Peptic UlcersPhase 4NCT00247130
Comparison of Intravenous Omeprazole to Ranitidine on Recurrent Bleeding After Endoscopic Treatment of Bleeding Ulcer
A Phase 4 study testing Omeprazole and Ranitidine in people with Peptic Ulcers, run by Keio University at 1 site in Japan.
Trial summary
The present study will compare the hemostasis-maintaining effects of intravenous omeprazole and ranitidine in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage that have undergone endoscopic hemostasis, to establish which anti-secretory medication prior to the start of oral alimentation is effective in preventing… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Peptic Ulcers
- What is being tested?
- Omeprazole and Ranitidine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteJapan
- Study dates
- Oct 2005to Jul 2007
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with identified gastric or duodenal ulcer
- Patients with hemorrhagic exposed vessel at the ulcer lesion, oozing or projectile hemorrhage (predominantly arterial) from the ulcer, and where endoscopic hemostasis has been performed.
- Over 20 years of age of either sex.
- The subject or his or her proxy consenter has provided written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Serious hepatopathy, nephropathy, or heart disease.
- Complicating malignant tumor.
- Hemorrhage from malignant tumor.
- The patient is on, or in need of, treatment with a drug considered to interact with the test drug.
- History of allergy to the test drug.
- History of anaphylactic shock.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Pregnant, possibly pregnant, or lactating.
- patient who is unable to fully understand the explanation about the study.
- patient who is judged by the investigator to be otherwise inappropriate for inclusion.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Japan1 site
Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine
Tokyo, Tokyo, 1608582
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Intravenous Omeprazole to That of Intravenous Ranitidine on the Maintenance of Hemostasis After Successful Endoscopic Treatment of Bleeding Peptic Ulcer
The present study will compare the hemostasis-maintaining effects of intravenous omeprazole and ranitidine in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage that have undergone endoscopic hemostasis, to establish which anti-secretory medication prior to the start of oral alimentation is effective in preventing re-hemorrhage after hemostasis.
Read the detailed description
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage is a relatively common condition, with the source of the bleeding being most commonly from the upper gastrointestinal tract, especially from gastric and duodenal ulcers. It often requires emergency treatment. First, the site of bleeding is determined. If an exposed blood vessel is found in the hemorrhagic lesion, or in the case of oozing or projectile hemorrhage, endoscopic hemostasis is performed on the lesion. After hemostasis is achieved, prevention of re-bleeding is important; usually, an antacid or similar medication is administered and the course is monitored under fasting conditions.Suppression of gastric acid secretion is necessary to raise gastric pH levels and maintain normal blood coagulation, and to promote healing of hemorrhagic lesions. In Japan, intravenous preparations of H2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors have been commonly used.In foreign countries, drug therapy for patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage emphasizes the maintenance of normal blood coagulation. High doses of these drugs have been established to constantly maintain a pH of 7 in the stomach (Daneshmend TK, et al., BMJ 1992, 304:143-147; Labentz J, et al., Gut 1997, 40:36-41; Hasselgren G, et al., Scand J Gastroenterol 1997, 32:328-333; Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB, et al., Scand J Gastroenterol 1997, 32:320-327; Sung JJY, et al., Ann Intern Med 2003, 139:237-243). In a clinical study, proton pump inhibitors were superior to H2 receptor antagonists in terms of clinical efficacy (Labentz J, et al., Gut 1997, 40:36-41). In Japan, emphasis is placed on promoting healing of lesions since endoscopic hemostasis is a fairly common practice; doses have been established at levels similar to therapeutic doses for peptic ulcers. It cannot be said, however, that superiority of intravenous proton pump inhibitors over H2 receptor antagonists has been established at such doses. This can possibly be attributed to fact that in previous studies the study populations were not homogenous in terms of severity; for example, patients requiring endoscopic hemostasis and those that did not were both included.Against this background, this study will compare the hemostasis-maintaining effects of intravenous omeprazole and ranitidine in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage that have undergone endoscopic hemostasis, to establish which anti-secretory medication prior to the start of oral alimentation is effective in preventing re-hemorrhage after hemostasis.
- Conditions
- Peptic Ulcers
- Being tested
- Omeprazole, Ranitidine
- Keywords
- Omeprazole, Ranitidine, Endoscopic treatment, Hemostasis, Peptic ulcer
- Medical subject headings
- Peptic Ulcer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OmeprazoleDrug
Also called omeprazon
RanitidineDrug
Also called Zantac
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Omeprazole | Active comparator | Omeprazole (20 mg), intravenous, 2x /day Receives: Drug: Omeprazole |
| Ranitidine | Active comparator | Ranitidine (100 mg), intravenous drip infusion, 2x /day. Receives: Drug: Ranitidine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
No evidence of hemorrhage or vessel exposure on a second endoscopy
Measured: 4 weeks after the bleeding
Secondary outcomes (3)
Plasma ghrelin levels
Measured: 4 weeks after the bleeding
Serum gastrin levels
Measured: 4 weeks after the bleeding
No evidence of hemorrhage or vessel exposure on a third endoscopy
Measured: 12 weeks after the bleeding
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2005
- Primary completionJul 2007
- Study completionJul 2007
Why it stopped: Superiority of iv omeprazole to ranitidine has already been proven by others.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Peptic UlcersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Keio University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hidekazu Suzuki, M.D., Ph.D., Keio University
- Investigators
- Toshifumi Hibi, M.D., Ph.D., Study chair, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of MedicineHidekazu Suzuki, M.D., Ph.D., Principal investigator, Upper GI Research Center, Keio University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00247130
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KEIO-UGI-001
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 28 Oct 2005
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Intravenous Omeprazole to That of Intravenous Ranitidine on the Maintenance of Hemostasis After Successful Endoscopic Treatment of Bleeding Peptic Ulcer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00247130
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KEIO-UGI-001
- Conditions
- Peptic Ulcers
- Keywords
- Omeprazole, Ranitidine, Endoscopic treatment, Hemostasis, Peptic ulcer
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Superiority of iv omeprazole to ranitidine has already been proven by others.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Keio UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2005
- Primary completion
- Jul 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present study will compare the hemostasis-maintaining effects of intravenous omeprazole and ranitidine in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage that have undergone endoscopic hemostasis, to establish which anti-secretory medication prior to the start of oral alimentation is effective in preventing re-hemorrhage after hemostasis.
