HIV InfectionsPhase 3KALESOLONCT00140751
Comparison of Treatment Simplification by LPV/r vs Current Treatment Continuation in HIV-Infected Patients
A Phase 3 study testing Lopinavir/ritonavir (drug) in people with HIV Infections, run by Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba at 25 sites in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerance of a treatment simplification by a Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus continuation of current treatment in HIV-infected patients Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Lopinavir/ritonavir (drug)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 186 participants
- Where
- 25 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Oct 2005to Jan 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > or = 18 years
- Confirmed HIV-1 seropositivity
- Antiretroviral treatment stable since 3 months at least
- HIV-1 ARN load < 50 copies/mL since 6 months at least
- Signed consent form
- No history of treatment failure (= viral load > 1000 copies/mL) including a protease inhibitor
- No opportunistic infection in the previous 6 months
Who cannot join
- Neutrophils < 750/mm3
- Hemoglobin < 8 g/dL
- Platelets < 60,000/mm3
- Creatinin > 150 micromoles/L
- SGOT > 5 NUL (Normal Upper Limit)
- SGPT > 5 NUL
Show all 10Show fewer
- Current IL-2 treatment
- HBV infection treated or not by lamivudine or tenofovir
- Pregnancy or feeding
- Enrollment in another study not compliant with KALESOLO Study group assignment
Trial locations and contacts
25 sites in 1 country.
25 sites in 1 country
France25 sites
Centre Hospitalier de la Région Annecienne (CHRA) - Service d'Infectiologie
Annecy, 74000
Hôpital Jean Verdier - Unité de Maladies Infectieuses
Bondy, 93143
Hôpital Pellegrin - Service de Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses
Bordeaux, 33000
Hôpital Saint-André - Service de Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses
Bordeaux, 33000
Hôpital Saint-André - Service de Médecine Interne et Maladies Tropicales
Bordeaux, 33000
Hôpital Côte de Nacre - Service des Maladies Infectieuses
Caen, 14033
Hôpital Henri Mondor - Service d'Immunologie Clinique
Créteil, 94010
Hôpital Pierre Zobda-Quitman - Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales
Fort-de-France, Martinique, 97261
Hôpital Raymond Poincaré - Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales
Garches, 92380
Hôpital A. Michallon - Service des Maladies Infectieuses
Grenoble, 38000
Hôpital Bicêtre - Service de Médecine Interne
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275
Hôpital Nord - CISIH
Marseille, 13020
Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite - Unité Médicale CISIH
Marseille, 13274
Hôpital Gui de Chauliac - Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales
Montpellier, 34000
Hôpital de l'Archet - Service d'Infectiologie
Nice, 06200
Hôpital Saint-Antoine - Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales
Paris, 75012
Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière - Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales
Paris, 75013
Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière - Service de Médecine Interne 1
Paris, 75013
Hôpital-Fondation Saint-Joseph - Service des Maladies Infectieuses
Paris, 75014
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP) - Département d'Immunologie
Paris, 75015
Hôpital Tenon - Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales
Paris, 75020
Hôpital Pontchaillou - Service des Maladies Infectieuses
Rennes, 35000
Hôpital Civil - Hôpital de Jour du CISIH - Clinique Médicale A
Strasbourg, 67000
Hôpital Gustave Dron - Service des Maladies Infectieuses
Tourcoing, 59200
Hôpital de Brabois Adultes - Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
About this study
Official title: A 48-Weeks National Multicenter Randomized Open Clinical Trial Evaluating Tolerance and Efficacy of a Treatment Simplification by Lopinavir/Ritonavir Versus Continuation of Current Treatment in HIV-Infected Patients With a Viral Load Inferior to 50 Copies/mL Since 6 Months At Least
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerance of a treatment simplification by a Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus continuation of current treatment in HIV-infected patients
Read the detailed description
Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has made a significant impact on the natural history of HIV-1 infection, but toxicities and complexities of therapy limit long-term efficacy, and make simpler yet effective HAART regimens highly desirable. Previous attempts to 'de-intensify' protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy by discontinuing reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTI) after achieving viral suppression met with failure, probably because plasma levels of most individually administered PI are too low to inhibit viral replication consistently.
