Carotid AtherosclerosisPhase 2/3NCT00180518
ACCULINK for Revascularization of Carotids in High Risk Patients "The ARCHeR Trial"
A Phase 2/3 study testing Over-the-wire & Rapid Exchange ACCULINK (tm) Carotid Stent & ACCUNET (tm) embolic protection system in people with Carotid Atherosclerosis and Carotid Artery Disease, run by Abbott Medical Devices.
Trial summary
1. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the over-the-wire (OTW) ACCULINK (tm) System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carotid Atherosclerosis, Carotid Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Over-the-wire & Rapid Exchange ACCULINK (tm) Carotid Stent & ACCUNET (tm) embolic protection system
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 581 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2000to Nov 2003
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient age >=18.
- Symptomatic patient: Transient ischemic attack (TIA), amaurosis fugax, or minor/non-disabling stroke (in the hemisphere supplied by the target vessel) within 180 days of enrollment; asymptomatic patient: meets angiographic and clinical inclusion criteria.
- Patient has no childbearing potential or a negative pregnancy test within 30 days of study procedure.
- Patient or legally authorized representative, and the patient's physician, agree to have the patient return for all required clinical contacts following study enrollment.
- Patient or legally authorized representative has been informed of the nature of the study, and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Medical Ethics Committee (MEC) of the respective clinical site. (Sample consent - Appendix A-2).
- Patient must meet two or more of the criteria listed in a-e OR one or more of the criteria listed in f-q below:
Show all 29Show fewer
- Knowledge of two or more proximal or major diseased coronary arteries with >=70% stenosis that have not, or cannot be revascularized;
- Unstable angina defined as rest angina with ECG changes;
- MI within the previous 30 days and current need for carotid artery revascularization
- Concurrent requirement for aortocoronary bypass or cardiac valve surgery within 30 days;
- Contralateral occlusion of the ICA;
- Currently on a list for major organ transplantation (i.e. heart, lung, liver, kidney) or is being evaluated for such;
- Ejection fraction <30% or New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or higher;
- FEV1 <30% (Predicted);
- Dialysis-dependent renal failure;
- Uncontrolled diabetes defined as fasting glucose >400 mg/dl and ketones >2+;
- Restenosis after previous CEA (defined as >=50% by angiography for symptomatic patients or >=80% by angiography for asymptomatic patients);
- Patient is status/post radiation treatment to the neck;
- Patient is status/post radical neck surgery;
- Surgically inaccessible lesions (e.g. lesions above the level of C2 or below the clavicle, lesions obstructed by tumors in the neck);
- Spinal immobility - inability to flex neck beyond neutral or kyphotic deformity;
- Presence of tracheostomy stoma;
- Contralateral laryngeal nerve paralysis. Anatomic Inclusion Criteria NOTE: Angiographic measurements must be made utilizing either on-line quantitative carotid angiography (QCA) or electronic calipers with magnification correction.
- 1. Patient has a discrete lesion located in the ICA (with or without involvement of the contiguous CCA).
- 2. Carotid stenosis must be >= 50% by angiography (symptomatic patient) or >= 80% by angiography (asymptomatic patient).
- 3. Target ICA vessel reference diameter must be >=4.0 mm and =<9.0 mm by angiography.
- NOTE: Patients with bilateral carotid stenosis are eligible. Management of the non-study stenosis may be done in accordance with local Principal Investigator recommendation. Treatment of the non-study artery must take place either >30 days before or >30 days after the study procedure is completed.
- Specific for the ACCUNET System 4. Expected ability to deliver the ACCUNET System distal to the lesion (absence of excessive tortuosity) and an available straight or mildly angulated segment >= 4 cm, by angiography, in the distal ICA (prior to the petrous portion of the vessel) in which to place the embolic protection device.
- 5. The diameter of the straight or mildly angulated segment, in the distal ICA prior to the petrous portion of the vessel, must be >= 3.25 mm and =< 7.5 mm by angiography.
Who cannot join
- Candidates will be ineligible for enrollment in the study if any one of the following conditions apply:
- Patient has an evolving stroke.
- Patient has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to any of the study medications or materials, including heparin, aspirin, baby aspirin, nitinol, or x-ray contrast.
- Patient has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to both ticlopidine and clopidogrel.
- Patient has active bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions.
- Patient has a history of major ipsilateral stroke likely to confound study endpoints.
Show all 27Show fewer
- Patient has severe dementia.
- Patient has a history of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage within the past 12 months.
- Patient has had a recent (<7 days) stroke of sufficient size (on CT or MRI) to place him or her at risk of hemorrhagic conversion during the procedure.
- Patient had hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic stroke within the past 60 days.
- Patient has Hgb < 8 gm/dl (unless on dialysis), platelet count < 50,000, uncorrected INR > 1.5, or heparin-associated thrombocytopenia.
