HeadacheNCT00298142
Management of Headache Disorders: A Clinical Trial Screening for Prognostic Patient Characteristics
A study of Headache, run by Vrije Universiteit Brussel at 14 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
The management of headache disorders is too often based upon trial and error or on personal beliefs and opinions. Seldom it is based on scientific arguments. Therefore the identification of prognostic patient characteristics is mandatory as this will lead to a more precise referral of headache patients.A prospective… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Headache
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- Feb 2006to Jun 2007
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Dutch speaking
- Willing to participate
- At least 18 years old
- Combination of headache and neck pain
- Headache since at least two months and at least twice a month
- A combination of migraine, tension type headache and cervicogenic headache
Who cannot join
- Clusterheadache
- Trigeminusneuralgia
- Peripheral neuropathy
- A history with neck surgery
- Comorbidity with chronic muskuloskeletal pain like fibromyalgia
- Radicular pain in the upper extremity
Show all 12Show fewer
- Osteoarthritis
- Down Syndroom
- Physio/ manual therapy treatment in the last 12 months for this headache complaint.
- The use of prescribed medication (like NSAIDs and triptans) for this headache complaint during the last two months
- Pregnancy
- Red flags as described in the Dutch General Practitioners Headache Guideline
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
Belgium14 sites
GP-De Loof
Aalst
UZA - Neurology Dept.
Antwerp, Antwerp, 2650
GP-Roelants
Boom, 2850
AZ-VUB
Brussels, Brussels Capital, 1090
GP-Marmitte
Dilbeek, 1700
GP - Sengeleng
Hamme, 9220
GP-De Hertogh
Kampenhout
GP- De Smet, De Leu, Van Watermeulen, Thienpont, Wille
Laarne
GP - Riffi Abdellatif
Mechelen, 2800
GP-Vande Voorde
Merchtem
GP - Goossens
Reet, 2840
GP- Dingemans, Michiels, Declercq
Reet, 2840
GP-Van de Heijning
Schoten
GP-Roelands
Zemst, 1980
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial to Investigate the Management of Headache Disorders. Study to Identify Prognostic Patient Characteristics and to Investigate the Additional Value of Physio-/Manual Therapy
The management of headache disorders is too often based upon trial and error or on personal beliefs and opinions. Seldom it is based on scientific arguments. Therefore the identification of prognostic patient characteristics is mandatory as this will lead to a more precise referral of headache patients.A prospective cohortstudy is designed to identify these prognostic patient characteristics. After testing, 186 headache patients (migraine, tension type headache and cervicogenic headache) will be randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups. Testing includes the fulfillment of questionnaires (Headache Diagnosis Questionnaire, Headache Inventory Questionnaire and the Headache Impact Test) and physical tests (Thermal Stimuli, Cervical Spine examination and Pressure Algometry). Treatment groups are a usual care group (administered by a medical doctor) and a usual care plus physio-/ manual therapy treatment. After six weeks of treatment subjects will complete the headache inventory list and the Headache Impact Test a second time. The perceived effect will be registered allowing the distinction between responders (positive effect) and non-responders (no effect or worse). Logistic regression-analysis will be used to identify the specific patient characteristics of the responders and the non-responders. Secondly the additional value of the physio-/ manual therapy intervention will be examined. Follow-up measurements up to 52 weeks are provided.
- Conditions
- Headache
- Being tested
- Usual Care provided by a medical doctor (GP or Neurologist), Usual care plus Physio-/ Manual Therapy
- Keywords
- Cervicogenic Headache, Migraine, Tension Type Headache
- Medical subject headings
- Headache, Post-Traumatic Headache, Migraine Disorders, Tension-Type Headache
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Usual Care provided by a medical doctor (GP or Neurologist)Procedure or surgery
Usual care plus Physio-/ Manual TherapyProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Manual Examination of the Cervical Spine
Pressure algometry
Thermal stimulation
Perceived effect
HIT-6
Secondary outcomes (5)
Frequency of headache
Intensity of headache
Medication Intake
Additional Profession help
Absenteism
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2006
- Study completionJun 2007
Why it stopped: Insufficient enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HeadacheStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Vrije Universiteit BrusselThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hogeschool Antwerpen
- Investigators
- Willem De Hertogh, MSc, Principal investigator, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00298142
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Headache Trial
- Other IDs
- OZR-VUB 997, OZR-HA G 815
- Status last verified
- Oct 2009
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2006
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2009
- Results posted
- No
Publications
De Hertogh WJ, Vaes PH, Vijverman V, De Cordt A, Duquet W. The clinical examination of neck pain patients: the validity of a group of tests. Man Ther. 2007 Feb;12(1):50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.02.007.
