Respiratory Distress Syndrome, AdultNCT00217880
Significance of Biological Markers in Patients With Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Disease
A study testing Bronchoscopy in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, run by University of Michigan at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to identify biological markers of disease in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) that are predictive of either disease susceptibility or prognosis, or that identify novel targets of therapeutic intervention. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 95 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult
- What is being tested?
- Bronchoscopy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2004to Jun 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 95 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Acute onset of illness with:
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio of less than 300 (ALI) or PaO2/FiO2 ratio of less than 200 (ARDS)
- Bilateral infiltrates consistent with pulmonary edema on frontal chest radiograph (infiltrates may be patchy, diffuse, homogeneous, or asymmetric)
- Positive pressure ventilation via an endotracheal tube
- No clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension (if measured, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure less than or equal to 18 mm Hg)
- First three criteria must occur together within a 24-hour interval
Who cannot join
- Greater than 48 hours elapsed following institution of mechanical ventilation
- Pregnancy
- Chronic respiratory failure as defined by any of the following:
- FEV1 less than 20 ml/kg of PBW; FEV1/FVC less than 50%
- Chronic hypercapnia or hypoxemia
- Hospitalization within past 6 months for acute respiratory failure
Show all 20Show fewer
- Chronic home use of oxygen or mechanical ventilation
- Left ventricular failure as defined by New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV status
- History of hematological malignancy or bone marrow transplantation
- Entry in other intervention clinical trials
- Decision of the patient or attending physician to forego aggressive care
- Expected survival of less than 6 months (based solely on pre-existing medical problems [e.g., poorly controlled neoplasm or other end-stage disease])
- AIDS (known history of HIV infection)
- Prednisone (or equivalent) therapy of 20 mg/day or more for a period of at least 2 months with treatment continuing within 3 weeks prior to screening
- Cytotoxic therapy within 3 weeks of screening
- Morbid obesity defined as greater than 1 kg/c body weight
- At risk for increased intracranial pressure that may result from permissive hypercapnia
- Permissive hypercapnia that is contraindicated
- Neuromuscular disease that would potentially impact ability to wean from mechanical ventilation
- Receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation when meeting screening criteria
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
About this study
Official title: Prognostic Significance of Biological Markers in Patients With ALI/ARDS
The purpose of this study is to identify biological markers of disease in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) that are predictive of either disease susceptibility or prognosis, or that identify novel targets of therapeutic intervention.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Respiratory failure due to ALI and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a major health problem despite significant progress in intensive care unit (ICU) care and ventilator management. It is also characterized by an unacceptably high mortality rate despite enormous expenditure of health care resources. Survivors of respiratory failure face long-term consequences concerning their quality of life. New therapies are needed to improve early survival and to decrease long-term sequelae of this syndrome. The purpose of this study is to identify biological markers of disease in patients with ALI that are predictive of either disease susceptibility or prognosis, or that identify novel targets of therapeutic intervention.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
As soon as possible after case identification, informed consent will be obtained from the patient or next of kin. Physiologic measurements and specimen collection will begin at the time of entry into the study. The inclusion criteria for this study allow entry of patients who have fulfilled criteria for ALI/ARDS for up to 48 hours. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and blood will be collected at various times after the onset of ALI/ARDS in order to measure levels of a predetermined set of biological markers. In addition, DNA will be collected from patients and analysed for the presence of specific genetic polymorphisms that might alter either disease susceptibility or clinical expression of disease. The levels of these markers or the presence of specific genetic polymorphisms will be correlated with measure of pulmonary inflammation and extent of lung injury, as defined by: 1) PaO2/FiO2 ratios; 2) lung compliance; 3) plateau pressures; and 4) calculation of the Murray Lung Injury Score (obtained at entry and Days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7,10, 14, and 21). Secondary outcome measures to be directly correlated with biomarker expression will include indicators of maladaptive responses to ALI (including the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome [MODS]), fibroproliferation, and nosocomial pneumonia (events which greatly impact the clinical course of patients with ALI/ARDS). Thus, the secondary outcome measures include: 1) the development of organ failure (using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score); 2) time on ventilator; 3) ventilator-free days; 4) ICU and hospital length of stay; 5) hospital mortality; 6) development of pneumonia; 7) development of lung fibrosis (as determined by high-resolution computed tomography [HRCT] and pulmonary function testing); and 8) health related and lung-specific quality of life (as assessed with the Medical Outcome Studies 36-Item Short form Health Survey Standard Form [SF-36] and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire).
