HIV InfectionsPhase 3NCT00232141
Study of Pregabalin Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Nerve Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy
A Phase 3 study testing pregabalin in people with HIV Infections and Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 44 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Study to determine if pregabalin is more effective than placebo in treating subjects with nerve pain associated with HIV neuropathy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections, Peripheral Neuropathy
- What is being tested?
- pregabalin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 302 participants
- Where
- 44 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2005to Nov 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects with confirmed diagnosis of HIV infection
- HIV-associated neuropathic pain (nerve pain) for at least 3 months prior to study start
- subjects with moderate to severe pain
- subjects on stable HIV and pain medications (some medications are not allowed to be taken while participating in the study).
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breast feeding females
- subjects using street drugs or alcohol abusers during the study
- subject's on anti-diabetic medications
- use of neuroregenerative agents or neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents 3 months prior to study start and throughout the study
- use of neurotoxic drugs (other than D-drugs) within a month prior to study start and throughout the study.
Trial locations and contacts
44 sites in 2 countries.
44 sites in 2 countries
United States41 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Pfizer Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78705
Pfizer Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287-7609
Pfizer Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Pfizer Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75204
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75208-4234
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75208
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75219
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75390-9036
Pfizer Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, 80262
Pfizer Investigational Site
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96816
Pfizer Investigational Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72207
Pfizer Investigational Site
Longview, Texas, 75605
Pfizer Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90025
Pfizer Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90028
Pfizer Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33133
Pfizer Investigational Site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Pfizer Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10018
Pfizer Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10021
Pfizer Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10029
Pfizer Investigational Site
Pensacola, Florida, 32504-5719
Pfizer Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Pfizer Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023
Pfizer Investigational Site
Portland, Oregon, 97209
Pfizer Investigational Site
Rochester, New York, 14642
Pfizer Investigational Site
Sacramento, California, 95817-1460
Pfizer Investigational Site
Safety Harbor, Florida, 34695
Pfizer Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Pfizer Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92103
Pfizer Investigational Site
San Francisco, California, 94117
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Pfizer Investigational Site
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107
Pfizer Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1010
Pfizer Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Pfizer Investigational Site
Stanford, California, 94301
Pfizer Investigational Site
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960
Pfizer Investigational Site
West Hollywood, California, 90069
Pfizer Investigational Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407
Puerto Rico3 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Ponce, 00716
Pfizer Investigational Site
San Juan, 00909-1711
Pfizer Investigational Site
San Juan, 00936-0000
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multi-Center Trial of Pregabalin Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy.
Study to determine if pregabalin is more effective than placebo in treating subjects with nerve pain associated with HIV neuropathy.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections, Peripheral Neuropathy
- Being tested
- pregabalin, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
pregabalinDrug
75mg BID (can be titrated up to 150mg BID on day 4 based on individual response and up to 300mg BID at the end of week 1, visit 3 and end of week 2, visit 4)
PlaceboDrug
Placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: pregabalin |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline for Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at Endpoint-LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) Relative to Baseline
Change from baseline in mean NRS-Pain scores at endpoint-LOCF. Daily pain scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale <(NRS)-Pain> ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Measured: Baseline, Week 14
Secondary outcomes (28)
Change From Baseline for MOS (Medical Outcomes Study)-Sleep Subscales and Sleep Problem Indices
Change from baseline in MOS-Sleep subscales \& Sleep Problem Indices. Twelve item subject-rated questionnaire assessing sleep constructs. Scores range from 0 - 100 and higher scores reflect more impairment. Subscales "sleep adequacy", "quantity of sleep" and "optimal sleep" low scores reflect impairment.
Measured: Baseline, Week 14
Change From Baseline for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscales
Change from Baseline in scale at endpoint: normal (score 0) to severe (score 21).
Measured: Baseline, Week 14
Change From Baseline for Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf) Scores
Change from baseline to endpoint in the mBPI-sf to assess pain severity and pain interference with functional activities: 11-point scale ranging from "no pain" (0) to "pain as bad as you can imagine" (10)
Measured: Baseline, Week 14
Change From Baseline for NRS-Sleep Interference Scores
11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (did not interfere with sleep) to 10 (completely interfered [unable to sleep due to pain])
Measured: Baseline, Week 14
Categorized Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
The PGIC is a participant-rated instrument that measures change in the participants overall status on a 7-point scale. Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). PGIC was evaluated using 3 categories of Improvement (Scores 1-3), No Change (Score 4), and Worsening (Scores 5-7).
Measured: Baseline, Week 14
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Rating
PGIC is a participant-rated instrument that measures change in the participants overall status on a 7-point scale. Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Measured: Baseline, Week 14, Endpoint-LOCF
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscores and Total Intensity Scores
Change in mean score NPSI, questionnaire evaluates symptoms of neuropathic pain. 10 pain descriptors questions answered on an 11-point scale 0 (no pain)-10 (most intense pain imaginable). 2 items related to temporal pain assessed on 5-point scales. The NPSI derives 5 pain subscores \& a total intensity score calculated from the 5 pain subscores
Measured: Baseline, Week 14
Change in Quantitative Assessment of Neuropathic Pain (QANeP)
Change in a quantitative assessment of the participants' neuropathic pain were on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain imaginable).
