Kidney TransplantationPhase 3BENEFITNCT00256750
Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression (BENEFIT)
A Phase 3 study testing Cyclosporine (CsA), Belatacept LI (less intensive) and Belatacept MI (more intensive) in people with Kidney Transplantation and Chronic Kidney Failure, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 105 sites in 21 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to learn if Belatacept can provide protection from organ rejection following kidney transplantation while avoiding some of the toxic effects of standard immunosuppressive medications such as kidney damage. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Transplantation, Chronic Kidney Failure
- What is being tested?
- Cyclosporine (CsA), Belatacept LI (less intensive) and Belatacept MI (more intensive)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 738 participants
- Where
- 105 sitesin 21 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2005to Apr 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The subject is a recipient of a living donor or deceased donor kidney transplant.
- Male or Female, 18 or older
Who cannot join
- First time recipient, PRA >- 50% or for retransplantation PRA >- 30%.
- If retransplantation, previous graft loss cannot be due to acute rejection.
- Positive cross match.
- Subject receiving extended criteria donor (ECD) organ
- For Long-term extension study-Subjects who have completed three years of study treatment (through Week 156)
Trial locations and contacts
105 sites in 21 countries.
105 sites in 21 countries
United States34 sites
Piedmont Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Medical College Of Georgia
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
University Of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University Of Alabama At Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Fletcher Allen Health Care
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Musc
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
University Of Chicago Hospitals
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Henry Ford Hospital, Transplant Institute
Detriot, Michigan, 48202
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Inova Transplant Center
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
University Of Iowa Hospitals And Clinics
Iowa City, Indiana, 52242
University Of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
Loma Linda University Medical Center-Transplantation Institu
Loma Linda, California, 92354
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
University Of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
University Of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 27232
Yale University School Of Medicine-Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia University College Of Physicians & Surgeons
New York, New York, 10032
Div Of Multi-Organ Trans, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102
Maine Tranplant Program
Portland, Maine, 04102
University Of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
California Institute Of Renal Research
San Diego, California, 92123
University Of California San Francisco Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94143
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Sacred Heart Medical Ctr Providence Medical Research Ctr
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Western New England Renal & Transplant Associates, Pc
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107
Washington University School Of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
India10 sites
Local Institution
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380052
Local Institution
Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160012
Local Institution
Chennai, 600 006
Local Institution
Gujarat, Ahmedabad, 380016
Local Institution
Kochi, Kerala, 682304
Local Institution
Lucknow, 226000
Local Institution
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 026
Local Institution
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400016
Local Institution
Nadiād, Gujarat, 387001
Local Institution
New Delhi, 110076
France7 sites
Local Institution
Bordeaux, 33076
Local Institution
Brest, 29609
Local Institution
Créteil, 94000
Local Institution
Grenoble, 38043
Local Institution
Nantes, 44093
Local Institution
Paris, 75015
Local Institution
Toulouse, 31054
Argentina6 sites
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1155APP
Local Institution
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, C1425APQ
Local Institution
Cordoba, Crd, Córdoba Province, X5016KEH
Local Institution
La Plata, Buenos Aires, 1900
Local Institution
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000
Local Institution
Santa Fe, Santa Fe Province, S3000EPV
Brazil6 sites
Local Institution
Campinas, São Paulo, 13033
Local Institution
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035
Local Institution
Porto Alegre/rs, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035
Local Institution
Rio de Janeiro / Rj, Rio de Janeiro, 21041
Local Institution
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403
Local Institution
Sao Paulo/sp, São Paulo, 04038
Canada6 sites
Local Institution
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2S2
Local Institution
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9
Local Institution
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Local Institution
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 2W5
Local Institution
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1
Local Institution
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7M 0Z9
Mexico6 sites
Local Institution
Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, 20000
Local Institution
Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62448
Local Institution
Distrito Federal, Mexico City, 14080
Local Institution
Mexico City, Mexico City, 14080
Local Institution
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
Local Institution
San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, 78240
Australia4 sites
Local Institution
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Local Institution
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Local Institution
Parkville, Victoria, 3052
Local Institution
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
Germany4 sites
Local Institution
Berlin, 13353
Local Institution
Erlangen, 91054
Local Institution
Essen, 45122
Local Institution
Hanover, 30625
Italy3 sites
Local Institution
Milan, 20162
Local Institution
Padova, 35128
Local Institution
Roma, 00168
South Africa3 sites
Local Institution
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4001
Local Institution
Observatory, Cape Town, 7925
Local Institution
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002
Spain3 sites
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08907
Local Institution
Madrid, 28040
Local Institution
Málaga, 29010
Poland2 sites
Local Institution
Poznan, 60-479
Local Institution
Szczecin, 70-111
Switzerland2 sites
Local Institution
Bern, 3010
Local Institution
Zurich, 8091
About this study
Official title: Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial (BENEFIT)
The purpose of this study is to learn if Belatacept can provide protection from organ rejection following kidney transplantation while avoiding some of the toxic effects of standard immunosuppressive medications such as kidney damage. Effects on kidney function and patient survival as well as drug safety will also be studied.
