AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney TransplantationPhase 3BENEFITNCT00256750

Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression (BENEFIT)

A Phase 3 study testing Cyclosporine (CsA), Belatacept LI (less intensive) and Belatacept MI (more intensive) in people with Kidney Transplantation and Chronic Kidney Failure, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 105 sites in 21 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to learn if Belatacept can provide protection from organ rejection following kidney transplantation while avoiding some of the toxic effects of standard immunosuppressive medications such as kidney damage. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Cyclosporine (CsA), Belatacept LI (less intensive) and Belatacept MI (more intensive)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
738 participants
Where
105 sitesin 21 countries
Study dates
Mar 2005to Apr 2015
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The subject is a recipient of a living donor or deceased donor kidney transplant.
  • Male or Female, 18 or older

Who cannot join

  • First time recipient, PRA >- 50% or for retransplantation PRA >- 30%.
  • If retransplantation, previous graft loss cannot be due to acute rejection.
  • Positive cross match.
  • Subject receiving extended criteria donor (ECD) organ
  • For Long-term extension study-Subjects who have completed three years of study treatment (through Week 156)

Trial locations and contacts

105 sites in 21 countries.

105 sites in 21 countries

United States34 sites
  • Piedmont Hospital

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30309

  • Emory University Hospital

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Medical College Of Georgia

    Augusta, Georgia, 30912

  • University Of Colorado Health Sciences Center

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • University Of Alabama At Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Fletcher Allen Health Care

    Burlington, Vermont, 05401

  • University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • Musc

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • Carolinas Medical Center

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203

  • University Of Chicago Hospitals

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Baylor University Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Henry Ford Hospital, Transplant Institute

    Detriot, Michigan, 48202

  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Inova Transplant Center

    Fairfax, Virginia, 22031

  • University Of Iowa Hospitals And Clinics

    Iowa City, Indiana, 52242

  • University Of Kentucky

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40536

  • Loma Linda University Medical Center-Transplantation Institu

    Loma Linda, California, 92354

  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • University Of Wisconsin

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • University Of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 27232

  • Yale University School Of Medicine-Yale New Haven Hospital

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06520

  • Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Columbia University College Of Physicians & Surgeons

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Div Of Multi-Organ Trans, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102

  • Maine Tranplant Program

    Portland, Maine, 04102

  • University Of Rochester Medical Center

    Rochester, New York, 14642

  • California Institute Of Renal Research

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • University Of California San Francisco Medical Center

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • Swedish Medical Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98104

  • Sacred Heart Medical Ctr Providence Medical Research Ctr

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • Western New England Renal & Transplant Associates, Pc

    Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107

  • Washington University School Of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

