Type 2 DiabetesPhase 2/3NCT00143520
Placebo and Active Controlled Study of Rivoglitazone in Type 2 Diabetes
A Phase 2/3 study testing Rivoglitazone and Pioglitazone in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by Daiichi Sankyo at 74 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a 6-month study to evaluate the effects of monotherapy with rivoglitazone, an insulin sensitizer, on glycemic control in newly identified type 2 diabetics or diabetics not adequately treated with other antidiabetic agents. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- Rivoglitazone and Pioglitazone
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 441 participants
- Where
- 74 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2004to Dec 2005
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 2 diabetes in male or female patients
- Between 18 and 75 years of age
- With a HbA1c greater than or equal to 7.5% and less than 10.5% at randomization
Who cannot join
- Type 1 diabetics or type 2 diabetics currently on insulin therapy
- Patients unwilling or unable to discontinue their anti-diabetic medication(s)
- History of ketoacidosis
- History of therapy with rosiglitazone, troglitazone, pioglitazone
Trial locations and contacts
74 sites in 1 country.
74 sites in 1 country
United States74 sites
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Bozeman, Montana
Study site
Bristol, Tennessee
Study site
Butte, Montana
Study site
Carrollton, Texas
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Study site
Clearwater, Florida
Study site
Clinton, Oklahoma
Study site
Cocoa Beach, Florida
Study site
Columbiana, Alabama
Study site
Columbus, Ohio
Study site
Conroe, Texas
Study site
Detroit, Michigan
Study site
Evansville, Indiana
Study site
Great Falls, Montana
Study site
Gurnee, Illinois
Study site
Hot Springs, Arkansas
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Huntsville, Alabama
Study site
Jonesboro, Arkansas
Study site
Jupiter, Florida
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri
Study site
Lakewood, Washington
Study site
Largo, Florida
Study site
Lexington, Kentucky
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas
Study site
Livonia, Michigan
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Marion, Ohio
Study site
Medford, Oregon
Study site
Miami, Florida
Study site
Midland, Texas
Study site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Study site
Moreno Valley, California
Study site
Muscle Shoals, Alabama
Study site
New Orleans, Louisiana
Study site
New Port Richey, Florida
Study site
Newark, Delaware
Study site
Norfolk, Virginia
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Study site
Olympia, Washington
Study site
Palm Harbor, Florida
Study site
Pembroke Pines, Florida
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Study site
Renton, Washington
Study site
Richmond, Virginia
Study site
Rochester, New York
Study site
Sacramento, California
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
San Diego, California
Study site
San Mateo, California
Study site
Santa Monica, California
Study site
Searcy, Arkansas
Study site
Sherwood, Arkansas
Study site
Simpsonville, South Carolina
Study site
Spokane, Washington
Study site
Spring, Texas
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Statesville, North Carolina
Study site
Sugar Land, Texas
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Torrance, California
Study site
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Study site
Virginia Beach, Virginia
Study site
Vista, California
Study site
Voorhees Township, New Jersey
Study site
Warner Robins, Georgia
Study site
West Hills, California
Study site
West Palm Beach, Florida
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled 26-week Dose-response Study of Rivoglitazone HCl (CS-011) With Active Comparator (Pioglitazone HCl) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
This is a 6-month study to evaluate the effects of monotherapy with rivoglitazone, an insulin sensitizer, on glycemic control in newly identified type 2 diabetics or diabetics not adequately treated with other antidiabetic agents. The study tests rivoglitazone and uses a placebo and active treatment group for comparison.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Being tested
- Rivoglitazone, Pioglitazone, Placebo
- Keywords
- Placebo and active control dose response study of rivoglitazone in type 2 diabetics
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RivoglitazoneDrug
PioglitazoneDrug
PlaceboDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in HbA1c
Secondary outcomes (1)
FPG, Lipids, hsCRP, Adiponectin
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2004
- Primary completionDec 2005
- Study completionDec 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Daiichi SankyoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 441 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Daiichi Sankyo
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00143520
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CS0011-203
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 1 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 10 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Truitt KE, Goldberg RB, Rosenstock J, Chou HS, Merante D, Triscari J, Wang AC. A 26-week, placebo- and pioglitazone-controlled, dose-ranging study of rivoglitazone, a novel thiazolidinedione for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jun;26(6):1321-31. doi: 10.1185/03007991003715079.
PubMed 20370378
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled 26-week Dose-response Study of Rivoglitazone HCl (CS-011) With Active Comparator (Pioglitazone HCl) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00143520
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CS0011-203
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Keywords
- Placebo and active control dose response study of rivoglitazone in type 2 diabetics
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 441 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Daiichi SankyoIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2004
- Primary completion
- Dec 2005 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2005 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a 6-month study to evaluate the effects of monotherapy with rivoglitazone, an insulin sensitizer, on glycemic control in newly identified type 2 diabetics or diabetics not adequately treated with other antidiabetic agents. The study tests rivoglitazone and uses a placebo and active treatment group for comparison.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Type 2 diabetes in male or female patients
- Between 18 and 75 years of age
- With a HbA1c greater than or equal to 7.5% and less than 10.5% at randomization
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Type 1 diabetics or type 2 diabetics currently on insulin therapy
- Patients unwilling or unable to discontinue their anti-diabetic medication(s)
- History of ketoacidosis
- History of therapy with rosiglitazone, troglitazone, pioglitazone
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rivoglitazone | Drug | – |
| Pioglitazone | Drug | – |
| Placebo | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Change in HbA1c
1 secondary outcome
FPG, Lipids, hsCRP, Adiponectin
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 May 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20370378Truitt KE, Goldberg RB, Rosenstock J, Chou HS, Merante D, Triscari J, Wang AC. A 26-week, placebo- and pioglitazone-controlled, dose-ranging study of rivoglitazone, a novel thiazolidinedione for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jun;26(6):1321-31. doi: 10.1185/03007991003715079.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
74 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Rivoglitazone and Pioglitazone in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by Daiichi Sankyo at 74 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 74 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in HbA1c. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00143520, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2021.