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplantation, Chronic Kidney Failure
- Being tested
- Cyclosporine (CsA), Belatacept LI (less intensive), Belatacept MI (more intensive)
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Failure, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cyclosporine (CsA)Drug
tablet, oral, 1st month target: 150-300 ng/mL, after 1st month target: 100-250 ng/mL, daily, 36 months (ST), 100-250 ng/mL, daily, 24 months (LT)
Belatacept LI (less intensive)Drug
solution, IV, 10mg/kg: Days 1 and 5, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12, then 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 36 months (ST), 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 24 months (LT)
Belatacept MI (more intensive)Drug
solution, IV, 10mg/kg: Days 1 and 5, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12, 16, 20, and 24, then 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 36 months (ST), 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 24 months (LT)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclosporine (CsA) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Cyclosporine (CsA) |
| Belatacept LI (less intensive) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Belatacept LI (less intensive) |
| Belatacept MI (more intensive) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Belatacept MI (more intensive) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft by Month 12
Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss (nephrectomy). Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) or 530 micromolar per liter (μmol/L) as determined by the central laboratory for ≥ 4 weeks or ≥ 56 consecutive days of dialysis or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant underwent retransplant.
Measured: Day 1 to Month 12
Percent of Participants With a Composite of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) Less Than 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 at Month 12 or With a Decrease in mGFR Greater Than or Equal to 10 mL/Min/1.73m^2 From Month 3 to Month 12
Measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) is the direct measurement of renal function and was assessed by measurement of the clearance of a true glomerular filtration marker (non-radiolabeled iothalamate) using a validated procedure. A GFR of 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 was used as the approximate equal of the threshold values of serum creatinine (SCr) of 1.5 mg/dL. A change in GFR of at least 10 mL/min/1.73 m^2 was used as the approximate change in SCr of at least 0.3 mg/dL. The change component of the composite renal endpoint was assessed from Month 3 to Month 12, since post-transplant renal function is largely stable by Month 3.
Measured: Month 12; Month 3 to Month 12
Percent of Participants Experiencing Acute Rejection (AR) Post-transplant by Month 12
Acute rejection was defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and biopsy confirmation. Clinical evidence was defined if either a or b was satisfied: a: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b: an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists. Allograft biopsies were evaluated by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification. AR was defined by a renal biopsy demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted.
Measured: Day 1 to Month 12
Secondary outcomes (40)
Mean Value of the Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR)
Measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) is the direct measurement of renal function and was assessed by measurement of the clearance of a true glomerular filtration marker (non-radiolabeled iothalamate) using a validated procedure. Missing mGRF assessments were imputed to assess renal function. The overall imputation strategy involved a primary imputation method (linear extrapolation and quartile method) followed by 2 secondary imputation methods (regression method and graded quartile method) to assess the robustness of conclusions obtained from the application of the primary imputation method. All imputation methods entailed replacing a missing value with a value drawn from a plausible distribution incorporating theoretical and observed aspects of the data. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2.
Measured: Months 3, 12, 24
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN) at Month 12
Prevalence of CAN = if participant met any of the following conditions: a: CAN observed in a biopsy either prior to 12 months (including baseline biopsy) or first post 12 months biopsy; b: participant had graft loss during the first year post transplant; c: no biopsy was available post 12 months and CAN not observed in biopsies prior to 12 months, but the measured GFR from Month 3 to Month 12 decreased at least 10 mL/min/1.73m^2; d: no biopsy available either prior to or post 12 months, and the measured GFR (incorporated missing data imputation) from Month 3 to Month 12 decreased at least 10 mL/min/1.73m^2. CAN = All allograft biopsies evaluated for presence and severity of CAN by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Onset of CAN determined by the biopsy date when it was observed.
Measured: Month 12
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events by Month 84
Adverse event (AE) defined: any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) defined: a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.
Measured: Randomization to Month 84
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest by Month 84
Prospectively identified events of special interest which were a subset of all AEs, and were either SAEs or non-serious AEs, included the following categories: Serious Infections and Infestations, Thrombolic/embolic events, and Malignancy. AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/ abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Time frame is from randomization to the event date, or to the last dose date+56, or to Month 84 (Day 2548), whichever is the earliest.
Measured: Randomization to Month 84
Mean Blood Pressure at Month 84
Blood pressure was measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Blood pressure was measured soon after the participant arrived and sat quietly at rest for 10 minutes. 3 consecutive seated blood pressure readings were made at least 1 minute apart.
Measured: Month 84
Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria Post-transplant by Month 36
Upper limit of normal (ULN). Units per Liter (U/L). Cells per microliter (c/µL). Grams per deciliter (g/dL). Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).Cells per Liter (c/L). Milliequivalents/Liter (mEq/L).
