Radiating Leg PainNCT00220935
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Treatment for Disc Herniation With Radiating Leg Pain
A study testing Orthotrac Pneumatic Vest in people with Radiating Leg Pain and Disc Protrusion, run by Texas Back Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Hypothesis - This study is designed to evaluate the results of using the Orthotrac Pneumatic Vest versus an EZ form brace in patients with radiating leg pain from disc bulge / protrusion / herniation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Radiating Leg Pain, Disc Protrusion
- What is being tested?
- Orthotrac Pneumatic Vest
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2003to Jul 2006
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 21 - 55
- Preferred no prior surgery or no spine surgery in previous 6 months.
- VAS > 4.0
- Symptoms unresolved after 4 weeks
- Minimal antalgic lean of the trunk when initially weight bearing
- Pain aggravated by weight bearing standing / walking
- Reduced leg pain on recumbency
- MRI Confirmed disc bulge / protrusion / herniation (HNP) site consistent with symptoms - preferred.
Who cannot join
- No neurological deficit
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Orthotrac Pneumatic Vest: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Treatment for Disc Herniation With Radiating Leg Pain
Hypothesis - This study is designed to evaluate the results of using the Orthotrac Pneumatic Vest versus an EZ form brace in patients with radiating leg pain from disc bulge / protrusion / herniation. Specifically, our hypothesis is that patients given the Orthotrac Pneumatic Vest (OPV) will have greater pain relief and increased self-reported functionality and fewer progressions to surgery than those using the EZ form brace.
Read the detailed description
Patient Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria:
Patient's who present with low back and unilateral leg pain are potential candidates for recruitment in this study. For purposes of the research, leg pain will constitute symptoms extending down the leg beyond the knee. The contralateral side may have pain in the buttock and down the posterior thigh but not below the knee. The criteria are as follows:
Inclusion / Exclusion:
- Age 21 - 55
- Preferred no prior surgery or no spine surgery in previous 6 months.
- No neurological deficit
- VAS > 4.0
- Symptoms unresolved after 4 weeks
- Minimal antalgic lean of the trunk when initially weight bearing
- Pain aggravated by weight bearing standing / walking
- Reduced leg pain on recumbency
- MRI Confirmed disc bulge / protrusion / herniation (HNP) site consistent with symptoms - preferred.
Patient Recruitment:
A total of 150 subjects, 75 per group, are being sought for this study. The best time to capture the list of potential patients is at the inception of their diagnosis and treatment. The TBI practice is equipped with electronic scheduling, medical record and billing systems. This poses significant advantages for patient recruitment to this project. On a daily basis, the project coordinator/patient recruiters (PC/PR) can access daily schedules for new patients entering the system for all 17 TBI physicians. This can be cross-correlated later with exiting diagnosis of leg pain to ensure maximum capture of potential candidates.
Upon obtaining permission to solicit the patient, the project will be explained and signed informed consent obtained from patients who agree to participate. Non-participants will be solicited for signature to permit us to monitor their progress during the course of their treatment by administering the outcome questionnaires. Those whom do not sign consent to participate or consent to be monitored will continue with their care and be purged from the project records.
Patient Randomization and Blinding of Analysis:
At the inception of the project and prior to beginning patient recruitment, assignments for 180 participants will be blocked randomized to obtain equal numbers in each treatment group; Orthotrac (OPV) and EZ form brace (EZF). An additional 30 randomizations over the study sample size of 150 will be completed to allow for 10% drop-out rate in each group in case of patient voluntary withdrawal from participation.
Random assignments will be sealed in sequentially numbered envelopes and will be kept under lock in the office of the surgeon co-investigator . Upon patient signing of informed consent to participate, the project coordinator (PC / PR) will obtain the next consecutive sealed randomization envelope, assign the patient to the random group and deliver group assignment identification to the principal investigator (PI) for warehousing of recruitment data.
The patient will then be scheduled with the PC who will obtain appropriate demographic information and administer the outcome measures. Measures will be obtained at the same time as recruitment when ever possible. Results from the outcome measures will be sealed in an envelope, unscored, and delivered to the surgeon co-investigator for warehousing and later analysis. In order to maintain blinding of the PC / PR, she will measure the patient and fit him/her for both devices on the initial visit. The PI will have the proper device ordered according to randomization and will check fitting on its delivery.
Experimental Maneuver
Patients who qualify for this study will have persistent leg pain attributed to lumbar HNP and be under typical medical / chiropractic care. At the stage of their entry into this project, the question of surgical intervention may be a realistic alternative. The experimental maneuver will contrast the ability of the OPV vs the EZF to improve symptoms and function. Patients assigned to the OPV group will be measured by the PC / PR and fit for the device. They will receive instructions in its use QID for a minimum of 30 minutes. Patients assigned to the EZF orthotic will be fit for the device and instructed to wear it during weight bearing hours.
