Early Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3PREMIERNCT00195663
Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab and Methotrexate (MTX) Versus MTX Monotherapy in Subjects With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 3 study testing Adalimumab and Methotrexate in people with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) at 123 sites in 19 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of adalimumab in combination with methotrexate in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to assess the long-term safety and maintenance of efficacy after treatment with adalimumab for up to 10 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Adalimumab and Methotrexate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 799 participants
- Where
- 123 sitesin 19 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2000to Apr 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject was age 18 or older and in good health (Investigator discretion) with a recent stable medical history.
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as defined by the 1987-revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, with a disease duration less than 3 years, at least 8 swollen joints out of the 66 joints assessed, at least 10 tender joints out of the 68 joints assessed, at least 1 joint erosion or rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >= 28 mm/1h or C-reactive protein (CRP) >= 1.5 mg/dl
Who cannot join
- Chronic arthritis diagnosed before the age of 16
- Preceding treatment with MTX, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, azathioprine or more than 2 other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
- Subject previously received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy
- Permanently wheelchair-bound or bedridden patients
- Subject considered by the investigator, for any reason, to be an unsuitable candidate for the study
- Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
123 sites in 19 countries.
123 sites in 19 countries
United States31 sites
Site Ref # / Investigator 96122
Austin, Texas, 78705
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 306
Austin, Texas, 78705
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 313
Austin, Texas, 78705
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 762
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 316
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 318
Concord, New Hampshire, 03301
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 319
Cumberland, Maryland, 21502
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2437
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 314
Dayton, Ohio, 45408
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2500
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4649
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 488
Durham, North Carolina, 27704
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 757
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
Site Ref # / Investigator 95960
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2532
Houston, Texas, 77074
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 758
Houston, Texas, 77074
Site Ref # / Investigator 95957
La Jolla, California, 92037
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 429
La Jolla, California, 92037
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 361
Lake Oswego, Oregon, 97035
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 336
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2491
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 761
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 302
Rockford, Illinois, 61103
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 328
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 322
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85260
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 321
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 327
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 326
Wheaton, Maryland, 20902
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2533
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605-0000
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 305
Yakima, Washington, 98902
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 325
Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542
Canada14 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4646
Edmonton, T6G 2S2
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 303
Hamilton, L8N 1Y2
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 330
Hamilton, L8N 2B6
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4634
Montreal, H2L 1S6
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 311
Montreal, H3Z 2Z3
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 309
Newmarket, L3Y 3R7
Site Ref # / Investigator 98199
North York, Ontario, M3H 5Y8
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 304
Pointe-Claire, H9J 3W3
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4633
Richmond, V7C 5L9
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 763
St. John's, A1A 5E8
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4635
Toronto, M4N 3M5
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 490
Toronto, M5L 3L9
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 760
Victoria, V8V 3P9
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4632
Winnipeg, R3N OK6
Australia11 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 310
Brisbane, 4102
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 755
Camperdown, 2050
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 337
Clayton, 3168
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 331
Darlinghurst, Sydney, 2010
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 745
Kogarah, 2217
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 738
Maroochydore, 4558
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 335
New Lambton, 2305
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 737
Shenton Park, 6008
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 307
South Hobart, 7004
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 427
West Heidelberg, 3081
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 739
Woodville, 5011
Germany11 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4631
Berlin, 10117
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 759
Berlin, 14059
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3417
Buch, 13125
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4630
Erlangen, 91054
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 347
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 742
Görlitz, 02826
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 746
Leipzig, 04103
Site Ref # / Investigator 98125
Munich, 80336
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 339
Munich, 80336
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 744
Ratingen, 40882
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 338
Vogelsang-Gommern, 39245
Spain9 sites
Site Ref # / Investigator 96121
Alicante, 03010
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 735
Alicante, 03010
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 1525
Barcelona, 08036
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 1528
Barcelona, 08915
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 750
Guadalajara, 19002
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 1526
Madrid, 28040
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 741
Madrid, 28040
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 390
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 749
Seville, 41014
Belgium7 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 753
Brussels, 1070
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 308
Brussels, 1090
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 752
Brussels, 1200
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 748
Diepenbeek, 3590
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6136
