AzTrials
AzTrials

Shock, SepticIVOIRENCT00241228

Haemofiltration Study : IVOIRE (hIgh VOlume in Intensive Care)

A study testing Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy) in people with Shock, Septic and Renal Failure, Acute, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 16 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Sepsis and septic shock are still important causes of mortality in intensive care medicine. Renal replacement therapy by standard volume haemofiltration is currently used, but a higher-volume haemofiltration may improve the prognosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Shock, Septic, Renal Failure, Acute
What is being tested?
Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
139 participants
Where
16 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
Oct 2005to Oct 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • septic shock (Bone criteria) for less than 24 hours
  • RIFLE criteria : injury or worse
  • age over 18 years
  • written informed consent by next of kin.

Who cannot join

  • cirrhosis
  • age over 80 years
  • life expectancy less than 3 months or metastatic cancer
  • for women : pregnancy and breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 3 countries.

16 sites in 3 countries

France9 sites
  • Hospital

    Agen, 47923

  • Clinic Bordeaux Nord

    Bordeaux, 33077

  • University Hospital

    Brest, 29200

  • University Hospital

    Grenoble, 38600

  • Hospital R Boulin - Libourne

    Libourne, 33505

  • University Hospital

    Lyon, 69317

  • Aphp - Hegp

    Paris, 75908

  • Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation II, Groupe Hospitalier Sud, CHU de Bordeaux

    Pessac, 33604

  • Hospital

    Tourcoing, 59209

Other trials in France

Belgium5 sites
  • Cliniques de l'Europe

    Brussels

  • Astrid Queen Military Hospital

    Bruxelles (Neder Over Hembeek)

  • TIVOLI Hospital

    La Louvière

  • University Hospital

    Liège

  • St-Pierre Para-University Hospital

    Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve

Other trials in Belgium

Netherlands2 sites
  • Hospital

    Delf

  • Hospital

    Heerlen

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Impact of High-volume Veno-venous Continuous Hemofiltration in the Early Management of Septic Shock Patients With Acute Renal Failure

Sepsis and septic shock are still important causes of mortality in intensive care medicine. Renal replacement therapy by standard volume haemofiltration is currently used, but a higher-volume haemofiltration may improve the prognosis. The study is a prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing two treatments in patients suffering from septic shock complicated with acute renal failure admitted to ICU. One group will be treated by early high volume haemofiltration (70 ml/kg/h) and the second group by standard volume haemofiltration (35 ml/kg/h). The main outcome will be one-month mortality.

Read the detailed description

Background

Sepsis and septic shock are still important causes of mortality in intensive care medicine nowadays. Mortality ranges from 40 up to 80 % depending on the number of organ failures. Therapeutic strategy consists of two major components: haemodynamic stabilization with restoration of adequate arterial pressure and optimization of peripheral perfusion delivery, and infection treatment. Mortality remains high despite the use of new antimicrobial therapy and adjuvant therapies such as activated protein C, low dose corticoids and haemofiltration. Initial observations in patients with acute renal failure treated by haemofiltration showed azotemia control, restoration of the sodium-water balance, elimination of inflammatory mediators and improvement of the cardiac and pulmonary functions was demonstrated independently of a negative water balance. There is no human randomized study so far demonstrating these preliminary findings. Nevertheless, several authors have demonstrated inflammatory mediators elimination by the use of haemofiltration. Moreover, the clinical improvement seems to be related to the ultra filtration dose and to the early initiation of therapy. Joannes-Boyau et al carried out a pilot study in abdominal surgery patients demonstrating that the use of high volume haemofiltration in patients with septic shock and multiple organ failure restores hemodynamic stability with drastic reductions in catecholamine requirements and a substantial reduction of observed vs. expected mortality.

Objectives

The principal objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of early Continuous High Volume Haemofiltration on 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock complicated by acute renal failure. The secondary objectives are to assess the effect of High Volume Haemofiltration on haemodynamics, doses of catecholamines, organ failures, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of renal replacement therapy need, morbidity, length of ICU and hospital stay, and 60- and 90-day mortality.

