Endocrine System DiseasesPhase 3NCT00174291
Prevention of Growth Retardation by Early Treatment With Growth Hormone (GH) in Children With CJA Treated by Corticosteroid Therapy
A Phase 3 study testing Somatropin in people with Endocrine System Diseases, run by Pfizer at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
To evaluate the effect of increasing the growth hormone dose on the statural response To assess the value of early treatment during the course of arthritic disease by comparing the height acquired in the medium term by children in the two groups: treated from the start, or 1 year to 15 months after the diagnosis of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 14 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Endocrine System Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Somatropin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Mar 2002to Oct 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 14 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- This study will be proposed to all patients previously included in study CTN 97-8129-016
Who cannot join
- Discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy for more than a year during study CTN 97-8129-016
- Patients withdrawing from the study prematurely
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prevention of Retarded Growth by Early Treatment With Recombinant Human Growth Factor Genotonorm (Registered) in Children With Systemic Forms of Chronic Juvenile Arthritis Receiving Long-term Corticosteroid Therapy. Extension of the Study Beyond Three Years
- To evaluate the effect of increasing the growth hormone dose on the statural response
- To assess the value of early treatment during the course of arthritic disease by comparing the height acquired in the medium term by children in the two groups: treated from the start, or 1 year to 15 months after the diagnosis of CJA, or treated for 4 years after the diagnosis
Read the detailed description
This trial terminated on 10-Jun-2011 due to prolonged issues with drug accountability and data collection discrepancies. The decision to terminate was not based on any safety concerns.
- Conditions
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Being tested
- Somatropin
- Medical subject headings
- Endocrine System Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SomatropinDrug
Liquid, daily to final height Maximum Dosage: 50 µg/kg/day
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Somatropin | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Somatropin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Annual Rate of Growth Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3
Annual rate of growth SDS was obtained by measuring the annual growth rate, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean annual growth rate and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Measured: Baseline, Year 3
Change From Baseline in Annual Rate of Growth Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height
Annual rate of growth SDS was obtained by measuring the annual growth rate, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean annual growth rate and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Measured: Baseline, final height (assessed up to Year 9.5)
Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3
Height was measured using a wall mounted device (example, Harpenden stadiometer). Height SDS was obtained by measuring the height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Measured: Baseline, Year 3
Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height
Height was measured using a wall mounted device (example, Harpenden stadiometer). Height SDS was obtained by measuring the height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Measured: Baseline, final height (assessed up to Year 9.5)
Change From Baseline in Predicted Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3
Predicted height was calculated according to Greulich and Pyle using Bayley Pinneau method. Predicted height SDS was obtained by calculating the predicted height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean predicted height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Measured: Baseline, Year 3
Change From Baseline in Predicted Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height
Predicted height was calculated according to Greulich and Pyle using Bayley Pinneau method. Predicted height SDS was obtained by calculating the predicted height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean predicted height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Measured: Baseline, final height (assessed up to Year 9.5)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Concentration at Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9
Measured: Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9
Change From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP3) Concentration at Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9
Measured: Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9
Change From Baseline in Lean Mass and Fat Mass at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9
Lean mass and fat mass: measurements of body composition assessed using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineralization at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9
Bone mineralization, an estimate of the amount of mineral (such as calcium) in the bone, was assessed using DEXA scan.
Measured: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Change From Baseline in Weight Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9
Body weight was measured using a balance scale. Weight SDS was obtained by measuring the weight, subtracting age- and gender- appropriate mean weight and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Measured: Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9
Change From Baseline in Corticosteroid Dose at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9
Measured: Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2002
- Primary completionOct 2011
- Study completionOct 2011
Why it stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Endocrine System DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00174291
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 307-MET-9002-052
- Other IDs
- A6281024
- Status last verified
- Oct 2012
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 4 Dec 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
David H, Aupiais C, Louveau B, Quartier P, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Carel JC, Simon D. Growth Outcomes After GH Therapy of Patients Given Long-Term Corticosteroids for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Dec 1;102(12):4578-4587. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-01455.
PubMed 29029101
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Dec 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevention of Retarded Growth by Early Treatment With Recombinant Human Growth Factor Genotonorm (Registered) in Children With Systemic Forms of Chronic Juvenile Arthritis Receiving Long-term Corticosteroid Therapy. Extension of the Study Beyond Three Years
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00174291
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 307-MET-9002-052
- Conditions
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2002
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Dec 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- To evaluate the effect of increasing the growth hormone dose on the statural response
- To assess the value of early treatment during the course of arthritic disease by comparing the height acquired in the medium term by children in the two groups: treated from the start, or 1 year to 15 months after the diagnosis of CJA, or treated for 4 years after the diagnosis
Detailed description
This trial terminated on 10-Jun-2011 due to prolonged issues with drug accountability and data collection discrepancies. The decision to terminate was not based on any safety concerns.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Somatropin | Experimental | Drug: Somatropin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- This study will be proposed to all patients previously included in study CTN 97-8129-016
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy for more than a year during study CTN 97-8129-016
- Patients withdrawing from the study prematurely
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SomatropinLiquid, daily to final height Maximum Dosage: 50 µg/kg/day | Drug | Somatropin |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Annual Rate of Growth Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3
Time frame: Baseline, Year 3
Annual rate of growth SDS was obtained by measuring the annual growth rate, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean annual growth rate and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Change From Baseline in Annual Rate of Growth Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height
Time frame: Baseline, final height (assessed up to Year 9.5)
Annual rate of growth SDS was obtained by measuring the annual growth rate, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean annual growth rate and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3
Time frame: Baseline, Year 3
Height was measured using a wall mounted device (example, Harpenden stadiometer). Height SDS was obtained by measuring the height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height
Time frame: Baseline, final height (assessed up to Year 9.5)
Height was measured using a wall mounted device (example, Harpenden stadiometer). Height SDS was obtained by measuring the height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Change From Baseline in Predicted Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3
Time frame: Baseline, Year 3
Predicted height was calculated according to Greulich and Pyle using Bayley Pinneau method. Predicted height SDS was obtained by calculating the predicted height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean predicted height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Change From Baseline in Predicted Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height
Time frame: Baseline, final height (assessed up to Year 9.5)
Predicted height was calculated according to Greulich and Pyle using Bayley Pinneau method. Predicted height SDS was obtained by calculating the predicted height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean predicted height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
6 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Concentration at Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9
Time frame: Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9
Change From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP3) Concentration at Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9
Time frame: Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9
Change From Baseline in Lean Mass and Fat Mass at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineralization at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9
Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Change From Baseline in Weight Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9
Time frame: Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9
Change From Baseline in Corticosteroid Dose at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9
Time frame: Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Dec 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29029101David H, Aupiais C, Louveau B, Quartier P, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Carel JC, Simon D. Growth Outcomes After GH Therapy of Patients Given Long-Term Corticosteroids for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Dec 1;102(12):4578-4587. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-01455.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Endocrine System Diseases
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Somatropin in people with Endocrine System Diseases, run by Pfizer at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Dec 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Annual Rate of Growth Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3 (time frame: Baseline, Year 3). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00174291, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2012.