TrachomaPhase 4NCT00286026
Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma II
A Phase 4 study testing Azithromycin in people with Trachoma, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Trachoma is the world's leading cause of preventable blindness. This disease, caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, is endemic in many parts of the developing world. In 1990s we evaluated the use of community-wide treatment with oral azithromycin in a project called Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma (ACT). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Trachoma
- What is being tested?
- Azithromycin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2005to Aug 2009
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Person resides within a selected rural village in a trachoma-endemic area of Egypt.
Who cannot join
- Person does not reside in one of the three rural villages being studied.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
About this study
Trachoma is the world's leading cause of preventable blindness. This disease, caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, is endemic in many parts of the developing world. In 1990s we evaluated the use of community-wide treatment with oral azithromycin in a project called Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma (ACT). This approach resulted in clinical improvement and dramatic reduction in prevalence of chlamydial infection through a 1-year follow-up. We enrolled the ACT villages, as well as an additional village that had not had any prior treatments, in our ACT II (2005) study and performed clinical surveys to assess trachoma activity testing conjunctival swabs for the presence of C. trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Thus, we hoped to determine the long-term (10 year) effects of azithromycin treatment.
We have completed the census and clinical survey of the initial three villages. Mass treatment with azithromycin would not be justified with such low rates (1.8 - 4%) of ocular chlamydial infection. We have treated only those living in households with one or more cases of chlamydial infection and we will not follow up on these individually treated families.
In order to achieve the goals of our study, we now propose to identify other more remote villages with trachoma infection rates of 20% or more to evaluate the effect of community-wide treatment with single dose of oral azithromycin. If one or more of these villages (dependent upon population) has trachoma rates of 20% or more they will be invited to participate in the azithromycin treatment. In one set of subjects (1 or 2 villages, dependent upon population and infection rate) we will perform treatment, and follow them up at 2-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment to ascertain infection rates. In a second set of subjects (1 or 2 villages, dependent upon population and infection rate) we will perform treatment, then perform re-treatment at 30-days post initial treatment, and follow them up at 2-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment to ascertain infection rates. This should help us determine the need for/and the best time for re-treatment to eliminate blinding trachoma, as some recent studies suggest there is a 2-4% failure rate in the initial treatment. In sum, this study should provide a rational approach to use of community-wide azithromycin treatment to eliminate blinding trachoma as a public health problem
Read the detailed description
This is operational research aimed at better defining the use of oral azithromycin as part of the SAFE strategy to eliminate blinding trachoma.
- Before the examinations, we will do a census and a sketch map of houses in each village. Particular emphasis will be placed on identifying all the children between 1 and 6 years of age. These children are the chief reservoir of infection, and would have been too young (or unborn) at the ACT study treatment, so it is of particular interest to determine their disease and infection status.
- Egyptian ophthalmologists will examine the eyelids, conjunctiva and cornea using magnifying loupes and a hand held light, with grading following the ACT protocol which contains categories referable to the W.H.O. detailed grading scheme. The clinical findings will be recorded on a standardized form.
- Egyptian health aides will photograph the inside of the right upper eyelid of all subjects. The photographs of the subjects at the initial visit and all subsequent examinations will be examined to confirm the consistency of clinical findings over the period of the study.
- To test for chlamydial infection, a single fiber-tipped swab will be stroked gently over the conjunctiva of the right eye by an Egyptian ophthalmologist. These swabs will be placed in special tubes and tested for Chlamydia trachomatis by a nucleic acid amplification assay. [APTIMA® Gen-Probe Inc. (San Diego, CA.)] The APTIMA® assay detects DNA via r-RNA by a process called transcription mediated amplification. Laboratory testing will be performed at the Chlamydia Research Laboratory at University of California, San Francisco.
- After the results are obtained from the nucleic acid amplification testing performed at the laboratory in San Francisco, treatment for trachoma will be done with a single-dose of oral azithromycin (20 mg/kg body weight in children, 1.0 gm adults). The azithromycin will be donated by Pfizer International. Young children will be weighed to determine the dose of azithromycin and the doses administered by a health aide under direct supervision of an Egyptian physician (Dr. Mahfouz). One set of subjects (1 or 2 villages depending upon population size, in order to generate meaningful numbers) will receive an initial treatment of 1.0 gm azithromycin; while the second set of subjects will receive an initial treatment of 1.0 gm azithromycin, followed by a second dose of 1.0 gm azithromycin at 30 days post treatment.
