Surgical Wound InfectionPhase 4NCT00164099
The Role of Synbiotics in Reducing Post-Operative Infections in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Pilot Study
A Phase 4 study testing Synbiotic 2000 in people with Surgical Wound Infection and Cystitis, run by Beth Israel Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
All surgical procedures carry with them the risk of infection. Even a minor infection can extend the hospitalization after cardiac surgery. The average minimum increase in length of stay for a single infection is three days. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgical Wound Infection, Cystitis, Bacteremia
- What is being tested?
- Synbiotic 2000
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2005to Jun 2007
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Undergoing cardiac surgery, able to consent, and at least one of the following:
- Age >65 years
- ejection fraction <=40%
- diabetes mellitus (insulin requiring and non-insulin requiring)
- peripheral vascular disease
- creatinine >=2 mg/dl
Show all 10Show fewer
- body surface area >= 2 sq meters
- endocarditis
- albumin <=2.5 g/dl
- on antibiotics for any reason other than operative prophylaxis
Who cannot join
- Unable to consent
- Not meeting inclusion criteria
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Beth Israel Medical Center
New York, New York, 10003
About this study
All surgical procedures carry with them the risk of infection. Even a minor infection can extend the hospitalization after cardiac surgery. The average minimum increase in length of stay for a single infection is three days.
One of the many means used to reduce post-operative infections is the preventative, or "prophylactic", administration of antibiotics just before and just after surgery. Because antibiotics, and for that matter surgery itself, alter the body's natural immune and inflammatory responses and the makeup of the bacteria in the intestine, there is a great deal of scientific interest in using the supplementation of bacteria that naturally reside in the intestine. It is felt that by doing so, the alterations in the immune response may be corrected and the patient better able to fight infections. There are studies using probiotics that have demonstrated a reduction in infection rates in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
Read more
Subjects will be patients at high risk for infection including those with any one or more of the following characteristics: over 65 years old, poor heart function (ejection fraction <40), diabetes (insulin dependant or non-insulin dependant), peripheral vascular disease, kidney dysfunction (creatinine level >2mg/dl), obesity (body surface area > 2 m2), low serum protein levels (albumin < 2.5 mg/dl), infection of the heart valve (endocarditis), or on any antibiotics other than standard prophylaxis before surgery.
The safety of these products has been very well established.
Patients who consent to enter the study will receive the synbiotic mix, or a placebo, which comes in a powder that may be mixed with a drink, or washed down into the stomach through the NG tube if the patient is still on a ventilator. Dosing will be initiated within four hours of patient arrival in the Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit and will continue on a twice daily basis for the duration of their admission days. Infection and diarrhea data will be monitored.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Despite progress in surgical methodology, infections remain one of the most difficult post-operative complications to prevent. In cardiac surgery, the presence of an infection can make the difference between a brief hospital stay and a life-threatening illness. The average minimum increase in length of stay due to a single infection is three days and can extend to months. Nationally, the average rate of deep sternal wound infection is 3% and conduit harvest site infection 1.4%.
Because of the intimate relationship between intestinal bacterial flora and normal gut and immunologic function, current research is investigating the relationship between the preservation or augmentation of certain naturally occurring bacterial strains in the intestine and clinical outcomes, particularly infectious. We propose to examine the efficacy of immediate post-operative supplementation with a product containing four bacterial strains and four different fibers, putatively fuel for bacterial growth, in reducing infections.
Until recently, most studies performed with LAB have selected strains for their palatability and usability in yogurts. For this reason, most studies have been based on LAB, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, L.casei, L. delbrueckii och Bifidobacillus adolescentis, B.bifidum, B.longum and Bifidobacterium infantis, which are common in yogurts and kefirs. It is only recently that interest has been focused on developing criteria for selecting LAB based on intraluminal biology, such as the ability to adhere to mucus or mucosal cells, the ability to ferment resistant fibers, and antioxidant capacity. For example, L.plantarum, which is often recovered from fermented fruits, vegetables, sourdoughs and silage, has been demonstrated to have a strong ability to adhere to mucosa and to break down resistant fibers. L. plantarum is the commonest LAB in human gastrointestinal tract and has shown the greatest ability of all LAB tested to survive in the gut (106 times that of L.rhamnosus for example) and activate cytokine secretion after passage through the stomach and the small intestine.