Hemoglobin (low): <8.0 g/dL; Platelet count: <50*10^9 c/L; Leukocytes: <2*10^3 c/µL; Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): >5.0*ULN U/L; Alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >5.0*ULN U/L; Asparate aminotransferase (AST): >5.0*ULN U/L; Bilirubin Total: >3.0*ULN mg/dL; Creatinine: >3.0*ULN mg/dL; Calcium Total: low if <7.0 mg/dL or high if >12.5 mg/dL; Bicarbonate: <11.0 mEq/L; Potassium serum: low if <3.0 mEq/L or high if >6.0 mEq/L; Magnesium serum: low is <0.8 mEq/L or high if >2.46 mEq/L; Sodium serum: low if <130.0 mEq/L or high if >155.0 mEq/L; Phosphorus inorganic: <2.0 mg/dL; Albumin: <2 g/dL; Uric acid: >10 mg/dL; Protein urine: >=3+
Measured: Baseline to Month 36
Percent of Participants With Development of Anti-Donor HLA Positive Antibodies by Month 84
Only participants who had non-missing test result for Class I or Class II anti-donor HLA antibodies were included in analysis and only participants who had at least one non-NA test result or finding were counted. This was a cumulative summary (excluding baseline) and once a participant was positive, that participant remained positive for the later time point. Acute rejection (AR) defined: a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and biopsy confirmation. Clinical evidence defined: if either a or b was satisfied: a: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b: an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists. AR defined as allograft biopsies of Banff 97 classification Grade IA or greater (higher scores indicate more severe rejection). Evaluated by blinded central independent pathologist.
Measured: Randomization to Month 84
Mean Change of the Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) From Month 3 to Month 12 and From Month 3 to Month 24
Measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) is the direct measurement of renal function and was assessed by measurement of the clearance of a true glomerular filtration marker (non-radiolabeled iothalamate) using a validated procedure. Missing mGRF assessments were imputed to assess renal function. The overall imputation strategy involved a primary imputation method (linear extrapolation and quartile method) followed by 2 secondary imputation methods (regression method and graded quartile method) to assess the robustness of conclusions obtained from the application of the primary imputation method. All imputation methods entailed replacing a missing value with a value drawn from a plausible distribution incorporating theoretical and observed aspects of the data. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2.
Measured: Month 3 to Month 12; Month 3 to Month 24
Percent of Participants With a Decrease in Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) Greater Than or Equal to 10mL/Min/1.73m^2 From Month 3 to Month 12
Measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) is the direct measurement of renal function and was assessed by measurement of the clearance of a true glomerular filtration marker (non-radiolabeled iothalamate) using a validated procedure. A change in GFR of at least 10 mL/min/1.73 m^2 was used as the approximate change in serum creatinine (SCr) of at least 0.3 mg/dL. The change component of the composite renal endpoint was assessed from Month 3 to Month 12, since post-transplant renal function is largely stable by Month 3. Month 3 = baseline
Measured: Month 3 to Month 12
Percent of Participants With a Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) Less Than 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 at Month 12
Measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) is the direct measurement of renal function and was assessed by measurement of the clearance of a true glomerular filtration marker (non-radiolabeled iothalamate) using a validated procedure. A GFR of 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 was used as the approximate equal of the threshold values of serum creatinine (SCr) of 1.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
Measured: Month 12
Mean Value of the Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) With Imputation
Calculated glomerular filtration rate (cGFR) was used to assess renal function (as measured by the estimated creatinine clearance) using the following modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula: MDRD: GFR = 170 x [SCr/0.95]^(-0.999) x [Age]^(-0.176) x [0.762 if participant is female] x [1.180 if participant is black] x [BUN]^(-0.170) x [Alb]^(+0.318); Age in years; Alb = Albumin in g/dL; SCr = Serum creatinine in mg/dL; BUN = Blood urea nitrogen in mg/dL; cGFR = mL/min/1.73m2
Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36
Mean Change in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) From Month 6 to Month 12
Calculated glomerular filtration rate (cGFR) was used to assess renal function (as measured by the estimated creatinine clearance) using the following modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula: MDRD: GFR = 170 x [SCr/0.95]^(-0.999) x [Age]^(-0.176) x [0.762 if participant is female] x [1.180 if participant is black] x [BUN]^(-0.170) x [Alb]^(+0.318); Age in years; Alb = Albumin in g/dL; SCr = Serum creatinine in mg/dL; BUN = Blood urea nitrogen in mg/dL; cGFR = mL/min/1.73m^2
Measured: Month 6 to Month 12
Percent of Participants With Incidence of New Onset Diabetes Mellitus by Month 36
The incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus defined as participants who developed diabetes mellitus after randomization and transplantation. Participants that did not have diabetes prior to randomization were determined to have new onset diabetes mellitus if (i) the participant received an anti-diabetic medication for a duration of at least 30 days or (ii) at least two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests indicate that FPG is >=126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L). New onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) = post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM)
