Multiple SclerosisPhase 3NCT00185211
BENEFIT Study (Betaferon® / Betaseron® in Newly Emerging Multiple Sclerosis for Initial Treatment) and BENEFIT Follow-up Study
A Phase 3 study testing Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Bayer at 94 sites in 20 countries.
Trial summary
This study will primarily compare the long-term effects of an early and continued treatment with Betaferon/Betaseron (patients who were treated with active medication during the double-blind BENEFIT study) to treatment initiated either after Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) has been diagnosed or after two… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 48 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Sclerosis
- What is being tested?
- Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 468 participants
- Where
- 94 sitesin 20 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2002to May 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 48 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who have reached scheduled end of study in BENEFIT, either by developing CDMS or by completing 24 months
Who cannot join
- No participation in the initial BENEFIT study
Trial locations and contacts
94 sites in 20 countries.
94 sites in 20 countries
Germany22 sites
Study site
Berlin, State of Berlin, 12200
Study site
Berlin, State of Berlin, 13585
Study site
Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, 38126
Study site
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50931
Study site
Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40225
Study site
Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40479
Study site
Erfurt, Thuringia, 99089
Study site
Giessen, Hesse, 35392
Study site
Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37099
Study site
Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 17475
Study site
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, 06120
Study site
Hennigsdorf, Brandenburg, 16761
Study site
Homburg, Saarland, 66424
Study site
Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, 39120
Study site
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55101
Study site
Marburg, Hesse, 35039
Study site
München, Bavaria, 81377
Study site
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149
Study site
Offenbach, Hesse, 63069
Study site
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053
Study site
Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, 89081
Study site
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97080
France9 sites
Study site
Bordeaux, Gironde, 33076
Study site
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003
Study site
Dijon, 21033
Study site
Lille, 59037
Study site
Nancy, 54035
Study site
Nice, 06000
Study site
Paris, 75019
Study site
Rennes, Brittany Region, 35038
Study site
Toulouse, 31059
Spain8 sites
Study site
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903
Study site
Barcelona, 08035
Study site
Barcelona, 08036
Study site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Study site
Madrid, 28040
Study site
Málaga, 29010
Study site
Seville, 41071
Study site
Valencia, 46026
Canada6 sites
Study site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9
Study site
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
Study site
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1
Study site
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2B5
Czechia6 sites
Study site
Brno, 63900
Study site
Hradec Králové, 50005
Study site
Ostrava, 70852
Study site
Pilsen, 30460
Study site
Prague, 10034
Study site
Prague, 12808
Finland6 sites
Study site
Helsinki, 00100
Study site
Kuopio, 70210
Study site
Oulu, 90029
Study site
Seinäjoki, 60220
Study site
Tampere, 33521
Study site
Turku, 20100
Hungary5 sites
Study site
Budapest, 1076
Study site
Budapest, 1145
Study site
Budapest, 1204
Study site
Debrecen, 4032
Study site
Szeged, Csongrád megye, 6720
Italy5 sites
Study site
Gallarate, Varese, 21013
Study site
Milan, 20132
Study site
Padova, 35128
Study site
Pavia, 27100
Study site
Torino, 10126
Poland5 sites
Study site
Bydgoszcz, 85681
Study site
Krakow, 31503
Study site
Lodz, 90153
Study site
Lublin, 20090
Study site
Wroclaw, 50420
Belgium4 sites
Study site
Brussels, 1200
Study site
Ghent, 9000
Study site
Leuven, 3000
Study site
Liège, 4000
United Kingdom4 sites
Study site
Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN
Study site
Dundee, Scotland, DD1 9SY
Study site
London, W6 8RF
Study site
Sheffield, S10 2JF
Austria3 sites
Study site
Graz, 8036
Study site
Innsbruck, 6020
Study site
Vienna, 1090
Israel2 sites
Study site
Haifa, Israel, 34362
Study site
Tel Litwinsky, Israel, 52621
Switzerland2 sites
Study site
Basel, Canton of Basel-City, 4031
Study site
Sankt Gallen, 9007
About this study
Official title: Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Extension of the Double-blind, Placebo-controlled BENEFIT Study (no. 92012/304747) to Obtain Long-term Follow-up Data of Patients With Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Patients With a First Demyelinating Event Suggestive of MS Treated With 8 MIU (250 µg) Interferon Beta-1b (Betaferon® / Betaseron®) Given Subcutaneously Every Other Day for at Least 36 Months.
