Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveNCT00281242
Changes in Cytokine Levels During an Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive and Lung Diseases, Obstructive, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a statistical association between changes in sputum serial levels of two cytokines, interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-6, during the treatment course of a severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE-COPD) and during the clinical course… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Lung Diseases, Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- blood draw
- How many people
- 37 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2005to Jul 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Emergency room and clinics
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of COPD (following American Thoracic Society guidelines) and/or chronic bronchitis
- ER visit and/or hospitalization with AE-COPD
- Current or former smokers with more than 20 pack-years
- Willingness to participate in follow-up studies defined in the protocol
- Ability to give informed consent
Who cannot join
- Unstable cardiovascular disease
- Other systemic disease in which survival of more than 2 years is unlikely
- Mental incompetence or active psychiatric illness
- Currently taking more than 20 mg/day of Prednisone
- Participation in another experimental protocol within 6 weeks of study entry
- Asthma
Show all 10Show fewer
- Cystic fibrosis
- Clinically significant bronchiectasis
- Lung cancer
- Other inflammatory or fibrotic lung disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105
About this study
Official title: Innate and Adaptive Immunity in COPD Exacerbations: Severe AE-COPD Clinical Course Study
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a statistical association between changes in sputum serial levels of two cytokines, interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-6, during the treatment course of a severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE-COPD) and during the clinical course itself (i.e., rate of recovery or potential complicated course). AE-COPD is defined as an episode requiring emergency room (ER) evaluation.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
COPD is one of the most pressing healthcare problems facing our nation. AE-COPD is responsible for the bulk of healthcare costs, and much of the morbidity and decline in health status among individuals with this common disease. The lack of accepted animal models of AE-COPD necessitates novel approaches using human samples. Advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis have been slowed, in part, due to controversy as to how exacerbations should be defined. The prevailing paradigm has defined AE-COPD as event-based. Such definitions clearly identify groups of patients with accelerated loss of pulmonary function and increased mortality. However, limited data show that symptom-based definitions of AE-COPD also capture episodes inducing significant morbidity and functional decline, and hence of concern to patients. Fundamental mechanisms are lacking to explain AE-COPD defined by either means.
Controversy also surrounds triggers of AE-COPD. Bacteria and viruses are involved in some episodes, but the relative importance of each is intertwined with disputes over the definition of AE-COPD. Progress at linking specific pathogens to molecular pathogenesis has been slow, both due to their diversity, and to the high rates of bacterial colonization of patients with COPD, even in the stable state. Moreover, in many AE-COPD cases, no pathogen can be identified. Without negating the value of analyzing infections with specific species of pathogens, it appears that progress in molecular pathogenesis could be accelerated by focusing on unifying features of the pulmonary immune response during AE-COPD.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The research protocol will involve a prospective, observational analysis. Participants will include acutely ill COPD patients having an AE-COPD who are enrolled during an ER evaluation or hospitalization at Ann Arbor VA Hospital or the University of Michigan Health Systems ER, clinic, or wards. All non-study diagnostic testing, decisions to discharge from the ER or admit to hospital, prescription of medications, and non-study follow-up will be left to the discretion of the primary caregivers.
Participants who are either being or anticipate being discharged to their usual residence from the ER will be enrolled while still in the ER. Participants who were discharged to their usual residence may be contacted by telephone and enrolled up to 24 hours later, if willing to return to the Medical Center for study initiation. Hospitalized patients will be enrolled within the first 48 hours. Study physicians and coordinators will be on call to capture people at presentation, prior to steroids and antibiotics, if possible. However, clinically indicated treatment will not be delayed to permit enrollment or collection of research samples. Participants will be questioned about the status of five respiratory symptoms (dyspnea, cough, sputum production, sputum viscosity, sputum purulence) using a published Respiratory Symptom score instrument. Each symptom will be scored for severity using the following three-point scale: 1) Usual level; 2) Somewhat worse than usual; 3) Much worse than usual. An acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) will be defined symptomatically as a minor worsening (score of 2) for two or more symptoms, or a major worsening (score of 3) for one or more symptoms.
A clinical score will be generated using a previously used system (Chest 2000; 118:1557-1565) in which 10 clinical parameters will be assessed (overall feeling of well-being, dyspnea, cough, sputum production, sputum viscosity, sputum purulence, overall appearance, respiratory rate, wheezing, and rales); severity of each parameter will be scored using the same three-point scale. Thus the scores will range from 10 to 30.
The following additional data will be obtained: vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, temperature, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation level); dyspnea assessment (MMRC \& University of California San Diego SOBQ); estimate of daily sputum production over last 72 hours; sputum color (using a standardized color "paint-chip" scale); changes in medication usage, with special attention to elicit any history of increased use of potent inhaled steroids, or patient-initiated use of oral steroids or antibiotics. If there is fever or focal findings on chest examination, a chest X-ray will be obtained as part of usual clinical care.