- Conditions
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult
- Being tested
- Bronchoscopy
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BronchoscopyProcedure or surgery
A bronchoscopy test will occur to view the participant's airways.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PaO2/FiO2 ratios
Measured: Measured at Year 4
Lung compliance
Measured: Measured at Year 4
Plateau pressures
Measured: Measured at Year 4
Calculation of the Murray Lung Injury Score (obtained at entry and Days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7,10, 14, and 21; analyzed at Year 4)
Measured: Measured at Year 4
Secondary outcomes (8)
Development of organ failure
Measured: Measured at Year 4
Time on ventilator
Measured: Measured at Year 4
Ventilator-free days
Measured: Measured at Year 4
ICU and hospital length of stay
Measured: Measured at Year 4
Hospital mortality
Measured: Measured at Year 4
Development of pneumonia
Measured: Measured at Year 4
Development of lung fibrosis
Measured: Measured at Year 4
Health-related and lung-specific quality of life
Measured: Measured at Year 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2004
- Primary completionApr 2009
- Study completionJun 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, AdultStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Investigators
- Theodore J. Standiford, MD, Study chair, University of Michigan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00217880
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 292
- Other IDs
- P50HL074024
- Status last verified
- Jul 2009
- First submitted
- 19 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prognostic Significance of Biological Markers in Patients With ALI/ARDS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00217880
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 292
- Conditions
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- Jul 2004
- Primary completion
- Apr 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to identify biological markers of disease in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) that are predictive of either disease susceptibility or prognosis, or that identify novel targets of therapeutic intervention.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Respiratory failure due to ALI and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a major health problem despite significant progress in intensive care unit (ICU) care and ventilator management. It is also characterized by an unacceptably high mortality rate despite enormous expenditure of health care resources. Survivors of respiratory failure face long-term consequences concerning their quality of life. New therapies are needed to improve early survival and to decrease long-term sequelae of this syndrome. The purpose of this study is to identify biological markers of disease in patients with ALI that are predictive of either disease susceptibility or prognosis, or that identify novel targets of therapeutic intervention.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
As soon as possible after case identification, informed consent will be obtained from the patient or next of kin. Physiologic measurements and specimen collection will begin at the time of entry into the study. The inclusion criteria for this study allow entry of patients who have fulfilled criteria for ALI/ARDS for up to 48 hours. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and blood will be collected at various times after the onset of ALI/ARDS in order to measure levels of a predetermined set of biological markers. In addition, DNA will be collected from patients and analysed for the presence of specific genetic polymorphisms that might alter either disease susceptibility or clinical expression of disease. The levels of these markers or the presence of specific genetic polymorphisms will be correlated with measure of pulmonary inflammation and extent of lung injury, as defined by: 1) PaO2/FiO2 ratios; 2) lung compliance; 3) plateau pressures; and 4) calculation of the Murray Lung Injury Score (obtained at entry and Days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7,10, 14, and 21). Secondary outcome measures to be directly correlated with biomarker expression will include indicators of maladaptive responses to ALI (including the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome [MODS]), fibroproliferation, and nosocomial pneumonia (events which greatly impact the clinical course of patients with ALI/ARDS). Thus, the secondary outcome measures include: 1) the development of organ failure (using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score); 2) time on ventilator; 3) ventilator-free days; 4) ICU and hospital length of stay; 5) hospital mortality; 6) development of pneumonia; 7) development of lung fibrosis (as determined by high-resolution computed tomography [HRCT] and pulmonary function testing); and 8) health related and lung-specific quality of life (as assessed with the Medical Outcome Studies 36-Item Short form Health Survey Standard Form [SF-36] and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 95 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio of less than 300 (ALI) or PaO2/FiO2 ratio of less than 200 (ARDS)
- Bilateral infiltrates consistent with pulmonary edema on frontal chest radiograph (infiltrates may be patchy, diffuse, homogeneous, or asymmetric)
- Positive pressure ventilation via an endotracheal tube
- No clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension (if measured, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure less than or equal to 18 mm Hg)
- First three criteria must occur together within a 24-hour interval
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Greater than 48 hours elapsed following institution of mechanical ventilation
- Pregnancy
- Chronic respiratory failure as defined by any of the following:
- Left ventricular failure as defined by New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV status
- History of hematological malignancy or bone marrow transplantation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BronchoscopyA bronchoscopy test will occur to view the participant's airways. | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
PaO2/FiO2 ratios
Time frame: Measured at Year 4
Lung compliance
Time frame: Measured at Year 4
Plateau pressures
Time frame: Measured at Year 4
Calculation of the Murray Lung Injury Score (obtained at entry and Days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7,10, 14, and 21; analyzed at Year 4)
Time frame: Measured at Year 4
8 secondary outcomes
Development of organ failure
Time frame: Measured at Year 4
Time on ventilator
Time frame: Measured at Year 4
Ventilator-free days
Time frame: Measured at Year 4
ICU and hospital length of stay
Time frame: Measured at Year 4
Hospital mortality
Time frame: Measured at Year 4
Development of pneumonia
Time frame: Measured at Year 4
Development of lung fibrosis
Time frame: Measured at Year 4
Health-related and lung-specific quality of life
Time frame: Measured at Year 4
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2013.
Related trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Theodore J. Standiford, MD study chair
University of Michigan
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bronchoscopy in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, run by University of Michigan at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PaO2/FiO2 ratios (time frame: Measured at Year 4). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2013.