Low-dose ritonavir substantially enhances lopinavir plasma levels, and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is effective as part of a combination therapy in both naive and PI-experienced patients. Furthermore, lopinavir is known to have a high genetic barrier to selection of resistance. LPV/r monotherapy could thus have the right combination of potency, favorable pharmacokinetics, and high genetic barrier needed to suppress viral replication and prevent the selection of lopinavir resistance. Preliminary results with "maintenance"LPV/r monotherapy show interesting results but data from randomized studies are needed.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- Lopinavir/ritonavir (drug)
- Keywords
- HIV-1, Treatment simplification, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Treatment Experienced, HIV Seropositivity
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections, HIV Seropositivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lopinavir/ritonavir (drug)Drug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Simplification | Experimental | The patients included in this arm are on Monotherapy of Kaletra (Lopinavir/ritonavir)during 48 weeks Receives: Drug: Lopinavir/ritonavir (drug) |
| Continued | No intervention | The patients included in this arm continue their treatment without any changes |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of patients with a viral load < 50 copies/mL at S48 without any modification of antiretroviral treatment during study
Measured: W48
Secondary outcomes (8)
Durability of viral response
Measured: W48
Evolution of lymphocytes CD4
Measured: W48
Observance
Measured: W48
Clinical and biological tolerance
Measured: W48
Quantitative and qualitative changes in quality of life data
Measured: W48
Cost-efficacy ratio
Measured: W48
Predictive value of proviral DNA before treatment simplification
Measured: W48
Proportion of patients showing a lipodystrophy at J0 and S48
Measured: W48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2005
- Primary completionJan 2008
- Study completionJan 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 186 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Abbott
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean-Luc MEYNARD, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Hôpital Saint-Antoine - Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales (Paris, France)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00140751
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IMEA-030
- Other IDs
- KALESOLO
- Acronym
- KALESOLO
- Status last verified
- Sep 2013
- First submitted
- 30 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Mocroft A, Ledergerber B, Katlama C, Kirk O, Reiss P, d'Arminio Monforte A, Knysz B, Dietrich M, Phillips AN, Lundgren JD; EuroSIDA study group. Decline in the AIDS and death rates in the EuroSIDA study: an observational study. Lancet. 2003 Jul 5;362(9377):22-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13802-0.
PubMed 12853195Yeni PG, Hammer SM, Hirsch MS, Saag MS, Schechter M, Carpenter CC, Fischl MA, Gatell JM, Gazzard BG, Jacobsen DM, Katzenstein DA, Montaner JS, Richman DD, Schooley RT, Thompson MA, Vella S, Volberding PA. Treatment for adult HIV infection: 2004 recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel. JAMA. 2004 Jul 14;292(2):251-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.2.251.
PubMed 15249575Bartlett JA, DeMasi R, Quinn J, Moxham C, Rousseau F. Overview of the effectiveness of triple combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 infected adults. AIDS. 2001 Jul 27;15(11):1369-77. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200107270-00006.
PubMed 11504958Palella FJ Jr, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, Loveless MO, Fuhrer J, Satten GA, Aschman DJ, Holmberg SD. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998 Mar 26;338(13):853-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199803263381301.
PubMed 9516219Murphy R, Gazzard B. Antiretroviral treatment guidelines. AIDS. 2003 Jun;17 Suppl 2:S1. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200306002-00001. No abstract available.
PubMed 12870522Bucher HC, Kofler A, Nuesch R, Young J, Battegay M, Opravil M. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of simplified versus continued protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS. 2003 Nov 21;17(17):2451-9. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200311210-00007.
PubMed 14600516Drechsler H, Powderly WG. Switching effective antiretroviral therapy: a review. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Nov 15;35(10):1219-30. doi: 10.1086/343050. Epub 2002 Oct 21.