Measured: Baseline, Week 14
Change in NRS-Sleep Interference Scores
Change in mean Pain-related sleep interference was assessed on an 11-point scale from 0 (did not interfere with sleep) to 10 (completely interfered [unable to sleep due to pain]). Weekly mean score was the sum of the daily diary scores divided by the number of diary entries during that week.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1-14
Shift in Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HADS) Subscales
Anxiety subscale analyzes generalized anxiety (anxious mood,restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). The depression subscale focuses on the state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response. A score of Normal = 0-7, Mild = 8-10, Moderate = 11-14, Severe = 15-21.
Measured: Baseline, Week 14
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-sf) Scores (The Worst Pain in the Past 24 Hours)
Change in mean BPI-sf, is a self-administered questionnaire to assess pain severity 0 (no pain to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine) and pain interference 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) during a 24 hour period. The BPI-sf was used to derive the change from baseline in 4 pain severity questions \& 7 pain interference questions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14, Endpoint - LOCF
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (The Least Pain in the Past 24 Hours)
Change in mean BPI-sf, is a self-administered questionnaire to assess pain severity 0 (no pain to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine) and pain interference 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) during a 24 hour period. The BPI-sf was used to derive the change from baseline in 4 pain severity questions \& 7 pain interference questions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14, Endpoint-LOCF
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (Average Level of Pain in the Past 24 Hours)
Change in mean BPI-sf, is a self-administered questionnaire to assess pain severity 0 (no pain to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine) and pain interference 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) during a 24 hour period. The BPI-sf was used to derive the change from baseline in 4 pain severity questions \& 7 pain interference questions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (How Much Pain Are You Having Right Now)
Change in mean BPI-sf, is a self-administered questionnaire to assess pain severity 0 (no pain to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine) and pain interference 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) during a 24 hour period. The BPI-sf was used to derive the change from baseline in 4 pain severity questions \& 7 pain interference questions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your General Activity)
Change in mean BPI-sf, is a self-administered questionnaire to assess pain severity 0 (no pain to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine) and pain interference 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) during a 24 hour period. The BPI-sf was used to derive the change from baseline in 4 pain severity questions \& 7 pain interference questions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your Mood)
Change in mean BPI-sf, is a self-administered questionnaire to assess pain severity 0 (no pain to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine) and pain interference 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) during a 24 hour period. The BPI-sf was used to derive the change from baseline in 4 pain severity questions \& 7 pain interference questions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your Walking Ability)
Change in mean BPI-sf, is a self-administered questionnaire to assess pain severity 0 (no pain to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine) and pain interference 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) during a 24 hour period. The BPI-sf was used to derive the change from baseline in 4 pain severity questions \& 7 pain interference questions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your Normal Work Including Both Work Outside the Home and Housework)
Change in mean BPI-sf, is a self-administered questionnaire to assess pain severity 0 (no pain to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine) and pain interference 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) during a 24 hour period. The BPI-sf was used to derive the change from baseline in 4 pain severity questions \& 7 pain interference questions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your Relations With Other People)
Change in mean BPI-sf, is a self-administered questionnaire to assess pain severity 0 (no pain to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine) and pain interference 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) during a 24 hour period. The BPI-sf was used to derive the change from baseline in 4 pain severity questions \& 7 pain interference questions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your Sleep)
Change in mean BPI-sf, is a self-administered questionnaire to assess pain severity 0 (no pain to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine) and pain interference 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) during a 24 hour period. The BPI-sf was used to derive the change from baseline in 4 pain severity questions \& 7 pain interference questions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your Enjoyment of Life)
Change in mean BPI-sf, is a self-administered questionnaire to assess pain severity 0 (no pain to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine) and pain interference 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) during a 24 hour period. The BPI-sf was used to derive the change from baseline in 4 pain severity questions \& 7 pain interference questions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Shift Table NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) - Duration of Spontaneous Pain
Number of subjects reporting duration of spontaneous pain. The NPSI includes the temporal item for assessment of duration of spontaneous, ongoing and paroxysmal pain. Assessed using a 5-point specific categorical scale and refers to the past 24 hours at endpoint.
Measured: Baseline-Week 14 (Endpoint)
Shift Table in NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory)- Number of Pain Attacks
Number of subjects reporting pain attacks. The NPSI includes the temporal item for assessing the numbers of pain attacks. Assessed using a 5-point specific categorical scale and refers to the past 24 hours at endpoint.
Measured: Baseline-Week 14 (Endpoint)
Change in Number of Pain Attacks Compared to Baseline - NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory)
Change from baseline in the number of pain attacks at endpoint. The NPSI includes the temporal item for assessing the numbers of pain attacks. Assessed using a 5-point specific categorical scale and refers to the past 24 hours at endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, Week 14
Duration of Spontaneous Pain-NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory)
Change from baseline to endpoint in the duration of spontaneous pain. The NPSI includes the temporal item for assessment of duration of spontaneous, ongoing and paroxysmal pain. Assessed using a 5-point specific categorical scale and refers to the past 24 hours at endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, Week 14
Gracely Pain Scale Score
The modified Gracely Pain Scale is a 13-point verbal rating scale based on sensory pain descriptors ranked by severity from nothing (rank = 0) to extremely intense (rank = 15). Subjects selected the verbal descriptors that best matched their average neuropathic pain during the last 24 hours prior to assessment.