Detailed description
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage is a relatively common condition, with the source of the bleeding being most commonly from the upper gastrointestinal tract, especially from gastric and duodenal ulcers. It often requires emergency treatment. First, the site of bleeding is determined. If an exposed blood vessel is found in the hemorrhagic lesion, or in the case of oozing or projectile hemorrhage, endoscopic hemostasis is performed on the lesion. After hemostasis is achieved, prevention of re-bleeding is important; usually, an antacid or similar medication is administered and the course is monitored under fasting conditions.Suppression of gastric acid secretion is necessary to raise gastric pH levels and maintain normal blood coagulation, and to promote healing of hemorrhagic lesions. In Japan, intravenous preparations of H2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors have been commonly used.In foreign countries, drug therapy for patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage emphasizes the maintenance of normal blood coagulation. High doses of these drugs have been established to constantly maintain a pH of 7 in the stomach (Daneshmend TK, et al., BMJ 1992, 304:143-147; Labentz J, et al., Gut 1997, 40:36-41; Hasselgren G, et al., Scand J Gastroenterol 1997, 32:328-333; Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB, et al., Scand J Gastroenterol 1997, 32:320-327; Sung JJY, et al., Ann Intern Med 2003, 139:237-243). In a clinical study, proton pump inhibitors were superior to H2 receptor antagonists in terms of clinical efficacy (Labentz J, et al., Gut 1997, 40:36-41). In Japan, emphasis is placed on promoting healing of lesions since endoscopic hemostasis is a fairly common practice; doses have been established at levels similar to therapeutic doses for peptic ulcers. It cannot be said, however, that superiority of intravenous proton pump inhibitors over H2 receptor antagonists has been established at such doses. This can possibly be attributed to fact that in previous studies the study populations were not homogenous in terms of severity; for example, patients requiring endoscopic hemostasis and those that did not were both included.Against this background, this study will compare the hemostasis-maintaining effects of intravenous omeprazole and ranitidine in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage that have undergone endoscopic hemostasis, to establish which anti-secretory medication prior to the start of oral alimentation is effective in preventing re-hemorrhage after hemostasis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Omeprazole | Active comparator | Drug: OmeprazoleOmeprazole (20 mg), intravenous, 2x /day |
| Ranitidine | Active comparator | Drug: RanitidineRanitidine (100 mg), intravenous drip infusion, 2x /day. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with identified gastric or duodenal ulcer
- Patients with hemorrhagic exposed vessel at the ulcer lesion, oozing or projectile hemorrhage (predominantly arterial) from the ulcer, and where endoscopic hemostasis has been performed.
- Over 20 years of age of either sex.
- The subject or his or her proxy consenter has provided written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Serious hepatopathy, nephropathy, or heart disease.
- Complicating malignant tumor.
- Hemorrhage from malignant tumor.
- The patient is on, or in need of, treatment with a drug considered to interact with the test drug.
- History of allergy to the test drug.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OmeprazoleAlso: omeprazon | Drug | Omeprazole |
| RanitidineAlso: Zantac | Drug | Ranitidine |
Primary outcome
No evidence of hemorrhage or vessel exposure on a second endoscopy
Time frame: 4 weeks after the bleeding
3 secondary outcomes
Plasma ghrelin levels
Time frame: 4 weeks after the bleeding
Serum gastrin levels
Time frame: 4 weeks after the bleeding
No evidence of hemorrhage or vessel exposure on a third endoscopy
Time frame: 12 weeks after the bleeding
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2015.
Related trials for Peptic Ulcers
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ilaprazole 10 mg in Prevention NSAIDs Associated Peptic Ulcer
Peptic Ulcer
Active, not recruiting
To Develop Methods for the Rehabilitation of Chronic Gastroduodenal Pathology in Children.
Gastritis Chronic, Gastroduodenitis
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of Vonorasan Versus Esomeprazole in the Treatment of Ulcers After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Ulcers, Gastric
Recruiting
SPADE Clinical Trial.
Early Gastric Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach
RecruitingObservational study
Efficacy and Safety of Esomeprazole 40 mg IV in Post-Surgical Patients Admitted to the ICU
Stress Ulcers, Reflux Episodes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Toshifumi Hibi, M.D., Ph.D. study chair
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine
Hidekazu Suzuki, M.D., Ph.D. principal investigator
Upper GI Research Center, Keio University School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Omeprazole and Ranitidine in people with Peptic Ulcers, run by Keio University at 1 site in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
No evidence of hemorrhage or vessel exposure on a second endoscopy (time frame: 4 weeks after the bleeding). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2015.