- If the prevalence of clinical trachoma is over 20% in children 10 and under, everyone in the village will be treated with oral azithromycin. After initial azithromycin treatment, follow-up examinations and specimen collection will be done 2, 12, and 24 months post-treatment for trachoma and chlamydial infection.
- If the prevalence is 10% to 20%, all children 10 and under, and the families of those children with active trachoma, will be treated. After initial azithromycin treatment, follow-up examinations and specimen collection will be done 2, 12, and 24 months post-treatment for trachoma and chlamydial infection.
- If the prevalence is less than 10%, only children with active disease and their families will receive treatment. There will be no follow-up examinations. Adults and older children will be told that azithromycin can cause nausea, vomiting, or loose stools or vomiting in some children and adults, and can occur in up to 5% (1 person in 20) of those treated. It should be noted that in our previous ACT study, more than 8,000 people received azithromycin with no complaints beyond minor gastro-intestinal upset.
- All positive specimens will have the major outer membrane gene amplified and sequenced. The genovars will be mapped for location within villages and families and then their distribution will be followed over time, after treatment to provide a better understanding of the epidemiology of the infection. Results of the study will be used as data input for the generation of mathematical models to predict whether community-wide retreatment (or alternate strategies) will be needed, and the optimal timing for such retreatment.
- Conditions
- Trachoma
- Being tested
- Azithromycin
- Keywords
- Chlamydia trachomatis
- Medical subject headings
- Trachoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AzithromycinDrug
Also called Zithromax, Zmax
1 gm Azithromycin orally, provided as four 250 mg tablets for adults; pediatric suspension will be provided to children > 1 year old (20 mg/kg body weight) to a maximal dose of 500 mg. One dose vs 2 doses given 30 days apart.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Subjects residing in villages assigned to treatment arm 1 will receive a clinical evaluation for trachoma and provide a swab specimen of conjunctivae of the R eye at enrollment (Day 0); will be treated with Azithromycin at Day 30; will be re-screened (clinical evaluation and swab specimen of R eye collected) at Day 60; and again at Day 360. Receives: Drug: Azithromycin |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Subjects residing in villages assigned to treatment arm 2 will receive a clinical evaluation for trachoma and provide a swab specimen of conjunctivae of the R eye at enrollment (Day 0), as well as receive an initial treatment with Azithromycin; will receive a second dose of Azithromycin at Day 30; will be re-screened (clinical evaluation and swab specimen of R eye collected) at Day 60; and again at Day 360. Receives: Drug: Azithromycin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis diagnosed by use of NAAT
Measured: One-year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2005
- Primary completionAug 2007
- Study completionAug 2009
Why it stopped: Prevalence of infection for screened population too low (\<7%) to enroll anyone.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (27)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TrachomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Julius Schachter, University of California, San Francisco
- Investigators
- Julius Schachter, PhD, Principal investigator, University of California, San FranciscoChandler R Dawson, MD, Principal investigator, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00286026
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H1079-17254
- Other IDs
- 5R01AI048789
- Status last verified
- Apr 2012
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2006
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Mabey D, Fraser-Hurt N. Antibiotics for trachoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD001860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001860.
PubMed 11869610Burton MJ, Frick KD, Bailey RL, Bowman RJ. Azithromycin for the treatment and control of trachoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002 Feb;3(2):113-20. doi: 10.1517/14656566.3.2.113.
PubMed 11829725Dawson CR, Schachter J. Should trachoma be treated with antibiotics? Lancet. 2002 Jan 19;359(9302):184-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07463-9. No abstract available.
PubMed 11812548Bain DL, Lietman T, Rasmussen S, Kalman S, Fan J, Lammel C, Zhang JZ, Dawson CR, Schachter J, Stephens RS. Chlamydial genovar distribution after community wide antibiotic treatment. J Infect Dis. 2001 Dec 15;184(12):1581-8. doi: 10.1086/324661. Epub 2001 Dec 3.
