Squamous Cell CarcinomaPhase 2NCT00176254
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Radiotherapy as Induction Therapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Radiotherapy, Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in people with Squamous Cell Carcinoma, run by Susanne Arnold.
Trial summary
This study utilizes two cycles of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin chemotherapies followed by four small doses of radiation, prior to other treatment (surgery or radiation). This study is evaluating if radiation as a chemoenhancer increases the response rate of initial therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Radiotherapy, Paclitaxel and Carboplatin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2000to Oct 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients greater than 18 years of age.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2.
- Patients with pathologically documented bulky T2, III and IV squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (excluding M1 disease), within 2 months of diagnosis. Bulky T2 tumors are defined as those that have a volume of disease greater than 35 cm3 as measured by CT or MRI scan (26).
- Patients will be medically fit for undergoing chemotherapy. Specifically:
- no evidence of active angina pectoris or ventricular arrhythmias; no myocardial infarction within the last six months. (Patients with medically controlled hypertension or congestive heart failure are eligible.)
- an absolute neutrophil count of > 1000/uL and platelet count > 100,000/microliter (uL)
Show all 13Show fewer
- serum total bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dL
- Creatinine Clearance greater than 50 ml/min
- Using an actual or calculated creatinine clearance using the formula:
- (140 - age) x (wgt in kg)/(serum creatinine)x(72)= multiply by 0.85 for females
- if a pre-existing grade I neuropathy exists, patients must be willing to risk worsening neuropathy secondary to Paclitaxel. Patients with grade II or greater neuropathy will be excluded from study.
- ability to give written, informed consent to participate in the trial.
- Patients will have measurable disease as determined by MRI or CT scan or evaluable disease determined by panendoscopy to be eligible for enrollment on this study.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant females. Males and women of childbearing potential must use effective contraception in order to prevent pregnancy during therapy.
- Patients with a history of previous or current malignancy at other sites diagnosed within the last 5 years, with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Patients with a history of other malignancies, who remain free of recurrence or metastases for greater than five years are eligible.
- Patients with active infection will not be eligible for this protocol until the infection is treated and the symptoms have clinically resolved.
- Patients with a history of allergy to drugs utilizing Cremophor in the formulation.
- Prior induction chemotherapy, prior irradiation or surgery will not be allowed.
- Patients with metastatic disease will not be eligible for this study.
- Patients with grade II or greater peripheral neuropathy will be excluded from study.
About this study
This study utilizes two cycles of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin chemotherapies followed by four small doses of radiation, prior to other treatment (surgery or radiation). This study is evaluating if radiation as a chemoenhancer increases the response rate of initial therapy.
Read the detailed description
Cancers of the head and neck (H\&N) comprise 5% of all cancers, with 40,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Surgery followed by irradiation or irradiation alone has been the standard of care for locally advanced Stage III and IV patients. With this approach, fewer than 30% of patients achieve long-term remission, and most recur locoregionally. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been administered prior to definitive therapy with response rates ranging from 60-90%; with pathologic complete response (CR) rates documented in 30-70% of clinical responders. However, large randomized trials have shown no improvement in overall survival.
Because induction chemotherapy alone does not appear to improve long-term disease free survival in advanced head and neck cancers, concomitant chemotherapy and radiation has been pursued in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers. Improved disease-free survival has been demonstrated with a variety of agents. The concept of synergy between radiation and chemotherapy is well established in vitro. Various schedules of radiation and chemotherapy have been utilized including weekly chemotherapy during radiation, chemotherapy given every three weeks during hyperfractionated radiation and alternating chemotherapy and radiation.
One exciting new chemotherapeutic agent, Paclitaxel has been shown to radiosensitize cancer cell lines in vitro. Recent studies have added Carboplatin to Paclitaxel in tandem or concurrently with radiation in hopes of improving response rates. From in-vitro data, it appears that the optimum schedule for the combination of Paclitaxel and radiation is to first induce G2/M arrest with Paclitaxel and follow this with radiation therapy. In a recent study by Chendil, et al, a novel radiation scheme appeared to enhance the response of both p53 wild type and p53 mutant cancer cell lines to chemotherapy. In vitro data with Carboplatin also indicates an additive effect when given prior to irradiation using various cell lines. What has not been evaluated, is whether a neoadjuvant regimen of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin followed by 4 small fractions of radiation can be given safely and effect an improved response rate in patients with bulky T2, Stage III and IV H\&N cancer. We propose the use of two cycles of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin followed by four small fractions of radiation, prior to definitive treatment (surgery or radiation). It is hoped that using radiation as a chemoenhancer will increase the response rate to induction therapy in this population of patients.
