AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisPhase 3NCT00185211

BENEFIT Study (Betaferon® / Betaseron® in Newly Emerging Multiple Sclerosis for Initial Treatment) and BENEFIT Follow-up Study

A Phase 3 study testing Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Bayer at 94 sites in 20 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will primarily compare the long-term effects of an early and continued treatment with Betaferon/Betaseron (patients who were treated with active medication during the double-blind BENEFIT study) to treatment initiated either after Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) has been diagnosed or after two… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 48 years
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis
What is being tested?
Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
468 participants
Where
94 sitesin 20 countries
Study dates
Aug 2002to May 2008
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 48 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who have reached scheduled end of study in BENEFIT, either by developing CDMS or by completing 24 months

Who cannot join

  • No participation in the initial BENEFIT study

Trial locations and contacts

94 sites in 20 countries.

94 sites in 20 countries

Germany22 sites
  • Study site

    Berlin, State of Berlin, 12200

  • Study site

    Berlin, State of Berlin, 13585

  • Study site

    Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, 38126

  • Study site

    Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50931

  • Study site

    Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40225

  • Study site

    Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40479

  • Study site

    Erfurt, Thuringia, 99089

  • Study site

    Giessen, Hesse, 35392

  • Study site

    Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37099

  • Study site

    Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 17475

  • Study site

    Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, 06120

  • Study site

    Hennigsdorf, Brandenburg, 16761

  • Study site

    Homburg, Saarland, 66424

  • Study site

    Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, 39120

  • Study site

    Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55101

  • Study site

    Marburg, Hesse, 35039

  • Study site

    München, Bavaria, 81377

  • Study site

    Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149

  • Study site

    Offenbach, Hesse, 63069

  • Study site

    Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053

  • Study site

    Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, 89081

  • Study site

    Würzburg, Bavaria, 97080

Other trials in Germany

France9 sites
  • Study site

    Bordeaux, Gironde, 33076

  • Study site

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003

  • Study site

    Dijon, 21033

  • Study site

    Lille, 59037

  • Study site

    Nancy, 54035

  • Study site

    Nice, 06000

  • Study site

    Paris, 75019

  • Study site

    Rennes, Brittany Region, 35038

  • Study site

    Toulouse, 31059

Other trials in France

Spain8 sites
  • Study site

    Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903

  • Study site

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Study site

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Study site

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28040

  • Study site

    Málaga, 29010

  • Study site

    Seville, 41071

  • Study site

    Valencia, 46026

Other trials in Spain

Canada6 sites
  • Study site

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9

  • Study site

    London, Ontario, N6A 5A5

  • Study site

    Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1

  • Study site

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8

  • Study site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2B5

Other trials in Canada

Czechia6 sites
  • Study site

    Brno, 63900

  • Study site

    Hradec Králové, 50005

  • Study site

    Ostrava, 70852

  • Study site

    Pilsen, 30460

  • Study site

    Prague, 10034

  • Study site

    Prague, 12808

Other trials in Czechia

Finland6 sites
  • Study site

    Helsinki, 00100

  • Study site

    Kuopio, 70210

  • Study site

    Oulu, 90029

  • Study site

    Seinäjoki, 60220

  • Study site

    Tampere, 33521

  • Study site

    Turku, 20100

Other trials in Finland

Hungary5 sites
  • Study site

    Budapest, 1076

  • Study site

    Budapest, 1145

  • Study site

    Budapest, 1204

  • Study site

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Study site

    Szeged, Csongrád megye, 6720

Other trials in Hungary

Italy5 sites
  • Study site

    Gallarate, Varese, 21013

  • Study site

    Milan, 20132

  • Study site

    Padova, 35128

  • Study site

    Pavia, 27100

  • Study site

    Torino, 10126

Other trials in Italy

Poland5 sites
  • Study site

    Bydgoszcz, 85681

  • Study site

    Krakow, 31503

  • Study site

    Lodz, 90153

  • Study site

    Lublin, 20090

  • Study site

    Wroclaw, 50420

Other trials in Poland

Belgium4 sites
  • Study site

    Brussels, 1200

  • Study site

    Ghent, 9000

  • Study site

    Leuven, 3000

  • Study site

    Liège, 4000

Other trials in Belgium

United Kingdom4 sites
  • Study site

    Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN

  • Study site

    Dundee, Scotland, DD1 9SY

  • Study site

    London, W6 8RF

  • Study site

    Sheffield, S10 2JF

Other trials in United Kingdom

Austria3 sites
  • Study site

    Graz, 8036

  • Study site

    Innsbruck, 6020

  • Study site

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Israel2 sites
  • Study site