This study will primarily compare the long-term effects of an early and continued treatment with Betaferon/Betaseron (patients who were treated with active medication during the double-blind BENEFIT study) to treatment initiated either after Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) has been diagnosed or after two years (those patients who were treated with placebo during the double-blind BENEFIT study).
Analyses are based on the integrated data of the initial BENEFIT study and this follow-up study.
Read the detailed description
The study has previously been posted by Schering AG, Germany. Schering AG, Germany has been renamed to Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc..
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the sponsor of the trial.
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Being tested
- Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)Drug
Initial Betaferon/Betaseron treatment (Interferon beta-1b, IFNB-1b), 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day, continued in Follow-up phase
Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)Drug
Initial placebo treatment; Betaferon/Betaseron, 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day offered in Follow-up phase (= this trial)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon beta-1b) | Experimental | Initial Betaferon/Betaseron treatment (Interferon beta-1b, IFNB-1b), 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day, continued in Follow-up phase Receives: Drug: Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) |
| Initial Placebo | Experimental | Initial placebo treatment; Betaferon/Betaseron, 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day offered in Follow-up phase (= this trial) Receives: Drug: Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With CDMS at Selected Points in Time
CDMS could be reached due to a qualifying relapse or sustained progression of 1.5 points on the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) as compared to the lowest EDSS obtained during screening or Day 1. The validity of CDMS diagnoses was confirmed by a central committee. The EDSS scale quantifies disability in MS in 8 functional systems, values vary between 0="normal neurological examination" and 10="death due to MS" measured in half-points on an ordinal scale. Time to CDMS = date of CDMS - date of Day 1 + 1 or time to CDMS = date of last clinical visit - date of Day 1 + 1 (right-censored)
Measured: up to 60 months after start of treatment
Time to Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Confirmed EDSS Progression at Selected Points in Time
EDSS progression was defined as an increase in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) of 1.0 point compared to the lowest EDSS score obtained during the screening or baseline visit, if this score was \<= 5.5. A confirmed EDSS progression status was defined as an EDSS progression observed at two consecutive scheduled visits at least 140 days apart from each other. The EDSS scale is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis in eight functional systems and values vary between 0="normal neurological examination" and 10="death due to MS" measured in half-points on a scale.
Measured: up to 60 months after start of treatment
Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) at Month 60
As an index of health related quality of life in people diagnosed with MS, the FAMS Trial Outcome Index covers overall physical health (sum of sub-scale scores Mobility, Symptoms, Thinking/Fatigue, Additional Concerns) with a score range from 0 to 148. A higher score reflects a higher overall physical health as reported by patients.
Measured: 60 months after start of treatment
Secondary outcomes (8)
Relapse-based Efficacy Domain: Time to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) According to McDonald Criteria
MS according to the criteria by McDonald was reached if, in addition to the single clinical demyelinating event, both dissemination in space and dissemination in time were established by MRI-criteria or a new relapse. Time to McDonald MS is the difference of date of McDonald MS to the date of Day 1 + 1. For subjects without McDonald MS, time to McDonald MS is the difference from the maximum (date of last magnetic resonance imaging scan, date of last clinical visit) to the date of Day 1 + 1 (right-censored observation).
Measured: up to 60 months after start of treatment
Relapse-based Efficacy Domain: Hazard Ratio for Recurrent Relapses
A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or the reappearance of a neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical demyelinating event. The time to the onset of recurrent relapses was determined for each subject according to the counting process representation for recurrent events. Time to a relapse was right-censored if a relapse-risk period ended without relapse. Based on the Andersen-Gill model the hazard ratio for recurrent relapses was estimated. Annualized relapse rates are provided as another outcome measure.
