AzTrials
AzTrials

Dysfunction of the Urinary BladderNCT00277615

Evaluation Study of Ultrasound Bladder Scanner for Monitoring Bladder Function

An observational study of Dysfunction of the Urinary Bladder, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel ultrasound bladder scanning device designed particularly for children in children with bladder dysfunction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 15 years
Conditions the study is for
Dysfunction of the Urinary Bladder
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Oct 2005to Dec 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 15 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Children with OAB

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 4-16 yrs
  • Dependent on bladder emptying by catheterization
  • Informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Wounds, scar tissue or staples in the suprapubic area
  • Severe urinary incontinence

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Department of pediatrics, University hospital of Aarhus, Skejby Sygehus

    Aarhus, Aarhus N, 8200

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Clinical Evaluation of a Portable Ultrasound Bladder Scanner for Continuous Monitoring of Bladder Function in Children.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel ultrasound bladder scanning device designed particularly for children in children with bladder dysfunction.

Read the detailed description

A continuous precise monitoring of bladder volume is of great impotence in many nephro-urological diseases in children.

Some children suffer from bladder dysfunctions that necessitate bladder emptying by catheterization. The bladder catheterizations are at present performed at fixed time intervals and are not based on the amount of urine in the bladder.

In order to avoid overfilling of the bladder, the interval between the emptying is set with a safety margin. This leads to at least some needless catheterizations and hereby discomfort for the children. A portable bladder monitor could possible give a measurement of the degreed of bladder filling and hereby minimize the number of catheterizations needed.

Another group of children suffers from daytime urinary incontinence as a result of overactive bladder syndrome. Home recordings of fluid intake and micturations are used for diagnosing the cause of the decease however; a portable bladder monitor system would possibly give a more true reflection of the bladder function.

With a prevalence of about 10 % nocturnal enuresis is the most common nephro-urological disorder of childhood. In this group of children a portable bladder monitor may enable a more precise measure of bladder function. In addition to this the monitor may be used as a alarm device in the treatment of the disorder.

The portable ultrasound bladder scanner tested has been designed particularly for children.

Hypothesis:

  • The bladder volume estimated by the portable ultrasound bladder scanner is concordant with "true" bladder volume measured by catheterization in children.
  • The portable ultrasound bladder scanner can be used for continuous non-invasive monitoring of bladder volume during natural fill in children with bladder dysfunction. 30 children that suffer from bladder dysfunction and perform bladder emptying by catheterization will be recruited from the Center of Child Incontinence, Skejby University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Keywords
Children, Bladder volume, Ultrasound

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2005
  3. Study completionDec 2012 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00277615
Sponsor's protocol ID
SHUL2006
Other IDs
2005-41-5570, 20050083
Status last verified
Jan 2012
First submitted
13 Jan 2006
Last updated
23 Jan 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Dysfunction of the Urinary Bladder, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in