Ghent, 9000
Site Ref # / Investigator 98256
Leuven, 3000
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 333
Liège, 4000
Sweden7 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 728
Stockholm, 113 24
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2565
Stockholm, 171 76
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4638
Stockholm, SE-141 86
Site Ref # / Investigator 96126
Umeå, 901 84
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 747
Uppsala, 75185
Site Ref # / Investigator 96120
Västerås, S-721 89
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 736
Västerås, S-721 89
France6 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 428
Bobigny, 93009
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 348
Montpellier, 34295
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4650
Paris, 75679
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3415
Pierre-Bénite, 69310
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 733
Rennes, 35056
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 346
Strasbourg, 67098
United Kingdom6 sites
Site Ref # / Investigator 96116
Bangor, LL57 2PW
Site Ref # / Investigator 95877
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
Site Ref # / Investigator 98258
Hereford, HR1 2ER
Site Ref # / Investigator 95795
Leeds, LS1 3EX
Site Ref # / Investigator 95958
London, SE1 9RT
Site Ref # / Investigator 98255
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN
Italy4 sites
Site Ref # / Investigator 95719
Genoa, 16132
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 323
Naples, 80131
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 345
Udine, 33100
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 756
Verona, 37134
Netherlands4 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 343
Groningen, 9713 GZ
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6133
Leiden, 2333 ZA
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 317
Maastricht, 6229 HX
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 315
Nijmegen, 6500 HB
Czechia3 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 754
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 332
Pilsen, 305 99
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 734
Prague, 128 50
Finland2 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6135
Heinola, FI-18120
Site Ref # / Investigator 6134
Helsinki, 00029
Ireland2 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 740
Cork, WDQ-23-KM9
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 751
Dublin
Norway2 sites
Site Ref # / Investigator 95800
Oslo, 0027
Site Ref # / Investigator 95875
Oslo, 0370
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Multi-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled, Parallel-Groups Study Comparing the Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-TNFα Antibody Adalimumab Given Every Second Week With Methotrexate Given Weekly and the Combination of Adalimumab and Methotrexate Administered Over 2 Years in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (PREMIER).
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of adalimumab in combination with methotrexate in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to assess the long-term safety and maintenance of efficacy after treatment with adalimumab for up to 10 years.
Read the detailed description
This study had an initial 2-year double-blind treatment period followed by an 8-year open-label extension period, for a total of up to 10 years study duration. The study was designed to assess the potential of adalimumab + methotrexate to improve signs and symptoms of disease and to inhibit radiographic progression in patients with recent onset (disease duration less than 3 years) rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with methotrexate. Adalimumab is a human anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody.
- Conditions
- Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Adalimumab, Methotrexate, Adalimumab placebo, Methotrexate placebo
- Keywords
- Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AdalimumabBiological
Also called ABT-D2E7, Humira
MethotrexateDrug
Adalimumab placeboBiological
Methotrexate placeboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Experimental | Participants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every other week and placebo to methotrexate orally once a week during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase and then adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension. Receives: Biological: Adalimumab; Drug: Methotrexate placebo |
| Adalimumab + methotrexate | Experimental | Participants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every other week and methotrexate orally once a week at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/week (could be escalated up to 20 mg/week) during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension phase. Receives: Biological: Adalimumab; Drug: Methotrexate |
| Methotrexate | Experimental | Participants received placebo to adalimumab subcutaneous injection once every other week and methotrexate orally once a week at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/week (could be escalated up to 20 mg/week) during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension phase. Receives: Drug: Methotrexate; Biological: Adalimumab placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
- Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).
Participants who withdrew early were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline and 52 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52
The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 52 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Secondary outcomes (32)
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).
Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline and Week 104
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 104
The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 104 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 104
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 52
The DAS28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C reactive protein, and general health were included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score >5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score <3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score <2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Measured: Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment
Major clinical response was defined as an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response for any six continuous months, over 104 weeks of treatment. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).
Participants withdrawing early were non-responders.
Measured: Any 6 continuous months from Baseline to Week 104
Change From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).
Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 76
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).
Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase
American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).
Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 76, and 104
Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
The HUI 2/3 is an assessment of various aspects of participants' health and ability to perform various tasks on a day-to-day basis, including reading, seeing, hearing, speaking, general outlook on life, pain/discomfort, ability to walk, use of hands, memory, ability to think/solve, and ability to perform basic activities such as eating, bathing, and dressing. The HUI 2/3 is a combined 15-item questionnaire based on a recall period of the previous 4 weeks. HUI-2 and HUI-3 scores are calculated independently. The HUI-2 score includes 6 attributes: Sensation, Mobility, Emotion, Cognition, Self-Care, and Pain. The HUI-3 score is comprised of 8 attributes: Vision, Hearing, Speech, Ambulation, Dexterity, Emotion, Cognition, and Pain.