PubMed 16769236De Hertogh WJ, Vaes PH, Devroey D, Truijen S, Duquet W, Oostendorp R. Management of headache disorders: design of a randomised clinical trial screening for prognostic patient characteristics. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Apr 26;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-38.
PubMed 17462091De Hertogh W, Vaes P, Devroey D, Louis P, Carpay H, Truijen S, Duquet W, Oostendorp R. Preliminary results, methodological considerations and recruitment difficulties of a randomised clinical trial comparing two treatment regimens for patients with headache and neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Sep 23;10:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-115.
PubMed 19775434
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial to Investigate the Management of Headache Disorders. Study to Identify Prognostic Patient Characteristics and to Investigate the Additional Value of Physio-/Manual Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00298142
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Headache Trial
- Conditions
- Headache
- Keywords
- Cervicogenic Headache, Migraine, Tension Type Headache
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Insufficient enrollment
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Vrije Universiteit BrusselUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hogeschool Antwerpen
- Study start
- Feb 2006
- Study completion
- Jun 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The management of headache disorders is too often based upon trial and error or on personal beliefs and opinions. Seldom it is based on scientific arguments. Therefore the identification of prognostic patient characteristics is mandatory as this will lead to a more precise referral of headache patients.A prospective cohortstudy is designed to identify these prognostic patient characteristics. After testing, 186 headache patients (migraine, tension type headache and cervicogenic headache) will be randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups. Testing includes the fulfillment of questionnaires (Headache Diagnosis Questionnaire, Headache Inventory Questionnaire and the Headache Impact Test) and physical tests (Thermal Stimuli, Cervical Spine examination and Pressure Algometry). Treatment groups are a usual care group (administered by a medical doctor) and a usual care plus physio-/ manual therapy treatment. After six weeks of treatment subjects will complete the headache inventory list and the Headache Impact Test a second time. The perceived effect will be registered allowing the distinction between responders (positive effect) and non-responders (no effect or worse). Logistic regression-analysis will be used to identify the specific patient characteristics of the responders and the non-responders. Secondly the additional value of the physio-/ manual therapy intervention will be examined. Follow-up measurements up to 52 weeks are provided.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Dutch speaking
- Willing to participate
- At least 18 years old
- Combination of headache and neck pain
- Headache since at least two months and at least twice a month
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Clusterheadache
- Trigeminusneuralgia
- Peripheral neuropathy
- A history with neck surgery
- Comorbidity with chronic muskuloskeletal pain like fibromyalgia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care provided by a medical doctor (GP or Neurologist) | Procedure or surgery | – |
| Usual care plus Physio-/ Manual Therapy | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Manual Examination of the Cervical Spine
Pressure algometry
Thermal stimulation
Perceived effect
HIT-6
5 secondary outcomes
Frequency of headache
Intensity of headache
Medication Intake
Additional Profession help
Absenteism
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Insufficient enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2009.
- Background: PubMed 16769236De Hertogh WJ, Vaes PH, Vijverman V, De Cordt A, Duquet W. The clinical examination of neck pain patients: the validity of a group of tests. Man Ther. 2007 Feb;12(1):50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.02.007.
- Background: PubMed 17462091De Hertogh WJ, Vaes PH, Devroey D, Truijen S, Duquet W, Oostendorp R. Management of headache disorders: design of a randomised clinical trial screening for prognostic patient characteristics. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Apr 26;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-38.
- Results publication: PubMed 19775434De Hertogh W, Vaes P, Devroey D, Louis P, Carpay H, Truijen S, Duquet W, Oostendorp R. Preliminary results, methodological considerations and recruitment difficulties of a randomised clinical trial comparing two treatment regimens for patients with headache and neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Sep 23;10:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-115.
Related trials for Headache
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Glymphatic System in Migraine
Migraine
RecruitingObservational study
Epidural Hydroxyethyl Starch for Post-Dural Puncture Headache in Parturients
Parturients, Accidental Puncture of Dura During Anaesthesia
RecruitingObservational study
Familial Mediterranean Fever and Related Disorders: Genetics and Disease Characteristics
Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), Autoinflammation
Active, not recruiting
Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of tDCS to Visual and Motor Cortex in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
App-Based Migraine Treatment: The Health enSuite Study
Migraine, Migraine With Aura
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Willem De Hertogh, MSc principal investigator
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study of Headache, run by Vrije Universiteit Brussel at 14 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Insufficient enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Manual Examination of the Cervical Spine. The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00298142, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2009.