Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Phase 2NCT00290940
Evaluation of Glucose Lowering Effect, Safety and Tolerability of CS-917
A Phase 2 study testing CS-917, metformin hydrochloride and pioglitazone in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Daiichi Sankyo at 66 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will compare glucose lowering with CS-917 compared to placebo after 3 months of treatment Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- CS-917, metformin hydrochloride and pioglitazone
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 66 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2006to Apr 2007
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Drug naive or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic subjects:
- Never received oral antihyperglycemic or insulin therapy or
- No oral antihyperglycemic or insulin therapy for more than 6 months since original diagnosis and
- No insulin therapy within one year of screening, with the exception of use during hospitalization or for use in gestational diabetes and
- No antihyperglycemic therapy for more than three consecutive days, or a total of of seven non-consecutive days, during the 8 weeks prior to screening.
- HbA1C>6.7% and < or = to 10% at screening
Who cannot join
- Current insulin therapy
- Symptoms of poorly controlled diabetes
- History of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar, nonketonic coma within one year of screening
- Serum bicarbonate < or = to 19 meq/L
- Serum creatinine (Scr) > 1.4 mg/dL (females) or 1.5 mg/dL (males)
- Contraindication to metformin
Trial locations and contacts
66 sites in 1 country.
66 sites in 1 country
United States66 sites
Study site
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
Study site
Beaver, Pennsylvania, 15009
Study site
Bensalem, Pennsylvania, 19020
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205
Study site
Brooksville, Florida, 34613
Study site
Burke, Virginia
Study site
Cadillac, Michigan, 49601
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28262
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Study site
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78404
Study site
Cudahy, California, 90201
Study site
Delaware, Ohio, 43015
Study site
Detroit, Michigan, 48235
Study site
Elizabeth, New Jersey, 07202
Study site
Excelsior Springs, Missouri, 64024
Study site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33308
Study site
Greer, South Carolina
Study site
Henderson, Nevada, 89052
Study site
Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77024
Study site
Interlochen, Michigan, 49643
Study site
Kissimmee, Florida, 34741
Study site
Lake Jackson, Texas, 77566
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89103
Study site
Lenoir, North Carolina, 28645
Study site
Livonia, Michigan, 48152
Study site
Long Beach, California, 90806
Study site
Madison, Wisconsin, 53719
Study site
Marion, Ohio, 43302
Study site
Mesa, Arizona, 85201
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33156
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee
Study site
North Richland Hills, Texas
Study site
Northport, Alabama, 35476
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Study site
Olympia, Washington, 98502
Study site
Oxon Hill, Maryland, 20745
Study site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33028
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85014
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206
Study site
Port Gibson, Mississippi, 39150
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Study site
Reading, Pennsylvania, 19696
Study site
Rolling Fork, Mississippi, 39159
Study site
Rome, Georgia
Study site
Roseville, California, 95661
Study site
Sacramento, California, 95841
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Study site
Sebastian, Florida
Study site
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66216
Study site
Spring Valley, California, 91978
Study site
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709
Study site
Studio City, California, 91604
Study site
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Study site
Tempe, Arizona, 85282
Study site
Toms River, New Jersey, 08755
Study site
Topeka, Kansas, 66614
Study site
Topeka, Kansas
Study site
Vista, California, 92083
Study site
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
Study site
Warner Robins, Georgia, 31093
Study site
West Hills, California, 91307
Study site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Study site
Wilmington, Delaware, 19805
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of CS-917 as Monotherapy for Type 2 Diabetes
This study will compare glucose lowering with CS-917 compared to placebo after 3 months of treatment
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- CS-917, metformin hydrochloride, pioglitazone
- Keywords
- Diabetes mellitus, Type 2, High blood sugar, Hyperglycemia, Antihyperglycemic agents, CS-917
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hyperglycemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CS-917Drug
metformin hydrochlorideDrug
pioglitazoneDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean change from baseline in HbA1C after 12 weeks compared to placebo
Secondary outcomes (5)
Onset of efficacy of CS-917
Safety and tolerability of CS-917
Changes in other relevant glycemic and metabolic measures
Proportion of subjects achieving therapeutic response
Proportion of subjects discontinuing or requiring rescue for continued or worsening hyperglycemia
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2006
- Study completionApr 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Daiichi SankyoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Daiichi Sankyo
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00290940
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CS0917-A-U205
- Status last verified
- Sep 2007
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2006
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2007
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of CS-917 as Monotherapy for Type 2 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00290940
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CS0917-A-U205
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- Diabetes mellitus, Type 2, High blood sugar, Hyperglycemia, Antihyperglycemic agents, CS-917
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Daiichi SankyoIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2006
- Study completion
- Apr 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare glucose lowering with CS-917 compared to placebo after 3 months of treatment
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Drug naive or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic subjects:
- Never received oral antihyperglycemic or insulin therapy or
- No oral antihyperglycemic or insulin therapy for more than 6 months since original diagnosis and
- No insulin therapy within one year of screening, with the exception of use during hospitalization or for use in gestational diabetes and
- No antihyperglycemic therapy for more than three consecutive days, or a total of of seven non-consecutive days, during the 8 weeks prior to screening.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Current insulin therapy
- Symptoms of poorly controlled diabetes
- History of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar, nonketonic coma within one year of screening
- Serum bicarbonate < or = to 19 meq/L
- Serum creatinine (Scr) > 1.4 mg/dL (females) or 1.5 mg/dL (males)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CS-917 | Drug | – |
| metformin hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| pioglitazone | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Mean change from baseline in HbA1C after 12 weeks compared to placebo
5 secondary outcomes
Onset of efficacy of CS-917
Safety and tolerability of CS-917
Changes in other relevant glycemic and metabolic measures
Proportion of subjects achieving therapeutic response
Proportion of subjects discontinuing or requiring rescue for continued or worsening hyperglycemia
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2007.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
66 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing CS-917, metformin hydrochloride and pioglitazone in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Daiichi Sankyo at 66 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 66 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean change from baseline in HbA1C after 12 weeks compared to placebo. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2007.