Measured: up to 60 months after start of treatment
Relapse-based Efficacy Domain (Supportive): Annualized Relapse Rate
The annualized relapse rate is defined as total number of relapses up to month 60 divided by the total observation time (last clinical visit minus first day of study treatment administration plus 1 of all participants) in years.
Measured: up to 60 months after start of treatment
Disability-based Efficacy Domain: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) at Month 60
The MSFC score consists of three sub-tests (Timed-25-Foot-Walk, 9-Hole-Peg-Test, 3" Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test [PASAT]). Standardized results (Z-scores) of the sub-tests and the overall MSFC Z-score as an average of the three Z-scores were derived using baseline data pooled over both treatment arms as reference population. Higher Z-scores reflect a better neurological status.
Measured: 60 months after start of treatment
MRI (Magnet-Resonance Imaging)-Based Efficacy Domain: Cumulative Number of Newly Active Lesions at Month 60
Newly active lesions are defined as displaying either new Gadolinium (Gd)-enhancement on T1-weighted scans or non-enhancement on T1-weighted scan but new on T2-weighted scan. The numbers of newly active lesions on yearly MRI scans were summed up to the cumulative number.
Measured: up to 60 months after start of treatment
MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Absolute Change of T2 Lesion Volume From Screening MRI to Month 60
Absolute change of T2 lesion volume from screening MRI to month 60 was calculated as T2 lesion volume at month 60 minus T2 lesion volume at screening.
Measured: 60 months after start of treatment
MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Absolute Change of Volume of Black Holes From Screening MRI to Month 60
Absolute change of volume of black holes from screening MRI to month 60 was calculated as volume of black holes at month 60 minus volume of black holes at screening.
Measured: 60 months after start of treatment
MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Percentage Change of Brain Volume From Screening MRI to Month 60
Two-timepoint percentage brain volume change was estimated with Structural Image Evaluation, using Normalisation, of Atrophy (SIENA) software. The measurements describe the percentage change from screening in brain volume at month 60.
Measured: 60 months after start of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2002
- Primary completionMay 2008
- Study completionMay 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BayerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 468 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bayer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bayer Study Director, Study director, Bayer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00185211
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 91031
- Other IDs
- 305207
- Status last verified
- Dec 2013
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 30 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Edan G, Kappos L, Montalban X, Polman CH, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Miller D, Barkhof F, Herrmann J, Lanius V, Stemper B, Pohl C, Sandbrink R, Pleimes D; BENEFIT Study Group. Long-term impact of interferon beta-1b in patients with CIS: 8-year follow-up of BENEFIT. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;85(11):1183-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306222. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
PubMed 24218527Nagtegaal GJ, Pohl C, Wattjes MP, Hulst HE, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Miller D, Montalban X, Kappos L, Edan G, Pleimes D, Beckman K, Stemper B, Polman CH, Sandbrink R, Barkhof F. Interferon beta-1b reduces black holes in a randomised trial of clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler. 2014 Feb;20(2):234-42. doi: 10.1177/1352458513494491. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
PubMed 23842212Penner IK, Stemper B, Calabrese P, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Pleimes D, Lanius V, Pohl C, Kappos L, Sandbrink R. Effects of interferon beta-1b on cognitive performance in patients with a first event suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2012 Oct;18(10):1466-71. doi: 10.1177/1352458512442438. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
PubMed 22492127Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Radu EW, Metzig C, Bauer L, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C; BENEFIT Study Group. Long-term effect of early treatment with interferon beta-1b after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: 5-year active treatment extension of the phase 3 BENEFIT trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Nov;8(11):987-97. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70237-6. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
PubMed 19748319Hartung HP, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Kappos L, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Petkau J, White R, Sahajpal V, Knappertz V, Beckmann K, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C; BENEFIT Study Group. Interferon beta-1b-neutralizing antibodies 5 years after clinically isolated syndrome. Neurology. 2011 Aug 30;77(9):835-43. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822c90d7. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
PubMed 21849647Freedman MS, Metzig C, Kappos L, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Yarden J, Spector L, Fire E, Dotan N, Schwenke S, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C. Predictive nature of IgM anti-alpha-glucose serum biomarker for relapse activity and EDSS progression in CIS patients: a BENEFIT study analysis. Mult Scler. 2012 Jul;18(7):966-73. doi: 10.1177/1352458511432327. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
PubMed 22183938Waschbisch A, Sandbrink R, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Schwab S, Pohl C, Wiendl H. Evaluation of soluble HLA-G as a biomarker for multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2011 Aug 9;77(6):596-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318228c14d. Epub 2011 Jul 27. No abstract available.
