Cervical DystoniaPhase 3NCT00288509
Open-label Extension Study of AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) for the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
A Phase 3 study testing Botulinum toxin type A in people with Cervical Dystonia, run by Ipsen at 18 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to assess longer term safety and effectiveness of Dysport®. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Dystonia
- What is being tested?
- Botulinum toxin type A
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 108 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2006to Jan 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects enrolled in the Y-47-52120-051 study, who have completed all study visits up to Week 12, or up to Week 4 in the event of an early withdrawal
- Returned to pre-treatment status as judged by the Investigator
Who cannot join
- Pure anterocollis or pure retrocollis
- Known antibodies to botulinum toxin type A
- Requirement for botulinum toxin injections to site(s) other than the neck and unable to avoid such treatment for the duration of the study
- Known significant underlying swallowing or respiratory abnormality which might be exacerbated by botulinum toxin treatment
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 2 countries.
18 sites in 2 countries
United States14 sites
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12205
Emory University School of Medicine, Wesley Woods Health Center
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329
University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Movement Disorder Clinic
Dallas, Texas, 75309
The Parkinson's and Movement Disorder Institute
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
University of Florida, Dept of Neurology
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Baylor College of Medicine, Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Iowa, Dept of Neurology
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
USC School of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, 90033
University of Miami, Dept of Neurology
Miami, Florida, 33136
Beth Israel Medical Center
New York, New York, 10003
Columbia University Medical Center, Neurological Institute
New York, New York, 10032
Barrow Neurology Clinics at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Wayne State University Medical Center
Southfield, Michigan, 48034
Russia4 sites
Scientific Research Institute of Neurology, RAMS
Moscow, 123367
Clinic "Cecil Plus"
Moscow, 125047
Municipal Multi-Speciality Hospital #2
Saint Petersburg, 194354
St Petersburg Pavlov State Medical University
Saint Petersburg, 197022
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label Extension Study to Assess the Longer Term Safety and Efficacy of Repeated Treatment of Dysport® Intramuscular Injection in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
The aim of this study is to assess longer term safety and effectiveness of Dysport®.
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia
- Being tested
- Botulinum toxin type A
- Medical subject headings
- Torticollis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Botulinum toxin type ABiological
Also called AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®)
In this long-term extension study, a dose of 500 units Dysport was administered by intramuscular injection into the clinically indicated neck muscles in a single dosing session in the first treatment cycle. This was the same dose as given in the preceding study NCT00257660 (Y-47-52120-051). Based on individual safety \& efficacy, subjects could then receive up to 3 subsequent injections with doses titrated in 250 unit steps, to a minimum of 250 units and a maximum of 1000 units. Retreatment occurred approximately 12-16 weeks after the previous injection, with the exact timing based on clinical need.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dysport | Experimental | 250-1000 units Receives: Biological: Botulinum toxin type A |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Total Score From Baseline
TWSTRS is comprised of three different components which are severity, disability \& pain. There is an ordinal scale for each component and the score range for each is the following: for severity from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (max severity), for disability from 0 (no disability) to 30 (max disability) and for pain from 0 (no pain) to 20 (max pain). TWSTRS total score is the sum of the 3 component scores, with a range from 0 to a maximum of 85. For each treatment cycle, the change in TWSTRS total score is the score at week 4 minus the score at baseline.
Measured: Week 4 follow-up visit
Secondary outcomes (3)
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Severity Subscale as a Change From Baseline
TWSTRS is comprised of three different components which are severity, disability \& pain. There is an ordinal scale for each component and the score range for severity is from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (max severity). For each treatment cycle, the change in TWSTRS severity subscale is the score at week 4 minus the score at baseline.
Measured: Week 4 follow-up visit
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Disability Subscale Score as a Change From Baseline
TWSTRS is comprised of three different components which are severity, disability \& pain. There is an ordinal scale for each component and the score range for disability is from 0 (no disability) to 30 (max disability). For each treatment cycle, the change in TWSTRS disability subscale is the score at week 4 minus the score at baseline.
Measured: Week 4 follow-up visit
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Pain Subscale Score as a Change From Baseline
TWSTRS is comprised of three different components which are severity, disability \& pain. There is an ordinal scale for each component and the score range for pain is from 0 (no pain) to 20 (max pain). For each treatment cycle, the change in TWSTRS pain subscale is the score at week 4 minus the score at baseline.
