Shock, SepticIVOIRENCT00241228
Haemofiltration Study : IVOIRE (hIgh VOlume in Intensive Care)
A study testing Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy) in people with Shock, Septic and Renal Failure, Acute, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 16 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Sepsis and septic shock are still important causes of mortality in intensive care medicine. Renal replacement therapy by standard volume haemofiltration is currently used, but a higher-volume haemofiltration may improve the prognosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Shock, Septic, Renal Failure, Acute
- What is being tested?
- Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 139 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2005to Oct 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- septic shock (Bone criteria) for less than 24 hours
- RIFLE criteria : injury or worse
- age over 18 years
- written informed consent by next of kin.
Who cannot join
- cirrhosis
- age over 80 years
- life expectancy less than 3 months or metastatic cancer
- for women : pregnancy and breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 3 countries.
16 sites in 3 countries
France9 sites
Hospital
Agen, 47923
Clinic Bordeaux Nord
Bordeaux, 33077
University Hospital
Brest, 29200
University Hospital
Grenoble, 38600
Hospital R Boulin - Libourne
Libourne, 33505
University Hospital
Lyon, 69317
Aphp - Hegp
Paris, 75908
Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation II, Groupe Hospitalier Sud, CHU de Bordeaux
Pessac, 33604
Hospital
Tourcoing, 59209
Belgium5 sites
Cliniques de l'Europe
Brussels
Astrid Queen Military Hospital
Bruxelles (Neder Over Hembeek)
TIVOLI Hospital
La Louvière
University Hospital
Liège
St-Pierre Para-University Hospital
Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve
About this study
Official title: Impact of High-volume Veno-venous Continuous Hemofiltration in the Early Management of Septic Shock Patients With Acute Renal Failure
Sepsis and septic shock are still important causes of mortality in intensive care medicine. Renal replacement therapy by standard volume haemofiltration is currently used, but a higher-volume haemofiltration may improve the prognosis. The study is a prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing two treatments in patients suffering from septic shock complicated with acute renal failure admitted to ICU. One group will be treated by early high volume haemofiltration (70 ml/kg/h) and the second group by standard volume haemofiltration (35 ml/kg/h). The main outcome will be one-month mortality.
Read the detailed description
Background
Sepsis and septic shock are still important causes of mortality in intensive care medicine nowadays. Mortality ranges from 40 up to 80 % depending on the number of organ failures. Therapeutic strategy consists of two major components: haemodynamic stabilization with restoration of adequate arterial pressure and optimization of peripheral perfusion delivery, and infection treatment. Mortality remains high despite the use of new antimicrobial therapy and adjuvant therapies such as activated protein C, low dose corticoids and haemofiltration. Initial observations in patients with acute renal failure treated by haemofiltration showed azotemia control, restoration of the sodium-water balance, elimination of inflammatory mediators and improvement of the cardiac and pulmonary functions was demonstrated independently of a negative water balance. There is no human randomized study so far demonstrating these preliminary findings. Nevertheless, several authors have demonstrated inflammatory mediators elimination by the use of haemofiltration. Moreover, the clinical improvement seems to be related to the ultra filtration dose and to the early initiation of therapy. Joannes-Boyau et al carried out a pilot study in abdominal surgery patients demonstrating that the use of high volume haemofiltration in patients with septic shock and multiple organ failure restores hemodynamic stability with drastic reductions in catecholamine requirements and a substantial reduction of observed vs. expected mortality.
Objectives
The principal objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of early Continuous High Volume Haemofiltration on 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock complicated by acute renal failure. The secondary objectives are to assess the effect of High Volume Haemofiltration on haemodynamics, doses of catecholamines, organ failures, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of renal replacement therapy need, morbidity, length of ICU and hospital stay, and 60- and 90-day mortality.
Study design
Open label randomized multicenter controlled trial on two parallel groups of patients with septic shock and acute renal failure admitted to ICU, treated early either by high volume (70 ml/kg/h) or by standard volume (35 ml/kg/h) haemofiltration.
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria. Septic shock (Bone criteria) for less than 24 hours, RIFLE criteria : injury or worse, age over 18 years, and written informed consent by next of kin. Non inclusion criteria. Cirrhosis, age over 80 years, life expectancy less than 3 months or metastatic cancer.
Intervention
High volume (70 ml/kg/h) vs. standard volume (35 ml/kg/h) haemofiltration during 96 hours. Further renal replacement therapy (if haemofiltration, only standard volume is allowed) may be used according to investigator decision.
Primary endpoint
All cause 28-day mortality.
Statistical aspects
460 patients are planned to be included (230 in each group). A 15 % absolute reduction in 28-days all-cause mortality in the high volume group compared with the standard group is expected. However, as this reduction might be greater, an interim analysis is planned when half of the total sample size will have been included. Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.