PubMed 21795647Moraal B, Pohl C, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH, Edan G, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Miller DH, Montalban X, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Barkhof F. Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of conversion to multiple sclerosis in the BENEFIT study. Arch Neurol. 2009 Nov;66(11):1345-52. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.243.
PubMed 19901165Polman C, Kappos L, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Selmaj K, Uitdehaag BM, Dahms S, Bauer L, Pohl C, Sandbrink R; BENEFIT investigators. Subgroups of the BENEFIT study: risk of developing MS and treatment effect of interferon beta-1b. J Neurol. 2008 Apr;255(4):480-7. doi: 10.1007/s00415-007-0733-2. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
PubMed 18004635Caloyeras JP, Zhang B, Wang C, Eriksson M, Fredrikson S, Beckmann K, Knappertz V, Pohl C, Hartung HP, Shah D, Miller JD, Sandbrink R, Lanius V, Gondek K, Russell MW. Cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon beta-1b for the treatment of patients with a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Clin Ther. 2012 May;34(5):1132-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
PubMed 22541587Nielsen JM, Pohl C, Polman CH, Barkhof F, Freedman MS, Edan G, Miller DH, Bauer L, Sandbrink R, Kappos L, Uitdehaag BM. MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2009 May 20;9:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-19.
PubMed 19457248Barkhof F, Polman CH, Radue EW, Kappos L, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Poppe P, de Vos M, Lasri F, Bauer L, Dahms S, Wagner K, Pohl C, Sandbrink R. Magnetic resonance imaging effects of interferon beta-1b in the BENEFIT study: integrated 2-year results. Arch Neurol. 2007 Sep;64(9):1292-8. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.9.1292.
PubMed 17846268Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Radu EW, Bauer L, Dahms S, Lanius V, Pohl C, Sandbrink R; BENEFIT Study Group. Effect of early versus delayed interferon beta-1b treatment on disability after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a 3-year follow-up analysis of the BENEFIT study. Lancet. 2007 Aug 4;370(9585):389-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61194-5.
PubMed 17679016De Jager PL, Chibnik LB, Cui J, Reischl J, Lehr S, Simon KC, Aubin C, Bauer D, Heubach JF, Sandbrink R, Tyblova M, Lelkova P; Steering committee of the BENEFIT study; Steering committee of the BEYOND study; Steering committee of the LTF study; Steering committee of the CCR1 study; Havrdova E, Pohl C, Horakova D, Ascherio A, Hafler DA, Karlson EW. Integration of genetic risk factors into a clinical algorithm for multiple sclerosis susceptibility: a weighted genetic risk score. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Dec;8(12):1111-9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70275-3. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
PubMed 19879194
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Extension of the Double-blind, Placebo-controlled BENEFIT Study (no. 92012/304747) to Obtain Long-term Follow-up Data of Patients With Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Patients With a First Demyelinating Event Suggestive of MS Treated With 8 MIU (250 µg) Interferon Beta-1b (Betaferon® / Betaseron®) Given Subcutaneously Every Other Day for at Least 36 Months.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00185211
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 91031
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 468 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BayerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2002
- Primary completion
- May 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Nov 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will primarily compare the long-term effects of an early and continued treatment with Betaferon/Betaseron (patients who were treated with active medication during the double-blind BENEFIT study) to treatment initiated either after Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) has been diagnosed or after two years (those patients who were treated with placebo during the double-blind BENEFIT study).
Analyses are based on the integrated data of the initial BENEFIT study and this follow-up study.
Detailed description
The study has previously been posted by Schering AG, Germany. Schering AG, Germany has been renamed to Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc..