PubMed 12410482Martinez E, Conget I, Lozano L, Casamitjana R, Gatell JM. Reversion of metabolic abnormalities after switching from HIV-1 protease inhibitors to nevirapine. AIDS. 1999 May 7;13(7):805-10. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199905070-00009.
PubMed 10357379Moyle G, Baldwin C, Mandalia S, Comitis S, Burn P, Gazzard B. Changes in metabolic parameters and body shape after replacement of protease inhibitor With efavirenz in virologically controlled HIV-1-positive persons: single-arm observational cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001 Dec 1;28(4):399-401. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200112010-00016. No abstract available.
PubMed 11707680Lambert-Niclot S, Grude M, Meynard JL, Marcelin AG, Valantin MA, Flandre P, Izopet J, Moinot L, Bouteloup V, Calvez V, Katlama C, Girard PM, Morand-Joubert L. Ultrasensitive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Viral Load as a Marker of Treatment Choice for Simplification Strategies. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 28;67(12):1883-1889. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy382.
PubMed 29767684Meynard JL, Bouteloup V, Landman R, Bonnard P, Baillat V, Cabie A, Kolta S, Izopet J, Taburet AM, Mercie P, Chene G, Girard PM; KALESOLO Study Group. Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus current treatment continuation for maintenance therapy of HIV-1 infection: the KALESOLO trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Nov;65(11):2436-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq327. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
PubMed 20843990
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 48-Weeks National Multicenter Randomized Open Clinical Trial Evaluating Tolerance and Efficacy of a Treatment Simplification by Lopinavir/Ritonavir Versus Continuation of Current Treatment in HIV-Infected Patients With a Viral Load Inferior to 50 Copies/mL Since 6 Months At Least
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00140751
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KALESOLO / IMEA-030
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Keywords
- HIV-1, Treatment simplification, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Treatment Experienced, HIV Seropositivity
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 186 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'BaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Abbott
- Study start
- Oct 2005
- Primary completion
- Jan 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerance of a treatment simplification by a Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus continuation of current treatment in HIV-infected patients
Detailed description
Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has made a significant impact on the natural history of HIV-1 infection, but toxicities and complexities of therapy limit long-term efficacy, and make simpler yet effective HAART regimens highly desirable. Previous attempts to 'de-intensify' protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy by discontinuing reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTI) after achieving viral suppression met with failure, probably because plasma levels of most individually administered PI are too low to inhibit viral replication consistently.
Low-dose ritonavir substantially enhances lopinavir plasma levels, and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is effective as part of a combination therapy in both naive and PI-experienced patients. Furthermore, lopinavir is known to have a high genetic barrier to selection of resistance. LPV/r monotherapy could thus have the right combination of potency, favorable pharmacokinetics, and high genetic barrier needed to suppress viral replication and prevent the selection of lopinavir resistance. Preliminary results with "maintenance"LPV/r monotherapy show interesting results but data from randomized studies are needed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Simplification | Experimental | Drug: Lopinavir/ritonavir (drug)The patients included in this arm are on Monotherapy of Kaletra (Lopinavir/ritonavir)during 48 weeks |
| Continued | No intervention | –The patients included in this arm continue their treatment without any changes |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age > or = 18 years
- Confirmed HIV-1 seropositivity
- Antiretroviral treatment stable since 3 months at least
- HIV-1 ARN load < 50 copies/mL since 6 months at least
- Signed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Neutrophils < 750/mm3
- Hemoglobin < 8 g/dL
- Platelets < 60,000/mm3
- Creatinin > 150 micromoles/L
- SGOT > 5 NUL (Normal Upper Limit)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lopinavir/ritonavir (drug) | Drug | Simplification |
Primary outcome
Percentage of patients with a viral load < 50 copies/mL at S48 without any modification of antiretroviral treatment during study
Time frame: W48
8 secondary outcomes
Durability of viral response
Time frame: W48
Evolution of lymphocytes CD4
Time frame: W48
Observance
Time frame: W48
Clinical and biological tolerance
Time frame: W48
Quantitative and qualitative changes in quality of life data
Time frame: W48
Cost-efficacy ratio
Time frame: W48
Predictive value of proviral DNA before treatment simplification
Time frame: W48
Proportion of patients showing a lipodystrophy at J0 and S48
Time frame: W48
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2013.
