Head and Neck CancerPhase 1/2NCT00137475
Using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy to Permit Sparing of Parotid Gland Function
A Phase 1/2 study testing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in people with Head and Neck Cancer, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Radiotherapy is the primary treatment modality or an important adjunct treatment for many patients with H\&N carcinoma. Local control is directly related to dose and to the technical accuracy with which the dose is delivered to the target volume. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Head and Neck Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Feb 2002to Aug 2012
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Squamous cell cancer of head and neck for radical/postoperative radiation therapy
- American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I-IV with M0 and N0-2 disease
- Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >= 70%
Who cannot join
- M1 or N3 disease
- Ineligibility for radiotherapy
- Recent malignancy
- Previous cancer or head and neck radiotherapy
- Salivary gland dysfunction
- Unwilling to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Phase I/II Feasibility/Efficacy Study Using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck (H&N) Cancer Patients to Permit Sparing of Parotid Gland Function
Radiotherapy is the primary treatment modality or an important adjunct treatment for many patients with H\&N carcinoma. Local control is directly related to dose and to the technical accuracy with which the dose is delivered to the target volume. Traditional radiotherapy techniques result in significant doses being delivered to normal tissues adjacent to the target, including the spinal cord and salivary glands. This leaves the patient with significant acute and late normal tissue toxicity that impacts on both the ability to tolerate the actual treatment and on the patient's long-term quality of life. Recently, the investigators have used static conformal multisegmental intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for a comprehensive irradiation of head and neck cancer with dose sparing of uninvolved tissues. This has resulted in substantial preservation of major salivary gland function in many patients with primary sites in the oral pharynx, oral cavity, nasopharynx, and pyriform sinus. While the investigators' results to date have shown promising preservation of salivary flow, they do not know whether patients treated with IMRT have similar local control rates as those treated with standard radiotherapy. Some investigators have raised the concern that by giving a low radiation dose to areas adjacent to the target volume there is a risk of undertreating the disease. On the other hand, the IMRT delivered with this protocol (called "simultaneous integrated boost", or SIB) may improve local control rates by delivering the same biologically effective dose in a shorter overall time period. This is a phase I/II trial which seeks to establish the efficacy of IMRT for H\&N cancer treatment, and to further investigate the relationship between radiation dose to the parotid glands, salivary flow, and quality of life.
Read the detailed description
Radiotherapy is the primary treatment modality or an important adjunct treatment for many patients with H\&N carcinoma. Local control is directly related to dose and to the technical accuracy with which the dose is delivered to the target volume. Traditional radiotherapy techniques result in significant doses being delivered to normal tissues adjacent to the target, including the spinal cord and salivary glands. This leaves the patient with significant acute and late normal tissue toxicity that impacts on both ability to tolerate the actual treatment and on the patient's long-term quality of life. Recently, we have used static conformal multisegmental intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for comprehensive irradiation of head and neck cancer with dose sparing of uninvolved tissues. This has resulted in substantial preservation of major salivary gland function in many patients with primary sites in the oral pharynx, oral cavity, nasopharynx, and pyriform sinus. While our results to date have shown promising preservation of salivary flow, we do not know whether patients treated with IMRT have similar local control rates as those treated with standard radiotherapy. Some investigators have raised concern that by giving a low radiation dose to areas adjacent to the target volume there is a risk of undertreating disease. On the other hand, the IMRT delivered with this protocol (called "simultaneous integrated boost", or SIB) may improve local control rates by delivering the same biologically effective dose in a shorter overall time period (see below). This is a phase I/II trial which seeks to establish the efficacy of IMRT for H\&N cancer treatment, and further investigate the relationship between radiation dose to the parotid glands, salivary flow, and quality of life. The specific objectives of the trial are as follows:
- To assess the local control rate and survival of patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy using the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for regions at high risk of recurrence;
- To determine the patterns of failure of patients treated with IMRT+SIB;
- To assess the incidence of chronic grade 2 xerostomia after parotid-sparing IMRT using the RTOG grading scale;
- To assess quality of life of patients during and after IMRT using subjective xerostomia questionnaire and the University of Washington Quality of Life Head and Neck Symptom Questionnaire;
- To assess quantitative changes in salivary function before and after IMRT using sialometry (unstimulated and stimulated whole salivary flow rates).
Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the H\&N will be eligible provided they are over 18 years' age, AJCC stage I-IV with M0 and N0-2 disease, and KPS >=70%. Ineligibility criteria include previous cancer or H\&N radiotherapy, salivary gland dysfunction, or unwilling to provide informed consent.