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the sponsor of the trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon beta-1b) | Experimental | Drug: Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)Initial Betaferon/Betaseron treatment (Interferon beta-1b, IFNB-1b), 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day, continued in Follow-up phase |
| Initial Placebo | Experimental | Drug: Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)Initial placebo treatment; Betaferon/Betaseron, 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day offered in Follow-up phase (= this trial) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 48 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who have reached scheduled end of study in BENEFIT, either by developing CDMS or by completing 24 months
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- No participation in the initial BENEFIT study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)Initial Betaferon/Betaseron treatment (Interferon beta-1b, IFNB-1b), 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day, continued in Follow-up phase | Drug | Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon beta-1b) |
| Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)Initial placebo treatment; Betaferon/Betaseron, 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day offered in Follow-up phase (= this trial) | Drug | Initial Placebo |
Primary outcome
Time to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With CDMS at Selected Points in Time
Time frame: up to 60 months after start of treatment
CDMS could be reached due to a qualifying relapse or sustained progression of 1.5 points on the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) as compared to the lowest EDSS obtained during screening or Day 1. The validity of CDMS diagnoses was confirmed by a central committee. The EDSS scale quantifies disability in MS in 8 functional systems, values vary between 0="normal neurological examination" and 10="death due to MS" measured in half-points on an ordinal scale. Time to CDMS = date of CDMS - date of Day 1 + 1 or time to CDMS = date of last clinical visit - date of Day 1 + 1 (right-censored)
Time to Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Confirmed EDSS Progression at Selected Points in Time
Time frame: up to 60 months after start of treatment
EDSS progression was defined as an increase in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) of 1.0 point compared to the lowest EDSS score obtained during the screening or baseline visit, if this score was \<= 5.5. A confirmed EDSS progression status was defined as an EDSS progression observed at two consecutive scheduled visits at least 140 days apart from each other. The EDSS scale is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis in eight functional systems and values vary between 0="normal neurological examination" and 10="death due to MS" measured in half-points on a scale.
Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) at Month 60
Time frame: 60 months after start of treatment
As an index of health related quality of life in people diagnosed with MS, the FAMS Trial Outcome Index covers overall physical health (sum of sub-scale scores Mobility, Symptoms, Thinking/Fatigue, Additional Concerns) with a score range from 0 to 148. A higher score reflects a higher overall physical health as reported by patients.
8 secondary outcomes
Relapse-based Efficacy Domain: Time to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) According to McDonald Criteria
Time frame: up to 60 months after start of treatment
Relapse-based Efficacy Domain: Hazard Ratio for Recurrent Relapses
Time frame: up to 60 months after start of treatment
Relapse-based Efficacy Domain (Supportive): Annualized Relapse Rate
Time frame: up to 60 months after start of treatment
Disability-based Efficacy Domain: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) at Month 60
Time frame: 60 months after start of treatment
MRI (Magnet-Resonance Imaging)-Based Efficacy Domain: Cumulative Number of Newly Active Lesions at Month 60
Time frame: up to 60 months after start of treatment
MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Absolute Change of T2 Lesion Volume From Screening MRI to Month 60
Time frame: 60 months after start of treatment
MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Absolute Change of Volume of Black Holes From Screening MRI to Month 60
Time frame: 60 months after start of treatment
MRI-based Efficacy Domain: Percentage Change of Brain Volume From Screening MRI to Month 60
Time frame: 60 months after start of treatment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Dec 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 24218527Edan G, Kappos L, Montalban X, Polman CH, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Miller D, Barkhof F, Herrmann J, Lanius V, Stemper B, Pohl C, Sandbrink R, Pleimes D; BENEFIT Study Group. Long-term impact of interferon beta-1b in patients with CIS: 8-year follow-up of BENEFIT. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;85(11):1183-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306222. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
- Background: PubMed 23842212Nagtegaal GJ, Pohl C, Wattjes MP, Hulst HE, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Miller D, Montalban X, Kappos L, Edan G, Pleimes D, Beckman K, Stemper B, Polman CH, Sandbrink R, Barkhof F. Interferon beta-1b reduces black holes in a randomised trial of clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler. 2014 Feb;20(2):234-42. doi: 10.1177/1352458513494491. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