Patient Assessment and Outcome Measures:
At the inception of the patient into the project, either as a participant or non-participant, a baseline assessment will be performed by the PC. Reassessment will be completed at 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks. The PC will monitor patient status and compliance with typical treatment on a weekly basis through the computerized scheduling and medical record. Telephone contact will be made on a biweekly basis to evaluate self-reported compliance with wear and determine any intervening health care service utilization or medication use using standardized phone interview methods
Assessment measures will include the following:
- Inception baseline:
- Demographic b. Diagnostic c. Pre-episode work status d. Rang of Motion (ROM) i. Flexion / Extension ii. Straight leg raise e. Pain evaluation i. Pain levels (Visual analogue scale) ii. Quantitative pain drawing iii. Medication use f. Functional evaluation i. Oswestry Back Disability index ii. SF - 36
- Follow-up evaluations:
- Work status
- Rang of Motion (ROM)
- Flexion / Extension ii. Straight leg raise c. Pain evaluation i. Pain levels (Visual analogue scale) ii. Quantitative pain drawing iii. Medication use d. Functional evaluation i. Oswestry Back Disability index ii. SF - 36
- Bi-weekly telephone contacts
- Work status
- Medication use
- Wear compliance
- Other health care utilization
- TBI treatment sessions (PT, DC, MD, injections, surgical scheduling)
Primary outcome for this project will be quantitative pain levels, using the VAS. Monitoring of medication use is expected to support this outcome. Further primary outcome centering on functionality scores will focus on the Oswestry and SF 36. The SF36 results can be expected to be a useful adjunct in the assessment of patients with low back pain when combined with disease-specific questionnaires (3). All other measures will be used descriptively and as explanatory variables.
- Conditions
- Radiating Leg Pain, Disc Protrusion
- Being tested
- Orthotrac Pneumatic Vest
- Keywords
- Randomized controlled clinical trial
- Medical subject headings
- Intervertebral Disc Displacement
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Orthotrac Pneumatic VestDevice
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
VAS
Oswestry
SF-36
Secondary outcomes (5)
ROM
Pain drawing
Medication use
Wear compliance
Extra-protocol treatment seeking
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2003
- Study completionJul 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Radiating Leg PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 150 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Texas Back Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc., Orthofix Inc.
- Investigators
- John J. Triano, DC,PhD, Principal investigator, Texas Back Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00220935
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P608
- Status last verified
- Jul 2005
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 5 Oct 2006
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Oct 2006. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Orthotrac Pneumatic Vest: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Treatment for Disc Herniation With Radiating Leg Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00220935
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P608
- Conditions
- Radiating Leg Pain, Disc Protrusion
- Keywords
- Randomized controlled clinical trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Texas Back InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc., Orthofix Inc.
- Study start
- Jan 2003
- Study completion
- Jul 2006
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hypothesis - This study is designed to evaluate the results of using the Orthotrac Pneumatic Vest versus an EZ form brace in patients with radiating leg pain from disc bulge / protrusion / herniation. Specifically, our hypothesis is that patients given the Orthotrac Pneumatic Vest (OPV) will have greater pain relief and increased self-reported functionality and fewer progressions to surgery than those using the EZ form brace.
Detailed description
Patient Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria:
Patient's who present with low back and unilateral leg pain are potential candidates for recruitment in this study. For purposes of the research, leg pain will constitute symptoms extending down the leg beyond the knee. The contralateral side may have pain in the buttock and down the posterior thigh but not below the knee. The criteria are as follows:
Inclusion / Exclusion:
- Age 21 - 55
- Preferred no prior surgery or no spine surgery in previous 6 months.
- No neurological deficit
- VAS > 4.0
- Symptoms unresolved after 4 weeks
- Minimal antalgic lean of the trunk when initially weight bearing
- Pain aggravated by weight bearing standing / walking
- Reduced leg pain on recumbency
- MRI Confirmed disc bulge / protrusion / herniation (HNP) site consistent with symptoms - preferred.
Patient Recruitment:
A total of 150 subjects, 75 per group, are being sought for this study. The best time to capture the list of potential patients is at the inception of their diagnosis and treatment. The TBI practice is equipped with electronic scheduling, medical record and billing systems. This poses significant advantages for patient recruitment to this project. On a daily basis, the project coordinator/patient recruiters (PC/PR) can access daily schedules for new patients entering the system for all 17 TBI physicians. This can be cross-correlated later with exiting diagnosis of leg pain to ensure maximum capture of potential candidates.