Sputum and blood samples will be collected for measurement of IL-6 and IL-17 levels at time 0 in the ER or hospital, and then 5-7 days, 10-12 days, 33-35 days, and 56-58 days later. Specimens may be obtained from participants requiring mechanical ventilation during the first 24 hours of intubation only, and only if they are not suspected to have pneumonia.
Subjects are reimbursed $25 per scheduled return visit following hospital discharge to help defray travel expenses.
- Being tested
- blood draw
- Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Lung Diseases, Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
blood drawOther
All subjects undergo blood draws at study visits and at the time of COPD exacerbation visits.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Research subjects | All participants undergo the same testing in this observational trial. There is no randomization, and no interventions other than blood drawing. Receives: Other: blood draw |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
biomarker analysis at the time of exacerbation, no clinical outcome
Measured: at each exacerbation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jan 2006 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2005
- Primary completionJun 2010
- Study completionJul 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 37 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jeffrey L. Curtis, University of Michigan
- Investigators
- Jeffrey L. Curtis, Study chair, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00281242
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1325
- Other IDs
- R01HL082480
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 20 Jan 2006
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Curtis JL, Freeman CM, Hogg JC. The immunopathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: insights from recent research. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 Oct 1;4(7):512-21. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-002FM.
PubMed 17878463Freeman CM, Curtis JL, Chensue SW. CC chemokine receptor 5 and CXC chemokine receptor 6 expression by lung CD8+ cells correlates with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity. Am J Pathol. 2007 Sep;171(3):767-76. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.061177. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
PubMed 17640964Freeman CM, Han MK, Martinez FJ, Murray S, Liu LX, Chensue SW, Polak TJ, Sonstein J, Todt JC, Ames TM, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, Getty C, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Cytotoxic potential of lung CD8(+) T cells increases with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity and with in vitro stimulation by IL-18 or IL-15. J Immunol. 2010 Jun 1;184(11):6504-13. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000006. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
PubMed 20427767Freeman CM, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Ames TM, Chensue SW, Todt JC, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, Getty C, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Lung dendritic cell expression of maturation molecules increases with worsening chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec 15;180(12):1179-88. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200904-0552OC. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
PubMed 19729666Freeman CM, Martinez CH, Todt JC, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Thompson DL, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are associated with decreased CD4+ & CD8+ T cells and increased growth & differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in peripheral blood. Respir Res. 2015 Aug 5;16(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0251-1.
PubMed 26243260
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jan 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Innate and Adaptive Immunity in COPD Exacerbations: Severe AE-COPD Clinical Course Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00281242
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1325
- Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 37 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- Sep 2005
- Primary completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jan 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a statistical association between changes in sputum serial levels of two cytokines, interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-6, during the treatment course of a severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE-COPD) and during the clinical course itself (i.e., rate of recovery or potential complicated course). AE-COPD is defined as an episode requiring emergency room (ER) evaluation.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
COPD is one of the most pressing healthcare problems facing our nation. AE-COPD is responsible for the bulk of healthcare costs, and much of the morbidity and decline in health status among individuals with this common disease. The lack of accepted animal models of AE-COPD necessitates novel approaches using human samples. Advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis have been slowed, in part, due to controversy as to how exacerbations should be defined. The prevailing paradigm has defined AE-COPD as event-based. Such definitions clearly identify groups of patients with accelerated loss of pulmonary function and increased mortality. However, limited data show that symptom-based definitions of AE-COPD also capture episodes inducing significant morbidity and functional decline, and hence of concern to patients. Fundamental mechanisms are lacking to explain AE-COPD defined by either means.
Controversy also surrounds triggers of AE-COPD. Bacteria and viruses are involved in some episodes, but the relative importance of each is intertwined with disputes over the definition of AE-COPD. Progress at linking specific pathogens to molecular pathogenesis has been slow, both due to their diversity, and to the high rates of bacterial colonization of patients with COPD, even in the stable state. Moreover, in many AE-COPD cases, no pathogen can be identified. Without negating the value of analyzing infections with specific species of pathogens, it appears that progress in molecular pathogenesis could be accelerated by focusing on unifying features of the pulmonary immune response during AE-COPD.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The research protocol will involve a prospective, observational analysis. Participants will include acutely ill COPD patients having an AE-COPD who are enrolled during an ER evaluation or hospitalization at Ann Arbor VA Hospital or the University of Michigan Health Systems ER, clinic, or wards. All non-study diagnostic testing, decisions to discharge from the ER or admit to hospital, prescription of medications, and non-study follow-up will be left to the discretion of the primary caregivers.
