AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaPhase 3NCT00151424

Efficacy and Safety of Asenapine With Placebo and Olanzapine (41022)(P05947)

A Phase 3 study testing asenapine and Olanzapine in people with Schizophrenia, run by Organon and Co.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Schizophrenia is a brain disease. The primary features of schizophrenia are characterized by Positive symptoms (symptoms that should not be there, inability to think clearly, to distinguish reality from fantasy i.e., hearing voices) and Negative symptoms (a reduction or absence of normal behaviors or emotions, i.e.… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Schizophrenia
What is being tested?
asenapine and Olanzapine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
277 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Feb 2005to 6 Feb 2006
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Currently suffering from an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia.

Who cannot join

  • Have an uncontrolled, unstable medical condition. Have any other psychiatric disorder other than schizophrenia as a primary diagnosis.

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Flexible-Dose, 6-Week Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Asenapine Compared With Placebo Using Olanzapine Positive Control in Subjects With an Acute Exacerbation of Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a brain disease. The primary features of schizophrenia are characterized by Positive symptoms (symptoms that should not be there, inability to think clearly, to distinguish reality from fantasy i.e., hearing voices) and Negative symptoms (a reduction or absence of normal behaviors or emotions, i.e., unable to manage emotions, make decisions and relate to others). Other symptoms include reduced ability to recall and learn new information, difficulty with problem solving, or maintaining productive employment. The symptoms of schizophrenia may be due to an imbalance in chemicals in the brain, primarily dopamine and serotonin, which enables brain cells to communicate with each other.

Asenapine is an investigational drug that may help to correct the imbalance in dopamine and serotonin. This is a 6 week study to test the efficacy and safety of asenapine and a comparator agent (olanzapine) in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Patients that complete this trial will have the option of continuing in an additional one year extension trial.

Conditions
Schizophrenia
Being tested
asenapine, Placebo, Olanzapine
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • asenapineDrug

    Asenapine 5-10mgBID

  • PlaceboDrug

    Matched against asenapine and olanzapine

  • OlanzapineDrug

    10-20 mg QD

Study groups in NCT00151424
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Experimentalasenapine 5-10mg BID
Receives: Drug: asenapine
2Placebo comparatorPlacebo
Receives: Drug: Placebo
3Active comparatorolanzapine 10-20 mg QD
Receives: Drug: Olanzapine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score at endpoint (6-week double-blind or last assessment after baseline) from baseline

    A 30-item, clinician rated instrument for assessing the symptoms of schizophrenia. Ratings for each item could range from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme).

    Measured: Screen, baseline, days 4, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Changes in PANSS subscale and Marder factor score Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) scores

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Screen, baseline, Days 4,7,14,21,28,35,42

  2. Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) scores

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Days 4,7,14,21,28,35,42

  3. Neurocognition and cognitive functioning

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Baseline , day 42

  4. Anxiety

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Baseline, day 42

  5. Suicidal thinking

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Baseline, day 42

  6. Quality of life and patient functionality

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Baseline, day 42

  7. Readiness to discharge, at scheduled assessments and endpoint from baseline

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Baseline up to day 14

  8. Extrapyramidal symptoms

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Baseline, Days 4,7,14,21,28,35,42

  9. Laboratory parameters

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Baseline, Days 14,,28,,42

  10. Vital signs

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Baseline, Days ,14,21,28,42

  11. Weight

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Baseline, Days 14,,28,,42

  12. Electrocardiograms (ECGs)

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Baseline, Days ,14, 28, 42

  13. Adverse events (including serious adverse events)

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Screen, baseline, Days 4,7,14,21,28,35,42 and recorded continuously for AEs up to 7 days after endpoint

  14. Serious adverse events (SAEs) up to 30 days after endpoint

    This was not a prespecified key secondary outcome

    Measured: Screen, baseline, Days 4,7,14,21,28,35,42 and recorded continuously for AEs up to 30 days after endpoint

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Feb 2005
  3. Primary completion6 Jan 2006
  4. Study completion6 Feb 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
277 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00151424
Sponsor's protocol ID
P05947
Other IDs
Hera, 41022
Status last verified
Feb 2022
First submitted
8 Sep 2005
Last updated
15 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Szegedi A, Verweij P, van Duijnhoven W, Mackle M, Cazorla P, Fennema H. Meta-analyses of the efficacy of asenapine for acute schizophrenia: comparisons with placebo and other antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;73(12):1533-40. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11r07596.

    PubMed 23290326

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing asenapine and Olanzapine in people with Schizophrenia, run by Organon and Co.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score at endpoint (6-week double-blind or last assessment after baseline) from baseline (time frame: Screen, baseline, days 4, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00151424, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in