- Patient has any condition that precludes proper angiographic assessment or makes percutaneous arterial access unsafe (e.g. morbid obesity, sustained SBP > 180 mm Hg.).
- Patient has had neurologic illness within the past two years characterized by fleeting or fixed neurologic deficit which cannot be distinguished from TIA or stroke (e.g. partial or secondarily generalized seizures; complicated or classic migraine; tumor or other space-occupying brain lesions; subdural hematoma, cerebral contusion or other post-traumatic lesions; intracranial infection; demyelinating disease; moderate to severe dementia; or intracranial hemorrhage).
- Patient is actively participating in another drug or device trial (IND or IDE) that has not completed the required protocol follow-up period. Patients may be enrolled only once in the ARCHeR clinical trial and may not participate in any other clinical trial during the ARCHeR follow-up period.
- Patient or patient's legally authorized representative is unable to understand and cooperate with study procedures or provide informed consent.
- Patient has a life expectancy less than two years.
- Patient has vertebrobasilar insufficiency symptoms only, without clearly identifiable symptoms referable to the targeted carotid artery
- Knowledge of cardiac sources of emboli (e.g. left ventricular aneurysm, atrial fibrillation, intracardiac filling defect, cardiomyopathy, aortic or mitral prosthetic heart valve, cardioversion of atrial fibrillation within 30 days prior to intervention, calcific aortic stenosis, endocarditis, mitral stenosis, atrial septal defect (ASD), atrial septal aneurysm, or left atrial myxoma).
- Patient has had a recent GI bleed that would interfere with antiplatelet therapy.
- Anatomic Exclusions
- Severe vascular tortuosity or anatomy that would preclude the safe introduction of a guide catheter, guide sheath, embolic protection system, or stent system.
- Presence of previously placed intravascular stent or intravascular graft in the ipsilateral distribution. (Patch grafts are not an exclusion criterion.)
- Presence of extensive or diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving the aortic arch and proximal common carotid artery that would preclude the safe introduction of a guide catheter or guide sheath.
- An intraluminal filling defect (defined as an endoluminal lucency surrounded by contrast, seen in multiple angiographic projections, in the absence of angiographic evidence of calcification) that is not associated with an ulcerated target lesion
- Other abnormal angiographic findings such as: ipsilateral intracranial or extracranial arterial stenosis greater in severity than the lesion to be treated, cerebral aneurysm >= 5 mm, AVM (arteriovenous malformation) of the cerebral vasculature, AV fistula, or other confounding intracranial lesion.
- Bilateral carotid stenosis if the intervention is planned within the 30-day ARCHeR periprocedure period.
- Occlusion [Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Trial (TIMI 0)] or "string sign" >1 cm of the ipsilateral common or internal carotid artery.
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Non-Randomized, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Trial to Assess Safety & Efficacy of the Acculink Carotid Stent System With the Accunet Embolic Protection System in High-Risk Patients With Carotid Artery Lesions.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the over-the-wire (OTW) ACCULINK (tm) System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA)
- To evaluate the efficacy of the OTW ACCUNET System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
- To demonstrate equivalence in the safety and performance of the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System and RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System and the corresponding OTW devices.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate equivalence in the safety and performance of the RX ACCUNET when used with the RX ACCULINK, to that of the ACCULINK and ACCUNET devices, in the treatment of high risk surgical patients and patients with anatomical risks who require treatment for carotid artery disease.
Patients in ARCHeR RX will be followed after the index procedure at one, six and 12 months. Equivalence in safety will be demonstrated by comparing 30-day rates of DSMI for ARCHeR Amendment 2 and ARCHeR RX. Secondary analyses will be performed on the rate of ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 12 months, target lesion revascularization at six and 12 months, acute device success for the RX ACCULINK and RX ACCUNET Systems, clinical success, and access site complications requiring treatment. Additionally, the stented segment will be evaluated by carotid duplex ultrasound at six and 12 months. Serious adverse events (SAE) of death or ipsilateral stroke that occur anytime during the follow-up period will be identified and reported, and will be adjudicated if indicated.
- Conditions
- Carotid Atherosclerosis, Carotid Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Over-the-wire & Rapid Exchange ACCULINK (tm) Carotid Stent & ACCUNET (tm) embolic protection system
- Keywords
- Carotid artery disease, High risk, High surgical risk
- Medical subject headings
- Carotid Artery Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Over-the-wire & Rapid Exchange ACCULINK (tm) Carotid Stent & ACCUNET (tm) embolic protection systemDevice
Two rapid exchange devices will be evaluated: the RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System ("RX ACCUNET") and the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System ("RX ACCULINK").
The RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System is intended to facilitate the placement of diagnostic and therapeutic devices during interventional procedures and to capture embolic material that may be present during carotid artery interventional procedures.
The RX ACCULINK™ Carotid Stent System is intended for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in the internal carotid artery (ICA), with or without involvement of the contiguous common carotid artery (CCA), in asymptomatic patients and symptomatic patients.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the over-the-wire (OTW) ACCULINK (tm) System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) To evaluate the efficacy of the OTW ACCUNET System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
To demonstrate equivalence in the safety and performance of the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System and RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System and the corresponding OTW devices. Receives: Device: Over-the-wire & Rapid Exchange ACCULINK (tm) Carotid Stent & ACCUNET (tm) embolic protection system |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
All Stroke, death and MI
Measured: within 30 days
Secondary outcomes (7)
Ipsilateral stroke
Measured: between 31 days and 12 months
2. Target vessel revascularization
Measured: six and 12 months
3. Ultrasound evaluation
Measured: six and 12 months
4. Acute device success for the RX ACCULINK System
Measured: Acute
5. Acute device success for the RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System
Measured: Acute
6. Clinical Success
Measured: Acute
7. Access site complications requiring treatment.
Measured: Acute
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2000
- Primary completionOct 2003
- Study completionNov 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Carotid AtherosclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abbott Medical DevicesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 581 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- L. Nelson Hopkins, M.D., Principal investigator, Millard Fillmore Hospital, Buffalo, NYMark H. Wholey, MD, Principal investigator, Shadyside Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00180518
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 99-706
- Status last verified
- Sep 2008
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 12 Sep 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Naylor AR. Regarding "Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results". J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45(1):222-3; author reply 223-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.089. No abstract available.
PubMed 17210414Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S, Davis T, Wholey M, Atkinson R, Cremonesi A, Fairman R, Walker G, Verta P, Popma J, Virmani R, Cohen DJ; ARCHeR Trial Collaborators. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Aug;44(2):258-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044.
PubMed 16890850Schonholz CJ, Uflacker R, Parodi JC, Hannegan C, Selby B. Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006 Apr;47(2):137-41.
PubMed 16572087Kasirajan K. What is the latest in inventory for carotid stenting and cerebral protection? Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2005 Jun;17(2):135-41. doi: 10.1177/153100350501700217.
PubMed 16110380Gray WA. Endovascular treatment of extra-cranial carotid artery bifurcation disease. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2005 Feb;53(1):69-77.
PubMed 15788981Gray WA. A cardiologist in the carotids. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 5;43(9):1602-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.051.
PubMed 15120818Illig KA, Zhang R, Tanski W, Benesch C, Sternbach Y, Green RM. Is the rationale for carotid angioplasty and stenting in patients excluded from NASCET/ACAS or eligible for ARCHeR justified? J Vasc Surg. 2003 Mar;37(3):575-81. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.79.
PubMed 12618695
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Sep 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Non-Randomized, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Trial to Assess Safety & Efficacy of the Acculink Carotid Stent System With the Accunet Embolic Protection System in High-Risk Patients With Carotid Artery Lesions.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00180518
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 99-706
- Conditions
- Carotid Atherosclerosis, Carotid Artery Disease
- Keywords
- Carotid artery disease, High risk, High surgical risk
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 581 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical DevicesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2000
- Primary completion
- Oct 2003 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2003 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the over-the-wire (OTW) ACCULINK (tm) System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA)
- To evaluate the efficacy of the OTW ACCUNET System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
- To demonstrate equivalence in the safety and performance of the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System and RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System and the corresponding OTW devices.
Detailed description
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate equivalence in the safety and performance of the RX ACCUNET when used with the RX ACCULINK, to that of the ACCULINK and ACCUNET devices, in the treatment of high risk surgical patients and patients with anatomical risks who require treatment for carotid artery disease.
Patients in ARCHeR RX will be followed after the index procedure at one, six and 12 months. Equivalence in safety will be demonstrated by comparing 30-day rates of DSMI for ARCHeR Amendment 2 and ARCHeR RX. Secondary analyses will be performed on the rate of ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 12 months, target lesion revascularization at six and 12 months, acute device success for the RX ACCULINK and RX ACCUNET Systems, clinical success, and access site complications requiring treatment. Additionally, the stented segment will be evaluated by carotid duplex ultrasound at six and 12 months. Serious adverse events (SAE) of death or ipsilateral stroke that occur anytime during the follow-up period will be identified and reported, and will be adjudicated if indicated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Device: Over-the-wire & Rapid Exchange ACCULINK (tm) Carotid Stent & ACCUNET (tm) embolic protection systemTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of the over-the-wire (OTW) ACCULINK (tm) System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) To evaluate the efficacy of the OTW ACCUNET System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). To demonstrate equivalence in the safety and performance of the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System and RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System and the corresponding OTW devices. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (29 listed)
- Patient age >=18.