India10 sites
  • Local Institution

    Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380052

  • Local Institution

    Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160012

  • Local Institution

    Chennai, 600 006

  • Local Institution

    Gujarat, Ahmedabad, 380016

  • Local Institution

    Kochi, Kerala, 682304

  • Local Institution

    Lucknow, 226000

  • Local Institution

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 026

  • Local Institution

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400016

  • Local Institution

    Nadiād, Gujarat, 387001

  • Local Institution

    New Delhi, 110076

Other trials in India

France7 sites
  • Local Institution

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Local Institution

    Brest, 29609

  • Local Institution

    Créteil, 94000

  • Local Institution

    Grenoble, 38043

  • Local Institution

    Nantes, 44093

  • Local Institution

    Paris, 75015

  • Local Institution

    Toulouse, 31054

Other trials in France

Argentina6 sites
  • Local Institution

    Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1155APP

  • Local Institution

    Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, C1425APQ

  • Local Institution

    Cordoba, Crd, Córdoba Province, X5016KEH

  • Local Institution

    La Plata, Buenos Aires, 1900

  • Local Institution

    Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000

  • Local Institution

    Santa Fe, Santa Fe Province, S3000EPV

Other trials in Argentina

Brazil6 sites
  • Local Institution

    Campinas, São Paulo, 13033

  • Local Institution

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035

  • Local Institution

    Porto Alegre/rs, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035

  • Local Institution

    Rio de Janeiro / Rj, Rio de Janeiro, 21041

  • Local Institution

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403

  • Local Institution

    Sao Paulo/sp, São Paulo, 04038

Other trials in Brazil

Canada6 sites
  • Local Institution

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2S2

  • Local Institution

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9

  • Local Institution

    Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4

  • Local Institution

    Montreal, Quebec, H2L 2W5

  • Local Institution

    Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1

  • Local Institution

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7M 0Z9

Other trials in Canada

Mexico6 sites
  • Local Institution

    Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, 20000

  • Local Institution

    Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62448

  • Local Institution

    Distrito Federal, Mexico City, 14080

  • Local Institution

    Mexico City, Mexico City, 14080

  • Local Institution

    Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460

  • Local Institution

    San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, 78240

Other trials in Mexico

Australia4 sites
  • Local Institution

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5000

  • Local Institution

    Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050

  • Local Institution

    Parkville, Victoria, 3052

  • Local Institution

    Westmead, New South Wales, 2145

Other trials in Australia

Germany4 sites
  • Local Institution

    Berlin, 13353

  • Local Institution

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Local Institution

    Essen, 45122

  • Local Institution

    Hanover, 30625

Other trials in Germany

Italy3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Milan, 20162

  • Local Institution

    Padova, 35128

  • Local Institution

    Roma, 00168

Other trials in Italy

South Africa3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4001

  • Local Institution

    Observatory, Cape Town, 7925

  • Local Institution

    Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002

Other trials in South Africa

Spain3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Barcelona, 08907

  • Local Institution

    Madrid, 28040

  • Local Institution

    Málaga, 29010

Other trials in Spain

Austria2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Innsbuck, 6020

  • Local Institution

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Belgium2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Ghent, 9000

  • Local Institution

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Poland2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Poznan, 60-479

  • Local Institution

    Szczecin, 70-111

Other trials in Poland

Switzerland2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Bern, 3010

  • Local Institution

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

Czechia1 site
  • Local Institution

    Prague, 140 21

Other trials in Czechia

Hungary1 site
  • Local Institution

    Szeged, H-6720

Other trials in Hungary

Israel1 site
  • Local Institution

    Petah Tikva, 49100

Other trials in Israel

Sweden1 site
  • Local Institution

    Gothenburg, SE-413 45

Other trials in Sweden

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Local Institution

    Antalya, 07059

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial (BENEFIT)

The purpose of this study is to learn if Belatacept can provide protection from organ rejection following kidney transplantation while avoiding some of the toxic effects of standard immunosuppressive medications such as kidney damage. Effects on kidney function and patient survival as well as drug safety will also be studied.

Being tested
Cyclosporine (CsA), Belatacept LI (less intensive), Belatacept MI (more intensive)
Medical subject headings
Kidney Failure, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cyclosporine (CsA)Drug

    tablet, oral, 1st month target: 150-300 ng/mL, after 1st month target: 100-250 ng/mL, daily, 36 months (ST), 100-250 ng/mL, daily, 24 months (LT)

  • Belatacept LI (less intensive)Drug

    solution, IV, 10mg/kg: Days 1 and 5, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12, then 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 36 months (ST), 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 24 months (LT)

  • Belatacept MI (more intensive)Drug

    solution, IV, 10mg/kg: Days 1 and 5, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12, 16, 20, and 24, then 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 36 months (ST), 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 24 months (LT)

Study groups in NCT00256750
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cyclosporine (CsA)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Cyclosporine (CsA)
Belatacept LI (less intensive)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Belatacept LI (less intensive)
Belatacept MI (more intensive)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Belatacept MI (more intensive)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft by Month 12

    Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss (nephrectomy). Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) or 530 micromolar per liter (μmol/L) as determined by the central laboratory for ≥ 4 weeks or ≥ 56 consecutive days of dialysis or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant underwent retransplant.

    Measured: Day 1 to Month 12

  2. Percent of Participants With a Composite of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) Less Than 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 at Month 12 or With a Decrease in mGFR Greater Than or Equal to 10 mL/Min/1.73m^2 From Month 3 to Month 12

    Measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) is the direct measurement of renal function and was assessed by measurement of the clearance of a true glomerular filtration marker (non-radiolabeled iothalamate) using a validated procedure. A GFR of 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 was used as the approximate equal of the threshold values of serum creatinine (SCr) of 1.5 mg/dL. A change in GFR of at least 10 mL/min/1.73 m^2 was used as the approximate change in SCr of at least 0.3 mg/dL. The change component of the composite renal endpoint was assessed from Month 3 to Month 12, since post-transplant renal function is largely stable by Month 3.