- Background: PubMed 22492127Penner IK, Stemper B, Calabrese P, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Pleimes D, Lanius V, Pohl C, Kappos L, Sandbrink R. Effects of interferon beta-1b on cognitive performance in patients with a first event suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2012 Oct;18(10):1466-71. doi: 10.1177/1352458512442438. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 19748319Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Radu EW, Metzig C, Bauer L, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C; BENEFIT Study Group. Long-term effect of early treatment with interferon beta-1b after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: 5-year active treatment extension of the phase 3 BENEFIT trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Nov;8(11):987-97. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70237-6. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 21849647Hartung HP, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Kappos L, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Petkau J, White R, Sahajpal V, Knappertz V, Beckmann K, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C; BENEFIT Study Group. Interferon beta-1b-neutralizing antibodies 5 years after clinically isolated syndrome. Neurology. 2011 Aug 30;77(9):835-43. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822c90d7. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 22183938Freedman MS, Metzig C, Kappos L, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Yarden J, Spector L, Fire E, Dotan N, Schwenke S, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C. Predictive nature of IgM anti-alpha-glucose serum biomarker for relapse activity and EDSS progression in CIS patients: a BENEFIT study analysis. Mult Scler. 2012 Jul;18(7):966-73. doi: 10.1177/1352458511432327. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 21795647Waschbisch A, Sandbrink R, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Schwab S, Pohl C, Wiendl H. Evaluation of soluble HLA-G as a biomarker for multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2011 Aug 9;77(6):596-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318228c14d. Epub 2011 Jul 27. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 19901165Moraal B, Pohl C, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH, Edan G, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Miller DH, Montalban X, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Barkhof F. Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of conversion to multiple sclerosis in the BENEFIT study. Arch Neurol. 2009 Nov;66(11):1345-52. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.243.
- Results publication: PubMed 18004635Polman C, Kappos L, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Selmaj K, Uitdehaag BM, Dahms S, Bauer L, Pohl C, Sandbrink R; BENEFIT investigators. Subgroups of the BENEFIT study: risk of developing MS and treatment effect of interferon beta-1b. J Neurol. 2008 Apr;255(4):480-7. doi: 10.1007/s00415-007-0733-2. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 22541587Caloyeras JP, Zhang B, Wang C, Eriksson M, Fredrikson S, Beckmann K, Knappertz V, Pohl C, Hartung HP, Shah D, Miller JD, Sandbrink R, Lanius V, Gondek K, Russell MW. Cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon beta-1b for the treatment of patients with a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Clin Ther. 2012 May;34(5):1132-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 19457248Nielsen JM, Pohl C, Polman CH, Barkhof F, Freedman MS, Edan G, Miller DH, Bauer L, Sandbrink R, Kappos L, Uitdehaag BM. MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2009 May 20;9:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-19.
- Results publication: PubMed 17846268Barkhof F, Polman CH, Radue EW, Kappos L, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Poppe P, de Vos M, Lasri F, Bauer L, Dahms S, Wagner K, Pohl C, Sandbrink R. Magnetic resonance imaging effects of interferon beta-1b in the BENEFIT study: integrated 2-year results. Arch Neurol. 2007 Sep;64(9):1292-8. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.9.1292.
Related trials for Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Remibrutinib After Switching From Ocrelizumab in Participants Living With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Long-Term Safety of Vumerity and Tecfidera in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Study of Skin Tumors in Tuberous Sclerosis
Tuberous Sclerosis
Recruiting
The Effects of Synchronous and Asynchronous Pilates Training Based on Telerehabilitation on Core Stabilization, Balance, Cognitive Functions, and Quality of Life in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Care in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Multiple Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bayer Study Director study director
Bayer
94 sites in 20 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Bayer at 94 sites in 20 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 94 sites in Germany, France, Spain, Canada, Czechia and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Nov 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With CDMS at Selected Points in Time (time frame: up to 60 months after start of treatment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00185211, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2013.