The range of each score is from 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health). An increase from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, and 104
Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component and items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 104
Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
ACR-N is a composite, continuous variable which measures the percentage of improvement from Baseline in individual participants based on the 7 core set variables of the ACR. ACR-N is defined as the smallest percent change from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint counts (TJC), swollen joint counts (SJC), and the median percent improvement in the 5 remaining measures (Patient's Assessment of Pain, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI], and C-Reactive Protein). A positive ACR-N value indicates improvement; a negative ACR-N value indicates worsening; ACR-N of 0 indicates no change.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables:
- 28 tender joint counts,
- 28 swollen joint counts,
- C-reactive protein, and
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity.
Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period
Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with >80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion)to 230 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period
Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (16 joints) and each forefoot (5 joints) on a 5-point scale (0 = no narrowing; 1 = up to 25% narrowing; 2 = 26-65% narrowing; 3 = 66-99% narrowing; and 4 = complete narrowing). Scores were summed to calculate the total score ranging from 0 (no narrowing) to 168 (maximum narrowing). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
The number of participants with no worsening in the modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) and in erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) scores, where no worsening is defined as a change from Baseline of ≤ 0 in mTSS, erosion score and JSN score, at Weeks 52 and 104.
Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104
The number of participants with no erosions at Baseline and no erosions at Weeks 52 and 104, where no erosions and no new erosions are defined as an erosion score = 0.
Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with >80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 230 (worst).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104
Number of participants with non-involved joints at Baseline and no newly involved joints at Weeks 52 and 104, where involved joints or no newly involved joints are defined as modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) = 0.
Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).
Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For participants randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.
Measured: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.
Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).
Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.
Measured: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.
Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).
Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.
Measured: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.
Change From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables:
- 28 tender joint counts,
- 28 swollen joint counts,
- C-reactive protein, and
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity.
Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Measured: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.
Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables:
- 28 tender joint counts,
- 28 swollen joint counts,
- C-reactive protein, and
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity.
Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Measured: After 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years
The modified TSS (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Measured: Baseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10
Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years
The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. The number of participants with change from Baseline ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 0 is reported as a measure of no disease progression.
Measured: Baseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10.
Composite Score of ACR50 Plus No Change in Modified Total Sharp Score
Measured: Year 10
Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
A major clinical response was defined as maintenance of an ACR70 response for at least a 6-month continuous period at any time during the study following the first dose of adalimumab. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).
Measured: From the first dose of adalimumab (at Week 1 or Week 106 for patients initially randomized to methotrexate in the DB phase) to Year 10
Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A decrease in the HAQ-DI score represents an improvement in physical function; a clinically significant improvement is defined as a decrease of least 0.22 from Baseline in the HAQ-DI score. The number of participants with improvement in HAQ-DI of at least 0.22 and 0.5 units from Baseline is reported.
Measured: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2000
- Primary completionApr 2004
- Study completionApr 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Early Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 799 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dawn Carlson, Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00195663
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DE013
- Acronym
- PREMIER
- Status last verified
- Jun 2013
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 12 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Smolen J, Fleischmann R, Aletaha D, Li Y, Zhou Y, Sainsbury I, Galindo IL. Disease activity improvements with optimal discriminatory ability between treatment arms: applicability in early and established rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Nov 10;21(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2005-9.
PubMed 31707982Smolen JS, van Vollenhoven RF, Florentinus S, Chen S, Suboticki JL, Kavanaugh A. Predictors of disease activity and structural progression after treatment with adalimumab plus methotrexate or continued methotrexate monotherapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and suboptimal response to methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Nov;77(11):1566-1572. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213502. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
PubMed 30076156Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, Kupper H, Li Y, Florentinus S, Sainsbury I. Long-term use of adalimumab as monotherapy after attainment of low disease activity with adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open. 2018 Jun 13;4(1):e000637. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000637. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29955381Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, van der Heijde D, van Vollenhoven RF, Emery P, Smolen JS, Sainsbury I, Florentinus S, Kupper H, Chen K, Kavanaugh A. Achieving comprehensive disease control in patients with early and established rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone. RMD Open. 2017 Sep 26;3(2):e000445. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000445. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 29018564Moller B, Everts-Graber J, Florentinus S, Li Y, Kupper H, Finckh A. Low Hemoglobin and Radiographic Damage Progression in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: Secondary Analysis From a Phase III Trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Jun;70(6):861-868. doi: 10.1002/acr.23427. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
PubMed 28950430Burmester GR, Landewe R, Genovese MC, Friedman AW, Pfeifer ND, Varothai NA, Lacerda AP. Adalimumab long-term safety: infections, vaccination response and pregnancy outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Feb;76(2):414-417. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209322. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
PubMed 27338778Landewe R, Smolen JS, Florentinus S, Chen S, Guerette B, van der Heijde D. Existing joint erosions increase the risk of joint space narrowing independently of clinical synovitis in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 May 21;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0626-1.
