AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck CancerPhase 1/2NCT00137475

Using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy to Permit Sparing of Parotid Gland Function

A Phase 1/2 study testing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in people with Head and Neck Cancer, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Radiotherapy is the primary treatment modality or an important adjunct treatment for many patients with H\&N carcinoma. Local control is directly related to dose and to the technical accuracy with which the dose is delivered to the target volume. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Head and Neck Cancer
What is being tested?
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
130 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Feb 2002to Aug 2012
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Squamous cell cancer of head and neck for radical/postoperative radiation therapy
  • American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I-IV with M0 and N0-2 disease
  • Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >= 70%

Who cannot join

  • M1 or N3 disease
  • Ineligibility for radiotherapy
  • Recent malignancy
  • Previous cancer or head and neck radiotherapy
  • Salivary gland dysfunction
  • Unwilling to provide informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Cross Cancer Institute

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Phase I/II Feasibility/Efficacy Study Using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck (H&N) Cancer Patients to Permit Sparing of Parotid Gland Function

Radiotherapy is the primary treatment modality or an important adjunct treatment for many patients with H\&N carcinoma. Local control is directly related to dose and to the technical accuracy with which the dose is delivered to the target volume. Traditional radiotherapy techniques result in significant doses being delivered to normal tissues adjacent to the target, including the spinal cord and salivary glands. This leaves the patient with significant acute and late normal tissue toxicity that impacts on both the ability to tolerate the actual treatment and on the patient's long-term quality of life. Recently, the investigators have used static conformal multisegmental intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for a comprehensive irradiation of head and neck cancer with dose sparing of uninvolved tissues. This has resulted in substantial preservation of major salivary gland function in many patients with primary sites in the oral pharynx, oral cavity, nasopharynx, and pyriform sinus. While the investigators' results to date have shown promising preservation of salivary flow, they do not know whether patients treated with IMRT have similar local control rates as those treated with standard radiotherapy. Some investigators have raised the concern that by giving a low radiation dose to areas adjacent to the target volume there is a risk of undertreating the disease. On the other hand, the IMRT delivered with this protocol (called "simultaneous integrated boost", or SIB) may improve local control rates by delivering the same biologically effective dose in a shorter overall time period. This is a phase I/II trial which seeks to establish the efficacy of IMRT for H\&N cancer treatment, and to further investigate the relationship between radiation dose to the parotid glands, salivary flow, and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Radiotherapy is the primary treatment modality or an important adjunct treatment for many patients with H\&N carcinoma. Local control is directly related to dose and to the technical accuracy with which the dose is delivered to the target volume. Traditional radiotherapy techniques result in significant doses being delivered to normal tissues adjacent to the target, including the spinal cord and salivary glands. This leaves the patient with significant acute and late normal tissue toxicity that impacts on both ability to tolerate the actual treatment and on the patient's long-term quality of life. Recently, we have used static conformal multisegmental intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for comprehensive irradiation of head and neck cancer with dose sparing of uninvolved tissues. This has resulted in substantial preservation of major salivary gland function in many patients with primary sites in the oral pharynx, oral cavity, nasopharynx, and pyriform sinus. While our results to date have shown promising preservation of salivary flow, we do not know whether patients treated with IMRT have similar local control rates as those treated with standard radiotherapy. Some investigators have raised concern that by giving a low radiation dose to areas adjacent to the target volume there is a risk of undertreating disease. On the other hand, the IMRT delivered with this protocol (called "simultaneous integrated boost", or SIB) may improve local control rates by delivering the same biologically effective dose in a shorter overall time period (see below). This is a phase I/II trial which seeks to establish the efficacy of IMRT for H\&N cancer treatment, and further investigate the relationship between radiation dose to the parotid glands, salivary flow, and quality of life. The specific objectives of the trial are as follows:

  • To assess the local control rate and survival of patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy using the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for regions at high risk of recurrence;
  • To determine the patterns of failure of patients treated with IMRT+SIB;
  • To assess the incidence of chronic grade 2 xerostomia after parotid-sparing IMRT using the RTOG grading scale;
  • To assess quality of life of patients during and after IMRT using subjective xerostomia questionnaire and the University of Washington Quality of Life Head and Neck Symptom Questionnaire;
  • To assess quantitative changes in salivary function before and after IMRT using sialometry (unstimulated and stimulated whole salivary flow rates).

Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the H\&N will be eligible provided they are over 18 years' age, AJCC stage I-IV with M0 and N0-2 disease, and KPS >=70%. Ineligibility criteria include previous cancer or H\&N radiotherapy, salivary gland dysfunction, or unwilling to provide informed consent.

Methodology: All patients accrued to this study will have a series of pre-treatment evaluations, including history, physical, KPS evaluation, CT/MRI of the head and neck, chest x-ray or CT, dental examination, QOL assessment using the University of Washington QOL H\&N symptom questionnaire (Hassan et al, 1993), and pre-treatment salivary flow measurements. All salivary flow measurements collected for this study will include unstimulated (resting) and stimulated (using citric acid solution), with a 5-minute collection time for each. Accrued patients will belong to one of two cohorts, which will determine the radiotherapy target volumes and dose levels: Group 1 - Patients who are treated with definitive radiotherapy (or chemoradiotherapy). The high dose region (PTV66) will consist of all areas of gross disease plus appropriate planning margin. The lower dose region (PTV54) will include PTV66 and all at-risk draining lymphatics of the neck. Group 2 - Patients treated with surgery and post-operative radiotherapy. The high-dose region (PTV60) will consist of the areas of previous gross disease and regions of the neck with metastatic lymph node involvement. The low-dose region (PTV54) will include PTV60 plus the remainder of the surgical bed and any additional regional lymphatic tissue considered to be at risk of harboring occult disease. All patients will be treated in 30 treatments (1 treatment per day, 5 days per week, for 6 weeks). PTV66 will receive 66 Gy, PTV54 will receive 54 Gy, etc. Thus different target regions will receive different doses per day (ranging from 1.8 to 2.2). In theory, giving high-risk regions a higher dose per day (hypofractionation) allows tumour cells less time to repopulate and should improve control rates (Fowler, 2000).

Investigations during and after treatment: Patients will have weekly toxicity assessments during radiotherapy. Follow-up after completion of RT will include history/physical, QOL assessment, and salivary flow collections. These assessments will be done at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, then every 1.5 months until 1 year. Follow-up beyond 1 year is at the physician's discretion but normally will involve visits every 3-4 months.

Statistical considerations: The sample size for this trial is based on the expected local control rate of similar patients treated with standard radiotherapy. For group 1 (patients treated with definitive radiotherapy) this is difficult to predict a priori because of the expected heterogeneity of stages and primary sites of accrued patients. However, stage I-II patients treated with RT alone, and selected stage III patients treated with chemoradiotherapy have 2-year local control rates of 70-80%. For group 2 (patients treated with surgery with high-risk features necessitating post-op RT), the expected local control rate is also approximately 70%. Assuming a power of 70%, significance of 5%, and a historical rate of local control of 75% (combined), the required number of patients to detect a 10% change in local control is 120.7. We will therefore accrue 120 patients, at an anticipated rate of 2-3 patients per month for 2-4 years.

Being tested
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
Keywords
IMRT, head and neck cancer, parotid sparing
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intensity-Modulated Radiation TherapyProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. locoregional control rates

  2. patterns of failure

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. quality of life

  2. saliva flow rates/xerostomia

  3. overall survival

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Aug 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2002
  3. Primary completionAug 2012
  4. Study completionAug 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
130 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00137475
Sponsor's protocol ID
NA-15-0006 / 17086
Status last verified
Feb 2014
First submitted
26 Aug 2005
Last updated
26 Feb 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in people with Head and Neck Cancer, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

locoregional control rates. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in