Measured: Week 4 post-transplantation to Month 36
Percent of Participants Using At Least One Anti-Hypertensive Medication to Control Hypertension at Month 36
This analysis was based on all participants who had been followed up at least 1092 days after transplantation. Hypertension was defined in according to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure for participants with chronic kidney disease. This definition was based upon SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg. In addition, all participants who had a SBP < 130 mm Hg and a DBP < 80 mm Hg who received an antihypertensive medication(s) for the indication of hypertension or with a medical history of hypertension were included in this definition. Systolic blood pressure = SBP; Diastolic blood pressure = DBP
Measured: Month 36
Percent of Participants With Incidence of Hypertension Post-Transplantation at Month 12
The incidence of hypertension was defined as the proportion of participants who developed hypertension after randomization and transplantation. Specifically, the incidence of hypertension was assessed only after the Week 4 visit. This period allowed for adequate stabilization and resolution of transient changes. If participants received antihypertensive medication for the indication of hypertension at this (or later) time point, they were considered to have developed hypertension. Hypertension was defined according to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure for subjects with chronic kidney disease. This definition was based upon SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg. Systolic blood pressure = SBP; Diastolic blood pressure = DBP
Measured: Month 12
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Hypertension Post-Transplantation at Month 12
The prevalence of hypertension was defined as the proportion of participants at any given time who meet the definition of hypertension. Hypertension defined according to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure for participants with chronic kidney disease. This definition is based upon SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg. Systolic blood pressure = SBP; Diastolic blood pressure = DBP
Measured: Month 12
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Blood pressure was measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Blood pressure was measured soon after the participant arrived and sat quietly at rest for 10 minutes. 3 consecutive seated blood pressure readings were made at least 1 minute apart.
Measured: Months 12, 24, 36
Percent of Participants at Baseline With Controlled Hypertension Post Transplantation by Month 12
Controlled hypertension was defined as a SBP < 130 mm Hg and a DBP < 80 mm Hg while receiving an antihypertensive medication for the indication of hypertension or receiving an antihypertensive medication for another indication with a medical history of hypertension. Participants with a SBP < 130 mm Hg and a DBP < 80 mm Hg who were prescribed an antihypertensive medication(s) for an indication(s) other than hypertension (eg, beta blockers for migraine prophylaxis) with no medical history of hypertension were not considered to have either hypertension or controlled hypertension. Systolic blood pressure = SBP; Diastolic blood pressure = DBP
Measured: Day 1 to Month 12
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Controlled Hypertension at Month 12
The prevalence of controlled hypertension was defined as the proportion of participants at any given time who met the definition of controlled hypertension. Controlled hypertension was defined as a SBP < 130 mm Hg and a DBP < 80 mm Hg while receiving an antihypertensive medication for the indication of hypertension or receiving an antihypertensive medication for another indication with a medical history of hypertension. Participants with a SBP < 130 mm Hg and a DBP < 80 mm Hg who were prescribed an antihypertensive medication(s) for an indication(s) other than hypertension (eg, beta blockers for migraine prophylaxis) with no medical history of hypertension were not considered to have either hypertension or controlled hypertension. Systolic blood pressure = SBP; Diastolic blood pressure = DBP
Measured: Month 12
Percent of Non-dyslipidemic Participants With Incidence of Dyslipidemia Post-Transplantation by Month 12
Incidence of dyslipidemia was defined as the proportion of participants who developed dyslipidemia after randomization and transplantation. Dyslipidemia was defined in accordance with recent guidelines from the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-K/DOQI). Dyslipidemia = hypertriglyceridemia (TGs >= 500 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) [5.65 mmol/L]), hypercholesterolemia (LDL >= 100 mg/dL [2.59 mmol/L]), or elevated non-HDL (non-HDL >= 130 mg/dL [3.36 mmol/L]) in the presence of high TGs (TGs >= 200 mg/dL [2.26 mmol/L]). The TG = triglyceride; LDL = low density lipoprotein; HDL = high density lipoprotein; millimole/Liter (mmol/L). For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation is used if N >=5. Otherwise exact method is used.
Measured: Randomization to Month 12
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Dyslipidemia at Month 12
The prevalence of dyslipidemia was defined as the proportion of participants at any given time who met the definition of dyslipidemia. Dyslipidemia defined in accordance with recent guidelines from the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-K/DOQI). Dyslipidemia defined as hypertriglyceridemia (TGs >= 500 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) [5.65 mmol/L]), hypercholesterolemia (LDL >= 100 mg/dL [2.59 mmol/L]), or elevated non-HDL (non-HDL >= 130 mg/dL [3.36 mmol/L]) in the presence of high TGs (TGs >= 200 mg/dL [2.26 mmol/L]). TG = triglyceride; LDL = low density lipoprotein; HDL = high density lipoprotein; millimole/Liter (mmol/L). For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation is used if N >=5. Otherwise exact method is used.
