AzTrials
AzTrials

Otitis Media, SerousPhase 3NCT00279916

Short Term Relief of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Serous Otitis Media Using Intranasal Steroid Sprays

A Phase 3 study testing Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray in people with Otitis Media, Serous and Negative Middle Ear Pressure, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We hypothesize that intranasal steroid application will have a beneficial therapeutic effect in adults with regard to resolution of serous otitis media and/or negative middle ear pressure, as compared to placebo. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 100 years
What is being tested?
Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
91 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Sep 2005to Mar 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female, age 0-18 years
  • Patients with serous otitis media and/or negative middle ear pressure as documented by otoscopic examination and tympanometry will be considered for enrollment
  • Pregnant

Who cannot join

  • Unwilling to discontinue breast feeding, when applicable
  • Active upper respiratory infection
  • Nasopharyngeal mass
  • Chronic infectious otitis media
  • Cholesteatoma
  • Acute infectious otitis media
Show all 15Show fewer
  • History of otologic surgery other than placement of a pressure equalizer tube in the affected ear
  • History of radiation therapy to the head and neck region
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Immunodeficiency
  • Mucociliary disorders
  • Craniofacial disorders/syndromes
  • Cleft palate
  • Development delay and/or symptoms suggestive of perilymph fistula

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Short Term Relief of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Serous Otitis Media Using Intranasal Steroid Sprays: a Randomized Placebo-controlled Study

We hypothesize that intranasal steroid application will have a beneficial therapeutic effect in adults with regard to resolution of serous otitis media and/or negative middle ear pressure, as compared to placebo. We further hypothesize that the rate of spontaneous short-term resolution of otitis media wit effusion in adults treated with placebo will be relatively low (minority of patients).

Read the detailed description

Newer intranasal steroid preparations are generally safe with relatively few side effects as demonstrated in large studies dealing with allergic rhinitis.

Eustachian Tube Dysfunction (ETD) primarily refers to an absent or inadequate ability to open the eustachian tube. The term Serous Otitis Media (SOM) generally referring to an accumulation of fluid within the middle ear space, in absence of signs indicating acute infection. Commonly, this can result in a conductive hearing loss due to restriction of tympanic membrane mobility. Negative Middle Ear Pressure (NMEP) is often a precursor to the development of SOM, and has it's own effect on the acoustic properties of the middle ear, also resulting in conductive hearing loss.

Due to the lack of a single accepted medical intervention to deal with ETD and the general benign nature of this condition, it is common practice for some physicians to take a "wait and see" initial approach when this clinical entity is encountered in lieu of prescribing unproved medications. It is generally accepted that some patients with Negative Middle Ear Pressure (NMEP) and/or Serous Otitis Media (SOM) will undergo spontaneous resolution of symptoms, yet the exact resolution rates are not clearly defined.

The purpose of this double-blind, randomized study of either triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray or a sham placebo nasal spray for 6 weeks is to determine if there is improvement in a test of middle ear pressure. Neither the subjects nor the Investigator will know which of the two treatments is being used until the end of the study.

Resolution of ETD symptoms will be measured by changes in the tympanogram, a test to measure pressure within the middle ear. This measurement will be taken at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment.

Being tested
Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray, Placebo nasal spray
Medical subject headings
Otitis Media with Effusion, Rhinitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Triamcinolone acetonide nasal sprayDrug

    Also called Nasacort AQ

    Subjects aged 12 years or older received 2 metered sprays in each nostril once daily (55 micrograms/spray) (total daily dose 220 micrograms).

    Subjects younger than 12 years old received received 1 metered spray in each nostril once daily (55 micrograms/spray) (total daily dose 110 micrograms).

  • Placebo nasal sprayDrug

    Subjects aged 12 years or older received an aqueous solution lacking triamcinolone, 2 metered sprays in each nostril once daily.

    Subjects younger than 12 years old received received 1 metered spray of placebo solution in each nostril once daily.

