AzTrials
AzTrials

InfluenzaPhase 2NCT00306995

Safety Study of Pandemic Candidate Influenza Vaccines in the Elderly Population

A Phase 2 study testing SB218352_15, SB218352_8 and SB218352_4 in people with Influenza and Influenza Vaccines, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 10 sites in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Influenza pandemics are caused by viruses that possess an Hemagglutinin molecule to which most of the population lacks immunity. If such virus is pathogenic to human and demonstrates the ability to transmit from person to person, the result is a global outbreak of disease that affects a high percentage of individuals… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Influenza, Influenza Vaccines
What is being tested?
SB218352_15, SB218352_8 and SB218352_4
Type of treatment
Vaccines
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
385 participants
Where
10 sitesGermany
Study dates
11 May 2005to 4 Jul 2006
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects who the investigator believes that they can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol
  • A male or female aged over 60 years at the time of vaccination.
  • Written informed consent obtained from the subject.

Who cannot join

  • Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug or vaccine) other than the study vaccine(s) within 30 days preceding the administration of the study vaccine, or planned use during the study period.
  • Participation in an earlier study with a candidate pandemic H9N2 vaccine.
  • Acute disease at the time of enrolment.
  • Acute clinically significant pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic or renal functional abnormality
  • History of allergic disease or reactions likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine.
  • Drug and/or alcohol dependency.

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country.

10 sites in 1 country

Germany10 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bad Bramstedt, Schleswig-Holstein, 24576

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bad Segeberg, Schleswig-Holstein, 23795

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dresden, Saxony, 01219

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dresden, Saxony, 01307

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Elmshorn, Schleswig-Holstein, 25335

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Finsterwalde, Brandenburg, 03238

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Geringswalde, Saxony, 09326

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ketzin, Brandenburg, 14669

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Schmiedeberg, Saxony, 01762

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tostedt, Lower Saxony, 21255

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Open, Randomized, Multicenter, Comparative Vaccination Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of Various Formulations of a Monovalent Candidate Pandemic Influenza A Vaccine in Individuals Over 60 Years of Age

Influenza pandemics are caused by viruses that possess an Hemagglutinin molecule to which most of the population lacks immunity. If such virus is pathogenic to human and demonstrates the ability to transmit from person to person, the result is a global outbreak of disease that affects a high percentage of individuals in a short period of time and is likely to cause substantially increased mortality and morbidity in all countries of the world. Recently, purely avian influenza viruses, including the H5N1, H9N2 and H7N7 subtypes, have been directly transmitted to humans, raising concern over the possibility of a new influenza pandemic among the world's immunologically naive populations. In order to face this kind of situation, a pandemic influenza vaccine has to be developed.

Being tested
SB218352_15, SB218352_8, SB218352_4, SB218352_2, SB218352_8AL
Keywords
prophylaxis of pandemic influenza
Medical subject headings
Influenza, Human

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SB218352_15Biological

    Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 1 vaccine

  • SB218352_8Biological

    Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 2 vaccine

  • SB218352_4Biological

    Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 3 vaccine

  • SB218352_2Biological

    Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 4 vaccine

  • SB218352_8ALBiological

    Pandemic influenza A formulation 2 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine

  • SB218352_4ALBiological

    Pandemic influenza A formulation 3 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine

  • SB218352_2ALBiological

    Pandemic influenza A formulation 4 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine

Study groups in NCT00306995
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SB218352_15 GroupExperimentalMale and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 1 non-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
Receives: Biological: SB218352_15
SB218352_8 GroupExperimentalMale and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 2 non-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
Receives: Biological: SB218352_8
SB218352_4 GroupExperimentalMale and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 3 non-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
Receives: Biological: SB218352_4
SB218352_2 GroupExperimentalMale and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 4 non-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
Receives: Biological: SB218352_2
SB218352_8AL GroupExperimentalMale and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 2 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
Receives: Biological: SB218352_8AL
SB218352_4AL GroupExperimentalMale and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 3 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
Receives: Biological: SB218352_4AL
SB218352_2AL GroupExperimentalMale and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 4 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
Receives: Biological: SB218352_2AL

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Serum Haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2)

    Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).

    Measured: At Day 10 post Dose 1

  2. Serum HI Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2)

    Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 1

  3. Number of Seroconverted Subjects Against Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer lower than (<) 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre higher than or equal to (≥) 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in post-vaccination titer

    Measured: At Day 10 post Dose 1

  4. Number of Seroconverted Subjects Against Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre ≥ 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in post-vaccination titer

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 1

  5. Seroconversion Factor for Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Seroconversion factor was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 10 compared to day 0.

    Measured: At Day 10 post Dose 1

  6. Seroconversion Factor for Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Seroconversion factor was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 21 compared to day 0.

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 1

  7. Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against H9N2

    Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.

    Measured: At Day 10 post Dose 1

  8. Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against H9N2

    Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 1

  9. Number of Subjects With Seroprotection Power Against H9N2

    Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.

    Measured: At Day 10 post Dose 1

  10. Number of Subjects With Seroprotection Power Against H9N2

    Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 1

  11. Serum HI Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2)

    Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)

  12. Serum HI Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2)

    Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)

  13. Number of Seroconverted Subjects Against Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre ≥ 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in postvaccination titer

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)

  14. Number of Seroconverted Subjects Against Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre ≥ 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in post-vaccination titer

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)

  15. Seroconversion Factor for Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Seroconversion factor defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 42) compared to day 0.

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)

  16. Seroconversion Factor for Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Seroconversion factor was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 and Day 386 for Subset 2) compared to day 0.