    Haifa, Israel, 34362

  • Study site

    Tel Litwinsky, Israel, 52621

Other trials in Israel

Netherlands2 sites
  • Study site

    Sittard, 6131 BK

  • Study site

    Tilburg, 5022 GC

Other trials in Netherlands

Switzerland2 sites
  • Study site

    Basel, Canton of Basel-City, 4031

  • Study site

    Sankt Gallen, 9007

Other trials in Switzerland

Denmark1 site
  • Study site

    Glostrup Municipality, 2600

Other trials in Denmark

Norway1 site
  • Study site

    Bergen, N-5021

Other trials in Norway

Portugal1 site
  • Study site

    Coimbra, 3000

Other trials in Portugal

Slovenia1 site
  • Study site

    Ljubljana, 1525

Other trials in Slovenia

Sweden1 site
  • Study site

    Gothenburg, 41685

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Extension of the Double-blind, Placebo-controlled BENEFIT Study (no. 92012/304747) to Obtain Long-term Follow-up Data of Patients With Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Patients With a First Demyelinating Event Suggestive of MS Treated With 8 MIU (250 µg) Interferon Beta-1b (Betaferon® / Betaseron®) Given Subcutaneously Every Other Day for at Least 36 Months.

This study will primarily compare the long-term effects of an early and continued treatment with Betaferon/Betaseron (patients who were treated with active medication during the double-blind BENEFIT study) to treatment initiated either after Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) has been diagnosed or after two years (those patients who were treated with placebo during the double-blind BENEFIT study).

Analyses are based on the integrated data of the initial BENEFIT study and this follow-up study.

Read the detailed description

The study has previously been posted by Schering AG, Germany. Schering AG, Germany has been renamed to Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc..

Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the sponsor of the trial.

Being tested
Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)Drug

    Initial Betaferon/Betaseron treatment (Interferon beta-1b, IFNB-1b), 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day, continued in Follow-up phase

  • Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)Drug

    Initial placebo treatment; Betaferon/Betaseron, 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day offered in Follow-up phase (= this trial)

Study groups in NCT00185211
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon beta-1b)ExperimentalInitial Betaferon/Betaseron treatment (Interferon beta-1b, IFNB-1b), 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day, continued in Follow-up phase
Receives: Drug: Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)
Initial PlaceboExperimentalInitial placebo treatment; Betaferon/Betaseron, 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day offered in Follow-up phase (= this trial)
Receives: Drug: Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With CDMS at Selected Points in Time

    CDMS could be reached due to a qualifying relapse or sustained progression of 1.5 points on the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) as compared to the lowest EDSS obtained during screening or Day 1. The validity of CDMS diagnoses was confirmed by a central committee. The EDSS scale quantifies disability in MS in 8 functional systems, values vary between 0="normal neurological examination" and 10="death due to MS" measured in half-points on an ordinal scale. Time to CDMS = date of CDMS - date of Day 1 + 1 or time to CDMS = date of last clinical visit - date of Day 1 + 1 (right-censored)

    Measured: up to 60 months after start of treatment

  2. Time to Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Confirmed EDSS Progression at Selected Points in Time

    EDSS progression was defined as an increase in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) of 1.0 point compared to the lowest EDSS score obtained during the screening or baseline visit, if this score was \<= 5.5. A confirmed EDSS progression status was defined as an EDSS progression observed at two consecutive scheduled visits at least 140 days apart from each other. The EDSS scale is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis in eight functional systems and values vary between 0="normal neurological examination" and 10="death due to MS" measured in half-points on a scale.

    Measured: up to 60 months after start of treatment

  3. Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) at Month 60

    As an index of health related quality of life in people diagnosed with MS, the FAMS Trial Outcome Index covers overall physical health (sum of sub-scale scores Mobility, Symptoms, Thinking/Fatigue, Additional Concerns) with a score range from 0 to 148. A higher score reflects a higher overall physical health as reported by patients.