Duration of the study: 3 years.
- Conditions
- Shock, Septic, Renal Failure, Acute
- Being tested
- Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)
- Keywords
- Shock, Septic, Renal Failure, Acute, Venovenous Hemofiltration, Randomized Controlled Trial, Multicenter Study, Mortality
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Septic, Acute Kidney Injury
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)Device
High Volume ultra filtration (70 ml/kg/h)
Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)Device
Conventional Volume (35 ml/kg/h)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High Volume | Experimental | ultra filtration : High volume : 70 ml/kg/h Receives: Device: Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy) |
| Medium Volume | Active comparator | Ultra filtration : conventional volume : 35 ml/kg/h Receives: Device: Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
all-cause mortality.
Measured: 28-day
Secondary outcomes (8)
Haemodynamic parameters and volume loading
Measured: Every 12 hours during 96 hours after inclusion
Doses and duration of catecholamine infusions
Measured: Every 12 hours during 96 hours after inclusion
Organ failures
Measured: During 96 hours after inclusion
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Measured: Total during the stay in intensive care
Duration of renal replacement therapy
Measured: Total during the stay in Intensive Care Unity (ICU)
Morbidity
Measured: Total during the stay in intensive care
Length of stay in ICU and hospital
Measured: End of hospitalization
Mortality
Measured: in ICU (96 first hours after inclusion), 60 and 90-day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2005
- Primary completionOct 2010
- Study completionOct 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Shock, SepticStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, BordeauxThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 139 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France
- Investigators
- Olivier JOANNES-BOYAU, Dr, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Bordeaux, FrancePatrick HONORE, Dr, Principal investigator, Quuen Astrid Military Hospital, BRUXELLES - BelgiumPaul Perez, Dr, Study chair, University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00241228
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 9410-04
- Other IDs
- 2004-024
- Acronym
- IVOIRE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2010
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2005
- Last updated
- 13 Oct 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Medica D, Quercia AD, Marengo M, Fanelli V, Castellano G, Fabbrini P, Migliori M, Merlotti G, Camussi G, Joannes-Boyau O, Honore PM, Cantaluppi V. High-volume hemofiltration does not protect human kidney endothelial and tubular epithelial cells from septic plasma-induced injury. Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 7;14(1):18323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69202-z.
PubMed 39112634Joannes-Boyau O, Honore PM, Perez P, Bagshaw SM, Grand H, Canivet JL, Dewitte A, Flamens C, Pujol W, Grandoulier AS, Fleureau C, Jacobs R, Broux C, Floch H, Branchard O, Franck S, Roze H, Collin V, Boer W, Calderon J, Gauche B, Spapen HD, Janvier G, Ouattara A. High-volume versus standard-volume haemofiltration for septic shock patients with acute kidney injury (IVOIRE study): a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Sep;39(9):1535-46. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2967-z. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
PubMed 23740278
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Oct 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of High-volume Veno-venous Continuous Hemofiltration in the Early Management of Septic Shock Patients With Acute Renal Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00241228
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IVOIRE / 9410-04
- Conditions
- Shock, Septic, Renal Failure, Acute
- Keywords
- Shock, Septic, Renal Failure, Acute, Venovenous Hemofiltration, Randomized Controlled Trial, Multicenter Study, Mortality
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 139 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BordeauxUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France
- Study start
- Oct 2005
- Primary completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sepsis and septic shock are still important causes of mortality in intensive care medicine. Renal replacement therapy by standard volume haemofiltration is currently used, but a higher-volume haemofiltration may improve the prognosis. The study is a prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing two treatments in patients suffering from septic shock complicated with acute renal failure admitted to ICU. One group will be treated by early high volume haemofiltration (70 ml/kg/h) and the second group by standard volume haemofiltration (35 ml/kg/h). The main outcome will be one-month mortality.
Detailed description
Background
Sepsis and septic shock are still important causes of mortality in intensive care medicine nowadays. Mortality ranges from 40 up to 80 % depending on the number of organ failures. Therapeutic strategy consists of two major components: haemodynamic stabilization with restoration of adequate arterial pressure and optimization of peripheral perfusion delivery, and infection treatment. Mortality remains high despite the use of new antimicrobial therapy and adjuvant therapies such as activated protein C, low dose corticoids and haemofiltration. Initial observations in patients with acute renal failure treated by haemofiltration showed azotemia control, restoration of the sodium-water balance, elimination of inflammatory mediators and improvement of the cardiac and pulmonary functions was demonstrated independently of a negative water balance. There is no human randomized study so far demonstrating these preliminary findings. Nevertheless, several authors have demonstrated inflammatory mediators elimination by the use of haemofiltration. Moreover, the clinical improvement seems to be related to the ultra filtration dose and to the early initiation of therapy. Joannes-Boyau et al carried out a pilot study in abdominal surgery patients demonstrating that the use of high volume haemofiltration in patients with septic shock and multiple organ failure restores hemodynamic stability with drastic reductions in catecholamine requirements and a substantial reduction of observed vs. expected mortality.