PubMed 11740734Pechere JC. New perspectives on macrolide antibiotics. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001;18 Suppl 1:S93-7. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00393-4.
PubMed 11574203Fraser-Hurt N, Bailey RL, Cousens S, Mabey D, Faal H, Mabey DC. Efficacy of oral azithromycin versus topical tetracycline in mass treatment of endemic trachoma. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(7):632-40.
PubMed 11477966Tabbara KF. Trachoma: a review. J Chemother. 2001 Apr;13 Suppl 1:18-22. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.2001.11782323.
PubMed 11434524Treadway G. Azithromycin: a new 15-membered macrolide. Jpn J Antibiot. 2001 Feb;54 Suppl A:70-6.
PubMed 11296412Bailey R, Lietman T. The SAFE strategy for the elimination of trachoma by 2020: will it work? Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):233-6. Epub 2003 Jul 7.
PubMed 11285668Frick KD, Lietman TM, Holm SO, Jha HC, Chaudhary JS, Bhatta RC. Cost-effectiveness of trachoma control measures: comparing targeted household treatment and mass treatment of children. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):201-7. Epub 2003 Jul 7.
PubMed 11285663Holm SO, Jha HC, Bhatta RC, Chaudhary JS, Thapa BB, Davis D, Pokhrel RP, Yinghui M, Zegans M, Schachter J, Frick KD, Tapert L, Lietman TM. Comparison of two azithromycin distribution strategies for controlling trachoma in Nepal. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):194-200. Epub 2003 Jul 7.
PubMed 11285662Lietman T, Fry A. Can we eliminate trachoma? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Apr;85(4):385-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.4.385. No abstract available.
PubMed 11264123Duran JM, Amsden GW. Azithromycin: indications for the future? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2000 Mar;1(3):489-505. doi: 10.1517/14656566.1.3.489.
PubMed 11249533Solomon AW, Akudibillah J, Abugri P, Hagan M, Foster A, Bailey RL, Mabey DC. Pilot study of the use of community volunteers to distribute azithromycin for trachoma control in Ghana. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(1):8-14. Epub 2003 Nov 5.
PubMed 11217675West S. The red eye. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 23;343(21):1577. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011233432117. No abstract available.
PubMed 11184764
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma II
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00286026
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H1079-17254
- Conditions
- Trachoma
- Keywords
- Chlamydia trachomatis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Prevalence of infection for screened population too low (\<7%) to enroll anyone.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
- Study start
- Jun 2005
- Primary completion
- Aug 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Trachoma is the world's leading cause of preventable blindness. This disease, caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, is endemic in many parts of the developing world. In 1990s we evaluated the use of community-wide treatment with oral azithromycin in a project called Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma (ACT). This approach resulted in clinical improvement and dramatic reduction in prevalence of chlamydial infection through a 1-year follow-up. We enrolled the ACT villages, as well as an additional village that had not had any prior treatments, in our ACT II (2005) study and performed clinical surveys to assess trachoma activity testing conjunctival swabs for the presence of C. trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Thus, we hoped to determine the long-term (10 year) effects of azithromycin treatment.
We have completed the census and clinical survey of the initial three villages. Mass treatment with azithromycin would not be justified with such low rates (1.8 - 4%) of ocular chlamydial infection. We have treated only those living in households with one or more cases of chlamydial infection and we will not follow up on these individually treated families.
In order to achieve the goals of our study, we now propose to identify other more remote villages with trachoma infection rates of 20% or more to evaluate the effect of community-wide treatment with single dose of oral azithromycin. If one or more of these villages (dependent upon population) has trachoma rates of 20% or more they will be invited to participate in the azithromycin treatment. In one set of subjects (1 or 2 villages, dependent upon population and infection rate) we will perform treatment, and follow them up at 2-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment to ascertain infection rates. In a second set of subjects (1 or 2 villages, dependent upon population and infection rate) we will perform treatment, then perform re-treatment at 30-days post initial treatment, and follow them up at 2-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment to ascertain infection rates. This should help us determine the need for/and the best time for re-treatment to eliminate blinding trachoma, as some recent studies suggest there is a 2-4% failure rate in the initial treatment. In sum, this study should provide a rational approach to use of community-wide azithromycin treatment to eliminate blinding trachoma as a public health problem
Detailed description
This is operational research aimed at better defining the use of oral azithromycin as part of the SAFE strategy to eliminate blinding trachoma.
