DementiaPhase 2NCT00200538
Efficacy and Tolerability of Memantine in Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) Patients
A Phase 2 study testing memantine in people with Dementia, run by Nantes University Hospital at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this trial is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of memantine (anti-excitotoxic, neuroprotective treatment currently used in Alzheimer's disease [AD]) in frontotemporal dementia patients after a one-year treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Dementia
- What is being tested?
- memantine
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Sep 2005to not given
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with FTD based on the criteria defined by the Lund and Manchester groups' consensus statement (revised in 1998), whose disease has been progressing during the last year.
- MMSE score of 19 or higher
- Men and women aged 45 to 75 years
- Without speech, visuospatial, or episodic memory impairments
Who cannot join
- Age > 76 years
- Illiterate or misunderstanding patients
- Patients with cancer, heart disease, lung disease, kidney disease (creatinine > 200 mg/dL), or epilepsy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Memantine (20 mg) in Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) Patients
The purpose of this trial is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of memantine (anti-excitotoxic, neuroprotective treatment currently used in Alzheimer's disease [AD]) in frontotemporal dementia patients after a one-year treatment.
Read the detailed description
Background: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the first cause of dementia in the presenium (onset before the age of 65 years). Characterized by behavioral disorders, it is often more incapacitating than Alzheimer's disease (AD), and leads to death within 7 years on average (9-10 years for AD). It affects young individuals (on average, 20 years younger than in AD), who are often still active. Management of these patients is therefore burdensome and complex. As opposed to AD, however, no treatment is currently available. Few therapeutic trials have actually been conducted on this disorder. Many reasons may account for this:
- recent availability of reliable diagnostic criteria (the Lund and Manchester groups' consensus statement in 1994; revised in 1998),
- the very small number of cases as opposed to AD-the number of cases was estimated at approximately 3,500 vs 600,000, for AD, in France in 2004-, FTD therefore falls into the category of rare diseases (i.e., less than 30,000 cases),
- the scarcity of valuable physiopathological hypotheses.
Besides a non-specific serotoninergic dysfunction, no significant anomalies related to particular neuromediators have apparently been found (as opposed to AD, which is characterized by a cholinergic deficit). In 1998, the discovery of mutations in the Tau gene in certain kindreds showing a dominant autosomal transmission of FTD, oriented research efforts toward the tau protein and provided new perspectives. Many studies have suggested the role of excitotoxicity. Abnormal aggregation of the tau protein has been observed in the brains of a majority of FTD patients (familial and sporadic form). Excitotoxicity may be responsible for promoting this abnormal aggregation through modification of the expression and phosphorylation state of the tau protein. The hypothesis of this study is that an anti-excitotoxic neuroprotective treatment may slow the pathogenic process and therefore be an effective treatment for this pathology.
Goals: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of memantine (anti-excitotoxic, neuroprotective treatment currently used in AD) in FTD patients after a one-year treatment.
Type of study: National, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, phase II therapeutic trial.
Study design: Sixty four (64) patients, aged 45 to 75 years, will be enrolled in the study for a period of 12 months (clinical inclusion criteria are defined based on the Lund and Manchester group consensus statement [revised version 1998]), and followed up for 1 year in a controlled study. At the time of inclusion, the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score should be at least 19 (below 18, a neuropsychological examination is impossible). Patients will either take memantine, or a placebo (randomization ratio of 1:1) twice a day (i.e., 20 mg of memantine per day in the memantine arm). The primary efficacy variable will be a global assessment tool, the CIBIC-Plus (Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input). Secondary efficacy variables will include behavioral scales [the NeuroPsychiatric Inventory (NPI), the Frontal Behavior Inventory (FBI)], cognitive scales [the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS), the MMSE], activities of daily living (Disability Assessment for Dementia, DAD), time spent by the caregiver of the patient (Resource Utilization in Dementia, RUD), and caregiver burden scale (Zarit Burden Inventory), and tolerability of the drug. The main analysis will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis in all randomized patients having undergone at least one evaluation after inclusion (the Last Observation Carried Forward LOCF value, will be attributed to missing values). This analysis will be carried out at the end of the double-blind study (main judgement criterion)
Expected results and perspectives: The main expected result is the confirmation of the efficacy of memantine as a treatment for FTD, which would set a precedent in the treatment of this disease. Such a result could also lead the way to the development of treatments for other related neurodegenerative disorders (tauopathies) such as the other frontotemporal lobar degenerations (semantic dementia, progressive non-fluent aphasia), progressive supranuclear palsy, or corticobasal degeneration. Finally, the standardized follow-up of a 64 patient cohort in this study will provide important information on the natural history of a rare and poorly-known disease.