    Measured: Month 12; Month 3 to Month 12

  3. Percent of Participants Experiencing Acute Rejection (AR) Post-transplant by Month 12

    Acute rejection was defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and biopsy confirmation. Clinical evidence was defined if either a or b was satisfied: a: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b: an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists. Allograft biopsies were evaluated by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification. AR was defined by a renal biopsy demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted.

    Measured: Day 1 to Month 12

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. Mean Value of the Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR)

    Measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) is the direct measurement of renal function and was assessed by measurement of the clearance of a true glomerular filtration marker (non-radiolabeled iothalamate) using a validated procedure. Missing mGRF assessments were imputed to assess renal function. The overall imputation strategy involved a primary imputation method (linear extrapolation and quartile method) followed by 2 secondary imputation methods (regression method and graded quartile method) to assess the robustness of conclusions obtained from the application of the primary imputation method. All imputation methods entailed replacing a missing value with a value drawn from a plausible distribution incorporating theoretical and observed aspects of the data. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2.

    Measured: Months 3, 12, 24

  2. Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN) at Month 12

    Prevalence of CAN = if participant met any of the following conditions: a: CAN observed in a biopsy either prior to 12 months (including baseline biopsy) or first post 12 months biopsy; b: participant had graft loss during the first year post transplant; c: no biopsy was available post 12 months and CAN not observed in biopsies prior to 12 months, but the measured GFR from Month 3 to Month 12 decreased at least 10 mL/min/1.73m^2; d: no biopsy available either prior to or post 12 months, and the measured GFR (incorporated missing data imputation) from Month 3 to Month 12 decreased at least 10 mL/min/1.73m^2. CAN = All allograft biopsies evaluated for presence and severity of CAN by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Onset of CAN determined by the biopsy date when it was observed.

    Measured: Month 12

  3. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events by Month 84

    Adverse event (AE) defined: any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) defined: a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.

    Measured: Randomization to Month 84

  4. Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest by Month 84

    Prospectively identified events of special interest which were a subset of all AEs, and were either SAEs or non-serious AEs, included the following categories: Serious Infections and Infestations, Thrombolic/embolic events, and Malignancy. AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/ abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Time frame is from randomization to the event date, or to the last dose date+56, or to Month 84 (Day 2548), whichever is the earliest.

    Measured: Randomization to Month 84

  5. Mean Blood Pressure at Month 84

    Blood pressure was measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Blood pressure was measured soon after the participant arrived and sat quietly at rest for 10 minutes. 3 consecutive seated blood pressure readings were made at least 1 minute apart.

    Measured: Month 84

  6. Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria Post-transplant by Month 36

    Upper limit of normal (ULN). Units per Liter (U/L). Cells per microliter (c/µL). Grams per deciliter (g/dL). Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).Cells per Liter (c/L). Milliequivalents/Liter (mEq/L).

    Hemoglobin (low): <8.0 g/dL; Platelet count: <50*10^9 c/L; Leukocytes: <2*10^3 c/µL; Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): >5.0*ULN U/L; Alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >5.0*ULN U/L; Asparate aminotransferase (AST): >5.0*ULN U/L; Bilirubin Total: >3.0*ULN mg/dL; Creatinine: >3.0*ULN mg/dL; Calcium Total: low if <7.0 mg/dL or high if >12.5 mg/dL; Bicarbonate: <11.0 mEq/L; Potassium serum: low if <3.0 mEq/L or high if >6.0 mEq/L; Magnesium serum: low is <0.8 mEq/L or high if >2.46 mEq/L; Sodium serum: low if <130.0 mEq/L or high if >155.0 mEq/L; Phosphorus inorganic: <2.0 mg/dL; Albumin: <2 g/dL; Uric acid: >10 mg/dL; Protein urine: >=3+

    Measured: Baseline to Month 36

  7. Percent of Participants With Development of Anti-Donor HLA Positive Antibodies by Month 84

    Only participants who had non-missing test result for Class I or Class II anti-donor HLA antibodies were included in analysis and only participants who had at least one non-NA test result or finding were counted. This was a cumulative summary (excluding baseline) and once a participant was positive, that participant remained positive for the later time point. Acute rejection (AR) defined: a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and biopsy confirmation. Clinical evidence defined: if either a or b was satisfied: a: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b: an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists. AR defined as allograft biopsies of Banff 97 classification Grade IA or greater (higher scores indicate more severe rejection). Evaluated by blinded central independent pathologist.