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)

  17. Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against H9N2

    Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)

  18. Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against H9N2

    Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)

  19. Number of Subjects With Seroprotection Power Against H9N2

    Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)

  20. Number of Subjects With Seroprotection Power Against H9N2

    Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.

    Measured: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Number of Subjects With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)

    An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination.

    Measured: During the 30-days (Day 0-30) post vaccination

  2. Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence which resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in permanent of serious physical disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a subject or might have put the subject at risk based on medical or scientific judgment or necessitated intervention to prevent such an event (e.q. invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias, or convulsion that do not resulted in hospitalization).

    Measured: From Day 0 to Day 51

  3. Frequency of Antigen-specific Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) T-cells

    Among expressed immune markers were interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L).

    Measured: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post vaccination

  4. Frequency of Antigen-specific CD4 T-cells

    Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).

    Measured: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination

  5. Cytokine-positive CD4 T-cells Frequency

    Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L). Descriptive comparison of the CMI response after Dose 1 and Dose 2 of the monovalent candidate pandemic influenza A vaccine. CMI response was determined in terms of the proportion of lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ per million T cells) activated in vitro by the vaccine antigen on Days 10 and 21 after the Dose 1 and on Day 21 after Dose 2 as compared to Day 0 (pre-vaccination). The results were calculated based on the individual difference between each post-vaccination timepoint (Day 10, Day 21, Day 42) and Day 0.

    Measured: At Days 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination

  6. Frequency of Antigen-specific Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T-cells

    Among expressed immune markers were interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L).

    Measured: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination

  7. Frequency of Antigen-specific CD8 T-cells

    Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).

    Measured: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination

  8. Cytokine-positive CD8 T-cells Frequency

    Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L). Descriptive comparison of the CMI response after Dose 1 and Dose 2 of the monovalent candidate pandemic influenza A vaccine. CMI response was determined in terms of the proportion of lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ per million T cells) activated in vitro by the vaccine antigen on Days 10 and 21 after the Dose 1 and on Day 21 after Dose 2 as compared to Day 0 (pre-vaccination). The results were calculated based on the individual difference between each post-vaccination timepoint (Day 10, Day 21, Day 42) and Day 0.

    Measured: At Days 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination

  9. Number of Subjects With Solicited Local Symptoms

    Assessed solicited local symptoms were pain, redness, swelling. Any = occurrence of any local symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 pain = pain which prevents normal everyday activities. Grade 3 redness/swelling = redness/swelling spreading beyond 50 millimeters (mm).

    Measured: During the 4-days post Dose 1 (Days 0-3), post Dose 2 (Days 21-24) and across these doses

  10. Number of Subjects With Solicited Local Symptoms

    Assessed solicited local symptoms were pain, redness, swelling. Any = occurrence of any local symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 pain = pain which prevents normal everyday activities. Grade 3 redness/swelling = redness/swelling spreading beyond 50 millimeters (mm).

    Measured: During the 4 Days post Dose 3 (Days 189-192 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-368 for Subset 2 groups)

  11. Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms

    Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating. Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = axillary temperature higher than (>) 39°C. Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.

    Measured: During the 4-days (Day 0-3) post Dose 1

  12. Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms

    Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating. Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = axillary temperature higher than (>) 39°C. Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.

    Measured: During the 4-days post Dose 2 (Days 21-24)

  13. Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms

    Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating. Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = axillary temperature higher than (>) 39°C. Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.

    Measured: During the 4-Days (Day 0-3) across doses 1 and 2

  14. Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms

    Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axilar temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating. Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = fever higher than (>) 39°C. Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.

    Measured: During the 4 Days post Dose 3 (Days 189-192 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-368 for Subset 2 groups)

  15. Number of Subjects With Unsolicited AEs

    An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination.

    Measured: During the 30-days post Dose 3 (Days 189-219 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-395 for Subset 2 groups)

  16. Number of Subjects With SAEs

    A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence which resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in permanent of serious physical disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a subject or might have put the subject at risk based on medical or scientific judgment or necessitated intervention to prevent such an event (e.q. invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias, or convulsion that do not resulted in hospitalization).

    Measured: Within the 365-day post-vaccination period (Days 0-364 for Subset 1 groups) and within the 395-day post-vaccination period (Days 0-394 for Subset 2 groups)

  17. Number of Subjects With Any SAEs

    A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence which resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in permanent of serious physical disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a subject or might have put the subject at risk based on medical or scientific judgment or necessitated intervention to prevent such an event (e.q. invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias, or convulsion that do not resulted in hospitalization). Only Subset 2 groups had available data for the specified time frame.

    Measured: Up to 30-day post Dose 3 (Days 365-394)

  18. Number of Subjects With Antibody Persistence

    Antibody persistence was evaluated in terms of seroprotection rate (SPR) against influenza A subtype H9N2 and seroconversion rate (SCR) against influenza A subtype H9N2.

    Measured: At Days 189 and 365

  19. Seroconversion Factor (SCF) for Influenza A Subtype H9N2.

    SCF was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs at the post-vaccination time points compared to Day 0, for each vaccine strain.

    Measured: At Days 189 and 365

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Mar 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study start11 May 2005
  3. Primary completion4 Jul 2006
  4. Study completion4 Jul 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
385 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00306995
Sponsor's protocol ID
102499
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
16 Feb 2006
Last updated
10 Feb 2020
Individual data sharing
Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing SB218352_15, SB218352_8 and SB218352_4 in people with Influenza and Influenza Vaccines, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 10 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Serum Haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2) (time frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1). The study lists 20 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in