- Before the examinations, we will do a census and a sketch map of houses in each village. Particular emphasis will be placed on identifying all the children between 1 and 6 years of age. These children are the chief reservoir of infection, and would have been too young (or unborn) at the ACT study treatment, so it is of particular interest to determine their disease and infection status.
- Egyptian ophthalmologists will examine the eyelids, conjunctiva and cornea using magnifying loupes and a hand held light, with grading following the ACT protocol which contains categories referable to the W.H.O. detailed grading scheme. The clinical findings will be recorded on a standardized form.
- Egyptian health aides will photograph the inside of the right upper eyelid of all subjects. The photographs of the subjects at the initial visit and all subsequent examinations will be examined to confirm the consistency of clinical findings over the period of the study.
- To test for chlamydial infection, a single fiber-tipped swab will be stroked gently over the conjunctiva of the right eye by an Egyptian ophthalmologist. These swabs will be placed in special tubes and tested for Chlamydia trachomatis by a nucleic acid amplification assay. [APTIMA® Gen-Probe Inc. (San Diego, CA.)] The APTIMA® assay detects DNA via r-RNA by a process called transcription mediated amplification. Laboratory testing will be performed at the Chlamydia Research Laboratory at University of California, San Francisco.
- After the results are obtained from the nucleic acid amplification testing performed at the laboratory in San Francisco, treatment for trachoma will be done with a single-dose of oral azithromycin (20 mg/kg body weight in children, 1.0 gm adults). The azithromycin will be donated by Pfizer International. Young children will be weighed to determine the dose of azithromycin and the doses administered by a health aide under direct supervision of an Egyptian physician (Dr. Mahfouz). One set of subjects (1 or 2 villages depending upon population size, in order to generate meaningful numbers) will receive an initial treatment of 1.0 gm azithromycin; while the second set of subjects will receive an initial treatment of 1.0 gm azithromycin, followed by a second dose of 1.0 gm azithromycin at 30 days post treatment.
- If the prevalence of clinical trachoma is over 20% in children 10 and under, everyone in the village will be treated with oral azithromycin. After initial azithromycin treatment, follow-up examinations and specimen collection will be done 2, 12, and 24 months post-treatment for trachoma and chlamydial infection.
- If the prevalence is 10% to 20%, all children 10 and under, and the families of those children with active trachoma, will be treated. After initial azithromycin treatment, follow-up examinations and specimen collection will be done 2, 12, and 24 months post-treatment for trachoma and chlamydial infection.
- If the prevalence is less than 10%, only children with active disease and their families will receive treatment. There will be no follow-up examinations. Adults and older children will be told that azithromycin can cause nausea, vomiting, or loose stools or vomiting in some children and adults, and can occur in up to 5% (1 person in 20) of those treated. It should be noted that in our previous ACT study, more than 8,000 people received azithromycin with no complaints beyond minor gastro-intestinal upset.
- All positive specimens will have the major outer membrane gene amplified and sequenced. The genovars will be mapped for location within villages and families and then their distribution will be followed over time, after treatment to provide a better understanding of the epidemiology of the infection. Results of the study will be used as data input for the generation of mathematical models to predict whether community-wide retreatment (or alternate strategies) will be needed, and the optimal timing for such retreatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Drug: AzithromycinSubjects residing in villages assigned to treatment arm 1 will receive a clinical evaluation for trachoma and provide a swab specimen of conjunctivae of the R eye at enrollment (Day 0); will be treated with Azithromycin at Day 30; will be re-screened (clinical evaluation and swab specimen of R eye collected) at Day 60; and again at Day 360. |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Drug: AzithromycinSubjects residing in villages assigned to treatment arm 2 will receive a clinical evaluation for trachoma and provide a swab specimen of conjunctivae of the R eye at enrollment (Day 0), as well as receive an initial treatment with Azithromycin; will receive a second dose of Azithromycin at Day 30; will be re-screened (clinical evaluation and swab specimen of R eye collected) at Day 60; and again at Day 360. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Person resides within a selected rural village in a trachoma-endemic area of Egypt.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Person does not reside in one of the three rural villages being studied.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AzithromycinAlso: Zithromax, Zmax1 gm Azithromycin orally, provided as four 250 mg tablets for adults; pediatric suspension will be provided to children > 1 year old (20 mg/kg body weight) to a maximal dose of 500 mg. One dose vs 2 doses given 30 days apart. | Drug | Arm 1, Arm 2 |
Primary outcome
Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis diagnosed by use of NAAT
Time frame: One-year
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2012.