Methodology: All patients accrued to this study will have a series of pre-treatment evaluations, including history, physical, KPS evaluation, CT/MRI of the head and neck, chest x-ray or CT, dental examination, QOL assessment using the University of Washington QOL H\&N symptom questionnaire (Hassan et al, 1993), and pre-treatment salivary flow measurements. All salivary flow measurements collected for this study will include unstimulated (resting) and stimulated (using citric acid solution), with a 5-minute collection time for each. Accrued patients will belong to one of two cohorts, which will determine the radiotherapy target volumes and dose levels: Group 1 - Patients who are treated with definitive radiotherapy (or chemoradiotherapy). The high dose region (PTV66) will consist of all areas of gross disease plus appropriate planning margin. The lower dose region (PTV54) will include PTV66 and all at-risk draining lymphatics of the neck. Group 2 - Patients treated with surgery and post-operative radiotherapy. The high-dose region (PTV60) will consist of the areas of previous gross disease and regions of the neck with metastatic lymph node involvement. The low-dose region (PTV54) will include PTV60 plus the remainder of the surgical bed and any additional regional lymphatic tissue considered to be at risk of harboring occult disease. All patients will be treated in 30 treatments (1 treatment per day, 5 days per week, for 6 weeks). PTV66 will receive 66 Gy, PTV54 will receive 54 Gy, etc. Thus different target regions will receive different doses per day (ranging from 1.8 to 2.2). In theory, giving high-risk regions a higher dose per day (hypofractionation) allows tumour cells less time to repopulate and should improve control rates (Fowler, 2000).
Investigations during and after treatment: Patients will have weekly toxicity assessments during radiotherapy. Follow-up after completion of RT will include history/physical, QOL assessment, and salivary flow collections. These assessments will be done at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, then every 1.5 months until 1 year. Follow-up beyond 1 year is at the physician's discretion but normally will involve visits every 3-4 months.
Statistical considerations: The sample size for this trial is based on the expected local control rate of similar patients treated with standard radiotherapy. For group 1 (patients treated with definitive radiotherapy) this is difficult to predict a priori because of the expected heterogeneity of stages and primary sites of accrued patients. However, stage I-II patients treated with RT alone, and selected stage III patients treated with chemoradiotherapy have 2-year local control rates of 70-80%. For group 2 (patients treated with surgery with high-risk features necessitating post-op RT), the expected local control rate is also approximately 70%. Assuming a power of 70%, significance of 5%, and a historical rate of local control of 75% (combined), the required number of patients to detect a 10% change in local control is 120.7. We will therefore accrue 120 patients, at an anticipated rate of 2-3 patients per month for 2-4 years.
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Cancer
- Being tested
- Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
- Keywords
- IMRT, head and neck cancer, parotid sparing
- Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intensity-Modulated Radiation TherapyProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
locoregional control rates
patterns of failure
Secondary outcomes (3)
quality of life
saliva flow rates/xerostomia
overall survival
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2002
- Primary completionAug 2012
- Study completionAug 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Head and Neck CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AHS Cancer Control Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rufus Scrimger, MD, Principal investigator, AHS Cancer Control Alberta
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00137475
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NA-15-0006 / 17086
- Status last verified
- Feb 2014
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 26 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase I/II Feasibility/Efficacy Study Using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck (H&N) Cancer Patients to Permit Sparing of Parotid Gland Function
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00137475
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NA-15-0006 / 17086
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Cancer
- Keywords
- IMRT, head and neck cancer, parotid sparing
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AHS Cancer Control AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2002
- Primary completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Radiotherapy is the primary treatment modality or an important adjunct treatment for many patients with H\&N carcinoma. Local control is directly related to dose and to the technical accuracy with which the dose is delivered to the target volume. Traditional radiotherapy techniques result in significant doses being delivered to normal tissues adjacent to the target, including the spinal cord and salivary glands. This leaves the patient with significant acute and late normal tissue toxicity that impacts on both the ability to tolerate the actual treatment and on the patient's long-term quality of life. Recently, the investigators have used static conformal multisegmental intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for a comprehensive irradiation of head and neck cancer with dose sparing of uninvolved tissues. This has resulted in substantial preservation of major salivary gland function in many patients with primary sites in the oral pharynx, oral cavity, nasopharynx, and pyriform sinus. While the investigators' results to date have shown promising preservation of salivary flow, they do not know whether patients treated with IMRT have similar local control rates as those treated with standard radiotherapy. Some investigators have raised the concern that by giving a low radiation dose to areas adjacent to the target volume there is a risk of undertreating the disease. On the other hand, the IMRT delivered with this protocol (called "simultaneous integrated boost", or SIB) may improve local control rates by delivering the same biologically effective dose in a shorter overall time period. This is a phase I/II trial which seeks to establish the efficacy of IMRT for H\&N cancer treatment, and to further investigate the relationship between radiation dose to the parotid glands, salivary flow, and quality of life.