Upon obtaining permission to solicit the patient, the project will be explained and signed informed consent obtained from patients who agree to participate. Non-participants will be solicited for signature to permit us to monitor their progress during the course of their treatment by administering the outcome questionnaires. Those whom do not sign consent to participate or consent to be monitored will continue with their care and be purged from the project records.
Patient Randomization and Blinding of Analysis:
At the inception of the project and prior to beginning patient recruitment, assignments for 180 participants will be blocked randomized to obtain equal numbers in each treatment group; Orthotrac (OPV) and EZ form brace (EZF). An additional 30 randomizations over the study sample size of 150 will be completed to allow for 10% drop-out rate in each group in case of patient voluntary withdrawal from participation.
Random assignments will be sealed in sequentially numbered envelopes and will be kept under lock in the office of the surgeon co-investigator . Upon patient signing of informed consent to participate, the project coordinator (PC / PR) will obtain the next consecutive sealed randomization envelope, assign the patient to the random group and deliver group assignment identification to the principal investigator (PI) for warehousing of recruitment data.
The patient will then be scheduled with the PC who will obtain appropriate demographic information and administer the outcome measures. Measures will be obtained at the same time as recruitment when ever possible. Results from the outcome measures will be sealed in an envelope, unscored, and delivered to the surgeon co-investigator for warehousing and later analysis. In order to maintain blinding of the PC / PR, she will measure the patient and fit him/her for both devices on the initial visit. The PI will have the proper device ordered according to randomization and will check fitting on its delivery.
Experimental Maneuver
Patients who qualify for this study will have persistent leg pain attributed to lumbar HNP and be under typical medical / chiropractic care. At the stage of their entry into this project, the question of surgical intervention may be a realistic alternative. The experimental maneuver will contrast the ability of the OPV vs the EZF to improve symptoms and function. Patients assigned to the OPV group will be measured by the PC / PR and fit for the device. They will receive instructions in its use QID for a minimum of 30 minutes. Patients assigned to the EZF orthotic will be fit for the device and instructed to wear it during weight bearing hours.
Patient Assessment and Outcome Measures:
At the inception of the patient into the project, either as a participant or non-participant, a baseline assessment will be performed by the PC. Reassessment will be completed at 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks. The PC will monitor patient status and compliance with typical treatment on a weekly basis through the computerized scheduling and medical record. Telephone contact will be made on a biweekly basis to evaluate self-reported compliance with wear and determine any intervening health care service utilization or medication use using standardized phone interview methods
Assessment measures will include the following:
- Inception baseline:
- Demographic b. Diagnostic c. Pre-episode work status d. Rang of Motion (ROM) i. Flexion / Extension ii. Straight leg raise e. Pain evaluation i. Pain levels (Visual analogue scale) ii. Quantitative pain drawing iii. Medication use f. Functional evaluation i. Oswestry Back Disability index ii. SF - 36
- Follow-up evaluations:
- Work status
- Rang of Motion (ROM)
- Flexion / Extension ii. Straight leg raise c. Pain evaluation i. Pain levels (Visual analogue scale) ii. Quantitative pain drawing iii. Medication use d. Functional evaluation i. Oswestry Back Disability index ii. SF - 36
- Bi-weekly telephone contacts
- Work status
- Medication use
- Wear compliance
- Other health care utilization
- TBI treatment sessions (PT, DC, MD, injections, surgical scheduling)
Primary outcome for this project will be quantitative pain levels, using the VAS. Monitoring of medication use is expected to support this outcome. Further primary outcome centering on functionality scores will focus on the Oswestry and SF 36. The SF36 results can be expected to be a useful adjunct in the assessment of patients with low back pain when combined with disease-specific questionnaires (3). All other measures will be used descriptively and as explanatory variables.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age 21 - 55
- Preferred no prior surgery or no spine surgery in previous 6 months.
- VAS > 4.0
- Symptoms unresolved after 4 weeks
- Minimal antalgic lean of the trunk when initially weight bearing
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- No neurological deficit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Orthotrac Pneumatic Vest | Device | – |
Primary outcome
VAS
Oswestry
SF-36
5 secondary outcomes
ROM
Pain drawing
Medication use
Wear compliance
Extra-protocol treatment seeking
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Oct 2006.
Related trials for Radiating Leg Pain
Not yet recruiting
Sciatic Neural Mobilization in Lumbar-Related Leg Pain
Low Back Pain, Leg Pain and/or Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John J. Triano, DC,PhD principal investigator
Texas Back Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Orthotrac Pneumatic Vest in people with Radiating Leg Pain and Disc Protrusion, run by Texas Back Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
VAS. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2006.