    Measured: Randomization to Month 84

  8. Mean Change of the Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) From Month 3 to Month 12 and From Month 3 to Month 24

    Measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) is the direct measurement of renal function and was assessed by measurement of the clearance of a true glomerular filtration marker (non-radiolabeled iothalamate) using a validated procedure. Missing mGRF assessments were imputed to assess renal function. The overall imputation strategy involved a primary imputation method (linear extrapolation and quartile method) followed by 2 secondary imputation methods (regression method and graded quartile method) to assess the robustness of conclusions obtained from the application of the primary imputation method. All imputation methods entailed replacing a missing value with a value drawn from a plausible distribution incorporating theoretical and observed aspects of the data. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2.

    Measured: Month 3 to Month 12; Month 3 to Month 24

  9. Percent of Participants With a Decrease in Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) Greater Than or Equal to 10mL/Min/1.73m^2 From Month 3 to Month 12

    Measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) is the direct measurement of renal function and was assessed by measurement of the clearance of a true glomerular filtration marker (non-radiolabeled iothalamate) using a validated procedure. A change in GFR of at least 10 mL/min/1.73 m^2 was used as the approximate change in serum creatinine (SCr) of at least 0.3 mg/dL. The change component of the composite renal endpoint was assessed from Month 3 to Month 12, since post-transplant renal function is largely stable by Month 3. Month 3 = baseline

    Measured: Month 3 to Month 12

  10. Percent of Participants With a Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) Less Than 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 at Month 12

    Measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) is the direct measurement of renal function and was assessed by measurement of the clearance of a true glomerular filtration marker (non-radiolabeled iothalamate) using a validated procedure. A GFR of 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 was used as the approximate equal of the threshold values of serum creatinine (SCr) of 1.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).

    Measured: Month 12

  11. Mean Value of the Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) With Imputation

    Calculated glomerular filtration rate (cGFR) was used to assess renal function (as measured by the estimated creatinine clearance) using the following modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula: MDRD: GFR = 170 x [SCr/0.95]^(-0.999) x [Age]^(-0.176) x [0.762 if participant is female] x [1.180 if participant is black] x [BUN]^(-0.170) x [Alb]^(+0.318); Age in years; Alb = Albumin in g/dL; SCr = Serum creatinine in mg/dL; BUN = Blood urea nitrogen in mg/dL; cGFR = mL/min/1.73m2

    Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36

  12. Mean Change in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) From Month 6 to Month 12

    Calculated glomerular filtration rate (cGFR) was used to assess renal function (as measured by the estimated creatinine clearance) using the following modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula: MDRD: GFR = 170 x [SCr/0.95]^(-0.999) x [Age]^(-0.176) x [0.762 if participant is female] x [1.180 if participant is black] x [BUN]^(-0.170) x [Alb]^(+0.318); Age in years; Alb = Albumin in g/dL; SCr = Serum creatinine in mg/dL; BUN = Blood urea nitrogen in mg/dL; cGFR = mL/min/1.73m^2

    Measured: Month 6 to Month 12

  13. Percent of Participants With Incidence of New Onset Diabetes Mellitus by Month 36

    The incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus defined as participants who developed diabetes mellitus after randomization and transplantation. Participants that did not have diabetes prior to randomization were determined to have new onset diabetes mellitus if (i) the participant received an anti-diabetic medication for a duration of at least 30 days or (ii) at least two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests indicate that FPG is >=126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L). New onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) = post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM)

    Measured: Week 4 post-transplantation to Month 36

  14. Percent of Participants Using At Least One Anti-Hypertensive Medication to Control Hypertension at Month 36

    This analysis was based on all participants who had been followed up at least 1092 days after transplantation. Hypertension was defined in according to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure for participants with chronic kidney disease. This definition was based upon SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg. In addition, all participants who had a SBP < 130 mm Hg and a DBP < 80 mm Hg who received an antihypertensive medication(s) for the indication of hypertension or with a medical history of hypertension were included in this definition. Systolic blood pressure = SBP; Diastolic blood pressure = DBP

