AzTrials
AzTrials

Tibial FracturesPhase 4NCT00161616

Study Evaluating InductOs in Diaphyseal Tibia Fractures

A Phase 4 study testing InductOs in people with Tibial Fractures, run by Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer at 27 sites in 12 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Demonstrate a larger proportion of subjects with healed fractures among subjects treated with InductOs and reamed, locked intramedullary nailing compared to subjects treated with reamed, locked intramedullary nailing alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tibial Fractures
What is being tested?
InductOs
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
277 participants
Where
27 sitesin 12 countries
Study dates
Sep 2003to Aug 2008
Phase
Phase 4

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects with acute open tibial shaft fractures (Gustilo Type I, II, IIIA, or IIIB) who require surgical management with reamed, statically locked intramedullary nail fixation and who are at low risk for amputation.
  • Subjects should be at least 18 years of age, be skeletally mature, and be able to provide written informed consent.
  • Initial fracture stabilization and wound debridement should occur within 1 day after injury and DFC should occur within 14 days after injury.

Who cannot join

  • Planned treatment for the fracture should not include further procedures to promote fracture healing. After 16 weeks have elapsed since DFC, unanticipated procedures to promote fracture healing are permitted as clinically indicated.
  • Presence of fracture distraction > 2 mm following definitive fracture fixation.
  • Presence of purulent drainage from the fracture site or evidence of active osteomyelitis.

Trial locations and contacts

27 sites in 12 countries.

27 sites in 12 countries

South Africa5 sites
  • Study site

    Bloemfontein, 9300

  • Study site

    Cape Town, 7505

  • Study site

    Cape Town, 7925

  • Study site

    Centurion, 0157

  • Study site

    Durban

Other trials in South Africa

Poland4 sites
  • Study site

    Bialystok, 15276

  • Study site

    Lublin, 20954

  • Study site

    Sosnowiec, 41200

  • Study site

    Szczecin, 71252

Other trials in Poland

Germany3 sites
  • Study site

    Berlin, 13353

  • Study site

    Mainz, 55131

  • Study site

    Münster, 48149

Other trials in Germany

Romania3 sites
  • Study site

    Bucharest, 14461

  • Study site

    Bucharest, 21659

  • Study site

    Bucharest, 50098

Other trials in Romania

France2 sites
  • Study site

    Créteil, 94010

  • Study site

    Toulouse, 31400

Other trials in France

Italy2 sites
  • Study site

    Pavia, 27100

  • Study site

    Roma, 00168

Other trials in Italy

Norway2 sites
  • Study site

    Bergen, 5021

  • Study site

    Oslo, 0407

Other trials in Norway

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Study site

    Bristol, BS2 8HW

  • Study site

    Norwich, NR4 7 UY

Other trials in United Kingdom

Belgium1 site
  • Study site

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

Finland1 site
  • Study site

    Turku, 20520

Other trials in Finland

Netherlands1 site
  • Study site

    Rotterdam, 3015 GD

Other trials in Netherlands

Spain1 site
  • Study site

    Alcalá, 28805

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Stratified Study of InductOs in Subjects With Open Diaphyseal Tibia Fractures Treated With Reamed Locked Intramedullary Nail Fixation

Demonstrate a larger proportion of subjects with healed fractures among subjects treated with InductOs and reamed, locked intramedullary nailing compared to subjects treated with reamed, locked intramedullary nailing alone.

Being tested
InductOs
Keywords
Open Diaphyseal Tibia Fractures
Medical subject headings
Tibial Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • InductOsDrug

    InductOs is rhBMP-2/ACS 1.5 mg/ml implanted once at the time of definitive fracture coverage

Study groups in NCT00161616
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AActive comparatorInductOs is rhBMP-2/ACS 1.5 mg/ml implanted once at the time of definitive fracture coverage +surgical fixation
Receives: Drug: InductOs
BOtherStandard of Care: Surgical fixation only
Receives: Drug: InductOs

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Patients With Healed Fractures

    Patients categorized by investigator as healed, not healed, no outcome (using pre-specified criteria). Healed: no tenderness at fracture site or pain with weight bearing, presence of bridging callus or disappearance of fracture lines, no hardware failure, no secondary intervention to promote fracture healing. Not healed: diagnosis of delayed union or nonunion, hardware failure, secondary intervention procedure for fracture healing recommended or performed, or conduct of procedure that may interfere with fracture healing. No outcome: subjects who did not achieve either healed or not healed.

    Measured: 13 and 20 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of Patients Achieving Combined Clinical and Radiographic Endpoint (CCRE)

    Patients categorized as Success or Failure of CCRE. Success defined as a fracture judged to be both clinically healed by clinical investigator, "healed" (see primary outcome), and radiographically united by independent, blinded radiology panel, "united." Patients deemed "not healed" or "not united" were assessed as failures.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2003
  3. Primary completionJul 2008
  4. Study completionAug 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
277 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00161616
Sponsor's protocol ID
3100N8-400
Status last verified
Jul 2009
First submitted
7 Sep 2005
Last updated
7 Sep 2009
Data monitoring committee
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in