AzTrials
AzTrials

Peptic UlcersPhase 4NCT00137033

Celebrex Low Dose ASA Study Examining the Incidence of Gastroduodenal Ulcers in a Healthy Population

A Phase 4 study testing Celecoxib, Naproxen and ASA in people with Peptic Ulcers, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 23 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the current study is to replicate the COXA-0508-258 study in a multicenter, US setting, using a lower dose of ASA. It is expected that this study will not only confirm the results of the 258 study but show that the incidence of UGI ulcers on celecoxib is significantly less than on traditional NSAIDs and the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Peptic Ulcers
What is being tested?
Celecoxib, Naproxen and ASA
How many people
605 participants
Where
23 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2004to Jul 2005
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • A healthy adult between 50 and 75 years of age inclusive: of normal clinical laboratory test results during the Screening Visit or, if abnormal, are not clinically significant in the Investigator's opinion.

Who cannot join

  • A gastric, pyloric channel or duodenal ulcer (defined as any break in the mucosa at least 3 mm in diameter with unequivocal depth) or more than 5 erosions in the stomach or duodenum ( the UGI endoscopic score greater or less) on the baseline UGI endoscopy

Trial locations and contacts

23 sites in 1 country.

23 sites in 1 country

United States23 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Anaheim, California, 92801

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320-1706

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612-7323

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Davenport, Iowa, 52807

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Farmington, Connecticut, 06030-0001

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Houston, Texas, 77074

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Houston, Texas, 77090

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Jupiter, Florida, 33458

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Metairie, Louisiana, 70001

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Miami, Florida, 33173

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Newburgh, Indiana, 47630

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Ocoee, Florida, 34761

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Active-Controlled Comparison Study of the Incidence of Gastroduodenal Ulcers Associated With Celecoxib and Low Dose ASA Versus Naproxen and Low Dose ASA in Healthy Subjects (50-75 Years of Age)

The aim of the current study is to replicate the COXA-0508-258 study in a multicenter, US setting, using a lower dose of ASA. It is expected that this study will not only confirm the results of the 258 study but show that the incidence of UGI ulcers on celecoxib is significantly less than on traditional NSAIDs and the incidence of UGI ulcers on celecoxib increases with the addition of ASA, but still is lower than traditional NSAIDs plus/minus ASA. This 7-day study is designed to compare the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers associated with celecoxib 200 mg QD and low dose aspirin 81 mg QD and with naproxen 500 mg BID plus low dose aspirin 81 mg QD in healthy adults(50-75 years of age).

Conditions
Peptic Ulcers
Being tested
Celecoxib, Naproxen, ASA
Medical subject headings
Peptic Ulcer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Compare the incidence of gastroduodenal endoscopic ulcers between celecoxib 200 mg QD plus ASA 81 mg QD vs. naproxen 500 mg BID plus ASA 81 mg QD in healthy subjects (50-75 years old).

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Compare the incidence of gastroduodenal endoscopic ulcers between celecoxib plus ASA vs placebo plus ASA in healthy subjects (50-75 years of age) Compare the incidence of gastroduodenal endoscopic ulcers between naproxen plus ASA vs. placebo plus ASA

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Aug 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2004
  3. Study completionJul 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
605 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00137033
Sponsor's protocol ID
A3191171
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
26 Aug 2005
Last updated
3 Mar 2021
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Celecoxib, Naproxen and ASA in people with Peptic Ulcers, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 23 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 23 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Compare the incidence of gastroduodenal endoscopic ulcers between celecoxib 200 mg QD plus ASA 81 mg QD vs. naproxen 500 mg BID plus ASA 81 mg QD in healthy subjects (50-75 years old).. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in