Measured: Month 12
Percent of Participants With Controlled Dyslipidemia at Month 12
Prevalence of controlled dyslipidemia = the proportion of participants at any given time who met the stated definition of dyslipidemia. Dyslipidemia defined in accordance with recent guidelines from the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-K/DOQI). Dyslipidemia defined as hypertriglyceridemia (TGs >= 500 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) [5.65 mmol/L]), hypercholesterolemia (LDL >= 100 mg/dL [2.59 mmol/L]), or elevated non-HDL (non-HDL >= 130 mg/dL [3.36 mmol/L]) in the presence of high TGs (TGs >= 200 mg/dL [2.26 mmol/L]). Controlled dyslipidemia defined as participants who received successful pharmacologic treatment for 1 of the above stated dyslipidemias, and their lipid values fell below the thresholds described. TG = triglyceride; LDL = low density lipoprotein; HDL = high density lipoprotein; millimole/Liter (mmol/L). For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation is used if N >=5. Otherwise exact method is used.
Measured: Month 12
Number of Participants With Antihyperlipidemic Medication by Intensity Level
An intensity level was associated with the dose level of the statin based anti-hyperlipidemic agent. Any other agent (i.e., non-statin therapy) used as an antihyperlipidemic were considered Level I treatment intensity. Multiple daily dose levels during a period were averaged to compute the daily dose during that period. Level I = 20 mg fluvastatin (flu), 10 mg lovastatin (lova), 10 mg pravastatin (prav), 5-10 mg simvastatin (sim); Level II = 10 mg atorvastatin (atorv), 40 mg flu, 20 mg lova, 20 mg prav, 5 mg rosuvastatin (rosu), 20 mg sim, 10/10 vytorin; Level III = 20 mg atorv, 80 mg flu, 40 mg lova, 40 mg prav, 10 mg rosu, 40 mg sim, 10/20 vytorin; Level IV = 40 mg atorv, 80 mg lova, 80 mg prav, 20 mg rosu, 80 mg sim, 10/40 vytorin; Level V = 80 mg atorv, 40 mg rosu, 10/80 vytorin. Concomitant use of a statin and an agent of another class elevated the intensity level of the statin therapy by 1 level; therefore, an intensity level of greater than V was possible.
Measured: Month 36
Percent of Participants Using At Least One Anti-Hyperlipidemic Medication
This analysis is based on all participants who were followed up at least 1092 days after transplantation.
Measured: Month 36
Mean Value of Lipid Parameters
Lipid parameters included total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides (TGs).
Measured: Months 12, 24, 36
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 36
Prevalence of AR = participants with the stated definition of AR at any given time. AR defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and renal biopsy confirmation demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted. Clinical evidence = if either a or b was satisfied: a: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b: an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists. Allograft biopsies were evaluated by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification.
Measured: Randomization to Month 36
Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) Post-transplant in Terms of Severity Using Banff Grades by Month 36
Acute rejection was defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and renal biopsy confirmation demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Clinical evidence defined: if either a or b was satisfied: a) an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b) an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists. Allograft biopsies were evaluated by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted.
Measured: Randomization to Month 36
Percent of Participants Using Polyclonal Antilymphocyte Preparations for Impaired Renal Function and Anticipated Delayed Graft Function by Month 12
A participant was considered to have delayed graft function (DGF), if treated with dialysis within the first week (Day 1 - 8) after transplantation. The use of polyclonal antilymphocyte preparations (LDT) was permitted only for participants randomized to cyclosporine (CsA) who experienced impaired renal allograft function and anticipated DGF following transplantation and were not permitted in belatacept-treated participants, except for the treatment of acute rejection. Participants treated with LDT began CsA at the discretion of the investigator by Day 7. LDT could also have been used in participants who met >= 1 of the following criteria, observed in the presence of a transplant artery and vein and no evidence of hydronephrosis by sonogram: Urine output < 250 mL/12 hours, no significant improvement (< 1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)) in serum creatinine from baseline value over the first 24 - 72 hours post-transplant, or dialysis treatment.
Measured: Randomization to Month 12
Percent of Participants Using Lymphocyte Depleting Therapy (LDT) for the Initial Treatment of Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 36
The use of LDT (thymoglobulin or antithymocyte gamma globulin [ATGAM]) was permitted only for participants randomized to cyclosporine (CsA) who experienced impaired renal allograft function and anticipated delayed graft function following transplantation. Acute rejection (AR) defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence (an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remained elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection existed) and biopsy confirmation. AR defined by a renal biopsy demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted.
Measured: Randomization to Month 36
Percent of Participants With Corticosteroid Resistant Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 36
Steroid-resistant acute rejection (AR) defined as the use of lymphocyte-depletion therapy following treatment with corticosteroids. AR defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and renal biopsy confirmation demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Clinical evidence defined: either a or b was satisfied: a) an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b) an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remained elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection existed. Allograft biopsies were evaluated by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 international standardized histopathological working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted.
