Liver CancerACRIN-6673NCT00132041
Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Patients With Liver Cancer and Cirrhosis
A study testing radiofrequency ablation in people with Liver Cancer, run by American College of Radiology Imaging Network at 18 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Radiofrequency ablation uses a high-frequency, electric current to kill tumor cells. CT-, MRI-, or ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation may be an effective treatment for liver cancer and cirrhosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Liver Cancer
- What is being tested?
- radiofrequency ablation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 51 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2005to Nov 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), meeting 1 of the following criteria:
- Histologically confirmed HCC
- Discrete non-biopsied hepatic tumors, meeting 1 of the following criteria:
- Hypervascular tumor > 2 cm by 2 imaging studies
- Hypervascular tumor > 2 cm by a single imaging study AND alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/mL
- Discrete non-biopsied hypervascular hepatic tumors by 2 consecutive imaging studies (e.g., CT scan or MRI) with documented tumor growth > 1 cm in diameter
- Histologically confirmed cirrhosis OR typical findings of cirrhosis (i.e., nodular liver, splenomegaly, varices, or ascites) by CT scan and/or MRI scan
- Single hepatic tumor > 3.0 cm but ≤ 5.0 cm in diameter OR 3 or fewer hepatic tumors ≤ 3.0 cm in diameter
- No excessive intrahepatic tumor burden (i.e., > 3 hepatic tumors OR a single hepatic tumor > 5 cm OR more than 3 vague hypervascular nodules > 1 cm)
- Tumor(s) ≥ 1 cm from the main, right, and left portal veins and hollow viscera
- No hepatic or portal vein tumor invasion
- Tumor(s) > 1 cm treatable by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation
- No extrahepatic tumor
- Not a surgical candidate due to any of the following reasons:
- Tumor in an unresectable location
- Comorbid disease
- Insufficient hepatic reserve
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
- 18 and over
Performance status
- Zubrod 0-2
Life expectancy
- Not specified
Hematopoietic
- No uncorrectable coagulopathy
Hepatic
- Not specified
Renal
- Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
Other
- Not pregnant
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- No active symptomatic bacterial or fungal infection that is newly diagnosed and/or requires treatment
- No absolute contraindication to IV iodinated contrast (i.e., history of significant contrast reaction not mitigated by appropriate premedication)
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- Not specified
Chemotherapy
- No prior or concurrent chemotherapy for HCC
- No prior or concurrent chemoembolization for HCC
Endocrine therapy
- Not specified
Radiotherapy
- No prior or concurrent radiotherapy for HCC
Surgery
- No prior choledochoenteric anastomosis
- No prior sphincterotomy of duodenal papilla
Other
- No prior or concurrent cryoablation for HCC
- No other prior or concurrent therapy for HCC
- At least 7 days since prior aspirin
- At least 24 hours since prior ibuprofen
- At least 12 hours since prior low molecular weight heparin preparations
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 1 country.
18 sites in 1 country
United States18 sites
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Lurleen Wallace Comprehensive Cancer at University of Alabama - Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7295
Hollings Cancer Center at Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030-4009
Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-4283
Rhode Island Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak Campus
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
University of California Davis Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900
Scott and White Cancer Institute
Temple, Texas, 76508
Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1096
UMASS Memorial Cancer Center - University Campus
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: Multicenter Feasibility Study of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients
RATIONALE: Radiofrequency ablation uses a high-frequency, electric current to kill tumor cells. CT-, MRI-, or ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation may be an effective treatment for liver cancer and cirrhosis.
PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well radiofrequency ablation works in treating patients with liver cancer and cirrhosis.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Determine the 18-month successful disease control rate, defined as no identifiable liver tumor by CT scan, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis treated with solitary or repetitive percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
Secondary
- Correlate tumor size, MELD score, and the number of RFA treatments (solitary or repetitive) with the 18-month successful disease control rate in patients treated with this procedure.
- Determine the local and remote intrahepatic and extrahepatic tumor recurrence rates in patients treated with this procedure.
- Correlate local and remote intrahepatic and extrahepatic tumor recurrence rates with the 18-month successful disease control rate in patients treated with this procedure.
- Correlate tumor size with the local disease control rate in patients treated with this procedure.
- Correlate solitary or repetitive RFA with or without local/regional tumor control with the development of extrahepatic tumor in these patients.
- Determine the local tumor eradication rate, as determined by examination of whole liver specimens or CT scan, in patients treated with this procedure.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to hepatic dysfunction using the MELD score (< 15 vs 15-25 vs > 25).
Patients undergo placement of an ablation electrode percutaneously into the tumor(s) by CT scan, MRI, or ultrasound guidance. Patients then undergo percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) directly to the tumor(s) for 12 minutes. Patients undergo CT scan of the liver within 1 week after RFA treatment and then every 3 months for up to 18 months. Patients with residual or recurrent intrahepatic tumor(s) detectable on the 3-month or subsequent CT scan undergo repeat RFA as is technically feasible and clinically indicated for up to 15 months after initial RFA treatment.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and then every 3 months for up to 18 months.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 40 patients will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Liver Cancer
- Being tested
- radiofrequency ablation
- Keywords
- adult primary hepatocellular carcinoma, localized unresectable adult primary liver cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Liver Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
radiofrequency ablationDevice
Also called RFA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| All Patients | Other | patients with cirrhosis undergoing solitary or repetitive percutaneous RFA treatment sessions for the treatment of HCC. Receives: Device: radiofrequency ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Participants With Successful Control of Disease at 18 Months
Outcome is positive (success) if alive and no disease is observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Outcome is negative if the patient was deceased or disease was observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Success rate it the fraction of eligible patients who were alive and disease free at 18 months.