PubMed 25994819Landewe R, Ostergaard M, Keystone EC, Florentinus S, Liu S, van der Heijde D. Analysis of integrated radiographic data from two long-term, open-label extension studies of adalimumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Feb;67(2):180-6. doi: 10.1002/acr.22426.
PubMed 25073879Keystone EC, Haraoui B, Guerette B, Mozaffarian N, Liu S, Kavanaugh A. Clinical, functional, and radiographic implications of time to treatment response in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a posthoc analysis of the PREMIER study. J Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;41(2):235-43. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121468. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
PubMed 24293583Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Florentinus S, Arulmani U, Liu S, Kupper H, Kavanaugh A. Longterm effect of delaying combination therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor in patients with aggressive early rheumatoid arthritis: 10-year efficacy and safety of adalimumab from the randomized controlled PREMIER trial with open-label extension. J Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;41(1):5-14. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130543. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
PubMed 24241487Smolen JS, van der Heijde DM, Keystone EC, van Vollenhoven RF, Goldring MB, Guerette B, Cifaldi MA, Chen N, Liu S, Landewe RB. Association of joint space narrowing with impairment of physical function and work ability in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: protection beyond disease control by adalimumab plus methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jul;72(7):1156-62. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201620. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
PubMed 22915617Strand V, Rentz AM, Cifaldi MA, Chen N, Roy S, Revicki D. Health-related quality of life outcomes of adalimumab for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: results from a randomized multicenter study. J Rheumatol. 2012 Jan;39(1):63-72. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101161. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
PubMed 22045836
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Multi-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled, Parallel-Groups Study Comparing the Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-TNFα Antibody Adalimumab Given Every Second Week With Methotrexate Given Weekly and the Combination of Adalimumab and Methotrexate Administered Over 2 Years in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (PREMIER).
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00195663
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREMIER / DE013
- Conditions
- Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 799 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2000
- Primary completion
- Apr 2004 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Feb 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of adalimumab in combination with methotrexate in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to assess the long-term safety and maintenance of efficacy after treatment with adalimumab for up to 10 years.
Detailed description
This study had an initial 2-year double-blind treatment period followed by an 8-year open-label extension period, for a total of up to 10 years study duration. The study was designed to assess the potential of adalimumab + methotrexate to improve signs and symptoms of disease and to inhibit radiographic progression in patients with recent onset (disease duration less than 3 years) rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with methotrexate. Adalimumab is a human anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Experimental | Biological: Adalimumab, Drug: Methotrexate placeboParticipants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every other week and placebo to methotrexate orally once a week during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase and then adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension. |
| Adalimumab + methotrexate | Experimental | Biological: Adalimumab, Drug: MethotrexateParticipants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every other week and methotrexate orally once a week at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/week (could be escalated up to 20 mg/week) during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension phase. |
| Methotrexate | Experimental | Drug: Methotrexate, Biological: Adalimumab placeboParticipants received placebo to adalimumab subcutaneous injection once every other week and methotrexate orally once a week at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/week (could be escalated up to 20 mg/week) during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension phase. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subject was age 18 or older and in good health (Investigator discretion) with a recent stable medical history.
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as defined by the 1987-revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, with a disease duration less than 3 years, at least 8 swollen joints out of the 66 joints assessed, at least 10 tender joints out of the 68 joints assessed, at least 1 joint erosion or rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >= 28 mm/1h or C-reactive protein (CRP) >= 1.5 mg/dl
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Chronic arthritis diagnosed before the age of 16
- Preceding treatment with MTX, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, azathioprine or more than 2 other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
- Subject previously received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy
- Permanently wheelchair-bound or bedridden patients
- Subject considered by the investigator, for any reason, to be an unsuitable candidate for the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AdalimumabAlso: ABT-D2E7, Humira | Biological | Adalimumab, Adalimumab + methotrexate |
| Methotrexate | Drug | Adalimumab + methotrexate, Methotrexate |
| Adalimumab placebo | Biological | Methotrexate |
| Methotrexate placebo | Drug | Adalimumab |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and 52 Weeks
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants who withdrew early were considered non-responders.
