Esophagitis, RefluxPhase 3NCT00255151
Comparison of Dexlansoprazole MR to Placebo on the Ability to Maintain Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis
A Phase 3 study testing Dexlansoprazole MR in people with Esophagitis, Reflux and Esophagitis, Peptic, run by Takeda at 100 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of once-daily (QD) treatment with Dexlansoprazole modified-release (MR) 60 mg and 90 mg and placebo in maintaining healing of erosive esophagitis (EE). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophagitis, Reflux, Esophagitis, Peptic
- What is being tested?
- Dexlansoprazole MR
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 451 participants
- Where
- 100 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2006to Nov 2006
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must have successfully completed the Phase 3 Study T-EE04-084 (NCT00251693) or T-EE04-085 (NCT00251719); and have healed esophageal erosions proven by endoscopy. Complete healing was assessed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed (defined as anything less than the criterion for Grade A). The subject was counted as healed if endoscopy findings did not meet the Grade A criterion.
Who cannot join
- Use of prescription or nonprescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists, sucralfate, misoprostol, or prokinetics throughout the study
- Use of antacids (except for study supplied) throughout the study.
- Subjects using drugs with significant anticholinergic effects such as tricyclics who cannot stay on a stable dose throughout the study.
- Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy.
Trial locations and contacts
100 sites in 1 country.
100 sites in 1 country
United States100 sites
Study site
Akron, Ohio
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Study site
Amarillo, Texas
Study site
Anderson, South Carolina
Study site
Anniston, Alabama
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia
Study site
Azusa, California
Study site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Study site
Bellevue, Washington
Study site
Bismarck, North Dakota
Study site
Bristol, Connecticut
Study site
Carmichael, California
Study site
Champaign, Illinois
Study site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Study site
Charlottesville, Virginia
Study site
Chattanooga, Tennessee
Study site
Chevy Chase, Maryland
Study site
Columbus, Ohio
Study site
Conroe, Texas
Study site
Cypress, California
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Davenport, Iowa
Study site
Dayton, Ohio
Study site
Egg Harbor, New Jersey
Study site
Evansville, Indiana
Study site
Fort Myers, Florida
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas
Study site
Fresno, California
Study site
Germantown, Tennessee
Study site
Greensboro, North Carolina
Study site
High Point, North Carolina
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Hueytown, Alabama
Study site
Huntsville, Alabama
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana
Study site
Jackson, Mississippi
Study site
Jackson, Tennessee
Study site
Jefferson City, Missouri
Study site
Johnson City, Tennessee
Study site
Kansas City, Kansas
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri
Study site
Kingsport, Tennessee
Study site
Lakewood, Washington
Study site
Lexington, Kentucky
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas
Study site
Littleton, Colorado
Study site
Longmont, Colorado
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky
Study site
Medford, Oregon
Study site
Miami, Florida
Study site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Study site
Missoula, Montana
Study site
Modesto, California
Study site
Mogadore, Ohio
Study site
Moline, Illinois
Study site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina
Study site
Naples, Florida
Study site
New Smyrna Beach, Florida
Study site
Newark, Delaware
Study site
Newburgh, Indiana
Study site
Newport Beach, California
Study site
Norfolk, Virginia
Study site
North Chicago, Illinois
Study site
North Little Rock, Arkansas
Study site
Oak Forest, Illinois
Study site
Oakland, California
Study site
Ocala, Florida
Study site
Odessa, Texas
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Study site
Orange, California
Study site
Pembroke Pines, Florida
Study site
Pharr, Texas
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Port Orange, Florida
Study site
Portland, Oregon
Study site
Prince Frederick, Maryland
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina
Study site
Richmond, Virginia
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Study site
San Diego, California
Study site
Santa Maria, California
Study site
Sarasota, Florida
Study site
Seguin, Texas
Study site
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Study site
Springfield, Illinois
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
St. Petersburg, Florida
Study site
Tacoma, Washington
Study site
Tallassee, Alabama
Study site
Temple, Texas
Study site
Tucson, Arizona
Study site
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Study site
Warwick, Rhode Island
Study site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado
Study site
Wichita, Kansas
Study site
Wilmington, North Carolina
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Study site
Zephyrhills, Florida
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg QD and 90 mg QD) Compared to Placebo in Maintenance of Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis
The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of once-daily (QD) treatment with Dexlansoprazole modified-release (MR) 60 mg and 90 mg and placebo in maintaining healing of erosive esophagitis (EE).
Read the detailed description
This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled, 6 month maintenance study. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of daily Dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg and 90 mg) with that of placebo, in maintaining healing of erosive esophagitis.
Because the development plan for Dexlansoprazole MR formulation was revised, the results of 2 identical studies, T-EE04-086 (NCT00255164) and T-EE04-087 (this study, NCT00255151), were combined and analyzed as a single larger study referred to as study T-EE04-086. A total of 451 subjects were included in the combined analysis: 237 subjects were enrolled into Study T-EE04-086, and 214 subjects were enrolled into Study T-EE04-087.
- Conditions
- Esophagitis, Reflux, Esophagitis, Peptic
- Being tested
- Dexlansoprazole MR, Placebo
- Keywords
- Erosive Esophagitis
- Medical subject headings
- Esophagitis, Peptic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dexlansoprazole MRDrug
Also called TAK-390MR, Dexilant, Kapidex
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.