    Measured: Month 36

  15. Percent of Participants With Incidence of Hypertension Post-Transplantation at Month 12

    The incidence of hypertension was defined as the proportion of participants who developed hypertension after randomization and transplantation. Specifically, the incidence of hypertension was assessed only after the Week 4 visit. This period allowed for adequate stabilization and resolution of transient changes. If participants received antihypertensive medication for the indication of hypertension at this (or later) time point, they were considered to have developed hypertension. Hypertension was defined according to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure for subjects with chronic kidney disease. This definition was based upon SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg. Systolic blood pressure = SBP; Diastolic blood pressure = DBP

    Measured: Month 12

  16. Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Hypertension Post-Transplantation at Month 12

    The prevalence of hypertension was defined as the proportion of participants at any given time who meet the definition of hypertension. Hypertension defined according to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure for participants with chronic kidney disease. This definition is based upon SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg. Systolic blood pressure = SBP; Diastolic blood pressure = DBP

    Measured: Month 12

  17. Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Blood pressure was measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Blood pressure was measured soon after the participant arrived and sat quietly at rest for 10 minutes. 3 consecutive seated blood pressure readings were made at least 1 minute apart.

    Measured: Months 12, 24, 36

  18. Percent of Participants at Baseline With Controlled Hypertension Post Transplantation by Month 12

    Controlled hypertension was defined as a SBP < 130 mm Hg and a DBP < 80 mm Hg while receiving an antihypertensive medication for the indication of hypertension or receiving an antihypertensive medication for another indication with a medical history of hypertension. Participants with a SBP < 130 mm Hg and a DBP < 80 mm Hg who were prescribed an antihypertensive medication(s) for an indication(s) other than hypertension (eg, beta blockers for migraine prophylaxis) with no medical history of hypertension were not considered to have either hypertension or controlled hypertension. Systolic blood pressure = SBP; Diastolic blood pressure = DBP

    Measured: Day 1 to Month 12

  19. Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Controlled Hypertension at Month 12

    The prevalence of controlled hypertension was defined as the proportion of participants at any given time who met the definition of controlled hypertension. Controlled hypertension was defined as a SBP < 130 mm Hg and a DBP < 80 mm Hg while receiving an antihypertensive medication for the indication of hypertension or receiving an antihypertensive medication for another indication with a medical history of hypertension. Participants with a SBP < 130 mm Hg and a DBP < 80 mm Hg who were prescribed an antihypertensive medication(s) for an indication(s) other than hypertension (eg, beta blockers for migraine prophylaxis) with no medical history of hypertension were not considered to have either hypertension or controlled hypertension. Systolic blood pressure = SBP; Diastolic blood pressure = DBP

    Measured: Month 12

  20. Percent of Non-dyslipidemic Participants With Incidence of Dyslipidemia Post-Transplantation by Month 12

    Incidence of dyslipidemia was defined as the proportion of participants who developed dyslipidemia after randomization and transplantation. Dyslipidemia was defined in accordance with recent guidelines from the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-K/DOQI). Dyslipidemia = hypertriglyceridemia (TGs >= 500 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) [5.65 mmol/L]), hypercholesterolemia (LDL >= 100 mg/dL [2.59 mmol/L]), or elevated non-HDL (non-HDL >= 130 mg/dL [3.36 mmol/L]) in the presence of high TGs (TGs >= 200 mg/dL [2.26 mmol/L]). The TG = triglyceride; LDL = low density lipoprotein; HDL = high density lipoprotein; millimole/Liter (mmol/L). For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation is used if N >=5. Otherwise exact method is used.

    Measured: Randomization to Month 12

  21. Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Dyslipidemia at Month 12

    The prevalence of dyslipidemia was defined as the proportion of participants at any given time who met the definition of dyslipidemia. Dyslipidemia defined in accordance with recent guidelines from the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-K/DOQI). Dyslipidemia defined as hypertriglyceridemia (TGs >= 500 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) [5.65 mmol/L]), hypercholesterolemia (LDL >= 100 mg/dL [2.59 mmol/L]), or elevated non-HDL (non-HDL >= 130 mg/dL [3.36 mmol/L]) in the presence of high TGs (TGs >= 200 mg/dL [2.26 mmol/L]). TG = triglyceride; LDL = low density lipoprotein; HDL = high density lipoprotein; millimole/Liter (mmol/L). For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation is used if N >=5. Otherwise exact method is used.