Detailed description
Radiotherapy is the primary treatment modality or an important adjunct treatment for many patients with H\&N carcinoma. Local control is directly related to dose and to the technical accuracy with which the dose is delivered to the target volume. Traditional radiotherapy techniques result in significant doses being delivered to normal tissues adjacent to the target, including the spinal cord and salivary glands. This leaves the patient with significant acute and late normal tissue toxicity that impacts on both ability to tolerate the actual treatment and on the patient's long-term quality of life. Recently, we have used static conformal multisegmental intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for comprehensive irradiation of head and neck cancer with dose sparing of uninvolved tissues. This has resulted in substantial preservation of major salivary gland function in many patients with primary sites in the oral pharynx, oral cavity, nasopharynx, and pyriform sinus. While our results to date have shown promising preservation of salivary flow, we do not know whether patients treated with IMRT have similar local control rates as those treated with standard radiotherapy. Some investigators have raised concern that by giving a low radiation dose to areas adjacent to the target volume there is a risk of undertreating disease. On the other hand, the IMRT delivered with this protocol (called "simultaneous integrated boost", or SIB) may improve local control rates by delivering the same biologically effective dose in a shorter overall time period (see below). This is a phase I/II trial which seeks to establish the efficacy of IMRT for H\&N cancer treatment, and further investigate the relationship between radiation dose to the parotid glands, salivary flow, and quality of life. The specific objectives of the trial are as follows:
- To assess the local control rate and survival of patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy using the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for regions at high risk of recurrence;
- To determine the patterns of failure of patients treated with IMRT+SIB;
- To assess the incidence of chronic grade 2 xerostomia after parotid-sparing IMRT using the RTOG grading scale;
- To assess quality of life of patients during and after IMRT using subjective xerostomia questionnaire and the University of Washington Quality of Life Head and Neck Symptom Questionnaire;
- To assess quantitative changes in salivary function before and after IMRT using sialometry (unstimulated and stimulated whole salivary flow rates).
Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the H\&N will be eligible provided they are over 18 years' age, AJCC stage I-IV with M0 and N0-2 disease, and KPS >=70%. Ineligibility criteria include previous cancer or H\&N radiotherapy, salivary gland dysfunction, or unwilling to provide informed consent.
Methodology: All patients accrued to this study will have a series of pre-treatment evaluations, including history, physical, KPS evaluation, CT/MRI of the head and neck, chest x-ray or CT, dental examination, QOL assessment using the University of Washington QOL H\&N symptom questionnaire (Hassan et al, 1993), and pre-treatment salivary flow measurements. All salivary flow measurements collected for this study will include unstimulated (resting) and stimulated (using citric acid solution), with a 5-minute collection time for each. Accrued patients will belong to one of two cohorts, which will determine the radiotherapy target volumes and dose levels: Group 1 - Patients who are treated with definitive radiotherapy (or chemoradiotherapy). The high dose region (PTV66) will consist of all areas of gross disease plus appropriate planning margin. The lower dose region (PTV54) will include PTV66 and all at-risk draining lymphatics of the neck. Group 2 - Patients treated with surgery and post-operative radiotherapy. The high-dose region (PTV60) will consist of the areas of previous gross disease and regions of the neck with metastatic lymph node involvement. The low-dose region (PTV54) will include PTV60 plus the remainder of the surgical bed and any additional regional lymphatic tissue considered to be at risk of harboring occult disease. All patients will be treated in 30 treatments (1 treatment per day, 5 days per week, for 6 weeks). PTV66 will receive 66 Gy, PTV54 will receive 54 Gy, etc. Thus different target regions will receive different doses per day (ranging from 1.8 to 2.2). In theory, giving high-risk regions a higher dose per day (hypofractionation) allows tumour cells less time to repopulate and should improve control rates (Fowler, 2000).
Investigations during and after treatment: Patients will have weekly toxicity assessments during radiotherapy. Follow-up after completion of RT will include history/physical, QOL assessment, and salivary flow collections. These assessments will be done at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, then every 1.5 months until 1 year. Follow-up beyond 1 year is at the physician's discretion but normally will involve visits every 3-4 months.
Statistical considerations: The sample size for this trial is based on the expected local control rate of similar patients treated with standard radiotherapy. For group 1 (patients treated with definitive radiotherapy) this is difficult to predict a priori because of the expected heterogeneity of stages and primary sites of accrued patients. However, stage I-II patients treated with RT alone, and selected stage III patients treated with chemoradiotherapy have 2-year local control rates of 70-80%. For group 2 (patients treated with surgery with high-risk features necessitating post-op RT), the expected local control rate is also approximately 70%. Assuming a power of 70%, significance of 5%, and a historical rate of local control of 75% (combined), the required number of patients to detect a 10% change in local control is 120.7. We will therefore accrue 120 patients, at an anticipated rate of 2-3 patients per month for 2-4 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Squamous cell cancer of head and neck for radical/postoperative radiation therapy
- American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I-IV with M0 and N0-2 disease
- Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >= 70%
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- M1 or N3 disease
- Ineligibility for radiotherapy
- Recent malignancy
- Previous cancer or head and neck radiotherapy
- Salivary gland dysfunction
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
locoregional control rates
patterns of failure
3 secondary outcomes
quality of life
saliva flow rates/xerostomia
overall survival
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Feb 2016.
Related trials for Head and Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rufus Scrimger, MD principal investigator
AHS Cancer Control Alberta
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in people with Head and Neck Cancer, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
locoregional control rates. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2016.