Participants who are either being or anticipate being discharged to their usual residence from the ER will be enrolled while still in the ER. Participants who were discharged to their usual residence may be contacted by telephone and enrolled up to 24 hours later, if willing to return to the Medical Center for study initiation. Hospitalized patients will be enrolled within the first 48 hours. Study physicians and coordinators will be on call to capture people at presentation, prior to steroids and antibiotics, if possible. However, clinically indicated treatment will not be delayed to permit enrollment or collection of research samples. Participants will be questioned about the status of five respiratory symptoms (dyspnea, cough, sputum production, sputum viscosity, sputum purulence) using a published Respiratory Symptom score instrument. Each symptom will be scored for severity using the following three-point scale: 1) Usual level; 2) Somewhat worse than usual; 3) Much worse than usual. An acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) will be defined symptomatically as a minor worsening (score of 2) for two or more symptoms, or a major worsening (score of 3) for one or more symptoms.
A clinical score will be generated using a previously used system (Chest 2000; 118:1557-1565) in which 10 clinical parameters will be assessed (overall feeling of well-being, dyspnea, cough, sputum production, sputum viscosity, sputum purulence, overall appearance, respiratory rate, wheezing, and rales); severity of each parameter will be scored using the same three-point scale. Thus the scores will range from 10 to 30.
The following additional data will be obtained: vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, temperature, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation level); dyspnea assessment (MMRC \& University of California San Diego SOBQ); estimate of daily sputum production over last 72 hours; sputum color (using a standardized color "paint-chip" scale); changes in medication usage, with special attention to elicit any history of increased use of potent inhaled steroids, or patient-initiated use of oral steroids or antibiotics. If there is fever or focal findings on chest examination, a chest X-ray will be obtained as part of usual clinical care.
Sputum and blood samples will be collected for measurement of IL-6 and IL-17 levels at time 0 in the ER or hospital, and then 5-7 days, 10-12 days, 33-35 days, and 56-58 days later. Specimens may be obtained from participants requiring mechanical ventilation during the first 24 hours of intubation only, and only if they are not suspected to have pneumonia.
Subjects are reimbursed $25 per scheduled return visit following hospital discharge to help defray travel expenses.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Research subjects | – | Other: blood drawAll participants undergo the same testing in this observational trial. There is no randomization, and no interventions other than blood drawing. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Emergency room and clinics
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of COPD (following American Thoracic Society guidelines) and/or chronic bronchitis
- ER visit and/or hospitalization with AE-COPD
- Current or former smokers with more than 20 pack-years
- Willingness to participate in follow-up studies defined in the protocol
- Ability to give informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Unstable cardiovascular disease
- Other systemic disease in which survival of more than 2 years is unlikely
- Mental incompetence or active psychiatric illness
- Currently taking more than 20 mg/day of Prednisone
- Participation in another experimental protocol within 6 weeks of study entry
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| blood drawAll subjects undergo blood draws at study visits and at the time of COPD exacerbation visits. | Other | Research subjects |
Primary outcome
biomarker analysis at the time of exacerbation, no clinical outcome
Time frame: at each exacerbation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jan 2016.
- Background: PubMed 17878463Curtis JL, Freeman CM, Hogg JC. The immunopathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: insights from recent research. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 Oct 1;4(7):512-21. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-002FM.
- Results publication: PubMed 17640964Freeman CM, Curtis JL, Chensue SW. CC chemokine receptor 5 and CXC chemokine receptor 6 expression by lung CD8+ cells correlates with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity. Am J Pathol. 2007 Sep;171(3):767-76. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.061177. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 20427767Freeman CM, Han MK, Martinez FJ, Murray S, Liu LX, Chensue SW, Polak TJ, Sonstein J, Todt JC, Ames TM, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, Getty C, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Cytotoxic potential of lung CD8(+) T cells increases with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity and with in vitro stimulation by IL-18 or IL-15. J Immunol. 2010 Jun 1;184(11):6504-13. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000006. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 19729666Freeman CM, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Ames TM, Chensue SW, Todt JC, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, Getty C, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Lung dendritic cell expression of maturation molecules increases with worsening chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec 15;180(12):1179-88. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200904-0552OC. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 26243260Freeman CM, Martinez CH, Todt JC, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Thompson DL, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are associated with decreased CD4+ & CD8+ T cells and increased growth & differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in peripheral blood. Respir Res. 2015 Aug 5;16(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0251-1.
- COPD FoundationLink provided by the sponsor.
- Training Grant in Lung DiseaseLink provided by the sponsor.
- Graduate Program in Immunology, University of MichiganLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeffrey L. Curtis study chair
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive and Lung Diseases, Obstructive, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
biomarker analysis at the time of exacerbation, no clinical outcome (time frame: at each exacerbation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00281242, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2016.