    Measured: Month 12

  22. Percent of Participants With Controlled Dyslipidemia at Month 12

    Prevalence of controlled dyslipidemia = the proportion of participants at any given time who met the stated definition of dyslipidemia. Dyslipidemia defined in accordance with recent guidelines from the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-K/DOQI). Dyslipidemia defined as hypertriglyceridemia (TGs >= 500 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) [5.65 mmol/L]), hypercholesterolemia (LDL >= 100 mg/dL [2.59 mmol/L]), or elevated non-HDL (non-HDL >= 130 mg/dL [3.36 mmol/L]) in the presence of high TGs (TGs >= 200 mg/dL [2.26 mmol/L]). Controlled dyslipidemia defined as participants who received successful pharmacologic treatment for 1 of the above stated dyslipidemias, and their lipid values fell below the thresholds described. TG = triglyceride; LDL = low density lipoprotein; HDL = high density lipoprotein; millimole/Liter (mmol/L). For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation is used if N >=5. Otherwise exact method is used.

    Measured: Month 12

  23. Number of Participants With Antihyperlipidemic Medication by Intensity Level

    An intensity level was associated with the dose level of the statin based anti-hyperlipidemic agent. Any other agent (i.e., non-statin therapy) used as an antihyperlipidemic were considered Level I treatment intensity. Multiple daily dose levels during a period were averaged to compute the daily dose during that period. Level I = 20 mg fluvastatin (flu), 10 mg lovastatin (lova), 10 mg pravastatin (prav), 5-10 mg simvastatin (sim); Level II = 10 mg atorvastatin (atorv), 40 mg flu, 20 mg lova, 20 mg prav, 5 mg rosuvastatin (rosu), 20 mg sim, 10/10 vytorin; Level III = 20 mg atorv, 80 mg flu, 40 mg lova, 40 mg prav, 10 mg rosu, 40 mg sim, 10/20 vytorin; Level IV = 40 mg atorv, 80 mg lova, 80 mg prav, 20 mg rosu, 80 mg sim, 10/40 vytorin; Level V = 80 mg atorv, 40 mg rosu, 10/80 vytorin. Concomitant use of a statin and an agent of another class elevated the intensity level of the statin therapy by 1 level; therefore, an intensity level of greater than V was possible.

    Measured: Month 36

  24. Percent of Participants Using At Least One Anti-Hyperlipidemic Medication

    This analysis is based on all participants who were followed up at least 1092 days after transplantation.

    Measured: Month 36

  25. Mean Value of Lipid Parameters

    Lipid parameters included total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides (TGs).

    Measured: Months 12, 24, 36

  26. Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 36

    Prevalence of AR = participants with the stated definition of AR at any given time. AR defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and renal biopsy confirmation demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted. Clinical evidence = if either a or b was satisfied: a: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b: an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists. Allograft biopsies were evaluated by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification.

    Measured: Randomization to Month 36

  27. Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) Post-transplant in Terms of Severity Using Banff Grades by Month 36

    Acute rejection was defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and renal biopsy confirmation demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Clinical evidence defined: if either a or b was satisfied: a) an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b) an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists. Allograft biopsies were evaluated by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted.

    Measured: Randomization to Month 36

  28. Percent of Participants Using Polyclonal Antilymphocyte Preparations for Impaired Renal Function and Anticipated Delayed Graft Function by Month 12

    A participant was considered to have delayed graft function (DGF), if treated with dialysis within the first week (Day 1 - 8) after transplantation. The use of polyclonal antilymphocyte preparations (LDT) was permitted only for participants randomized to cyclosporine (CsA) who experienced impaired renal allograft function and anticipated DGF following transplantation and were not permitted in belatacept-treated participants, except for the treatment of acute rejection. Participants treated with LDT began CsA at the discretion of the investigator by Day 7. LDT could also have been used in participants who met >= 1 of the following criteria, observed in the presence of a transplant artery and vein and no evidence of hydronephrosis by sonogram: Urine output < 250 mL/12 hours, no significant improvement (< 1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)) in serum creatinine from baseline value over the first 24 - 72 hours post-transplant, or dialysis treatment.

