AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 2NCT00124449

Study of Abatacept Versus Placebo to Assess the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in Adult Patients

A Phase 2 study testing Abatacept in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 48 sites in 10 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess if Abatacept given for six months will prevent rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients who are at risk for the development of RA in comparison to placebo. High risk patients are defined as those having a positive laboratory test for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP2). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What is being tested?
Abatacept
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
56 participants
Where
48 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
Feb 2005to Apr 2008
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of undifferentiated arthritis
  • Clinical synovitis of two or more joints
  • At least one but not more than three of the criteria for diagnosis of RA (1987).
  • No prior disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)/biologics.
  • Duration of disease must be 18 months or less.
  • Positive for antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides.

Who cannot join

  • Women of child bearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy.
  • Active vasculitis of a major organ system.
  • Severe or recurrent bacterial infection.
  • History of cancer in the last five years except certain skin cancers.
  • Herpes zoster that resolved less than 2 months prior to enrollment

Trial locations and contacts

48 sites in 10 countries.

48 sites in 10 countries

United States20 sites
  • Local Institution

    Arlington, Virginia

  • Local Institution

    Austin, Texas

  • Local Institution

    Boulder, Colorado

  • Local Institution

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Local Institution

    Colorado Springs, Colorado

  • Local Institution

    Cumberland, Maryland

  • Local Institution

    Duluth, Minnesota

  • Local Institution

    Durham, North Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Evansville, Indiana

  • Local Institution

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Hagerstown, Maryland

  • Local Institution

    Huntington Beach, California

  • Local Institution

    Huntsville, Alabama

  • Local Institution

    Los Angeles, California

  • Local Institution

    Mobile, Alabama

  • Local Institution

    New Orleans, Louisiana

  • Local Institution

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

  • Local Institution

    Willow Grove, Pennsylvania

  • Local Institution

    Wilmington, North Carolina

Other trials in United States

Germany5 sites
  • Local Institution

    Berlin

  • Local Institution

    Dresden

  • Local Institution

    Hamburg

  • Local Institution

    Hanover

  • Local Institution

    Heidelberg

Other trials in Germany

Spain5 sites
  • Local Institution

    A Coruña

  • Local Institution

    Barcelona

  • Local Institution

    Madrid

  • Local Institution

    Oviedo

  • Local Institution

    Seville

Other trials in Spain

Australia4 sites
  • Local Institution

    Cairns, Queensland

  • Local Institution

    Clayton, Victoria

  • Local Institution

    Malvern, Victoria

  • Local Institution

    Shenton Park, Western Australia

Other trials in Australia

Mexico4 sites
  • Local Institution

    Guadalajara, Jalisco

  • Local Institution

    Guadalajara, Mexico City

  • Local Institution

    León, Guanajuato

  • Local Institution

    Morelia, Michioacan

Other trials in Mexico

Italy3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Bari

  • Local Institution

    Ferrara

  • Local Institution

    Milan

Other trials in Italy

Belgium2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Brussels

  • Local Institution

    Leuven

Other trials in Belgium

France2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Paris

  • Local Institution

    Strasbourg

Other trials in France

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Leeds, North Yorkshire

  • Local Institution

    Liverpool, Merseyside

Other trials in United Kingdom

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Local Institution

    Ponce

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A Phase II Study of Abatacept Versus Placebo to Assess the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in Adult Patients With Undifferentiated Arthritis Who Are at High Risk for the Development of RA

The purpose of this study is to assess if Abatacept given for six months will prevent rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients who are at risk for the development of RA in comparison to placebo. High risk patients are defined as those having a positive laboratory test for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP2).

Being tested
Abatacept, placebo
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AbataceptDrug

    Also called Orencia

    solution, intravenous injection, monthly, 169 days

    weight based:

    <60 kg = 500 mg

    60 to 100 kg = 750 mg

    >100 kg = 1 g

  • placeboDrug

    solution, intravenous injection, 0 mg, monthly, 169 days

Study groups in NCT00124449
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Abatacept
2Placebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With a Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) by American Rheumatism Association (ARA) Criteria and/or Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy

    ARA criteria is a 7-item tool for RA classification purposes; a patient is said to have RA (meeting endpoint) if he or she has satisfied at least 4 of the 7 criteria. If a participant discontinued due to lack of efficacy, he/she was regarded as meeting primary endpoint also.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Number of Participants With a Diagnosis of RA by 1987 ARA Criteria and/or Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy

    ARA criteria is a 7-item tool for classification purposes; a patient is said to have RA (meeting endpoint) if he or she has satisfied at least 4 of the 7 criteria. If a participant discontinued due to lack of efficacy, he/she was regarded as meeting endpoint also.

    Measured: 24 months

  2. Number of Participants With Undifferentiated Inflammatory Arthritis (UA) Who Develop Another Rheumatic Disease

    Clinical diagnosis of other rheumatic diseases at 12 and 24 months. If a participant discontinued due to lack of efficacy, he/she was regarded as meeting endpoint also.