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 52 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
32 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104
Time frame: Baseline and Week 104
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 104
Time frame: Baseline and Week 104
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Any 6 continuous months from Baseline to Week 104
Change From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 76
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 76, and 104
Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, and 104
Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 104
Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.
Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.
Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.
Change From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.
Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: After 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years
Time frame: Baseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10
Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years
Time frame: Baseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10.
Composite Score of ACR50 Plus No Change in Modified Total Sharp Score
Time frame: Year 10
Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: From the first dose of adalimumab (at Week 1 or Week 106 for patients initially randomized to methotrexate in the DB phase) to Year 10
Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jul 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31707982Smolen J, Fleischmann R, Aletaha D, Li Y, Zhou Y, Sainsbury I, Galindo IL. Disease activity improvements with optimal discriminatory ability between treatment arms: applicability in early and established rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Nov 10;21(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2005-9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30076156Smolen JS, van Vollenhoven RF, Florentinus S, Chen S, Suboticki JL, Kavanaugh A. Predictors of disease activity and structural progression after treatment with adalimumab plus methotrexate or continued methotrexate monotherapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and suboptimal response to methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Nov;77(11):1566-1572. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213502. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29955381Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, Kupper H, Li Y, Florentinus S, Sainsbury I. Long-term use of adalimumab as monotherapy after attainment of low disease activity with adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open. 2018 Jun 13;4(1):e000637. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000637. eCollection 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29018564Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, van der Heijde D, van Vollenhoven RF, Emery P, Smolen JS, Sainsbury I, Florentinus S, Kupper H, Chen K, Kavanaugh A. Achieving comprehensive disease control in patients with early and established rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone. RMD Open. 2017 Sep 26;3(2):e000445. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000445. eCollection 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28950430Moller B, Everts-Graber J, Florentinus S, Li Y, Kupper H, Finckh A. Low Hemoglobin and Radiographic Damage Progression in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: Secondary Analysis From a Phase III Trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Jun;70(6):861-868. doi: 10.1002/acr.23427. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27338778Burmester GR, Landewe R, Genovese MC, Friedman AW, Pfeifer ND, Varothai NA, Lacerda AP. Adalimumab long-term safety: infections, vaccination response and pregnancy outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Feb;76(2):414-417. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209322. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25994819Landewe R, Smolen JS, Florentinus S, Chen S, Guerette B, van der Heijde D. Existing joint erosions increase the risk of joint space narrowing independently of clinical synovitis in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 May 21;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0626-1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25073879Landewe R, Ostergaard M, Keystone EC, Florentinus S, Liu S, van der Heijde D. Analysis of integrated radiographic data from two long-term, open-label extension studies of adalimumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Feb;67(2):180-6. doi: 10.1002/acr.22426.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24293583Keystone EC, Haraoui B, Guerette B, Mozaffarian N, Liu S, Kavanaugh A. Clinical, functional, and radiographic implications of time to treatment response in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a posthoc analysis of the PREMIER study. J Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;41(2):235-43. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121468. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24241487Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Florentinus S, Arulmani U, Liu S, Kupper H, Kavanaugh A. Longterm effect of delaying combination therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor in patients with aggressive early rheumatoid arthritis: 10-year efficacy and safety of adalimumab from the randomized controlled PREMIER trial with open-label extension. J Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;41(1):5-14. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130543. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22915617Smolen JS, van der Heijde DM, Keystone EC, van Vollenhoven RF, Goldring MB, Guerette B, Cifaldi MA, Chen N, Liu S, Landewe RB. Association of joint space narrowing with impairment of physical function and work ability in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: protection beyond disease control by adalimumab plus methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jul;72(7):1156-62. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201620. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22045836Strand V, Rentz AM, Cifaldi MA, Chen N, Roy S, Revicki D. Health-related quality of life outcomes of adalimumab for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: results from a randomized multicenter study. J Rheumatol. 2012 Jan;39(1):63-72. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101161. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruiting
Pix-Risk: Early Detection of Rheumatoid Arthritis Via the DETECTRA Platform
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Anatomical Shoulder Domelock System Study
Avascular Necrosis, Revision Surgery
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Atherosclerosis in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Using Atherogenic Index of the Plasma and Carotid Intima Media Thickness
Atheroscleroses, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA
RecruitingObservational study
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Lung Disease Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Chronic Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dawn Carlson study director
AbbVie
123 sites in 19 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Adalimumab and Methotrexate in people with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) at 123 sites in 19 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 123 sites in United States, Canada, Australia, Germany, Spain and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Feb 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52 (time frame: Baseline and 52 Weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00195663, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2013.