The clinical impact of a particular LAB is strongly associated with its ability to colonize the intestinal mucosa. LAB common in dairy products such as yogurts (L.Acidophilus, L.bulgaris and bifidobacteria) have very limited ability to colonize intestinal mucosal cells. L.rhamnosus (GG) and even more so L.plantarum (299) have been shown to remain viable up to 28 days post supplementation. L.plantarum is unique as it uses carbohydrate receptors (mannose) similar to those of gram-negative bacteria (E.coli, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Salmonella, Shigella, Pseudomonas and Vibrio cholerae). L. plantarum has also been shown to prevent adhesion of enteropathogenic E.coli through induction of mRNA expression for the intestinal mucins MUC2 and MUC3.
Design of the present study 75 consecutive patients deemed at high risk for post-operative infection will be prospectively and blindly randomized to one of the following three groups:
- Lactic acid bacteria and fermentable fiber
- Fermentable fiber alone
- Non-fermentable (placebo)
Sachets containing LAB plus fiber, fiber alone, or placebo will be provided by the manufacturer and will be randomized, coded, and assigned to patients in order. Patients will begin receiving doses within 4 hours of arrival to the CSICU and will remain on treatment twice daily for 14 days.
Data collection Infection control data are collected on all patients undergoing cardiac surgery using established institutional definitions for infections. Incidence of sternal infections, donor site infections, vein harvest site infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, catheter and blood stream infections, and clostridium difficile colitis will be considered. In addition, the incidence of diarrhea, defined as stools of liquid or gelatinous consistency, or more than three stools in one day, will be monitored. Data will be collected during hospital stay and at one-month follow-up. Finally, C-reactive protein levels, which are commonly assessed during hospitalizations and used as part of the assessment for coronary risk, will be drawn pre-operatively and four days post-operatively.
- Conditions
- Surgical Wound Infection, Cystitis, Bacteremia, Pneumonia, Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous
- Being tested
- Synbiotic 2000
- Keywords
- Coronary Artery Bypass, Postoperative Complications, Probiotics, Surgical Wound infection, cystitis, bacteremia, pneumonia, Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous
- Medical subject headings
- Surgical Wound Infection, Cystitis, Bacteremia, Pneumonia, Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous, Postoperative Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Synbiotic 2000Drug
See protocol - 4 bacteria, 4 fiber mixture
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Infection
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Tolerance
Measured: 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2005
- Study completionJun 2007
Why it stopped: Patients would not take product
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Surgical Wound InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beth Israel Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- David S Seres, MD, Principal investigator, Beth Israel Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00164099
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 224-04
- Status last verified
- Sep 2006
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2007
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Role of Synbiotics in Reducing Post-Operative Infections in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00164099
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 224-04
- Conditions
- Surgical Wound Infection, Cystitis, Bacteremia, Pneumonia, Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous
- Keywords
- Coronary Artery Bypass, Postoperative Complications, Probiotics, Surgical Wound infection, cystitis, bacteremia, pneumonia, Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Patients would not take product
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Beth Israel Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2005
- Study completion
- Jun 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
All surgical procedures carry with them the risk of infection. Even a minor infection can extend the hospitalization after cardiac surgery. The average minimum increase in length of stay for a single infection is three days.
One of the many means used to reduce post-operative infections is the preventative, or "prophylactic", administration of antibiotics just before and just after surgery. Because antibiotics, and for that matter surgery itself, alter the body's natural immune and inflammatory responses and the makeup of the bacteria in the intestine, there is a great deal of scientific interest in using the supplementation of bacteria that naturally reside in the intestine. It is felt that by doing so, the alterations in the immune response may be corrected and the patient better able to fight infections. There are studies using probiotics that have demonstrated a reduction in infection rates in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
Subjects will be patients at high risk for infection including those with any one or more of the following characteristics: over 65 years old, poor heart function (ejection fraction <40), diabetes (insulin dependant or non-insulin dependant), peripheral vascular disease, kidney dysfunction (creatinine level >2mg/dl), obesity (body surface area > 2 m2), low serum protein levels (albumin < 2.5 mg/dl), infection of the heart valve (endocarditis), or on any antibiotics other than standard prophylaxis before surgery.
The safety of these products has been very well established.
Patients who consent to enter the study will receive the synbiotic mix, or a placebo, which comes in a powder that may be mixed with a drink, or washed down into the stomach through the NG tube if the patient is still on a ventilator. Dosing will be initiated within four hours of patient arrival in the Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit and will continue on a twice daily basis for the duration of their admission days. Infection and diarrhea data will be monitored.