Study groups in NCT00279916
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Triamcinolone acetonideActive comparatorTriamcinolone acetonide nasal spray; Subjects aged 12 years or older received 2 metered sprays in each nostril once daily (55 micrograms/spray) (total daily dose 220 micrograms) for 6 weeks duration. Subjects younger than 12 years old received received 1 metered spray in each nostril once daily (55 micrograms/spray) (total daily dose 110 micrograms) for 6 weeks duration.
Receives: Drug: Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray
PlaceboSham comparatorPlacebo nasal spray; Subjects aged 12 years or older received an aqueous solution lacking triamcinolone, 2 metered sprays in each nostril once daily for 6 weeks duration. Subjects younger than 12 years old received received 1 metered spray of placebo solution in each nostril once daily for 6 weeks duration.
Receives: Drug: Placebo nasal spray

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Subjects With Complete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry, Regardless of Additional Treatment

    Number of subjects with resolution of eustachian tube dysfunction symptoms, as determined by the change in tympanogram type in both ears from an initial Type B or C result to Type A result at 6 weeks. Type A; peaked pressure measurement under -100 kilo Pascals (kPa). Type B; non-peaked, or flat tympanogram, Type C; peaked pressure measurements more negative than -100 kPa. A Pascal is a unit used to quantify internal pressure.

    Measured: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Complete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry Considering the Subjects Who Took Additional Treatment as Having Incomplete Resolution

    For this outcome measure, the subjects treated with antibiotics or oral decongestants while enrolled in the study were handled as having treatment failures. For this outcome measure, subjects with complete normalization of abnormal tympanometry at 6 weeks had a Type A tympanogram and did not take antibiotics, oral decongestants, nasal spray or a combination.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Per-Ear Treatment Outcome

    Initial Tympanogram Type at baseline was compared to Follow-Up Tympanogram Type at 6 weeks. Type A is considered to be normal. Type A; peaked pressure measurement under -100 kilo Pascals (kPa). Type B; non-peaked, or flat tympanogram, Type C; peaked pressure measurements more negative than -100 kPa. A Pascal is a unit used to quantify internal pressure.

    Measured: baseline, 6 weeks

  3. Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Fullness or Pressure in Ears

    As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.

    Measured: baseline, 6 weeks

  4. Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Pain in Ears

    As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.

    Measured: baseline, 6 weeks

  5. Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Plugged Sensation in Ears

    As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.

    Measured: baseline, 6 weeks

  6. Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Popping Sensation in Ears

    As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.

    Measured: baseline, 6 weeks

  7. Number of Subjects With Change in Symptom Frequency and Severity - Dampened Hearing/Loss Worse Than Usual

    As measured by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. The questionnaire had 5 symptoms with a Frequency Rating from 1=Never to 5=Constantly, and Severity rating from 1=None at all to 5=Maximum severity. The change in frequency and severity ratings were categorized as same, better, or worse.

    Measured: baseline, 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jan 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Sep 2005
  3. Primary completionFeb 2009
  4. Study completionMar 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
91 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00279916
Sponsor's protocol ID
103-04
Other IDs
IST4008
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
18 Jan 2006
Last updated
30 May 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gluth MB, McDonald DR, Weaver AL, Bauch CD, Beatty CW, Orvidas LJ. Management of eustachian tube dysfunction with nasal steroid spray: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 May;137(5):449-55. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.56.

    PubMed 21576556
  • Mulvaney CA, Galbraith K, Webster KE, Rana M, Connolly R, Tudor-Green B, Marom T, Daniel M, Venekamp RP, Schilder AG, MacKeith S. Topical and oral steroids for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 13;12(12):CD015255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015255.pub2.

    PubMed 38088821

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray in people with Otitis Media, Serous and Negative Middle Ear Pressure, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Aug 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Subjects With Complete Normalization of Abnormal Tympanometry, Regardless of Additional Treatment (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00279916, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in