AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney NeoplasmsPhase 2/3NCT00221728

Comparison Between Surgery and Radiofrequency for Treatment of Renal Tumors

A Phase 2/3 study testing Radiofrequency and conservative surgery in people with Kidney Neoplasms, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Surgical treatment of multiple or recurrent renal tumors may be complicated by renal function impairment. Mini-invasive thermotherapy as radiofrequency (RF), induces necrosis of tumoral tissue while sparing normal renal parenchyma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Radiofrequency and conservative surgery
How many people
160 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Apr 2005to Jan 2008
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Solid kidney tumor: diameter <= 40mm, maximum volume 32cc
  • Intra-parenchymatous localization
  • At least one of the following criteria:
  • Patient of more than 70 years old
  • Hereditary kidney cancer (von Hippel-Lindau Disease disease, hereditary tubulopapillary carcinoma...)
  • Single kidney, with tumor difficult to reach to a conservative surgery (central-hilar or intra-parenchymatous tumour...)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Context of local recurrence after partial kidney surgery
  • Patient with impaired renal function (renal clearance < 30 ml/min)
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Conservative surgery feasible in good technical and carcinological conditions
  • Contra-indication to either treatment
  • Kidney cancer metastases

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Service de radiologie B, Hôpital Pellegrin

    Bordeaux, 33076

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Treatment of Renal Tumors With Radiofrequency: Efficacy Evaluation in Comparison With Conservative Surgery (Multicentric Randomized Trial)

Surgical treatment of multiple or recurrent renal tumors may be complicated by renal function impairment. Mini-invasive thermotherapy as radiofrequency (RF), induces necrosis of tumoral tissue while sparing normal renal parenchyma. The purpose of the study is to compare, in patients at risk of renal insufficiency, a strategy based on surgical approach and a strategy based on RF approach. 180 patients from 9 centers will be randomized in two groups (surgical vs. RF, delivered either percutaneously or under laparoscopy). The proportion of patients with a local carcinologic efficacy at 5 years and the general and renal tolerance will be analysed and compared between both strategies.

Read the detailed description

Background. Surgical treatment of multiple or recurrent renal tumors may be complicated by renal function impairment. Mini-invasive thermotherapy as radiofrequency (RF), induces necrosis of tumoral tissue while sparing normal renal parenchyma.

Objectives. The main objective is to assess the 5-year local carcinologic efficacy (no residual tumor tissue and no recurrence at the site of treatment) of the radiofrequency treatment. Secondary objectives are to assess 5-year overall carcinologic efficacy, predictive factors of technical success of RF procedures, and the general and renal tolerance 5 years after treatment.

Study design. Open label, randomized, parallel-group, multicentric clinical trial (9 centers).

Eligibility criteria. Patients with renal tumor in whom a surgical treatment may result in renal function impairment.

Intervention.

Experimental group: radiofrequency treatment, percutaneous or under laparoscopy, using RF 3000™ generator (Radiotherapeutics, Boston scientific) under a standardized heating protocol. A second procedure is allowed in case of residual tumoral tissue or tumor recurrence.

Control group: conservative kidney surgery.

Outcomes. The principal outcome is the 5-year local carcinologic efficacy (no residual tumor tissue and no recurrence at the site of treatment, as assessed by tomodensitometry or MRI after injection). Secondary outcomes are 5-year overall carcinologic efficacy (local efficacy and no metastases), renal function, technical success of RF procedures (no residual tumor tissue 2 months after procedure) and tolerance.

Follow-up. Clinical, biological and imaging follow-ups are scheduled 2 months, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after the first treatment.

Being tested
Radiofrequency, conservative surgery
Keywords
Kidney Neoplasms, Surgery, Catheter Ablation, Randomized controlled trials, Kidney Failure, Chronic
Medical subject headings
Kidney Neoplasms, Kidney Failure, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RadiofrequencyDevice

  • conservative surgeryProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Carcinologic efficacy at the site of treatment,

    Measured: at 5 years

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Overall carcinologic efficacy

    Measured: at 5 years

  2. Carcinologic efficacy and lack of adverse consequences on renal function

    Measured: at 5 years

  3. Local technical success

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2005
  3. Primary completionJan 2008
  4. Study completionJan 2008 (estimated)

Why it stopped: lack of patients

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
160 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00221728
Sponsor's protocol ID
9359-03
Other IDs
2003-006
Status last verified
May 2010
First submitted
13 Sep 2005
Last updated
28 May 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Radiofrequency and conservative surgery in people with Kidney Neoplasms, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: lack of patients). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Carcinologic efficacy at the site of treatment, (time frame: at 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in