AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary ArteriosclerosisNCT00235846

Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting During Coronary Bypass Surgery

A study testing vein harvest in people with Coronary Arteriosclerosis, run by Aalborg University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Conventional open vein harvesting from the legs during coronary artery bypass surgery result in wound complications among 30% of the patients. Endoscopic harvesting decrease the complication rate, but it remains to be shown whether this is also a fact among patient in whom only short segments of veingraft material is… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Arteriosclerosis
What is being tested?
vein harvest
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
132 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Dec 2004to Jul 2007
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Elective coronary artery bypass surgery

Who cannot join

  • Leg wounds
  • Acute surgery
  • Previous vascular surgery
  • Combined surgery (valve + coronary)
  • Arterial revascularization

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Aalborg Hospital

    Aalborg, DK-9100

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Conventional open vein harvesting from the legs during coronary artery bypass surgery result in wound complications among 30% of the patients. Endoscopic harvesting decrease the complication rate, but it remains to be shown whether this is also a fact among patient in whom only short segments of veingraft material is needed from the leg. We hypothesise that the rate of wound complications will be reduced and the patient satisfaction will be increased also among patients in whom only short vein segments are endoscopically harvested compared to conventional open vein harvesting.

Read the detailed description

Conventional open vein harvesting from the legs during coronary artery bypass surgery result in wound complications among 30% of the patients. Endoscopic harvesting decrease the complication rate, but it remains to be shown whether this is also a fact among patient in whom only short segments of veingraft material is needed from the leg. We hypothesise that the rate of wound complications will be reduced and the patient satisfaction will be increased also among patients in whom only short vein segments are endoscopically harvested compared to conventional open vein harvesting.

Preoperative demographic as well ass peri- and postoperative data are collected prospectively at 5-7 days and 1 month postoperatively. Wound complications are registered as well as post operative pain in the wound is evaluated using af visual analogue scale. Patients are evaluating the cosmetic results after wound healing.

Being tested
vein harvest
Keywords
Endoscopic vein harvesting, Saphenous vein
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • vein harvestProcedure or surgery

    Conventional open vein harvest or endoscopic vein harvest

Study groups in NCT00235846
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional vein harvestActive comparatorConventional open vein harvest from the lower leg
Receives: Procedure: vein harvest
Endoscopic vein harvestExperimentalEndoscopic vein harvest from the calf
Receives: Procedure: vein harvest

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of wound complications

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Patient satisfaction

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Oct 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2004
  3. Primary completionJul 2007
  4. Study completionJul 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
132 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00235846
Sponsor's protocol ID
VN 2004/14
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
10 Oct 2005
Last updated
14 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Andreasen JJ, Nekrasas V, Dethlefsen C. Endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Aug;34(2):384-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.04.028. Epub 2008 May 27.

    PubMed 18508277

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing vein harvest in people with Coronary Arteriosclerosis, run by Aalborg University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of wound complications (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00235846, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in