Measured: Randomization to Month 36
Number of Participants Who Recovered Completely From an Episode of Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 12
Acute rejection (AR) = a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and renal biopsy confirmation demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater. Clinical evidence = if either a or b was satisfied: a: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b: an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists. Complete recovery following AR defined as serum creatinine [SCr] levels returned to baseline. Recovery calculated using 2 algorithms: Algorithm 1 = last laboratory measurement prior to onset of AR (baseline and first laboratory measurement after 84 days since onset of AR = resolution); Algorithm 2 = lowest laboratory measurement on or after transplantation and prior to onset day of AR (baseline and lowest laboratory measurement after onset on first AR up to Month 12 = resolution)
Measured: Randomization to Month 12
Percent of Participants With Subclinical Rejection at Month 12
Subclinical rejection defined as histological findings by the central pathologist consistent with acute rejection, but lacking its clinical correlate. Acute rejection defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and renal biopsy confirmation demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted. Clinical evidence defined if either a or b was satisfied: a) an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b) an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remained elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection existed. Allograft biopsies were evaluated by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology.
Measured: Month 12
Number of Participants Treated for Acute Rejection (AR) Regardless of Histological Findings by Month 36
Allograft rejection includes any episode of rejection including: clinically suspected rejection, treated rejection, any central biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and acute rejection (AR: a subset of BPAR) defined as central biopsy-proven rejection that was either clinically suspected by protocol-defined reasons or by other reasons and was treated. Acute rejection (AR) defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence ( either an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remained elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of AR) and renal biopsy confirmation biopsy demonstrating a Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Only the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted.
Measured: Randomization to Month 36
Mean Value of Physical and Mental Components Using SF-36 Questionnaire
SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 scale measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). PCS represented by 4 domains: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. MCS represented by 4 domains: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Their scores were computed based on weighted combinations of the 8 domain scores, which were transformed to a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Higher scores reflect better health-related functional status. Scoring is standardized using the norm-based scoring method where data is scored in relation to the U.S. general population having a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores below 50 are below the U.S. general population norm and above 50 are above the U.S. general population norm.
Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36
Mean Value of the Eight Domain Scores of Quality of Life Using SF-36 Questionnaire
SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 scale measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). PCS represented by 4 domains: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. MCS represented by 4 domains: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Their scores were computed based on weighted combinations of the 8 domain scores, which were transformed to a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Higher scores reflect better health-related functional status. Scoring is standardized using the norm-based scoring method where data is scored in relation to the U.S. general population having a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores below 50 are below the U.S. general population norm and above 50 are above the U.S. general population norm.
Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36
Mean Relative to an Identified Distribution (Ridit) Value of Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Using Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale (MTSOSDS-59R)
The Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale (MTSOSD-59R) was used to assess the occurrence (never, occasionally, regularly, almost always, always) and distress (0=no distress to 4=terrible distress) of symptoms associated with immunosuppressive therapies. Ridit (relative to an identified distribution) analysis (Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley \& Sons, Inc. 1991) was used. Ridit scores were calculated at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months for overall symptom occurrence score and overall symptom distress. The Ridit score reflects the probability that a score observed for an individual randomly selected from a group would be higher (worse symptom) than a score observed for a randomly selected individual from the reference group. The reference group was constituted by the frequency distribution of the responses of all participants on all items at baseline. The ridit of the reference group is by definition, 0.5.
Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36
Mean Changes in the Value of Physical and Mental Components Using SF-36 From Baseline Up To Months 6, 12, 24, and 36
SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 scale measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). PCS represented by 4 domains: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. MCS represented by 4 domains: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Their scores were computed based on weighted combinations of the 8 domain scores, which were transformed to a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Higher scores reflect better health-related functional status. Scoring is standardized using the norm-based scoring method where data is scored in relation to the U.S. general population having a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores below 50 are below the U.S. general population norm and above 50 are above the U.S. general population norm.
Measured: Baseline to Months 6, 12, 24,and 36
Mean Change in the Value of the Eight Domain Scores Using SF-36 From Baseline Up To Months 6, 12, 24, and 36
SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 scale measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). PCS represented by 4 domains: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. MCS represented by 4 domains: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Their scores were computed based on weighted combinations of the 8 domain scores, which were transformed to a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Higher scores reflect better health-related functional status. Scoring is standardized using the norm-based scoring method where data is scored in relation to the U.S. general population having a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores below 50 are below the U.S. general population norm and above 50 are above the U.S. general population norm.
Measured: Baseline to Months 6, 12, 24, and 36
Percent of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft
Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss (nephrectomy). Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) or 530 micromoles per liter (μmol/L) as determined by the central laboratory for ≥ 4 weeks or ≥ 56 consecutive days of dialysis or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant underwent retransplant.
Measured: Months 24, 36
Percent of Participants With Composite Endpoint or Death, Graft Loss or Acute Rejection by Month 36
Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss (nephrectomy). Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) or 530 micromoles per liter (μmol/L) as determined by the central laboratory for ≥ 4 weeks or ≥ 56 consecutive days of dialysis or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant underwent retransplant. Acute rejection was defined as central biopsy proven rejection that was either (1) clinically suspected by protocol defined reasons or (2) clinically suspected by other reasons and treated. Death and graft loss were not imputed.