    Measured: 12 months, 24 months

  3. Change From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion and Joint Space Narrowing Score at 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months

    Mean change from baseline using the Genant-Modified Sharp Score. Erosion score=assessment of 14 sites in each hand and wrist + 6 joints in each foot, using an 8-point scale from 0 (no erosions) to 3.5 (erosions of 100% or articular surfaces). Joint score= assessment of 13 sites in each wrist and hand + 6 sites in each foot using a 9-point scale from 0 (normal) to 4.0 (definite ankylosis). As-observed data. Change from Baseline=postbaseline score at timepoint (6 or 12 or 24 months) minus baseline score; a lower value signifies improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

  4. Change From Baseline in Total Erosion, Edema, Synovitis Scores at 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months

    Mean change from baseline. Degree of synovitis and structural joint damage (erosion, edema) of the carpal and metacarpophalangeal joints, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) assessment. Edema scale=0 (no bone involved) to 3 (67% to 100% of bone involved). Synovitis scale=0 (normal) and 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe. Bone erosion scale=0 (0% of bone involved) to 10 (91% to 100% of bone involved). Change from baseline=postbaseline score at timepoint - baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

  5. Number of Participants With Persistent Symptomatic Clinical Synovitis

    Synovitis, assessed by clinical signs and symptoms

    Measured: 6, 12, and 24 months

  6. Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) Scores - Mean Change From Baseline

    SF-36, a 36-item instrument that covers 8 quality of life domains, which were used to derive the physical and mental component summary scores, which ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. Change from baseline=postbaseline - baseline value; a higher value signifies improvement.

    Measured: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

  7. Change From Baseline in Cytokine Levels and Second Generation Anti-cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (Anti-CCP2) Antibodies at 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months

    To assess pharmacodynamic effect of abatacept on serum levels of autoantibodies, mean change from baseline in cytokines (interleukin-6 [IL-6], interleukin-1B [IL-1B], tumor necrosis factor Alpha [TNF-Alpha], Matrix Metalloproteinase 3T [MMP3T], and anti-CCP2), as measured by standard laboratory investigations, were assessed. Change from baseline=postbaseline value at timepoint (6 or 12 or 24 months) minus baseline value; a lower value signifies improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 Months, 12 months, 24 months

  8. Number of Participants With Anti-CCP2 Positive and/or Rheumatoid Factor (RF) Positive Over Time

    To assess the pharmacodynamic effect of abatacept on serum levels of autoantibodies, number of participants with Anti-CCP2 Positive of Rheumatoid Factor (RF) positive

    Measured: Day 1, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

  9. Frequency of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Typing

    To assess the pharmacodynamic effect of abatacept on serum levels of autoantibodies, a blood sample was obtained for HLA typing to determine the presence or absence of alleles associated with RA susceptibility and severity (shared epitope alleles HLA-DRB10401 and HLA-DRB10404).

    Measured: Day 1

  10. DAS 28 C Reactive Protein (CRP) Score - Mean Change From Baseline

    The DAS 28 (CRP) is a composite of 4 variables: 28 tender joint count, 28 swollen joint count, CRP, and subject assessment of disease activity measure on a VAS of 100 mm. Change from Baseline=postbaseline score-baseline score; a lower value signifies improvement.

    Measured: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

  11. Number of Participants With a DAS 28 (CRP) Score of ≤3.2 (Low Disease Activity) or <2.6 (in Remission)

    The DAS 28 (CRP) is a composite of 4 variables: tender joint count, swollen joint count, CRP, and subject assessment of disease activity measure on a VAS of 100 mm. Scores for disease activity are defined as low (≤ 3.2) and in remission (< 2.6).

    Measured: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

  12. Number of Subjects With Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index Response

    This questionnaire includes 20 questions assessing physical function in 8 domains. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty and 3=unable to do. Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. HAQ response =improvement of at least 0.3 units from baseline.

    Measured: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

  13. Overall Safety - Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, and Deaths

    AEs were monitored at all scheduled visits of the study drug treatment and observation periods and at the follow-up visits performed 28, 56, and 85 days after the last infusion of study medication for participants who were withdrawn prematurely

    Measured: Throughout the treatment period (6 months)

  14. Number of Participants With Positive Responses for Serum Levels of Abatacept-specific Antibodies

    Immunogenicity, as measured by the number of positive repsonses for serum levels of abatacept-specific antibodies measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Postive response for whole molecule assessment was a value of > 400 and for tip assessment was ≥25.

    Measured: Up to 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jul 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2005
  3. Primary completionMay 2007
  4. Study completionApr 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00124449
Sponsor's protocol ID
IM101-046
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
30 Jun 2005
Last updated
7 Apr 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Emery P, Durez P, Dougados M, Legerton CW, Becker JC, Vratsanos G, Genant HK, Peterfy C, Mitra P, Overfield S, Qi K, Westhovens R. Impact of T-cell costimulation modulation in patients with undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis or very early rheumatoid arthritis: a clinical and imaging study of abatacept (the ADJUST trial). Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Mar;69(3):510-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.119016. Epub 2009 Nov 23.

    PubMed 19933744

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Abatacept in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 48 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 48 sites in United States, Germany, Spain, Australia, Mexico and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Nov 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With a Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) by American Rheumatism Association (ARA) Criteria and/or Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00124449, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in