- Background: PubMed 12853195Mocroft A, Ledergerber B, Katlama C, Kirk O, Reiss P, d'Arminio Monforte A, Knysz B, Dietrich M, Phillips AN, Lundgren JD; EuroSIDA study group. Decline in the AIDS and death rates in the EuroSIDA study: an observational study. Lancet. 2003 Jul 5;362(9377):22-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13802-0.
- Background: PubMed 15249575Yeni PG, Hammer SM, Hirsch MS, Saag MS, Schechter M, Carpenter CC, Fischl MA, Gatell JM, Gazzard BG, Jacobsen DM, Katzenstein DA, Montaner JS, Richman DD, Schooley RT, Thompson MA, Vella S, Volberding PA. Treatment for adult HIV infection: 2004 recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel. JAMA. 2004 Jul 14;292(2):251-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.2.251.
- Background: PubMed 11504958Bartlett JA, DeMasi R, Quinn J, Moxham C, Rousseau F. Overview of the effectiveness of triple combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 infected adults. AIDS. 2001 Jul 27;15(11):1369-77. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200107270-00006.
- Background: PubMed 9516219Palella FJ Jr, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, Loveless MO, Fuhrer J, Satten GA, Aschman DJ, Holmberg SD. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998 Mar 26;338(13):853-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199803263381301.
- Background: PubMed 12870522Murphy R, Gazzard B. Antiretroviral treatment guidelines. AIDS. 2003 Jun;17 Suppl 2:S1. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200306002-00001. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 14600516Bucher HC, Kofler A, Nuesch R, Young J, Battegay M, Opravil M. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of simplified versus continued protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS. 2003 Nov 21;17(17):2451-9. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200311210-00007.
- Background: PubMed 12410482Drechsler H, Powderly WG. Switching effective antiretroviral therapy: a review. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Nov 15;35(10):1219-30. doi: 10.1086/343050. Epub 2002 Oct 21.
- Background: PubMed 10357379Martinez E, Conget I, Lozano L, Casamitjana R, Gatell JM. Reversion of metabolic abnormalities after switching from HIV-1 protease inhibitors to nevirapine. AIDS. 1999 May 7;13(7):805-10. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199905070-00009.
- Background: PubMed 11707680Moyle G, Baldwin C, Mandalia S, Comitis S, Burn P, Gazzard B. Changes in metabolic parameters and body shape after replacement of protease inhibitor With efavirenz in virologically controlled HIV-1-positive persons: single-arm observational cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001 Dec 1;28(4):399-401. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200112010-00016. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29767684Lambert-Niclot S, Grude M, Meynard JL, Marcelin AG, Valantin MA, Flandre P, Izopet J, Moinot L, Bouteloup V, Calvez V, Katlama C, Girard PM, Morand-Joubert L. Ultrasensitive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Viral Load as a Marker of Treatment Choice for Simplification Strategies. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 28;67(12):1883-1889. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy382.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20843990Meynard JL, Bouteloup V, Landman R, Bonnard P, Baillat V, Cabie A, Kolta S, Izopet J, Taburet AM, Mercie P, Chene G, Girard PM; KALESOLO Study Group. Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus current treatment continuation for maintenance therapy of HIV-1 infection: the KALESOLO trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Nov;65(11):2436-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq327. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
- Click here for more information about this study: KALESOLOLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Luc MEYNARD, MD, PhD principal investigator
Hôpital Saint-Antoine - Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales (Paris, France)
25 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Lopinavir/ritonavir (drug) in people with HIV Infections, run by Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba at 25 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 25 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of patients with a viral load < 50 copies/mL at S48 without any modification of antiretroviral treatment during study (time frame: W48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00140751, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2013.