Dexlansoprazole MRDrug
Also called TAK-390MR, Kapidex, Dexilant
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.
PlaceboDrug
Dexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Dexlansoprazole MR |
| Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Dexlansoprazole MR |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.
Crude rates analyzed maintenance of healed EE from baseline of this study and considered prematurely discontinued subjects as relapsed.
Measured: 6 months
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method
Percentage of subjects who maintained complete healing of erosive esophagitis as assessed by endoscopy. In the life table method, subjects without post-baseline endoscopy were included as censored; subjects who did not have a recurrence of EE and did not complete the study were also considered censored.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.
The percentage was calculated as the days that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which either a daytime or nighttime result was reported.
Measured: 6 months
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.
The percentage was calculated as the days that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which either a daytime or nighttime result was marked
Measured: 6 months
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.
The percentage was calculated as the nights that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which a nighttime result was marked.
Measured: 6 months
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.
The percentage was calculated as the nights that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which a nighttime result was marked.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2006
- Primary completionNov 2006
- Study completionNov 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophagitis, RefluxStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by TakedaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 451 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Takeda
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study chair, Takeda
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00255151
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- T-EE04-087
- Other IDs
- U1111-1114-1767
- Status last verified
- Feb 2012
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2005
- Last updated
- 3 Feb 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Howden CW, Larsen LM, Perez MC, Palmer R, Atkinson SN. Clinical trial: efficacy and safety of dexlansoprazole MR 60 and 90 mg in healed erosive oesophagitis - maintenance of healing and symptom relief. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 1;30(9):895-907. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04119.x. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
PubMed 19681809
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Feb 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg QD and 90 mg QD) Compared to Placebo in Maintenance of Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00255151
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- T-EE04-087
- Conditions
- Esophagitis, Reflux, Esophagitis, Peptic
- Keywords
- Erosive Esophagitis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 451 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- TakedaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2006
- Primary completion
- Nov 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Aug 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of once-daily (QD) treatment with Dexlansoprazole modified-release (MR) 60 mg and 90 mg and placebo in maintaining healing of erosive esophagitis (EE).
Detailed description
This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled, 6 month maintenance study. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of daily Dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg and 90 mg) with that of placebo, in maintaining healing of erosive esophagitis.
Because the development plan for Dexlansoprazole MR formulation was revised, the results of 2 identical studies, T-EE04-086 (NCT00255164) and T-EE04-087 (this study, NCT00255151), were combined and analyzed as a single larger study referred to as study T-EE04-086. A total of 451 subjects were included in the combined analysis: 237 subjects were enrolled into Study T-EE04-086, and 214 subjects were enrolled into Study T-EE04-087.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD | Experimental | Drug: Dexlansoprazole MR |
| Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD | Experimental | Drug: Dexlansoprazole MR |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subjects must have successfully completed the Phase 3 Study T-EE04-084 (NCT00251693) or T-EE04-085 (NCT00251719); and have healed esophageal erosions proven by endoscopy. Complete healing was assessed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed (defined as anything less than the criterion for Grade A). The subject was counted as healed if endoscopy findings did not meet the Grade A criterion.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Use of prescription or nonprescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists, sucralfate, misoprostol, or prokinetics throughout the study
- Use of antacids (except for study supplied) throughout the study.
- Subjects using drugs with significant anticholinergic effects such as tricyclics who cannot stay on a stable dose throughout the study.
- Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dexlansoprazole MRAlso: TAK-390MR, Dexilant, KapidexDexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months. | Drug | Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD |
| Dexlansoprazole MRAlso: TAK-390MR, Kapidex, DexilantDexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months. | Drug | Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD |
| PlaceboDexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.
Time frame: 6 months
Crude rates analyzed maintenance of healed EE from baseline of this study and considered prematurely discontinued subjects as relapsed.
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method
Time frame: 6 months
Percentage of subjects who maintained complete healing of erosive esophagitis as assessed by endoscopy. In the life table method, subjects without post-baseline endoscopy were included as censored; subjects who did not have a recurrence of EE and did not complete the study were also considered censored.
4 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.
Time frame: 6 months
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.
Time frame: 6 months
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.
Time frame: 6 months
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Feb 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 19681809Howden CW, Larsen LM, Perez MC, Palmer R, Atkinson SN. Clinical trial: efficacy and safety of dexlansoprazole MR 60 and 90 mg in healed erosive oesophagitis - maintenance of healing and symptom relief. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 1;30(9):895-907. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04119.x. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
- For the Dexilant package insert refer to this linkLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Esophagitis, Reflux
Recruiting
SPADE Clinical Trial.
Early Gastric Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
PPI Dosing Per CYP2C19 Genotype
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With Esophagitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Domperidone in Treating Patients With Gastrointestinal Disorders
Digestive System Disorder, Dyspepsia
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Predictors of Symptom Improvement After Laparoscopic Fundoplication
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Hiatal Hernia
RecruitingObservational study
A Study of the Safety of Vonoprazan Exposure in Pregnant Women and Their Offspring
Erosive Esophagitis, Heartburn
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study chair
Takeda
100 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Dexlansoprazole MR in people with Esophagitis, Reflux and Esophagitis, Peptic, run by Takeda at 100 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 100 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Aug 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis. (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00255151, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2012.