- Conditions
- Dementia
- Being tested
- memantine
- Keywords
- frontotemporal dementia, Mémantine, Patients with frontotemporal dementia
- Medical subject headings
- Dementia, Frontotemporal Dementia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
memantineDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DementiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nantes University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Martine Vercelletto, MD, Study director, Centre de la Mémoire, Clinique Neurologique CHU Nord Nantes 44093 France; mvercelletto@chu-nantes.frLucette Lacomblez, MD, Principal investigator, Federation de Neurologie AP-HP Paris 75 013 France; lucette.lacomblez@psl.ap-hop-paris.frBruno Dubois, MD, Principal investigator, Centre du Langage et de Neuropsychologie AP-HP Paris 75013 France; b.dubois@psl.ap-hop-paris.frAnne Sophie Rigaud, MD, Principal investigator, Hôpital Broca, Paris 75 France; anne-sophie.rigaud@brc.ap-hop-paris.frJean-Francois Dartigues, MD, Principal investigator, Hôpital Pellegrin Bordeaux 33 076 France; jean-francois.dartigues@u.bordeaux2.frSophie Auriacombe, MD, Principal investigator, Hôpital Pellegrin Bordeaux 33 076 France ; sophie.auriacombe@u.bordeaux.frPhilippe Couratier, MD, Principal investigator, Hôpital Dupuytren, Limoges 87000 France; philippe.couratier@unilim.frJacques Touchon, MD, Principal investigator, Hôpital Gui de Chaulliac, Montpellier 34 295 France; jacques.touchon@wanadoo.fr
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00200538
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BRD/05/01-E
- Status last verified
- Jan 2005
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 14 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Vercelletto M, Boutoleau-Bretonniere C, Volteau C, Puel M, Auriacombe S, Sarazin M, Michel BF, Couratier P, Thomas-Anterion C, Verpillat P, Gabelle A, Golfier V, Cerato E, Lacomblez L; French research network on Frontotemporal dementia. Memantine in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: negative results. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(4):749-59. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-101632.
PubMed 21157021Boutoleau-Bretonniere C, Lebouvier T, Volteau C, Jaulin P, Lacomblez L, Damier P, Thomas-Anterion C, Vercelletto M. Prospective evaluation of behavioral scales in the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;34(2):75-82. doi: 10.1159/000341784. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
PubMed 22922703
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Memantine (20 mg) in Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00200538
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BRD/05/01-E
- Conditions
- Dementia
- Keywords
- frontotemporal dementia, Mémantine, Patients with frontotemporal dementia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2005
- First posted
- 20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this trial is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of memantine (anti-excitotoxic, neuroprotective treatment currently used in Alzheimer's disease [AD]) in frontotemporal dementia patients after a one-year treatment.
Detailed description
Background: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the first cause of dementia in the presenium (onset before the age of 65 years). Characterized by behavioral disorders, it is often more incapacitating than Alzheimer's disease (AD), and leads to death within 7 years on average (9-10 years for AD). It affects young individuals (on average, 20 years younger than in AD), who are often still active. Management of these patients is therefore burdensome and complex. As opposed to AD, however, no treatment is currently available. Few therapeutic trials have actually been conducted on this disorder. Many reasons may account for this:
- recent availability of reliable diagnostic criteria (the Lund and Manchester groups' consensus statement in 1994; revised in 1998),
- the very small number of cases as opposed to AD-the number of cases was estimated at approximately 3,500 vs 600,000, for AD, in France in 2004-, FTD therefore falls into the category of rare diseases (i.e., less than 30,000 cases),
- the scarcity of valuable physiopathological hypotheses.