    Measured: Randomization to Month 12

  29. Percent of Participants Using Lymphocyte Depleting Therapy (LDT) for the Initial Treatment of Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 36

    The use of LDT (thymoglobulin or antithymocyte gamma globulin [ATGAM]) was permitted only for participants randomized to cyclosporine (CsA) who experienced impaired renal allograft function and anticipated delayed graft function following transplantation. Acute rejection (AR) defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence (an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remained elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection existed) and biopsy confirmation. AR defined by a renal biopsy demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted.

    Measured: Randomization to Month 36

  30. Percent of Participants With Corticosteroid Resistant Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 36

    Steroid-resistant acute rejection (AR) defined as the use of lymphocyte-depletion therapy following treatment with corticosteroids. AR defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and renal biopsy confirmation demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Clinical evidence defined: either a or b was satisfied: a) an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b) an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remained elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection existed. Allograft biopsies were evaluated by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 international standardized histopathological working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted.

    Measured: Randomization to Month 36

  31. Number of Participants Who Recovered Completely From an Episode of Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 12

    Acute rejection (AR) = a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and renal biopsy confirmation demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater. Clinical evidence = if either a or b was satisfied: a: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b: an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists. Complete recovery following AR defined as serum creatinine [SCr] levels returned to baseline. Recovery calculated using 2 algorithms: Algorithm 1 = last laboratory measurement prior to onset of AR (baseline and first laboratory measurement after 84 days since onset of AR = resolution); Algorithm 2 = lowest laboratory measurement on or after transplantation and prior to onset day of AR (baseline and lowest laboratory measurement after onset on first AR up to Month 12 = resolution)

    Measured: Randomization to Month 12

  32. Percent of Participants With Subclinical Rejection at Month 12

    Subclinical rejection defined as histological findings by the central pathologist consistent with acute rejection, but lacking its clinical correlate. Acute rejection defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence and renal biopsy confirmation demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Only the episode with the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted. Clinical evidence defined if either a or b was satisfied: a) an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; b) an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remained elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection existed. Allograft biopsies were evaluated by a blinded central independent pathologist using Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology.

    Measured: Month 12

  33. Number of Participants Treated for Acute Rejection (AR) Regardless of Histological Findings by Month 36

    Allograft rejection includes any episode of rejection including: clinically suspected rejection, treated rejection, any central biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and acute rejection (AR: a subset of BPAR) defined as central biopsy-proven rejection that was either clinically suspected by protocol-defined reasons or by other reasons and was treated. Acute rejection (AR) defined as a clinico-pathological event requiring clinical evidence ( either an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; or a serum creatinine that remained elevated within 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of AR) and renal biopsy confirmation biopsy demonstrating a Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. Only the highest Banff grade for each participant was counted.

    Measured: Randomization to Month 36

  34. Mean Value of Physical and Mental Components Using SF-36 Questionnaire

    SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 scale measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). PCS represented by 4 domains: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. MCS represented by 4 domains: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Their scores were computed based on weighted combinations of the 8 domain scores, which were transformed to a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Higher scores reflect better health-related functional status. Scoring is standardized using the norm-based scoring method where data is scored in relation to the U.S. general population having a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores below 50 are below the U.S. general population norm and above 50 are above the U.S. general population norm.

    Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36

  35. Mean Value of the Eight Domain Scores of Quality of Life Using SF-36 Questionnaire

    SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 scale measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). PCS represented by 4 domains: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. MCS represented by 4 domains: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Their scores were computed based on weighted combinations of the 8 domain scores, which were transformed to a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Higher scores reflect better health-related functional status. Scoring is standardized using the norm-based scoring method where data is scored in relation to the U.S. general population having a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores below 50 are below the U.S. general population norm and above 50 are above the U.S. general population norm.

    Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36

  36. Mean Relative to an Identified Distribution (Ridit) Value of Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Using Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale (MTSOSDS-59R)

    The Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale (MTSOSD-59R) was used to assess the occurrence (never, occasionally, regularly, almost always, always) and distress (0=no distress to 4=terrible distress) of symptoms associated with immunosuppressive therapies. Ridit (relative to an identified distribution) analysis (Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley \& Sons, Inc. 1991) was used. Ridit scores were calculated at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months for overall symptom occurrence score and overall symptom distress. The Ridit score reflects the probability that a score observed for an individual randomly selected from a group would be higher (worse symptom) than a score observed for a randomly selected individual from the reference group. The reference group was constituted by the frequency distribution of the responses of all participants on all items at baseline. The ridit of the reference group is by definition, 0.5.

    Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36

  37. Mean Changes in the Value of Physical and Mental Components Using SF-36 From Baseline Up To Months 6, 12, 24, and 36

    SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 scale measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). PCS represented by 4 domains: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. MCS represented by 4 domains: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Their scores were computed based on weighted combinations of the 8 domain scores, which were transformed to a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Higher scores reflect better health-related functional status. Scoring is standardized using the norm-based scoring method where data is scored in relation to the U.S. general population having a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores below 50 are below the U.S. general population norm and above 50 are above the U.S. general population norm.

    Measured: Baseline to Months 6, 12, 24,and 36

  38. Mean Change in the Value of the Eight Domain Scores Using SF-36 From Baseline Up To Months 6, 12, 24, and 36

    SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 scale measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). PCS represented by 4 domains: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. MCS represented by 4 domains: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Their scores were computed based on weighted combinations of the 8 domain scores, which were transformed to a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Higher scores reflect better health-related functional status. Scoring is standardized using the norm-based scoring method where data is scored in relation to the U.S. general population having a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores below 50 are below the U.S. general population norm and above 50 are above the U.S. general population norm.

    Measured: Baseline to Months 6, 12, 24, and 36

  39. Percent of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft

    Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss (nephrectomy). Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) or 530 micromoles per liter (μmol/L) as determined by the central laboratory for ≥ 4 weeks or ≥ 56 consecutive days of dialysis or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant underwent retransplant.

    Measured: Months 24, 36

  40. Percent of Participants With Composite Endpoint or Death, Graft Loss or Acute Rejection by Month 36

    Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss (nephrectomy). Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) or 530 micromoles per liter (μmol/L) as determined by the central laboratory for ≥ 4 weeks or ≥ 56 consecutive days of dialysis or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant underwent retransplant. Acute rejection was defined as central biopsy proven rejection that was either (1) clinically suspected by protocol defined reasons or (2) clinically suspected by other reasons and treated. Death and graft loss were not imputed.

    Measured: Randomization to Month 36

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Nov 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2005
  3. Primary completionJun 2008
  4. Study completionApr 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
738 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00256750
Sponsor's protocol ID
IM103-008
Acronym
BENEFIT
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
15 Nov 2005
Last updated
19 Aug 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Vincenti F, Rostaing L, Grinyo J, Rice K, Steinberg S, Gaite L, Moal MC, Mondragon-Ramirez GA, Kothari J, Polinsky MS, Meier-Kriesche HU, Munier S, Larsen CP. Belatacept and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 28;374(4):333-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506027.

    PubMed 26816011
  • Dobbels F, Wong S, Min Y, Sam J, Kalsekar A. Beneficial effect of belatacept on health-related quality of life and perceived side effects: results from the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials. Transplantation. 2014 Nov 15;98(9):960-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000159.

    PubMed 24831918
  • Vincenti F, Larsen CP, Alberu J, Bresnahan B, Garcia VD, Kothari J, Lang P, Urrea EM, Massari P, Mondragon-Ramirez G, Reyes-Acevedo R, Rice K, Rostaing L, Steinberg S, Xing J, Agarwal M, Harler MB, Charpentier B. Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT, a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study in adult kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2012 Jan;12(1):210-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03785.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

    PubMed 21992533

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Cyclosporine (CsA), Belatacept LI (less intensive) and Belatacept MI (more intensive) in people with Kidney Transplantation and Chronic Kidney Failure, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 105 sites in 21 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 105 sites in United States, India, France, Argentina, Brazil and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Aug 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft by Month 12 (time frame: Day 1 to Month 12). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00256750, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in