Measured: Randomization to Month 36
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2005
- Primary completionJun 2008
- Study completionApr 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Kidney TransplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 738 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00256750
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM103-008
- Acronym
- BENEFIT
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2005
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Vincenti F, Rostaing L, Grinyo J, Rice K, Steinberg S, Gaite L, Moal MC, Mondragon-Ramirez GA, Kothari J, Polinsky MS, Meier-Kriesche HU, Munier S, Larsen CP. Belatacept and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 28;374(4):333-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506027.
PubMed 26816011Dobbels F, Wong S, Min Y, Sam J, Kalsekar A. Beneficial effect of belatacept on health-related quality of life and perceived side effects: results from the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials. Transplantation. 2014 Nov 15;98(9):960-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000159.
PubMed 24831918Vincenti F, Larsen CP, Alberu J, Bresnahan B, Garcia VD, Kothari J, Lang P, Urrea EM, Massari P, Mondragon-Ramirez G, Reyes-Acevedo R, Rice K, Rostaing L, Steinberg S, Xing J, Agarwal M, Harler MB, Charpentier B. Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT, a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study in adult kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2012 Jan;12(1):210-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03785.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
PubMed 21992533
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial (BENEFIT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00256750
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BENEFIT / IM103-008
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplantation, Chronic Kidney Failure
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 738 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2005
- Primary completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Aug 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to learn if Belatacept can provide protection from organ rejection following kidney transplantation while avoiding some of the toxic effects of standard immunosuppressive medications such as kidney damage. Effects on kidney function and patient survival as well as drug safety will also be studied.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclosporine (CsA) | Active comparator | Drug: Cyclosporine (CsA) |
| Belatacept LI (less intensive) | Experimental | Drug: Belatacept LI (less intensive) |
| Belatacept MI (more intensive) | Experimental | Drug: Belatacept MI (more intensive) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- The subject is a recipient of a living donor or deceased donor kidney transplant.
- Male or Female, 18 or older
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- First time recipient, PRA >- 50% or for retransplantation PRA >- 30%.
- If retransplantation, previous graft loss cannot be due to acute rejection.
- Positive cross match.
- Subject receiving extended criteria donor (ECD) organ
- For Long-term extension study-Subjects who have completed three years of study treatment (through Week 156)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclosporine (CsA)tablet, oral, 1st month target: 150-300 ng/mL, after 1st month target: 100-250 ng/mL, daily, 36 months (ST), 100-250 ng/mL, daily, 24 months (LT) | Drug | Cyclosporine (CsA) |
| Belatacept LI (less intensive)solution, IV, 10mg/kg: Days 1 and 5, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12, then 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 36 months (ST), 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 24 months (LT) | Drug | Belatacept LI (less intensive) |
| Belatacept MI (more intensive)solution, IV, 10mg/kg: Days 1 and 5, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12, 16, 20, and 24, then 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 36 months (ST), 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 24 months (LT) | Drug | Belatacept MI (more intensive) |
Primary outcome
Percent of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft by Month 12
Time frame: Day 1 to Month 12
Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss (nephrectomy). Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) or 530 micromolar per liter (μmol/L) as determined by the central laboratory for ≥ 4 weeks or ≥ 56 consecutive days of dialysis or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant underwent retransplant.
Percent of Participants With a Composite of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) Less Than 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 at Month 12 or With a Decrease in mGFR Greater Than or Equal to 10 mL/Min/1.73m^2 From Month 3 to Month 12
Time frame: Month 12; Month 3 to Month 12
Measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) is the direct measurement of renal function and was assessed by measurement of the clearance of a true glomerular filtration marker (non-radiolabeled iothalamate) using a validated procedure. A GFR of 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 was used as the approximate equal of the threshold values of serum creatinine (SCr) of 1.5 mg/dL. A change in GFR of at least 10 mL/min/1.73 m^2 was used as the approximate change in SCr of at least 0.3 mg/dL. The change component of the composite renal endpoint was assessed from Month 3 to Month 12, since post-transplant renal function is largely stable by Month 3.
Percent of Participants Experiencing Acute Rejection (AR) Post-transplant by Month 12
Time frame: Day 1 to Month 12
Acute rejection was defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and biopsy confirmation. Clinical evidence was defined if either a or b was satisfied: a: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b: an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists. Allograft biopsies were evaluated by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification. AR was defined by a renal biopsy demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted.