- Background: PubMed 11869610Mabey D, Fraser-Hurt N. Antibiotics for trachoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD001860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001860.
- Background: PubMed 11829725Burton MJ, Frick KD, Bailey RL, Bowman RJ. Azithromycin for the treatment and control of trachoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002 Feb;3(2):113-20. doi: 10.1517/14656566.3.2.113.
- Background: PubMed 11812548Dawson CR, Schachter J. Should trachoma be treated with antibiotics? Lancet. 2002 Jan 19;359(9302):184-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07463-9. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11740734Bain DL, Lietman T, Rasmussen S, Kalman S, Fan J, Lammel C, Zhang JZ, Dawson CR, Schachter J, Stephens RS. Chlamydial genovar distribution after community wide antibiotic treatment. J Infect Dis. 2001 Dec 15;184(12):1581-8. doi: 10.1086/324661. Epub 2001 Dec 3.
- Background: PubMed 11574203Pechere JC. New perspectives on macrolide antibiotics. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001;18 Suppl 1:S93-7. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00393-4.
- Background: PubMed 11477966Fraser-Hurt N, Bailey RL, Cousens S, Mabey D, Faal H, Mabey DC. Efficacy of oral azithromycin versus topical tetracycline in mass treatment of endemic trachoma. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(7):632-40.
- Background: PubMed 11434524Tabbara KF. Trachoma: a review. J Chemother. 2001 Apr;13 Suppl 1:18-22. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.2001.11782323.
- Background: PubMed 11296412Treadway G. Azithromycin: a new 15-membered macrolide. Jpn J Antibiot. 2001 Feb;54 Suppl A:70-6.
- Background: PubMed 11285668Bailey R, Lietman T. The SAFE strategy for the elimination of trachoma by 2020: will it work? Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):233-6. Epub 2003 Jul 7.
- Background: PubMed 11285663Frick KD, Lietman TM, Holm SO, Jha HC, Chaudhary JS, Bhatta RC. Cost-effectiveness of trachoma control measures: comparing targeted household treatment and mass treatment of children. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):201-7. Epub 2003 Jul 7.
- Background: PubMed 11285662Holm SO, Jha HC, Bhatta RC, Chaudhary JS, Thapa BB, Davis D, Pokhrel RP, Yinghui M, Zegans M, Schachter J, Frick KD, Tapert L, Lietman TM. Comparison of two azithromycin distribution strategies for controlling trachoma in Nepal. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):194-200. Epub 2003 Jul 7.
- Background: PubMed 11264123Lietman T, Fry A. Can we eliminate trachoma? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Apr;85(4):385-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.4.385. No abstract available.
Related trials for Trachoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Evaluation of the Impact of Oral Ivermectin on Musca Sorbens Flies, Putative Vector of Trachoma
Survival of Flies Developing in Faecal Samples
Not yet recruiting
The Effects of Hand and Face Washing With Soap on Active Trachoma Among Children 1-9 Years Old.
Active Trachoma
Recruiting
RESTORE: Comparing Two Approaches to Repeat TT Surgery Performed by Integrated Eye Care Workers (IECWs)
Trachoma, Eye Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Kebele Elimination of Trachoma for Ocular Health
Trachoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Julius Schachter, PhD principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
Chandler R Dawson, MD principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Azithromycin in people with Trachoma, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis diagnosed by use of NAAT (time frame: One-year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00286026, which also lists 27 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2012; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.