Besides a non-specific serotoninergic dysfunction, no significant anomalies related to particular neuromediators have apparently been found (as opposed to AD, which is characterized by a cholinergic deficit). In 1998, the discovery of mutations in the Tau gene in certain kindreds showing a dominant autosomal transmission of FTD, oriented research efforts toward the tau protein and provided new perspectives. Many studies have suggested the role of excitotoxicity. Abnormal aggregation of the tau protein has been observed in the brains of a majority of FTD patients (familial and sporadic form). Excitotoxicity may be responsible for promoting this abnormal aggregation through modification of the expression and phosphorylation state of the tau protein. The hypothesis of this study is that an anti-excitotoxic neuroprotective treatment may slow the pathogenic process and therefore be an effective treatment for this pathology.
Goals: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of memantine (anti-excitotoxic, neuroprotective treatment currently used in AD) in FTD patients after a one-year treatment.
Type of study: National, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, phase II therapeutic trial.
Study design: Sixty four (64) patients, aged 45 to 75 years, will be enrolled in the study for a period of 12 months (clinical inclusion criteria are defined based on the Lund and Manchester group consensus statement [revised version 1998]), and followed up for 1 year in a controlled study. At the time of inclusion, the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score should be at least 19 (below 18, a neuropsychological examination is impossible). Patients will either take memantine, or a placebo (randomization ratio of 1:1) twice a day (i.e., 20 mg of memantine per day in the memantine arm). The primary efficacy variable will be a global assessment tool, the CIBIC-Plus (Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input). Secondary efficacy variables will include behavioral scales [the NeuroPsychiatric Inventory (NPI), the Frontal Behavior Inventory (FBI)], cognitive scales [the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS), the MMSE], activities of daily living (Disability Assessment for Dementia, DAD), time spent by the caregiver of the patient (Resource Utilization in Dementia, RUD), and caregiver burden scale (Zarit Burden Inventory), and tolerability of the drug. The main analysis will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis in all randomized patients having undergone at least one evaluation after inclusion (the Last Observation Carried Forward LOCF value, will be attributed to missing values). This analysis will be carried out at the end of the double-blind study (main judgement criterion)
Expected results and perspectives: The main expected result is the confirmation of the efficacy of memantine as a treatment for FTD, which would set a precedent in the treatment of this disease. Such a result could also lead the way to the development of treatments for other related neurodegenerative disorders (tauopathies) such as the other frontotemporal lobar degenerations (semantic dementia, progressive non-fluent aphasia), progressive supranuclear palsy, or corticobasal degeneration. Finally, the standardized follow-up of a 64 patient cohort in this study will provide important information on the natural history of a rare and poorly-known disease.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with FTD based on the criteria defined by the Lund and Manchester groups' consensus statement (revised in 1998), whose disease has been progressing during the last year.
- MMSE score of 19 or higher
- Men and women aged 45 to 75 years
- Without speech, visuospatial, or episodic memory impairments
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age > 76 years
- Illiterate or misunderstanding patients
- Patients with cancer, heart disease, lung disease, kidney disease (creatinine > 200 mg/dL), or epilepsy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| memantine | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Sep 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 21157021Vercelletto M, Boutoleau-Bretonniere C, Volteau C, Puel M, Auriacombe S, Sarazin M, Michel BF, Couratier P, Thomas-Anterion C, Verpillat P, Gabelle A, Golfier V, Cerato E, Lacomblez L; French research network on Frontotemporal dementia. Memantine in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: negative results. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(4):749-59. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-101632.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22922703Boutoleau-Bretonniere C, Lebouvier T, Volteau C, Jaulin P, Lacomblez L, Damier P, Thomas-Anterion C, Vercelletto M. Prospective evaluation of behavioral scales in the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;34(2):75-82. doi: 10.1159/000341784. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
Related trials for Dementia
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Lisdexamfetamine For the Treatment of Conduct Disorder in Children
Conduct Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Martine Vercelletto, MD study director
Centre de la Mémoire, Clinique Neurologique CHU Nord Nantes 44093 France; mvercelletto@chu-nantes.fr
Lucette Lacomblez, MD principal investigator
Federation de Neurologie AP-HP Paris 75 013 France; lucette.lacomblez@psl.ap-hop-paris.fr
Bruno Dubois, MD principal investigator
Centre du Langage et de Neuropsychologie AP-HP Paris 75013 France; b.dubois@psl.ap-hop-paris.fr
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing memantine in people with Dementia, run by Nantes University Hospital at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00200538, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2026.