AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveNCT00281242

Changes in Cytokine Levels During an Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive and Lung Diseases, Obstructive, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a statistical association between changes in sputum serial levels of two cytokines, interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-6, during the treatment course of a severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE-COPD) and during the clinical course… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years
What is being tested?
blood draw
How many people
37 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2005to Jul 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Emergency room and clinics

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of COPD (following American Thoracic Society guidelines) and/or chronic bronchitis
  • ER visit and/or hospitalization with AE-COPD
  • Current or former smokers with more than 20 pack-years
  • Willingness to participate in follow-up studies defined in the protocol
  • Ability to give informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Unstable cardiovascular disease
  • Other systemic disease in which survival of more than 2 years is unlikely
  • Mental incompetence or active psychiatric illness
  • Currently taking more than 20 mg/day of Prednisone
  • Participation in another experimental protocol within 6 weeks of study entry
  • Asthma
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Clinically significant bronchiectasis
  • Lung cancer
  • Other inflammatory or fibrotic lung disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Innate and Adaptive Immunity in COPD Exacerbations: Severe AE-COPD Clinical Course Study

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a statistical association between changes in sputum serial levels of two cytokines, interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-6, during the treatment course of a severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE-COPD) and during the clinical course itself (i.e., rate of recovery or potential complicated course). AE-COPD is defined as an episode requiring emergency room (ER) evaluation.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

COPD is one of the most pressing healthcare problems facing our nation. AE-COPD is responsible for the bulk of healthcare costs, and much of the morbidity and decline in health status among individuals with this common disease. The lack of accepted animal models of AE-COPD necessitates novel approaches using human samples. Advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis have been slowed, in part, due to controversy as to how exacerbations should be defined. The prevailing paradigm has defined AE-COPD as event-based. Such definitions clearly identify groups of patients with accelerated loss of pulmonary function and increased mortality. However, limited data show that symptom-based definitions of AE-COPD also capture episodes inducing significant morbidity and functional decline, and hence of concern to patients. Fundamental mechanisms are lacking to explain AE-COPD defined by either means.

Controversy also surrounds triggers of AE-COPD. Bacteria and viruses are involved in some episodes, but the relative importance of each is intertwined with disputes over the definition of AE-COPD. Progress at linking specific pathogens to molecular pathogenesis has been slow, both due to their diversity, and to the high rates of bacterial colonization of patients with COPD, even in the stable state. Moreover, in many AE-COPD cases, no pathogen can be identified. Without negating the value of analyzing infections with specific species of pathogens, it appears that progress in molecular pathogenesis could be accelerated by focusing on unifying features of the pulmonary immune response during AE-COPD.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The research protocol will involve a prospective, observational analysis. Participants will include acutely ill COPD patients having an AE-COPD who are enrolled during an ER evaluation or hospitalization at Ann Arbor VA Hospital or the University of Michigan Health Systems ER, clinic, or wards. All non-study diagnostic testing, decisions to discharge from the ER or admit to hospital, prescription of medications, and non-study follow-up will be left to the discretion of the primary caregivers.

Participants who are either being or anticipate being discharged to their usual residence from the ER will be enrolled while still in the ER. Participants who were discharged to their usual residence may be contacted by telephone and enrolled up to 24 hours later, if willing to return to the Medical Center for study initiation. Hospitalized patients will be enrolled within the first 48 hours. Study physicians and coordinators will be on call to capture people at presentation, prior to steroids and antibiotics, if possible. However, clinically indicated treatment will not be delayed to permit enrollment or collection of research samples. Participants will be questioned about the status of five respiratory symptoms (dyspnea, cough, sputum production, sputum viscosity, sputum purulence) using a published Respiratory Symptom score instrument. Each symptom will be scored for severity using the following three-point scale: 1) Usual level; 2) Somewhat worse than usual; 3) Much worse than usual. An acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) will be defined symptomatically as a minor worsening (score of 2) for two or more symptoms, or a major worsening (score of 3) for one or more symptoms.

A clinical score will be generated using a previously used system (Chest 2000; 118:1557-1565) in which 10 clinical parameters will be assessed (overall feeling of well-being, dyspnea, cough, sputum production, sputum viscosity, sputum purulence, overall appearance, respiratory rate, wheezing, and rales); severity of each parameter will be scored using the same three-point scale. Thus the scores will range from 10 to 30.

The following additional data will be obtained: vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, temperature, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation level); dyspnea assessment (MMRC \& University of California San Diego SOBQ); estimate of daily sputum production over last 72 hours; sputum color (using a standardized color "paint-chip" scale); changes in medication usage, with special attention to elicit any history of increased use of potent inhaled steroids, or patient-initiated use of oral steroids or antibiotics. If there is fever or focal findings on chest examination, a chest X-ray will be obtained as part of usual clinical care.

Sputum and blood samples will be collected for measurement of IL-6 and IL-17 levels at time 0 in the ER or hospital, and then 5-7 days, 10-12 days, 33-35 days, and 56-58 days later. Specimens may be obtained from participants requiring mechanical ventilation during the first 24 hours of intubation only, and only if they are not suspected to have pneumonia.

Subjects are reimbursed $25 per scheduled return visit following hospital discharge to help defray travel expenses.

Being tested
blood draw
Keywords
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Lung Diseases, Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • blood drawOther

    All subjects undergo blood draws at study visits and at the time of COPD exacerbation visits.

Study groups in NCT00281242
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Research subjectsAll participants undergo the same testing in this observational trial. There is no randomization, and no interventions other than blood drawing.
Receives: Other: blood draw

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. biomarker analysis at the time of exacerbation, no clinical outcome

    Measured: at each exacerbation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jan 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2005
  3. Primary completionJun 2010
  4. Study completionJul 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
37 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00281242
Sponsor's protocol ID
1325
Other IDs
R01HL082480
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
20 Jan 2006
Last updated
29 Jan 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Curtis JL, Freeman CM, Hogg JC. The immunopathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: insights from recent research. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 Oct 1;4(7):512-21. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-002FM.

    PubMed 17878463
  • Freeman CM, Curtis JL, Chensue SW. CC chemokine receptor 5 and CXC chemokine receptor 6 expression by lung CD8+ cells correlates with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity. Am J Pathol. 2007 Sep;171(3):767-76. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.061177. Epub 2007 Jul 19.

    PubMed 17640964
  • Freeman CM, Han MK, Martinez FJ, Murray S, Liu LX, Chensue SW, Polak TJ, Sonstein J, Todt JC, Ames TM, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, Getty C, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Cytotoxic potential of lung CD8(+) T cells increases with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity and with in vitro stimulation by IL-18 or IL-15. J Immunol. 2010 Jun 1;184(11):6504-13. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000006. Epub 2010 Apr 28.

    PubMed 20427767
  • Freeman CM, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Ames TM, Chensue SW, Todt JC, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, Getty C, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Lung dendritic cell expression of maturation molecules increases with worsening chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec 15;180(12):1179-88. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200904-0552OC. Epub 2009 Sep 3.

    PubMed 19729666
  • Freeman CM, Martinez CH, Todt JC, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Thompson DL, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are associated with decreased CD4+ & CD8+ T cells and increased growth & differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in peripheral blood. Respir Res. 2015 Aug 5;16(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0251-1.

    PubMed 26243260

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive and Lung Diseases, Obstructive, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

biomarker analysis at the time of exacerbation, no clinical outcome (time frame: at each exacerbation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00281242, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in