40 secondary outcomes
Mean Value of the Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR)
Time frame: Months 3, 12, 24
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN) at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events by Month 84
Time frame: Randomization to Month 84
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest by Month 84
Time frame: Randomization to Month 84
Mean Blood Pressure at Month 84
Time frame: Month 84
Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria Post-transplant by Month 36
Time frame: Baseline to Month 36
Percent of Participants With Development of Anti-Donor HLA Positive Antibodies by Month 84
Time frame: Randomization to Month 84
Mean Change of the Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) From Month 3 to Month 12 and From Month 3 to Month 24
Time frame: Month 3 to Month 12; Month 3 to Month 24
Percent of Participants With a Decrease in Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) Greater Than or Equal to 10mL/Min/1.73m^2 From Month 3 to Month 12
Time frame: Month 3 to Month 12
Percent of Participants With a Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) Less Than 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Mean Value of the Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) With Imputation
Time frame: Months 6, 12, 24, 36
Mean Change in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) From Month 6 to Month 12
Time frame: Month 6 to Month 12
Percent of Participants With Incidence of New Onset Diabetes Mellitus by Month 36
Time frame: Week 4 post-transplantation to Month 36
Percent of Participants Using At Least One Anti-Hypertensive Medication to Control Hypertension at Month 36
Time frame: Month 36
Percent of Participants With Incidence of Hypertension Post-Transplantation at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Hypertension Post-Transplantation at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Percent of Participants at Baseline With Controlled Hypertension Post Transplantation by Month 12
Time frame: Day 1 to Month 12
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Controlled Hypertension at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Percent of Non-dyslipidemic Participants With Incidence of Dyslipidemia Post-Transplantation by Month 12
Time frame: Randomization to Month 12
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Dyslipidemia at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Percent of Participants With Controlled Dyslipidemia at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Number of Participants With Antihyperlipidemic Medication by Intensity Level
Time frame: Month 36
Percent of Participants Using At Least One Anti-Hyperlipidemic Medication
Time frame: Month 36
Mean Value of Lipid Parameters
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 36
Time frame: Randomization to Month 36
Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) Post-transplant in Terms of Severity Using Banff Grades by Month 36
Time frame: Randomization to Month 36
Percent of Participants Using Polyclonal Antilymphocyte Preparations for Impaired Renal Function and Anticipated Delayed Graft Function by Month 12
Time frame: Randomization to Month 12
Percent of Participants Using Lymphocyte Depleting Therapy (LDT) for the Initial Treatment of Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 36
Time frame: Randomization to Month 36
Percent of Participants With Corticosteroid Resistant Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 36
Time frame: Randomization to Month 36
Number of Participants Who Recovered Completely From an Episode of Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 12
Time frame: Randomization to Month 12
Percent of Participants With Subclinical Rejection at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Number of Participants Treated for Acute Rejection (AR) Regardless of Histological Findings by Month 36
Time frame: Randomization to Month 36
Mean Value of Physical and Mental Components Using SF-36 Questionnaire
Time frame: Months 6, 12, 24, 36
Mean Value of the Eight Domain Scores of Quality of Life Using SF-36 Questionnaire
Time frame: Months 6, 12, 24, 36
Mean Relative to an Identified Distribution (Ridit) Value of Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Using Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale (MTSOSDS-59R)
Time frame: Months 6, 12, 24, 36
Mean Changes in the Value of Physical and Mental Components Using SF-36 From Baseline Up To Months 6, 12, 24, and 36
Time frame: Baseline to Months 6, 12, 24,and 36
Mean Change in the Value of the Eight Domain Scores Using SF-36 From Baseline Up To Months 6, 12, 24, and 36
Time frame: Baseline to Months 6, 12, 24, and 36
Percent of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft
Time frame: Months 24, 36
Percent of Participants With Composite Endpoint or Death, Graft Loss or Acute Rejection by Month 36
Time frame: Randomization to Month 36
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26816011Vincenti F, Rostaing L, Grinyo J, Rice K, Steinberg S, Gaite L, Moal MC, Mondragon-Ramirez GA, Kothari J, Polinsky MS, Meier-Kriesche HU, Munier S, Larsen CP. Belatacept and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 28;374(4):333-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506027.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24831918Dobbels F, Wong S, Min Y, Sam J, Kalsekar A. Beneficial effect of belatacept on health-related quality of life and perceived side effects: results from the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials. Transplantation. 2014 Nov 15;98(9):960-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000159.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21992533Vincenti F, Larsen CP, Alberu J, Bresnahan B, Garcia VD, Kothari J, Lang P, Urrea EM, Massari P, Mondragon-Ramirez G, Reyes-Acevedo R, Rice K, Rostaing L, Steinberg S, Xing J, Agarwal M, Harler MB, Charpentier B. Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT, a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study in adult kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2012 Jan;12(1):210-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03785.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
Related trials for Kidney Transplantation
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) After a Kidney Transplant
Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Biomarker-Guided Mycophenolate Mofetil Elimination in Low-Risk Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant Recipient
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Immunosuppression Personalization: an Open-labeled Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Pediatric Kidney Disease, Transplant;Failure,Kidney
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
105 sites in 21 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cyclosporine (CsA), Belatacept LI (less intensive) and Belatacept MI (more intensive) in people with Kidney Transplantation and Chronic Kidney Failure, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 105 sites in 21 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 105 sites in United States, India, France, Argentina, Brazil and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Aug 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft by Month 12 (time frame: Day 1 to Month 12). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00256750, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2016.