Study design

Open label randomized multicenter controlled trial on two parallel groups of patients with septic shock and acute renal failure admitted to ICU, treated early either by high volume (70 ml/kg/h) or by standard volume (35 ml/kg/h) haemofiltration.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria. Septic shock (Bone criteria) for less than 24 hours, RIFLE criteria : injury or worse, age over 18 years, and written informed consent by next of kin. Non inclusion criteria. Cirrhosis, age over 80 years, life expectancy less than 3 months or metastatic cancer.

Intervention

High volume (70 ml/kg/h) vs. standard volume (35 ml/kg/h) haemofiltration during 96 hours. Further renal replacement therapy (if haemofiltration, only standard volume is allowed) may be used according to investigator decision.

Primary endpoint

All cause 28-day mortality.

Statistical aspects

460 patients are planned to be included (230 in each group). A 15 % absolute reduction in 28-days all-cause mortality in the high volume group compared with the standard group is expected. However, as this reduction might be greater, an interim analysis is planned when half of the total sample size will have been included. Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Duration of the study: 3 years.

Being tested
Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)
Keywords
Shock, Septic, Renal Failure, Acute, Venovenous Hemofiltration, Randomized Controlled Trial, Multicenter Study, Mortality
Medical subject headings
Shock, Septic, Acute Kidney Injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)Device

    High Volume ultra filtration (70 ml/kg/h)

  • Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)Device

    Conventional Volume (35 ml/kg/h)

Study groups in NCT00241228
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High VolumeExperimentalultra filtration : High volume : 70 ml/kg/h
Receives: Device: Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)
Medium VolumeActive comparatorUltra filtration : conventional volume : 35 ml/kg/h
Receives: Device: Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. all-cause mortality.

    Measured: 28-day

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Haemodynamic parameters and volume loading

    Measured: Every 12 hours during 96 hours after inclusion

  2. Doses and duration of catecholamine infusions

    Measured: Every 12 hours during 96 hours after inclusion

  3. Organ failures

    Measured: During 96 hours after inclusion

  4. Duration of mechanical ventilation

    Measured: Total during the stay in intensive care

  5. Duration of renal replacement therapy

    Measured: Total during the stay in Intensive Care Unity (ICU)

  6. Morbidity

    Measured: Total during the stay in intensive care

  7. Length of stay in ICU and hospital

    Measured: End of hospitalization

  8. Mortality

    Measured: in ICU (96 first hours after inclusion), 60 and 90-day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Oct 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2005
  3. Primary completionOct 2010
  4. Study completionOct 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
139 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00241228
Sponsor's protocol ID
9410-04
Other IDs
2004-024
Acronym
IVOIRE
Status last verified
Oct 2010
First submitted
17 Oct 2005
Last updated
13 Oct 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Medica D, Quercia AD, Marengo M, Fanelli V, Castellano G, Fabbrini P, Migliori M, Merlotti G, Camussi G, Joannes-Boyau O, Honore PM, Cantaluppi V. High-volume hemofiltration does not protect human kidney endothelial and tubular epithelial cells from septic plasma-induced injury. Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 7;14(1):18323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69202-z.

    PubMed 39112634
  • Joannes-Boyau O, Honore PM, Perez P, Bagshaw SM, Grand H, Canivet JL, Dewitte A, Flamens C, Pujol W, Grandoulier AS, Fleureau C, Jacobs R, Broux C, Floch H, Branchard O, Franck S, Roze H, Collin V, Boer W, Calderon J, Gauche B, Spapen HD, Janvier G, Ouattara A. High-volume versus standard-volume haemofiltration for septic shock patients with acute kidney injury (IVOIRE study): a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Sep;39(9):1535-46. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2967-z. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

    PubMed 23740278

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Venovenous haemofiltration (renal replacement therapy) in people with Shock, Septic and Renal Failure, Acute, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 16 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in France, Belgium, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

all-cause mortality. (time frame: 28-day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00241228, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in