Measured: Week 4 follow-up visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2006
- Primary completionJan 2008
- Study completionJan 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical DystoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IpsenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ipsen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ipsen Medical Director, Study director, Ipsen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00288509
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Y-47-52120-731
- Other IDs
- 2005-002429-29, 2005
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 7 Feb 2006
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized, and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants. Any requests should be submitted to www.vivli.org for assessment by an independent scientific review board.
Publications
Truong D, Brodsky M, Lew M, Brashear A, Jankovic J, Molho E, Orlova O, Timerbaeva S; Global Dysport Cervical Dystonia Study Group. Long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) in cervical dystonia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010 Jun;16(5):316-23. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
PubMed 20359934Mordin M, Masaquel C, Abbott C, Copley-Merriman C. Factors affecting the health-related quality of life of patients with cervical dystonia and impact of treatment with abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 16;4(10):e005150. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005150.
PubMed 25324317
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label Extension Study to Assess the Longer Term Safety and Efficacy of Repeated Treatment of Dysport® Intramuscular Injection in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00288509
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Y-47-52120-731
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IpsenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2006
- Primary completion
- Jan 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Apr 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to assess longer term safety and effectiveness of Dysport®.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dysport | Experimental | Biological: Botulinum toxin type A250-1000 units |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subjects enrolled in the Y-47-52120-051 study, who have completed all study visits up to Week 12, or up to Week 4 in the event of an early withdrawal
- Returned to pre-treatment status as judged by the Investigator
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pure anterocollis or pure retrocollis
- Known antibodies to botulinum toxin type A
- Requirement for botulinum toxin injections to site(s) other than the neck and unable to avoid such treatment for the duration of the study
- Known significant underlying swallowing or respiratory abnormality which might be exacerbated by botulinum toxin treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Botulinum toxin type AAlso: AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®)In this long-term extension study, a dose of 500 units Dysport was administered by intramuscular injection into the clinically indicated neck muscles in a single dosing session in the first treatment cycle. This was the same dose as given in the preceding study NCT00257660 (Y-47-52120-051). Based on individual safety \& efficacy, subjects could then receive up to 3 subsequent injections with doses titrated in 250 unit steps, to a minimum of 250 units and a maximum of 1000 units. Retreatment occurred approximately 12-16 weeks after the previous injection, with the exact timing based on clinical need. | Biological | Dysport |
Primary outcome
Change in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Total Score From Baseline
Time frame: Week 4 follow-up visit
TWSTRS is comprised of three different components which are severity, disability \& pain. There is an ordinal scale for each component and the score range for each is the following: for severity from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (max severity), for disability from 0 (no disability) to 30 (max disability) and for pain from 0 (no pain) to 20 (max pain). TWSTRS total score is the sum of the 3 component scores, with a range from 0 to a maximum of 85. For each treatment cycle, the change in TWSTRS total score is the score at week 4 minus the score at baseline.
3 secondary outcomes
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Severity Subscale as a Change From Baseline
Time frame: Week 4 follow-up visit
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Disability Subscale Score as a Change From Baseline
Time frame: Week 4 follow-up visit
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Pain Subscale Score as a Change From Baseline
Time frame: Week 4 follow-up visit
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 20359934Truong D, Brodsky M, Lew M, Brashear A, Jankovic J, Molho E, Orlova O, Timerbaeva S; Global Dysport Cervical Dystonia Study Group. Long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) in cervical dystonia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010 Jun;16(5):316-23. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25324317Mordin M, Masaquel C, Abbott C, Copley-Merriman C. Factors affecting the health-related quality of life of patients with cervical dystonia and impact of treatment with abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 16;4(10):e005150. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005150.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized, and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants. Any requests should be submitted to www.vivli.org for assessment by an independent scientific review board.
Related trials for Cervical Dystonia
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
Accelerating TMS for Cervical Dystonia
Isolated Cervical Dystonia
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VIM0423 in Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Dystonia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessment of Cervical Range of Motion Restrictions in Infants With Arthrogenic Torticollis - A Feasibility Study
Torticollis (Arthrogenic)
Recruiting
Effect of Vibro-tactile Stimulation Intensity on Head Posture in Cervical Dystonia
Cervical Dystonia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
An Observational Study of Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Isolated/Primary Dystonia That Affects More Than One Region of the Body
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ipsen Medical Director study director
Ipsen
18 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Botulinum toxin type A in people with Cervical Dystonia, run by Ipsen at 18 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in United States, Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Apr 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Total Score From Baseline (time frame: Week 4 follow-up visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00288509, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2022.