Measured: 18 months after start of therapy
Secondary outcomes (7)
Number of Participants With Success in Those Who Received Solitary vs Repetitive Radiofrequency Ablation
this outcome measures the impact of Solitary vs repetitive radiofrequency ablation on success.
Success is defined as the number of patients centrally determined to be alive and tumor-free 18 months after start of therapy, corrected for repetitive RFA.
Measured: 18 months after start of therapy
Effect of Tumor Size on Successful Control of Disease at 18 Months
Outcome is positive (success) if alive and no disease is observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Outcome is negative if the patient was deceased or disease was observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Success rate it the fraction of eligible patients who were alive and disease free at 18 months. Tumor size is a continuous variable as measured at imaging.
Measured: 18 months after start of therapy
Local Tumor Recurrence (Control) Rates
local tumor control rate is defined as a tumor that was ablated and was not seen again within the 18 month period
Measured: 18 months after start of therapy
Impact of Tumor Size on Local Control Rates
Lesion level local control is defined as a success if a tumor is ablated and does not recur in 18 mo.
Measured: 18 months after start of therapy
Development of Extra-hepatic Tumor
Whether or not extrahepatic tumors were seen at 18months post ablation will be compared with the number of RFA sessions.
Measured: 18 months after start of therapy
Local Tumor Eradication Rate by Examination of Liver Via Autopsy or Transplant vs That Determined by CT Scan
the primary outcome was evidence of existing tumor on pathologic review of the liver at the time or transplant or autopsy within the 18 month observational period. This outcome was compared to the CT HCC detection.
Measured: 18 months after start of therapy
Remote Tumor Occurrence Rates
remote tumor occurrence rate is defined as a new intrahepatic tumor that developed remote from the ablation site within the 18 month period
Measured: 18 months after start of therapy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2005
- Primary completionAug 2009
- Study completionNov 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Liver CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- American College of Radiology Imaging Network
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gerald D. Dodd, MD, Study chair, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00132041
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000439446
- Other IDs
- ACRIN-6673, U01CA080098, U01CA079778
- Acronym
- ACRIN-6673
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter Feasibility Study of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00132041
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACRIN-6673 / CDR0000439446
- Conditions
- Liver Cancer
- Keywords
- adult primary hepatocellular carcinoma, localized unresectable adult primary liver cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- American College of Radiology Imaging NetworkResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Dec 2005
- Primary completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Sep 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Radiofrequency ablation uses a high-frequency, electric current to kill tumor cells. CT-, MRI-, or ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation may be an effective treatment for liver cancer and cirrhosis.
PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well radiofrequency ablation works in treating patients with liver cancer and cirrhosis.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Determine the 18-month successful disease control rate, defined as no identifiable liver tumor by CT scan, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis treated with solitary or repetitive percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
Secondary
- Correlate tumor size, MELD score, and the number of RFA treatments (solitary or repetitive) with the 18-month successful disease control rate in patients treated with this procedure.
- Determine the local and remote intrahepatic and extrahepatic tumor recurrence rates in patients treated with this procedure.
- Correlate local and remote intrahepatic and extrahepatic tumor recurrence rates with the 18-month successful disease control rate in patients treated with this procedure.
- Correlate tumor size with the local disease control rate in patients treated with this procedure.
- Correlate solitary or repetitive RFA with or without local/regional tumor control with the development of extrahepatic tumor in these patients.
- Determine the local tumor eradication rate, as determined by examination of whole liver specimens or CT scan, in patients treated with this procedure.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to hepatic dysfunction using the MELD score (< 15 vs 15-25 vs > 25).
Patients undergo placement of an ablation electrode percutaneously into the tumor(s) by CT scan, MRI, or ultrasound guidance. Patients then undergo percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) directly to the tumor(s) for 12 minutes. Patients undergo CT scan of the liver within 1 week after RFA treatment and then every 3 months for up to 18 months. Patients with residual or recurrent intrahepatic tumor(s) detectable on the 3-month or subsequent CT scan undergo repeat RFA as is technically feasible and clinically indicated for up to 15 months after initial RFA treatment.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and then every 3 months for up to 18 months.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 40 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| All Patients | Other | Device: radiofrequency ablationpatients with cirrhosis undergoing solitary or repetitive percutaneous RFA treatment sessions for the treatment of HCC. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| radiofrequency ablationAlso: RFA | Device | All Patients |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Participants With Successful Control of Disease at 18 Months
Time frame: 18 months after start of therapy
Outcome is positive (success) if alive and no disease is observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Outcome is negative if the patient was deceased or disease was observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Success rate it the fraction of eligible patients who were alive and disease free at 18 months.
7 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Success in Those Who Received Solitary vs Repetitive Radiofrequency Ablation
Time frame: 18 months after start of therapy
Effect of Tumor Size on Successful Control of Disease at 18 Months
Time frame: 18 months after start of therapy
Local Tumor Recurrence (Control) Rates
Time frame: 18 months after start of therapy
Impact of Tumor Size on Local Control Rates
Time frame: 18 months after start of therapy
Development of Extra-hepatic Tumor
Time frame: 18 months after start of therapy
Local Tumor Eradication Rate by Examination of Liver Via Autopsy or Transplant vs That Determined by CT Scan
Time frame: 18 months after start of therapy
Remote Tumor Occurrence Rates
Time frame: 18 months after start of therapy
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Clinical trial summary from the National Cancer Institute's PDQ® databaseLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Liver Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
SAMe in Prevention of Oxaliplatin-associated Liver Injury
Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastases
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gerald D. Dodd, MD study chair
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
18 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing radiofrequency ablation in people with Liver Cancer, run by American College of Radiology Imaging Network at 18 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Sep 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Participants With Successful Control of Disease at 18 Months (time frame: 18 months after start of therapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2020.