    Measured: 60 months after start of treatment

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Relapse-based Efficacy Domain: Time to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) According to McDonald Criteria

    MS according to the criteria by McDonald was reached if, in addition to the single clinical demyelinating event, both dissemination in space and dissemination in time were established by MRI-criteria or a new relapse. Time to McDonald MS is the difference of date of McDonald MS to the date of Day 1 + 1. For subjects without McDonald MS, time to McDonald MS is the difference from the maximum (date of last magnetic resonance imaging scan, date of last clinical visit) to the date of Day 1 + 1 (right-censored observation).

    Measured: up to 60 months after start of treatment

  2. Relapse-based Efficacy Domain: Hazard Ratio for Recurrent Relapses

    A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or the reappearance of a neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical demyelinating event. The time to the onset of recurrent relapses was determined for each subject according to the counting process representation for recurrent events. Time to a relapse was right-censored if a relapse-risk period ended without relapse. Based on the Andersen-Gill model the hazard ratio for recurrent relapses was estimated. Annualized relapse rates are provided as another outcome measure.

    Measured: up to 60 months after start of treatment

  3. Relapse-based Efficacy Domain (Supportive): Annualized Relapse Rate

    The annualized relapse rate is defined as total number of relapses up to month 60 divided by the total observation time (last clinical visit minus first day of study treatment administration plus 1 of all participants) in years.

    Measured: up to 60 months after start of treatment

  4. Disability-based Efficacy Domain: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) at Month 60

    The MSFC score consists of three sub-tests (Timed-25-Foot-Walk, 9-Hole-Peg-Test, 3" Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test [PASAT]). Standardized results (Z-scores) of the sub-tests and the overall MSFC Z-score as an average of the three Z-scores were derived using baseline data pooled over both treatment arms as reference population. Higher Z-scores reflect a better neurological status.

    Measured: 60 months after start of treatment

  5. MRI (Magnet-Resonance Imaging)-Based Efficacy Domain: Cumulative Number of Newly Active Lesions at Month 60

    Newly active lesions are defined as displaying either new Gadolinium (Gd)-enhancement on T1-weighted scans or non-enhancement on T1-weighted scan but new on T2-weighted scan. The numbers of newly active lesions on yearly MRI scans were summed up to the cumulative number.

    Measured: up to 60 months after start of treatment

  6. MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Absolute Change of T2 Lesion Volume From Screening MRI to Month 60

    Absolute change of T2 lesion volume from screening MRI to month 60 was calculated as T2 lesion volume at month 60 minus T2 lesion volume at screening.

    Measured: 60 months after start of treatment

  7. MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Absolute Change of Volume of Black Holes From Screening MRI to Month 60

    Absolute change of volume of black holes from screening MRI to month 60 was calculated as volume of black holes at month 60 minus volume of black holes at screening.

    Measured: 60 months after start of treatment

  8. MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Percentage Change of Brain Volume From Screening MRI to Month 60

    Two-timepoint percentage brain volume change was estimated with Structural Image Evaluation, using Normalisation, of Atrophy (SIENA) software. The measurements describe the percentage change from screening in brain volume at month 60.

    Measured: 60 months after start of treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2002
  3. Primary completionMay 2008
  4. Study completionMay 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
468 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00185211
Sponsor's protocol ID
91031
Other IDs
305207
Status last verified
Dec 2013
First submitted
9 Sep 2005
Last updated
30 Dec 2013
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Edan G, Kappos L, Montalban X, Polman CH, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Miller D, Barkhof F, Herrmann J, Lanius V, Stemper B, Pohl C, Sandbrink R, Pleimes D; BENEFIT Study Group. Long-term impact of interferon beta-1b in patients with CIS: 8-year follow-up of BENEFIT. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;85(11):1183-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306222. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

    PubMed 24218527
  • Nagtegaal GJ, Pohl C, Wattjes MP, Hulst HE, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Miller D, Montalban X, Kappos L, Edan G, Pleimes D, Beckman K, Stemper B, Polman CH, Sandbrink R, Barkhof F. Interferon beta-1b reduces black holes in a randomised trial of clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler. 2014 Feb;20(2):234-42. doi: 10.1177/1352458513494491. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

    PubMed 23842212
  • Penner IK, Stemper B, Calabrese P, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Pleimes D, Lanius V, Pohl C, Kappos L, Sandbrink R. Effects of interferon beta-1b on cognitive performance in patients with a first event suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2012 Oct;18(10):1466-71. doi: 10.1177/1352458512442438. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