- Symptomatic patient: Transient ischemic attack (TIA), amaurosis fugax, or minor/non-disabling stroke (in the hemisphere supplied by the target vessel) within 180 days of enrollment; asymptomatic patient: meets angiographic and clinical inclusion criteria.
- Patient has no childbearing potential or a negative pregnancy test within 30 days of study procedure.
- Patient or legally authorized representative, and the patient's physician, agree to have the patient return for all required clinical contacts following study enrollment.
- Patient or legally authorized representative has been informed of the nature of the study, and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Medical Ethics Committee (MEC) of the respective clinical site. (Sample consent - Appendix A-2).
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- Candidates will be ineligible for enrollment in the study if any one of the following conditions apply:
- Patient has an evolving stroke.
- Patient has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to any of the study medications or materials, including heparin, aspirin, baby aspirin, nitinol, or x-ray contrast.
- Patient has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to both ticlopidine and clopidogrel.
- Patient has active bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Over-the-wire & Rapid Exchange ACCULINK (tm) Carotid Stent & ACCUNET (tm) embolic protection systemTwo rapid exchange devices will be evaluated: the RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System ("RX ACCUNET") and the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System ("RX ACCULINK"). The RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System is intended to facilitate the placement of diagnostic and therapeutic devices during interventional procedures and to capture embolic material that may be present during carotid artery interventional procedures. The RX ACCULINK™ Carotid Stent System is intended for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in the internal carotid artery (ICA), with or without involvement of the contiguous common carotid artery (CCA), in asymptomatic patients and symptomatic patients. | Device | 1 |
Primary outcome
All Stroke, death and MI
Time frame: within 30 days
7 secondary outcomes
Ipsilateral stroke
Time frame: between 31 days and 12 months
2. Target vessel revascularization
Time frame: six and 12 months
3. Ultrasound evaluation
Time frame: six and 12 months
4. Acute device success for the RX ACCULINK System
Time frame: Acute
5. Acute device success for the RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System
Time frame: Acute
6. Clinical Success
Time frame: Acute
7. Access site complications requiring treatment.
Time frame: Acute
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Sep 2008.
- Background: PubMed 17210414Naylor AR. Regarding "Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results". J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45(1):222-3; author reply 223-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.089. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16890850Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S, Davis T, Wholey M, Atkinson R, Cremonesi A, Fairman R, Walker G, Verta P, Popma J, Virmani R, Cohen DJ; ARCHeR Trial Collaborators. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Aug;44(2):258-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044.
- Background: PubMed 16572087Schonholz CJ, Uflacker R, Parodi JC, Hannegan C, Selby B. Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006 Apr;47(2):137-41.
- Background: PubMed 16110380Kasirajan K. What is the latest in inventory for carotid stenting and cerebral protection? Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2005 Jun;17(2):135-41. doi: 10.1177/153100350501700217.
- Background: PubMed 15788981Gray WA. Endovascular treatment of extra-cranial carotid artery bifurcation disease. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2005 Feb;53(1):69-77.
- Background: PubMed 15120818Gray WA. A cardiologist in the carotids. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 5;43(9):1602-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.051.
- Background: PubMed 12618695Illig KA, Zhang R, Tanski W, Benesch C, Sternbach Y, Green RM. Is the rationale for carotid angioplasty and stenting in patients excluded from NASCET/ACAS or eligible for ARCHeR justified? J Vasc Surg. 2003 Mar;37(3):575-81. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.79.
Related trials for Carotid Atherosclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
PET-MR Imaging of Natriuretic Peptide Receptor C (NPR-C) in Carotid Atherosclerosis With 64Cu-NODAGA-CANF (Multisite)
Carotid Atherosclerosis, Carotid Artery Stenosis Asymptomatic
Recruiting
Isometric Resistance Exercise on Accelerated Atherosclerosis in Hypertension
Atherosclerosis Cardiovascular Disease
Recruiting
Predicting High-Risk Carotid Plaque: Integrating radioMics and biomEchanics
Carotid Artery, Carotid Arteriosclerosis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Rosa Roxburghii Tratt Freeze-Dried Powder on Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques: A Real-World Study
Carotid Artery Plaques, Atherosclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
L. Nelson Hopkins, M.D. principal investigator
Millard Fillmore Hospital, Buffalo, NY
Mark H. Wholey, MD principal investigator
Shadyside Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Over-the-wire & Rapid Exchange ACCULINK (tm) Carotid Stent & ACCUNET (tm) embolic protection system in people with Carotid Atherosclerosis and Carotid Artery Disease, run by Abbott Medical Devices.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 29 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
All Stroke, death and MI (time frame: within 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00180518, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2008.