- Conditions
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Radiotherapy, Paclitaxel, Carboplatin
- Keywords
- head and neck, squamous cell carcinoma, squamous cell, carcinoma, paclitaxel, carboplatin, radiotherapy, induction therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RadiotherapyRadiation
80 centigray (cGy) on Day 1 \& 2 and 22 \& 23 of chemotherapy
PaclitaxelDrug
Also called Taxol
225 mg/m2 intravenously over three hours on Days 1 and 22
CarboplatinDrug
Also called Paraplatin, CBDCA
Area under the curve (AUC) of 6 will be given intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1 and 22
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Induction chemotherapy and radiation | Experimental | Induction chemotherapy with low dose radiation Receives: Radiation: Radiotherapy; Drug: Paclitaxel; Drug: Carboplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Response Rate to Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Definitive Therapy (Surgery or Radiation)
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR
Measured: assessed pre-study and once between days 36-57
Secondary outcomes (4)
Frequency of Severe (>/= Grade 3) Toxicities
Measured: assessed starting on day 1 through study day 58 or until toxicity resolves
5 Year Overall Survival Rates
Measured: 5 years post study
5 Year Disease-specific Survival
Outcome is calculated from the time of enrollment to the time of death due to disease under study or survival to 5 years without death from disease under study, whichever occurs first.The 5-year rates of disease-specific survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: 5 years
5 Year Progression Free Survival
Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2000
- Primary completionOct 2012
- Study completionOct 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Squamous Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Susanne Arnold
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Susanne Arnold, University of Kentucky
- Investigators
- Susanne Arnold, MD, Principal investigator, University of Kentucky
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00176254
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 00-H&N-11-BMS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 16 May 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Radiotherapy as Induction Therapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00176254
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 00-H&N-11-BMS
- Conditions
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Keywords
- head and neck, squamous cell carcinoma, squamous cell, carcinoma, paclitaxel, carboplatin, radiotherapy, induction therapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Susanne ArnoldUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Study start
- May 2000
- Primary completion
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Jan 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study utilizes two cycles of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin chemotherapies followed by four small doses of radiation, prior to other treatment (surgery or radiation). This study is evaluating if radiation as a chemoenhancer increases the response rate of initial therapy.
Detailed description
Cancers of the head and neck (H\&N) comprise 5% of all cancers, with 40,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Surgery followed by irradiation or irradiation alone has been the standard of care for locally advanced Stage III and IV patients. With this approach, fewer than 30% of patients achieve long-term remission, and most recur locoregionally. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been administered prior to definitive therapy with response rates ranging from 60-90%; with pathologic complete response (CR) rates documented in 30-70% of clinical responders. However, large randomized trials have shown no improvement in overall survival.
Because induction chemotherapy alone does not appear to improve long-term disease free survival in advanced head and neck cancers, concomitant chemotherapy and radiation has been pursued in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers. Improved disease-free survival has been demonstrated with a variety of agents. The concept of synergy between radiation and chemotherapy is well established in vitro. Various schedules of radiation and chemotherapy have been utilized including weekly chemotherapy during radiation, chemotherapy given every three weeks during hyperfractionated radiation and alternating chemotherapy and radiation.
One exciting new chemotherapeutic agent, Paclitaxel has been shown to radiosensitize cancer cell lines in vitro. Recent studies have added Carboplatin to Paclitaxel in tandem or concurrently with radiation in hopes of improving response rates. From in-vitro data, it appears that the optimum schedule for the combination of Paclitaxel and radiation is to first induce G2/M arrest with Paclitaxel and follow this with radiation therapy. In a recent study by Chendil, et al, a novel radiation scheme appeared to enhance the response of both p53 wild type and p53 mutant cancer cell lines to chemotherapy. In vitro data with Carboplatin also indicates an additive effect when given prior to irradiation using various cell lines. What has not been evaluated, is whether a neoadjuvant regimen of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin followed by 4 small fractions of radiation can be given safely and effect an improved response rate in patients with bulky T2, Stage III and IV H\&N cancer. We propose the use of two cycles of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin followed by four small fractions of radiation, prior to definitive treatment (surgery or radiation). It is hoped that using radiation as a chemoenhancer will increase the response rate to induction therapy in this population of patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Induction chemotherapy and radiation | Experimental | Radiation: Radiotherapy, Drug: Paclitaxel, Drug: CarboplatinInduction chemotherapy with low dose radiation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Adult patients greater than 18 years of age.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2.
- Patients with pathologically documented bulky T2, III and IV squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (excluding M1 disease), within 2 months of diagnosis. Bulky T2 tumors are defined as those that have a volume of disease greater than 35 cm3 as measured by CT or MRI scan (26).
- Patients will be medically fit for undergoing chemotherapy. Specifically:
- (140 - age) x (wgt in kg)/(serum creatinine)x(72)= multiply by 0.85 for females
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Pregnant females. Males and women of childbearing potential must use effective contraception in order to prevent pregnancy during therapy.
- Patients with a history of previous or current malignancy at other sites diagnosed within the last 5 years, with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Patients with a history of other malignancies, who remain free of recurrence or metastases for greater than five years are eligible.
- Patients with active infection will not be eligible for this protocol until the infection is treated and the symptoms have clinically resolved.
- Patients with a history of allergy to drugs utilizing Cremophor in the formulation.
- Prior induction chemotherapy, prior irradiation or surgery will not be allowed.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Radiotherapy80 centigray (cGy) on Day 1 \& 2 and 22 \& 23 of chemotherapy | Radiation | Induction chemotherapy and radiation |
| PaclitaxelAlso: Taxol225 mg/m2 intravenously over three hours on Days 1 and 22 | Drug | Induction chemotherapy and radiation |
| CarboplatinAlso: Paraplatin, CBDCAArea under the curve (AUC) of 6 will be given intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1 and 22 | Drug | Induction chemotherapy and radiation |
Primary outcome
Response Rate to Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Definitive Therapy (Surgery or Radiation)
Time frame: assessed pre-study and once between days 36-57
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR
4 secondary outcomes
Frequency of Severe (>/= Grade 3) Toxicities
Time frame: assessed starting on day 1 through study day 58 or until toxicity resolves
5 Year Overall Survival Rates
Time frame: 5 years post study
5 Year Disease-specific Survival
Time frame: 5 years
5 Year Progression Free Survival
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Susanne Arnold, MD principal investigator
University of Kentucky
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Radiotherapy, Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in people with Squamous Cell Carcinoma, run by Susanne Arnold.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jan 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Response Rate to Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Definitive Therapy (Surgery or Radiation) (time frame: assessed pre-study and once between days 36-57). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2023.