    PubMed 22492127
  • Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Radu EW, Metzig C, Bauer L, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C; BENEFIT Study Group. Long-term effect of early treatment with interferon beta-1b after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: 5-year active treatment extension of the phase 3 BENEFIT trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Nov;8(11):987-97. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70237-6. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

    PubMed 19748319
  • Hartung HP, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Kappos L, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Petkau J, White R, Sahajpal V, Knappertz V, Beckmann K, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C; BENEFIT Study Group. Interferon beta-1b-neutralizing antibodies 5 years after clinically isolated syndrome. Neurology. 2011 Aug 30;77(9):835-43. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822c90d7. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

    PubMed 21849647
  • Freedman MS, Metzig C, Kappos L, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Yarden J, Spector L, Fire E, Dotan N, Schwenke S, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C. Predictive nature of IgM anti-alpha-glucose serum biomarker for relapse activity and EDSS progression in CIS patients: a BENEFIT study analysis. Mult Scler. 2012 Jul;18(7):966-73. doi: 10.1177/1352458511432327. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

    PubMed 22183938
  • Waschbisch A, Sandbrink R, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Schwab S, Pohl C, Wiendl H. Evaluation of soluble HLA-G as a biomarker for multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2011 Aug 9;77(6):596-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318228c14d. Epub 2011 Jul 27. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21795647
  • Moraal B, Pohl C, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH, Edan G, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Miller DH, Montalban X, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Barkhof F. Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of conversion to multiple sclerosis in the BENEFIT study. Arch Neurol. 2009 Nov;66(11):1345-52. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.243.

    PubMed 19901165
  • Polman C, Kappos L, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Selmaj K, Uitdehaag BM, Dahms S, Bauer L, Pohl C, Sandbrink R; BENEFIT investigators. Subgroups of the BENEFIT study: risk of developing MS and treatment effect of interferon beta-1b. J Neurol. 2008 Apr;255(4):480-7. doi: 10.1007/s00415-007-0733-2. Epub 2007 Nov 15.

    PubMed 18004635
  • Caloyeras JP, Zhang B, Wang C, Eriksson M, Fredrikson S, Beckmann K, Knappertz V, Pohl C, Hartung HP, Shah D, Miller JD, Sandbrink R, Lanius V, Gondek K, Russell MW. Cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon beta-1b for the treatment of patients with a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Clin Ther. 2012 May;34(5):1132-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

    PubMed 22541587
  • Nielsen JM, Pohl C, Polman CH, Barkhof F, Freedman MS, Edan G, Miller DH, Bauer L, Sandbrink R, Kappos L, Uitdehaag BM. MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2009 May 20;9:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-19.

    PubMed 19457248
  • Barkhof F, Polman CH, Radue EW, Kappos L, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Poppe P, de Vos M, Lasri F, Bauer L, Dahms S, Wagner K, Pohl C, Sandbrink R. Magnetic resonance imaging effects of interferon beta-1b in the BENEFIT study: integrated 2-year results. Arch Neurol. 2007 Sep;64(9):1292-8. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.9.1292.

    PubMed 17846268
  • Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Radu EW, Bauer L, Dahms S, Lanius V, Pohl C, Sandbrink R; BENEFIT Study Group. Effect of early versus delayed interferon beta-1b treatment on disability after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a 3-year follow-up analysis of the BENEFIT study. Lancet. 2007 Aug 4;370(9585):389-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61194-5.

    PubMed 17679016
  • De Jager PL, Chibnik LB, Cui J, Reischl J, Lehr S, Simon KC, Aubin C, Bauer D, Heubach JF, Sandbrink R, Tyblova M, Lelkova P; Steering committee of the BENEFIT study; Steering committee of the BEYOND study; Steering committee of the LTF study; Steering committee of the CCR1 study; Havrdova E, Pohl C, Horakova D, Ascherio A, Hafler DA, Karlson EW. Integration of genetic risk factors into a clinical algorithm for multiple sclerosis susceptibility: a weighted genetic risk score. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Dec;8(12):1111-9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70275-3. Epub 2009 Oct 29.

    PubMed 19879194

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Bayer at 94 sites in 20 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 94 sites in Germany, France, Spain, Canada, Czechia and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Nov 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With CDMS at Selected Points in Time (time frame: up to 60 months after start of treatment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00185211, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2013.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT00185211 | AzTrials