Measured: Week 14
Quantitative Assessments of Neuropathic Pain (QANeP) Maximum Sensory Thresholds : Shift Table
Shift from baseline in maximum sensory thresholds (in grams representing the force equivalent of various sizes of von Frey filaments) as measured on QANeP. Improved - decrease in the maximum of the 3 trials at endpoint. Worsened - an increase. Note:Sensory Thresholds are the highest values of the 3 trials at baseline (Week=0) and endpoint (Week 14)
Measured: Baseline-Week 14 (Endpoint)
Quantitative Assessments of Neuropathic Pain (QANeP) Median Sensory Thresholds : Shift Table
Shift from baseline in median sensory thresholds (designated as Weight) from 3 trials as measured on the QANeP. Improved - a decrease in the median of the three trials at endpoint. Worsened - an increase. Note: Sensory Thresholds are the highest values of the three Trials at both baseline (Week=0) and endpoint (Week 14).
Measured: Baseline-Week 14 (Endpoint)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2005
- Primary completionNov 2007
- Study completionNov 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00232141
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A0081066
- Status last verified
- Jun 2009
- First submitted
- 30 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multi-Center Trial of Pregabalin Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00232141
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A0081066
- Conditions
- HIV Infections, Peripheral Neuropathy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2005
- Primary completion
- Nov 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Aug 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study to determine if pregabalin is more effective than placebo in treating subjects with nerve pain associated with HIV neuropathy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: pregabalin |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subjects with confirmed diagnosis of HIV infection
- HIV-associated neuropathic pain (nerve pain) for at least 3 months prior to study start
- subjects with moderate to severe pain
- subjects on stable HIV and pain medications (some medications are not allowed to be taken while participating in the study).
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant or breast feeding females
- subjects using street drugs or alcohol abusers during the study
- subject's on anti-diabetic medications
- use of neuroregenerative agents or neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents 3 months prior to study start and throughout the study
- use of neurotoxic drugs (other than D-drugs) within a month prior to study start and throughout the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| pregabalin75mg BID (can be titrated up to 150mg BID on day 4 based on individual response and up to 300mg BID at the end of week 1, visit 3 and end of week 2, visit 4) | Drug | 1 |
| PlaceboPlacebo | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline for Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at Endpoint-LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) Relative to Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 14
Change from baseline in mean NRS-Pain scores at endpoint-LOCF. Daily pain scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale <(NRS)-Pain> ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
28 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline for MOS (Medical Outcomes Study)-Sleep Subscales and Sleep Problem Indices
Time frame: Baseline, Week 14
Change From Baseline for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscales
Time frame: Baseline, Week 14
Change From Baseline for Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf) Scores
Time frame: Baseline, Week 14
Change From Baseline for NRS-Sleep Interference Scores
Time frame: Baseline, Week 14
Categorized Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 14
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Rating
Time frame: Baseline, Week 14, Endpoint-LOCF
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscores and Total Intensity Scores
Time frame: Baseline, Week 14
Change in Quantitative Assessment of Neuropathic Pain (QANeP)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 14
Change in NRS-Sleep Interference Scores
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-14
Shift in Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HADS) Subscales
Time frame: Baseline, Week 14
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-sf) Scores (The Worst Pain in the Past 24 Hours)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14, Endpoint - LOCF
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (The Least Pain in the Past 24 Hours)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14, Endpoint-LOCF
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (Average Level of Pain in the Past 24 Hours)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (How Much Pain Are You Having Right Now)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your General Activity)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your Mood)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your Walking Ability)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your Normal Work Including Both Work Outside the Home and Housework)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your Relations With Other People)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your Sleep)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-sf Scores (During the Past 24 Hours, How Pain Has Interfered With Your Enjoyment of Life)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1,2,6,10,14 and Endpoint
Shift Table NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) - Duration of Spontaneous Pain
Time frame: Baseline-Week 14 (Endpoint)
Shift Table in NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory)- Number of Pain Attacks
Time frame: Baseline-Week 14 (Endpoint)
Change in Number of Pain Attacks Compared to Baseline - NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 14
Duration of Spontaneous Pain-NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 14
Gracely Pain Scale Score
Time frame: Week 14
Quantitative Assessments of Neuropathic Pain (QANeP) Maximum Sensory Thresholds : Shift Table
Time frame: Baseline-Week 14 (Endpoint)
Quantitative Assessments of Neuropathic Pain (QANeP) Median Sensory Thresholds : Shift Table
Time frame: Baseline-Week 14 (Endpoint)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
44 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing pregabalin in people with HIV Infections and Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 44 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 44 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Aug 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline for Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at Endpoint-LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) Relative to Baseline (time frame: Baseline, Week 14). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2021.