Objectives
The principal objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of early Continuous High Volume Haemofiltration on 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock complicated by acute renal failure. The secondary objectives are to assess the effect of High Volume Haemofiltration on haemodynamics, doses of catecholamines, organ failures, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of renal replacement therapy need, morbidity, length of ICU and hospital stay, and 60- and 90-day mortality.
Study design
Open label randomized multicenter controlled trial on two parallel groups of patients with septic shock and acute renal failure admitted to ICU, treated early either by high volume (70 ml/kg/h) or by standard volume (35 ml/kg/h) haemofiltration.
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria. Septic shock (Bone criteria) for less than 24 hours, RIFLE criteria : injury or worse, age over 18 years, and written informed consent by next of kin. Non inclusion criteria. Cirrhosis, age over 80 years, life expectancy less than 3 months or metastatic cancer.
Intervention
High volume (70 ml/kg/h) vs. standard volume (35 ml/kg/h) haemofiltration during 96 hours. Further renal replacement therapy (if haemofiltration, only standard volume is allowed) may be used according to investigator decision.
Primary endpoint
All cause 28-day mortality.
Statistical aspects
460 patients are planned to be included (230 in each group). A 15 % absolute reduction in 28-days all-cause mortality in the high volume group compared with the standard group is expected. However, as this reduction might be greater, an interim analysis is planned when half of the total sample size will have been included. Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.
Duration of the study: 3 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High Volume | Experimental | Device: Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)ultra filtration : High volume : 70 ml/kg/h |
| Medium Volume | Active comparator | Device: Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)Ultra filtration : conventional volume : 35 ml/kg/h |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- septic shock (Bone criteria) for less than 24 hours
- RIFLE criteria : injury or worse
- age over 18 years
- written informed consent by next of kin.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- cirrhosis
- age over 80 years
- life expectancy less than 3 months or metastatic cancer
- for women : pregnancy and breastfeeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)High Volume ultra filtration (70 ml/kg/h) | Device | High Volume |
| Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)Conventional Volume (35 ml/kg/h) | Device | Medium Volume |
Primary outcome
all-cause mortality.
Time frame: 28-day
8 secondary outcomes
Haemodynamic parameters and volume loading
Time frame: Every 12 hours during 96 hours after inclusion
Doses and duration of catecholamine infusions
Time frame: Every 12 hours during 96 hours after inclusion
Organ failures
Time frame: During 96 hours after inclusion
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Total during the stay in intensive care
Duration of renal replacement therapy
Time frame: Total during the stay in Intensive Care Unity (ICU)
Morbidity
Time frame: Total during the stay in intensive care
Length of stay in ICU and hospital
Time frame: End of hospitalization
Mortality
Time frame: in ICU (96 first hours after inclusion), 60 and 90-day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Oct 2010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39112634Medica D, Quercia AD, Marengo M, Fanelli V, Castellano G, Fabbrini P, Migliori M, Merlotti G, Camussi G, Joannes-Boyau O, Honore PM, Cantaluppi V. High-volume hemofiltration does not protect human kidney endothelial and tubular epithelial cells from septic plasma-induced injury. Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 7;14(1):18323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69202-z.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23740278Joannes-Boyau O, Honore PM, Perez P, Bagshaw SM, Grand H, Canivet JL, Dewitte A, Flamens C, Pujol W, Grandoulier AS, Fleureau C, Jacobs R, Broux C, Floch H, Branchard O, Franck S, Roze H, Collin V, Boer W, Calderon J, Gauche B, Spapen HD, Janvier G, Ouattara A. High-volume versus standard-volume haemofiltration for septic shock patients with acute kidney injury (IVOIRE study): a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Sep;39(9):1535-46. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2967-z. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
Related trials for Shock, Septic
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Not yet recruiting
Vitamin C for Acute Kidney Injury in ACLF With Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Not yet recruiting
ICU-SUCCEED for Survivors of Acute Respiratory Failure and Their Caregivers
Acute Respiratory Failure, Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Trajectories of Myocardial Work in Patients With Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock Hyperdynamic
RecruitingObservational study
Immunothrombosis With Septic Shock Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapy With the OXIRIS Membrane
Sepsis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Olivier JOANNES-BOYAU, Dr principal investigator
University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
Patrick HONORE, Dr principal investigator
Quuen Astrid Military Hospital, BRUXELLES - Belgium
Paul Perez, Dr study chair
University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
16 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy) in people with Shock, Septic and Renal Failure, Acute, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 16 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in France, Belgium, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
all-cause mortality. (time frame: 28-day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00241228, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2010.