AzTrials
AzTrials

Vitamin D DeficiencyPhase 2NCT00242476

A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of an Investigational Drug in Elderly Subjects With Low Vitamin D Levels (0822A-009)

A Phase 2 study testing MK0822A in people with Vitamin D Deficiency, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will assess the effectiveness of an investigational drug in elderly subjects with low vitamin D levels. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 70 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vitamin D Deficiency
What is being tested?
MK0822A
How many people
216 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2005to Jul 2006
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 70 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Man or a woman 70 years old or older in general good health

Who cannot join

  • Having any form of neurological impairments that may impair motor function.

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, 16-Week Study to Assess the Effect of Vitamin D3 8400IU Once Weekly on Body Sway and Neuromuscular Function in Men and Women Aged 70 Years or Older

This study will assess the effectiveness of an investigational drug in elderly subjects with low vitamin D levels.

Being tested
MK0822A
Medical subject headings
Vitamin D Deficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MK0822ADrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mediolateral body sway at 16 weeks.

    Measured: at 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Functional status assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery Test determined at 16 weeks. General safety and tolerability at 16 weeks.

    Measured: at 16 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2005
  3. Primary completionJul 2006
  4. Study completionJul 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
216 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00242476
Sponsor's protocol ID
0822A-009
Other IDs
MK0822A-009, 2005_089
Status last verified
May 2015
First submitted
18 Oct 2005
Last updated
14 May 2015
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Lips P, Binkley N, Pfeifer M, Recker R, Samanta S, Cohn DA, Chandler J, Rosenberg E, Papanicolaou DA. Once-weekly dose of 8400 IU vitamin D(3) compared with placebo: effects on neuromuscular function and tolerability in older adults with vitamin D insufficiency. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):985-91. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28113. Epub 2010 Feb 3.

    PubMed 20130093

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing MK0822A in people with Vitamin D Deficiency, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mediolateral body sway at 16 weeks. (time frame: at 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00242476, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in