Randot Preschool Stereoacuity at 18 Weeks- Anisometropic Participants Only

    The Randot Preschool Stereotest measures stereopsis from 800 to 40 seconds of arc on patients as young as 2 years of age. This Stereotest is designed as a matching game in which the patient matches pictures in a test booklet wearing special glasses. A subject can fail the pretest (not see any pictures) or can score >800 (the worst), 800, 400, 200, 100, 60, or 40 (the best) seconds of arc. If two shapes are identified correctly the patient progresses to the next lower stereoacuity level. A failed test occurs when the patient cannot identify any shapes.

    Measured: 18 weeks

  3. Mean Change in Visual Acuity in the Sound Eye

    Acuity is measured in each eye using the Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) visual acuity testing protocol at baseline and at 18wks resulting in a Snellen acuity score that can range from 20/16 to 20/800. The score is converted to logMAR (log of min angle of resolution) for statistical analysis, and a difference between the scores is calculated.

    A positive difference indicates acuity was better at 18wks than at baseline; a negative difference indicates acuity was worse at 18wks than at baseline.

    Measured: baseline to 18 weeks

  4. Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity in the Sound Eye

    Acuity is measured in each eye using the Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) visual acuity testing protocol at baseline and at 18wks resulting in a Snellen acuity score that can range from 20/16 to 20/800. The score is converted to logMAR (log of min angle of resolution) for statistical analysis, and a difference between the scores is calculated.

    A positive difference indicates acuity was better at 18wks than at baseline; a negative difference indicates acuity was worse at 18wks than at baseline.

    Measured: baseline to 18 weeks

  5. Visual Acuity Distribution in the Sound Eye

    Acuity is measured in each eye using the Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) visual acuity testing protocol at baseline and at 18 wks resulting in a Snellen acuity score that can range from 20/16 to 20/800. This acuity score is converted to logMAR (log of min angle of resolution) for statistical analysis.

    20/16=-0.1 logMAR; best 20/20=0.0 logMAR; 20/25=0.1; 20/32=0.2; 20/40=0.3; 20/50=0.4; 20/63=0.5; 20/80=0.6; 20/100=0.7; 20/125=0.8; 20/160=0.9; 20/200=1.0; 20/250=1.1; 20/320=1.2; 20/400=1.3; 20/500=1.4; 20/640=1.5; 20/800=1.6; worst

    Measured: 18 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Apr 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2005
  3. Primary completionOct 2007
  4. Study completionJan 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
240 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00315302
Sponsor's protocol ID
NEI-115
Other IDs
2U10EY011751
Acronym
ATS8
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
14 Apr 2006
Last updated
19 Jul 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Pharmacological plus optical penalization treatment for amblyopia: results of a randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;127(1):22-30. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.520.

    PubMed 19139333
  • Repka MX, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Birch E, Cotter SA, Holmes JM, Hertle RW, Hoover DL, Klimek DL, Marsh-Tootle W, Scheiman MM, Suh DW, Weakley DR; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Treatment of severe amblyopia with weekend atropine: results from 2 randomized clinical trials. J AAPOS. 2009 Jun;13(3):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.03.002.

    PubMed 19541265
  • Wallace DK, Lazar EL, Melia M, Birch EE, Holmes JM, Hopkins KB, Kraker RT, Kulp MT, Pang Y, Repka MX, Tamkins SM, Weise KK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Stereoacuity in children with anisometropic amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2011 Oct;15(5):455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.06.007.

    PubMed 22108357
  • Repka M, Simons K, Kraker R; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Laterality of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug;150(2):270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.040. Epub 2010 May 8.

    PubMed 20451898

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Atropine and Plano Lens in people with Amblyopia, run by Jaeb Center for Health Research at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Aug 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Acuity Mean Score in the Amblyopic Eye (time frame: 18 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00315302, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in