Detailed description
Background:
Despite progress in surgical methodology, infections remain one of the most difficult post-operative complications to prevent. In cardiac surgery, the presence of an infection can make the difference between a brief hospital stay and a life-threatening illness. The average minimum increase in length of stay due to a single infection is three days and can extend to months. Nationally, the average rate of deep sternal wound infection is 3% and conduit harvest site infection 1.4%.
Because of the intimate relationship between intestinal bacterial flora and normal gut and immunologic function, current research is investigating the relationship between the preservation or augmentation of certain naturally occurring bacterial strains in the intestine and clinical outcomes, particularly infectious. We propose to examine the efficacy of immediate post-operative supplementation with a product containing four bacterial strains and four different fibers, putatively fuel for bacterial growth, in reducing infections.
Until recently, most studies performed with LAB have selected strains for their palatability and usability in yogurts. For this reason, most studies have been based on LAB, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, L.casei, L. delbrueckii och Bifidobacillus adolescentis, B.bifidum, B.longum and Bifidobacterium infantis, which are common in yogurts and kefirs. It is only recently that interest has been focused on developing criteria for selecting LAB based on intraluminal biology, such as the ability to adhere to mucus or mucosal cells, the ability to ferment resistant fibers, and antioxidant capacity. For example, L.plantarum, which is often recovered from fermented fruits, vegetables, sourdoughs and silage, has been demonstrated to have a strong ability to adhere to mucosa and to break down resistant fibers. L. plantarum is the commonest LAB in human gastrointestinal tract and has shown the greatest ability of all LAB tested to survive in the gut (106 times that of L.rhamnosus for example) and activate cytokine secretion after passage through the stomach and the small intestine.
The clinical impact of a particular LAB is strongly associated with its ability to colonize the intestinal mucosa. LAB common in dairy products such as yogurts (L.Acidophilus, L.bulgaris and bifidobacteria) have very limited ability to colonize intestinal mucosal cells. L.rhamnosus (GG) and even more so L.plantarum (299) have been shown to remain viable up to 28 days post supplementation. L.plantarum is unique as it uses carbohydrate receptors (mannose) similar to those of gram-negative bacteria (E.coli, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Salmonella, Shigella, Pseudomonas and Vibrio cholerae). L. plantarum has also been shown to prevent adhesion of enteropathogenic E.coli through induction of mRNA expression for the intestinal mucins MUC2 and MUC3.
Design of the present study 75 consecutive patients deemed at high risk for post-operative infection will be prospectively and blindly randomized to one of the following three groups:
- Lactic acid bacteria and fermentable fiber
- Fermentable fiber alone
- Non-fermentable (placebo)
Sachets containing LAB plus fiber, fiber alone, or placebo will be provided by the manufacturer and will be randomized, coded, and assigned to patients in order. Patients will begin receiving doses within 4 hours of arrival to the CSICU and will remain on treatment twice daily for 14 days.
Data collection Infection control data are collected on all patients undergoing cardiac surgery using established institutional definitions for infections. Incidence of sternal infections, donor site infections, vein harvest site infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, catheter and blood stream infections, and clostridium difficile colitis will be considered. In addition, the incidence of diarrhea, defined as stools of liquid or gelatinous consistency, or more than three stools in one day, will be monitored. Data will be collected during hospital stay and at one-month follow-up. Finally, C-reactive protein levels, which are commonly assessed during hospitalizations and used as part of the assessment for coronary risk, will be drawn pre-operatively and four days post-operatively.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Undergoing cardiac surgery, able to consent, and at least one of the following:
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Unable to consent
- Not meeting inclusion criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Synbiotic 2000See protocol - 4 bacteria, 4 fiber mixture | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Infection
Time frame: 3 months
1 secondary outcome
Tolerance
Time frame: 2 weeks
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Patients would not take product). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2007.
Related trials for Surgical Wound Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of NTP in Thyroid Surgery: Pilot Study on Morbidity Prevention and Adjuvant Oncological Control
Thyroid Diseases, Wound Healing
RecruitingObservational study
Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Integrating Next Generation Sequencing for Treatment of Surgical Site Infection After Fracture Fixation:
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David S Seres, MD principal investigator
Beth Israel Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Synbiotic 2000 in people with Surgical Wound Infection and Cystitis, run by Beth Israel Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Patients would not take product). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Infection (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2007.